Verstovšek, Srđan

Abstract Background : Myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by progressive bone marrow dysfunction, extramedullary hematopoiesis, massive splenomegaly, elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, severe constitutional symptoms, cachexia and premature death. INCB018424 is a potent, selective inhibitor of JAK 1 and 2 which has demonstrated impressive clinical activity in the early portion of a phase 1/2 study in patients with PMF and Post-PV/ET MF. Methods : Following the initial dose escalation phase with a BID schedule (N=11), both twice daily (10 mg BID to 25 mg BID, N=56) and once daily (25 mg QD to 200 mg QD, N= 37) dose regimens were explored. Endpoints included spleen size assessed by manual palpation, constitutional symptoms assessed using the Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) and JAK2 allele burden. Exercise capacity is being assessed using the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and body mass and composition are being assessed using standard methods. Safety was assessed by collection of adverse events and monitoring of laboratory data. Results : Over 100 patients are currently enrolled in the study, with a mean exposure to drug of > 5 months. Twenty percent of patients have received INCB018424 for > 9 months. INCB018424 is associated with a rapid reduction of splenomegaly in over 93% of patients from a mean baseline spleen size >20 cm, with 50% or greater reduction being observed in 35% of patients dosed with 10 mg BID or 50 mg QD, and 59% of patients dosed with 25mg BID regimens. These declines nearly always occur within the first month of therapy, with further, slower decreases often observed thereafter. In responding patients, spleen size reduction persists for the duration of therapy (currently up to one year follow-up). Constitutional symptoms are reported with high frequency in the study population as assessed by the MFSAF: night sweats, pruritis and fatigue were reported by >60%, >45% and >90% of patients respectively. Improvements in self-assessed symptom scores (mean % improvement of 40% to 60%) occurred by the first assessment at week 2. Activity limitations are also reported by a high proportion of MF patients; 70% of respondents reported impaired ability to exercise or get around, with a mean score >5 on the 11-point MFSAF scale; INCB018424 therapy was associated with rapid (within 2 weeks) and marked (40% or more) improvement in self-assessed score. There was a dose-dependent weight gain, most pronounced in patients with the lowest body mass index (BMI) values at baseline. Profound reductions in inflammatory cytokines were observed by the first evaluation at week 2 in virtually all patients, and were maintained during therapy. INCB018424 is generally well tolerated with the primary toxicity being dose-dependent grade 3 or 4 reversible thrombocytopenia which occurred in 0%, 18% and 32% of patients dosed with 10 mg BID, 50 mg QD or 25 mg BID. Conclusions : INCB18424 shows unprecedented and durable clinical efficacy in reducing spleen size and improving constitutional symptoms in patients with MF. Results from proactive dose modification regimens, assessments of exercise capacity, MRI-based spleen volume assessment and body composition determination will be presented.

Abstract Background: Activating mutations in the pseudokinase domain of JAK2 occur at a high frequency in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs). Increasing JAK2 V617F allele burden has been shown to correlate with disease severity (bone marrow dysfunction, organomegaly and constitutional symptoms), which is consistent with exaggerated JAK2 signaling playing a central role in MPDs. INCB018424 is a potent and selective JAK1/2 inhibitor currently being evaluated in the clinic for the treatment of MPDs including primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (Post-PV/ET MF). Methods: The percentage of mutant JAK2 V617F relative to wild-type JAK2 was determined in peripheral blood using a quantitative single-nucleotide extension assay. The assay is based on the single nucleotide extension of a DNA primer that anneals adjacent to the V617F mutation. The percentage of JAK2 V617F in bone marrow was determined using pyrosequencing as previously described. The relationship between JAK2 V617F allele burden and clinical phenotype was assessed with samples obtained at study entry. JAK2 V617F allele burden was assessed in nineteen PMF and Post-PV/ET MF patients treated with 25 mg BID INCB018424 for a minimum of three months using peripheral blood and bone marrow. Results: There is an excellent correlation in the JAK2 V617F allele burden between samples obtained from bone marrow and peripheral blood, suggesting that the fraction of cells bearing the mutant clone remains stable during hematopoiesis in this patient group. The mean %V617F values were 59%, 80% and 86% for Post-ET MF (n=2), Post-PV MF (n=8) and PMF (n=9) patients. V617F allele burden correlated with spleen size, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and Body Mass Index (BMI) in this patient population (R2 values if 0.61, 0.17 and 0.44, respectively), with a higher allele burden predicting larger spleen size, a higher ANC and a lower BMI. Eighteen of the nineteen evaluable JAK2 V617F-positive patients had baseline JAK2 V617F values above 50%, with the mean %V617F value for all evaluable patients being 81%, implying that the majority of hematopoietic stem cells contain the mutant allele in this patient population. During INCB018424 therapy (at least 3 months of treatment) in these patients, profound improvements in clinical endpoints including reduction or resolution of splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms are observed, yet only a modest decrease in JAK2 V617F allele burden is seen in both bone marrow and peripheral blood (13% and 9 % decrease from baseline, respectively, at 3 months). Conclusions: While the patient group is small and heterogeneous in nature, clinical correlates of V617F allele burden observed in myelofibrosis patients in this study are similar to those reported in PV. In addition, despite profound clinical improvements in these patients, V617F allele burdens do not change dramatically suggesting that the clinical activity of INCB018424 might involve inhibition of downstream signaling in cells harboring activating JAK2 mutations rather than changing the allele burden.

7059 Background: Patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) have historically poor outcomes, with ~6-7 mos median OS in relapsed/refractory (r/r) setting. Splenomegaly is a poor prognostic factor and potential target in CMML. CD123 is detected on blasts, monocytes, and neoplastic microenvironmental plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) infiltrates part of the CMML malignant clone (Solary, et al). Tagraxofusp, a novel CD123 targeted therapy, demonstrated high levels of activity in BPDCN, an aggressive hematologic malignancy derived from CD123-expressing pDCs, and is FDA approved in BPDCN. As such, tagraxofusp may offer a novel approach in CMML. Methods: Multicenter, 2-stage Ph1/2 enrolling patients (pts) with r/r CMML. Objectives: determine optimal dose, evaluate safety and efficacy. Stage 1 dose escalation: IV tagraxofusp (7, 9, and 12 mcg/kg/day) dosed on days 1-3 every 21 days (C1-4), 28 days (C5-7), and 42 days (C8+). Stage 2 (ongoing), pts receive optimal S1 dose (12 mcg/kg/day; no MTD). Results: 20 pts (12 CMML-1; 8 CMML-2) enrolled. 18 pts 2nd-line (2 pts in 1L), HMAs most common prior therapy. Median age 69 (43-80); 81% male. 11 (52%) had baseline splenomegaly (spleen palpable below left costal margin by physical exam) of 2-27 cm. Most common TRAEs: hypoalbuminaemia (35%), thrombocytopenia (35%), nausea (30%), vomiting (30%), and fatigue (20%). Most common ≥Gr3 TRAEs were thrombocytopenia (35%) and nausea (5%). Capillary leak syndrome in 3 pts (15%; all Gr1&2). 100% (10/10) of pts with splenomegaly had spleen response: 80% (8/10) had reductions ≥50% and 67% (4/6) with spleen size ≥5 cm had reductions ≥50%. 3 pts achieved bone marrow complete responses, including 1 pt bridged to SCT in remission. Conclusions: Tagraxofusp demonstrated single agent activity in CMML as 80% of pts showed ≥50% reduction in splenomegaly by palpation. Splenomegaly in CMML, as in myelofibrosis, is a major cause of morbidity and associated with poor prognosis and impaired QoL. Targeting splenomegaly in myeloid neoplasms with proliferative features may be an important therapeutic goal. Given CD123 expression on CMML blasts, monocytes, and malignant pDCs, tagraxofusp may offer a targeted approach, especially in pts with splenomegaly. Updated safety and efficacy data to be presented. Registrational trial planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02268253.

7058 Background: Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who fail or are intolerant to JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have no standard treatment options. CD123 is expressed on a variety of malignancies, including MF. CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), in the MPN microenvironment, including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and MF, may be tumor-promoting. Monocytosis in MF associated with rapid disease progression and short survival, suggesting an accelerated disease phase. Notably, monocytes share a common precursor with CD123+ pDCs. Tagraxofusp, a novel CD123 targeted therapy, demonstrated high activity in patients with BPDCN, an aggressive hematologic malignancy derived from CD123+ pDCs, and is FDA approved in BPDCN. As such, tagraxofusp may offer a novel therapeutic approach in MF. Methods: Multicenter, 2-stage Ph 1/2 trial enrolling patients (pts) with MF relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to JAKi. Objectives: determine optimal dose, evaluate safety and efficacy. Stage 1 dose escalation: IV tagraxofusp (7, 9, and 12 mcg/kg/day) dosed daily days 1-3 every 21 days (C1-4), 28 days (C5-7), and 42 days (C8+). Stage 2 (ongoing): pts receive optimal S1 dose (12 mcg/kg/day; no MTD). Results: 23 r/r pts treated. Median age 69 (55-81); 57% female. DIPSS Plus: 4% INT-1, 55% INT-2, 41% high. Baseline platelets: median 59 K/uL (15-579); 70% (16/23) <100 K/uL, 8 pts <50 K/uL. 87% (20/23) baseline splenomegaly (palpable ≥5 cm below left costal margin by physical exam). Most common TRAEs: headache (22%), hypoalbuminaemia (22%), ALT incr. (17%) and thrombocytopenia (17%). Most common ≥Gr3 TRAE thrombocytopenia (2%). Capillary leak syndrome in 1 pt (4%; Gr3). 57% (8/14) of pts with baseline spleen ≥5cm BCM spleen responses: 43% (6/14) had ≥29% and 21% (3/14) had ≥45% reduction. 100% of pts with baseline spleen ≥5cm and monocytosis splenomegaly reductions: 80% (4/5) had ≥29% and 40% (2/5) had ≥45%. 6 pts (3 monocytosis pts and 5 pts platelets <100 K/uL) had 6 mos+ duration, 9 pts ongoing. Conclusions: Tagraxofusp demonstrated single agent activity (reduction in splenomegaly) and manageable safety in R/R MF, including pts with monocytosis, an unmet medical need. Given the presence of CD123+ pDCs, tagraxofusp may offer a novel targeted approach in MF. Updated data to be presented. Registrational designs are being evaluated. Clinical trial information: NCT02268253.

6624 Background: RUX is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that demonstrated significant clinical benefit in patients (pts) with MF in COMFORT-I (NCT00952289), a phase 3, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study (N=309). Methods: Pts assessed MF-related symptoms daily using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v2.0; Total Symptom Score (TSS) was calculated from individual scores for abdominal discomfort, pain under left ribs, early satiety, night sweats, itching, and bone/muscle pain. Therapy was interrupted if platelet or absolute neutrophil count fell below 50,000/µL or 500/µL, respectively. AEs were evaluated during treatment interruption or discontinuation. The protocol suggested an optional tapering strategy and possible addition of steroids if RUX therapy was discontinued for reasons other than thrombocytopenia. Results: In RUX-treated patients with treatment interruption, TSS gradually returned to baseline levels over approximately 1 week. The most common AE leading to treatment interruption or discontinuation in each group was thrombocytopenia (n=11, RUX) and abdominal pain (n=4, PBO). Of these, only 1 RUX pt discontinued for thrombocytopenia. A summary of new onset/worsening AE data after treatment interruption or discontinuation is presented (Table). Of 58 pts who discontinued study treatment, 23 (n=10, RUX; n=13, PBO) experienced a total of 43 SAEs (19, RUX; 24, PBO) that showed no specific pattern or difference between treatment groups. Four of 21 RUX-treated pts had dose tapering following study drug discontinuation. Conclusions: Apart from the expected return of MF-related symptoms, there was no pattern of AEs to suggest that RUX interruption or discontinuation is associated with a specific withdrawal syndrome. [Table: see text]

AimsRearrangement of the platelet‐derived growth factor receptor B (PDGFRB) gene defines a unique group of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with frequent eosinophilia and high sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This genetic abnormality is also rarely reported in Philadelphia‐like B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma (B‐ALL). PDGFRB rearrangement was initially thought to only occur in cases with 5q31–33 rearrangement as determined with conventional cytogenetics; however, there are reported cases with cryptic rearrangements. We aim to develop a broader strategy for screening of PDGFRB rearrangements of patients with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms.Methods and resultsWe performed fluorescence in‐situ hybridisation (FISH) for PDGFRB rearrangement in 197 patients, including 70 with B‐ALL, 10 with myeloid neoplasms with 5q31–33 rearrangements, and 117 with eosinophilia (≥0.5 × 109/l in peripheral blood or ≥5% in bone marrow), and identified PDGFRB rearrangement in four of 197 (2.0%) cases. In an attempt to identify clinicopathological and genetic features that may have a stronger association with PDGFRB rearrangement, we analysed 13 patients with confirmed PDGFRB rearrangements, including 10 with myeloid neoplasms and three with B‐ALL. Among the 10 patients with myeloid neoplasms, eosinophilia was present in eight, monocytosis in two, 5q31–33 rearrangement in seven, and abnormal bone marrow morphology in all. All patients with myeloid neoplasms showed an excellent response to imatinib, including a patient in blast crisis. The three B‐ALL patients presented de novo, showed no eosinophilia, had a complex karyotype including 5q31–33 rearrangement, and had clinically aggressive courses with ultimate patient demise.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that a higher yield for the identification of PDGFRB rearrangement may result from an index of suspicion in patients with eosinophilia, monocytosis, bone marrow features of a myeloid neoplasm, and 5q31–33 rearrangement, and patients with Philadelphia‐like B‐ALL.

Background Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who fail or are intolerant to JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have limited treatment options. Tagraxofusp is a targeted therapy directed to CD123 that was approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). CD123 is expressed on a variety of malignancies including BPDCN, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and certain myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including MF. High-expressing CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), the cell of origin of BPDCN, have been detected in the microenvironment of certain myeloid neoplasms, including MF, where they may play a tumor-promoting role. Notably, pDCs share a common precursor cell with monocytes, and monocytosis has been reported as a poor prognostic factor in patients with MF, associated with shortened overall survival. We hypothesized that tagraxofusp may offer a novel and rational therapeutic approach in patients with relapsed/refractory MF, and in particular in patients with monocytosis. Aims To assess safety and evaluate efficacy of tagraxofusp in patients with MF who were relapsed, refractory, or unable to tolerate JAKi. Methods This multicenter, open-label Phase 1/2 trial is enrolling patients with MF. In the Stage 1 (dose escalation), tagraxofusp was administered as a daily IV infusion at 7, 9, or 12 mcg/kg on days 1-3 every 21 days (cycle 1-4), 28 days (cycles 5-7), and 42 days (cycles 8+). In Stage 2 (expansion), patients are receiving the recommended Phase 2 dose (12 mcg/kg). Results 27 patients with MF have been treated, including 14 patients who had previously received ≥ 3 lines of therapy. Median age was 69 years (range 54-81), 52% were female, and 26% had baseline monocytosis (≥ 1x109/L). Baseline risk assessment based on the DIPSS Plus risk group assessment showed 1 patient (4%) with intermediate-1, 16 patients (59%) with intermediate-2, and 9 patients (33%) with high-risk. At study entry, median platelet count was 59 K/uL; 67% of patients had baseline platelets &lt;100 K/uL, of which 10 patients had platelets &lt;50 K/uL. 74% of patients had baseline splenomegaly (spleen palpable ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin). In terms of molecular mutations: JAK2 (n=18); CALR (n=3); and MPL (n=1), and additional molecular analysis showed ASXL1 (n=5). In terms of cytogenetics, 30% (8/27) of patients had an abnormal karyotype, mainly 20q- (n=3), -5/5q-, -7/7q-, and 12p- (each n=2). Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, incidence ≥ 15%) include headache, hypoalbuminemia, increased levels of alanine aminotransferase, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Most common ≥ grade 3 TRAE's were thrombocytopenia (8%) and anemia (15%). Capillary leak syndrome was reported in 1 patient (grade 3). Among the 17 evaluable patients with baseline splenomegaly, 53% had spleen size reductions, of which 4 patients had reductions of &gt; 45%. In 5 patients with baseline splenomegaly and monocytosis (&gt;1x109/L monocytes), 80% (4/5) had spleen size reductions, of which 2 had reductions of &gt;45%. Five patients had treatment duration of 12 months or more, with two of those patients ongoing (13+,and 24+ months, respectively). Six patients with platelets &lt;100 K/uL had treatment duration of 6 months or more, including 3 patients with baseline monocytosis who had treatment duration of 12 months or more. 7 patients had objective responses (IWG-MRT 2013 responses), including Clinical improvement (CI) (n=5) and CI (Symptom) (n=2). 20 patients were evaluable for symptomatic assessment (MPN-SAF TSS). Symptom response rate was 45% (defined as ³50% reduction in TSS score). Reductions in both symptom score and spleen size was noted in 6/6 patients who had splenomegaly at baseline. Conclusions Tagraxofusp demonstrated single agent clinical activity, with a predictable and manageable safety profile, in patients with relapsed/refractory MF, including in patients with monocytosis, a poor prognostic factor and unmet medical need. Tagraxofusp may offer MF patients, and MF patients with monocytosis in particular, a novel treatment option. Enrollment continues, and updated trial data will be presented. This clinical trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02268253. Disclosures Pemmaraju: affymetrix: Research Funding; sagerstrong: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; samus: Research Funding; mustangbio: Consultancy, Research Funding; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gupta:Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Yacoub:Dynavax: Equity Ownership; Cara: Equity Ownership; Ardelyx: Equity Ownership; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Speakers Bureau; Hylapharm: Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Other: Advisory role; Amgen: Other: Advisory role; Daiichi: Other: Advisory role; Stemline: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; celyad: Other: Advisory role; Abbvie: Other: Advisory role; Kite: Other: Advisory role; Jazz: Other: Advisory role; Astellas: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau. Lee:AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ai Therapeutics: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Roche Molecular Systems: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy. Schiller:Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sardone:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wysowskyj:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Poradosu:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. McDonald:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rupprecht:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Talpaz:Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Taparia:Novartis: Consultancy. Verstovsek:Protaganist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Pharma Essentia: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy. Khoury:Kiromic: Research Funding; Angle: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Patnaik:Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Approximately two-thirds of patients with primary or post-essential thrombocythemia/polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (MF) have anemia, many of whom require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. In this heavily transfused population there are severely limited treatment options; effective treatment for anemia in MF is a critically unmet medical need. Luspatercept is a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent which binds to select TGF-β superfamily ligands to reduce aberrant Smad2/3 signaling and enhance late-stage erythropoiesis. Here we report the interim results of the ongoing open-label, phase 2 trial evaluating luspatercept in patients with MF and anemia. Methods: Seventy-four patients with MF and anemia were enrolled, including 41 not receiving concomitant ruxolitinib at study entry who received either no RBC transfusions (n = 20; Cohort 1) or 2-4 RBC U/28 d in the 12 wks prior to treatment (n = 21; Cohort 2). Thirty-three enrolled patients were receiving a stable dose of ruxolitinib for at least 16 wks, of which 14 were not receiving RBC transfusions (Cohort 3A) and 19 were (Cohort 3B). Patients in Cohorts 3A and 3B received a median dose of ruxolitinib of 20 mg/d (range, 5-50 mg/d) for a median of 41 and 43 wks, respectively. Patients received luspatercept every 21 d at a starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg in doses escalating up to 1.75 mg/kg. The primary endpoint in patients not receiving transfusions was a hemoglobin (Hb) increase ≥ 1.5 g/L at every assessment from baseline for ≥ 12 consecutive wks, within the first 24 wks on study. In patients receiving RBC transfusions, the primary endpoint was RBC transfusion-independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 12 consecutive wks, within the first 24 wks on study. Additional endpoints included proportion of patients achieving mean Hb increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL in Cohorts 1 and 3A, and ≥ 50% decrease in RBC transfusions (minimum 4 RBC U decrease from baseline) in Cohorts 2 and 3B, with both responses lasting ≥ 12 consecutive wks, within 24 wks of study entry. Intent-to-treat (ITT) data were analyzed as of May 10, 2019. Results: Median age was 71 y (range, 50-88 y) and 42 (57%) were male. Median interval from MF diagnosis to study entry was 3.3 y (range, 19 d-13.5 y). Seven patients were Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-1, 58 were intermediate-2, and 8 were high risk. Median Hb concentration at study entry was 8.8 g/dL (range, 6.7-9.8 g/dL) for Cohort 1 and 8.6 g/dL (range, 6.7-9.1 g/dL) for Cohort 3A. Patients in Cohort 2 received a median of 2.7 RBC U/28 d (range, 1-5 U/28 d) and patients in Cohort 3B received a median of 2.3 RBC U/28 d (range, 2-4 U/28 d). Patients received a median of 8 cycles of luspatercept (range, 1-24 cycles). Efficacy data are displayed in the Table, per ITT data. Two of twenty (10%) and 3/14 (21%) patients in Cohorts 1 and 3A, respectively, achieved an absolute Hb increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL at every measurement from baseline over any consecutive 12 wks. Two of twenty-one (10%) and 6/19 (32%) patients in Cohorts 2 and 3B, respectively, achieved RBC-TI over any consecutive 12 wks. Median duration of Hb response was 20 wks (range, 12-27 wks) in Cohort 1 and 12 wks (range, 12-13 wks) in Cohort 3A. Median duration of RBC-TI was 23 wks (range, 16-31 wks) in Cohort 2 and 32 wks (range, 12-65 wks) in Cohort 3B. Three (15%) and 8 (57%) patients in Cohorts 1 and 3A, respectively, achieved a mean Hb increase of ≥ 1.5 g/dL. Eight (38%) and 10 (53%) patients in Cohorts 2 and 3B, respectively, achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in RBC transfusion burden from baseline. Ruxolitinib exposure remained stable throughout the 24-wk treatment period in both Cohorts 3A and 3B. There was no difference in spleen size between responders and non-responders. Four (5%) patients had grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs). There were no treatment-related deaths. Treatment-related AEs occurring in ≥ 3% of patients were hypertension (11%), bone pain (8%), and diarrhea (4%). Seven (9%) patients had ≥ 1 AE resulting in treatment discontinuation; 23 (31%) remain on study. Conclusions: The initial results from this ongoing study suggest clinically significant activity of luspatercept in patients with MF-associated anemia, including those receiving concomitant ruxolitinib. A minority of AEs were grade 3-4 in severity, consistent with previous studies in MDS and beta-thalassemia. Disclosures Gerds: CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Imago Biosciences: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding. Vannucchi:Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Passamonti:Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kremyanskaya:La Jolla: Consultancy; Incyte, Celgene, Constellation, Protagonist.: Research Funding. Gotlib:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Promedior: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kartos: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding. Ribrag:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; argenX: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mead:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodation expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Harrison:Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; CTI: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Promedior: Honoraria; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AOP: Honoraria; Shire: Speakers Bureau. Mesa:Shire: Honoraria; Promedior: Research Funding; Genotech: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; LaJolla: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy; Galena Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Incyte: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Gale:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Laadem:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pariseau:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Gerike:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Zhang:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Linde:Abbott Laboratories, Inc.: Equity Ownership; Acceleron Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership; Fibrogen, Inc.: Equity Ownership. Reynolds:Acceleron Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Verstovsek:Gilead: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Pharma Essentia: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Protaganist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Luspatercept is an investigational therapy that is not approved for any use in any country. Luspatercept is currently being evaluated for potential use in patients with anemia due to myelodysplastic syndromes, beta-thalassemia, or myelofibrosis.

Abstract Background: Polycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by erythrocytosis and overactive JAK/STAT activity. The RESPONSE trial compared ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, with best available therapy (BAT) in patients (pts) with PV intolerant of or resistant to hydroxyurea according to modified European LeukemiaNet criteria. RUX was superior to BAT in achieving the primary endpoint (21% vs 1%; P<0.0001), and 60% of pts randomized to RUX achieved protocol-defined hematocrit (HCT) control through Wk 32 vs 20% of pts randomized to BAT (J Clin Oncol32:5s, 2014; suppl, abstract 7026). However, the actual phlebotomy rate between Wks 8−32 was only 20% in pts randomized to RUX compared with 62% in pts randomized to BAT, and 85% of pts in the RUX arm continued to receive treatment at the median 81-wk follow-up, suggesting most pts derived some benefit from RUX. Therefore, an analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of RUX in pts who did and did not achieve protocol-defined HCT control. Methods: Phlebotomy-dependent PV pts with splenomegaly, aged ≥18 years, and resistant to or intolerant of HU were enrolled. Pts were required to have HCT between 40%−45% 14 days prior to randomization; those who did not could enter a phlebotomy control period to achieve a HCT in this range within 14 days of randomization. Eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to RUX or BAT. BAT pts could cross over to receive RUX from Wk 32 if they had not met the primary endpoint, or after Wk 32 due to protocol-defined disease progression. The primary composite endpoint comprised HCT control and a ≥35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume (SV) at Wk 32. HCT control was defined as lack of phlebotomy eligibility between Wks 8−32 with no more than 1 phlebotomy eligibility between randomization and Wk 8. Phlebotomy eligibility was based on protocol-defined HCT values (regardless of receipt of phlebotomy), and pts with missing data or assessments outside of protocol-defined time windows were considered non-responders. In pts who were HCT control non-responders (HCT-N) as defined by protocol, time to second phlebotomy eligibility was evaluated. For this analysis, pts without phlebotomy eligibility were excluded and phlebotomies in the first 8 wks were not considered. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated in both HCT control responders (HCT-R) and HCT-N, including the 14-item modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Results: Of 222 randomized pts (RUX, n=110; BAT, n=112), most were male (RUX, 60%; BAT, 71%) and the median age (range) was similar between treatment arms (RUX, 62.0 [34.0–90.0]; BAT, 60.0 [33.0–84.0]). Although pts had a HCT between 40% and 45% within 14 days prior to randomization (with or without phlebotomy), 24% of pts had a HCT >45% on Day 1 (similar between treatment arms) illustrating that many pts have poor HCT control over short intervals of observation. RUX treatment resulted in long-term benefits on HCT levels, even in pts who did not achieve protocol-defined HCT control through Wk 32. Among the RUX HCT-R group, the probability of maintaining HCT response was 97% at 48 wks and 87% at 80 wks. Most BAT pts crossed over to receive RUX immediately after the Wk 32 visit (84% between Wks 32 and 48). In the RUX HCT-N pts, the median time to subsequent phlebotomy eligibility was 52 wks, compared with 21 wks for BAT HCT-N pts (Figure). Compared with the entire BAT group, more RUX-R and RUX-N pts had a ≥50% improvement in the MPN-SAF total symptom score at Wk 32 (RUX-N, 38%; RUX-R, 40%; BAT, 4%). Median changes from baseline at Wk 32 in key symptoms such as tiredness (RUX-N; −50%; RUX-R, −49%; BAT, −4%), itching (RUX-N, −88%; RUX-R, −97%; BAT, −2%), and night sweats (RUX-N, −100%; RUX-R, −97%; BAT, 4%) were also greater among RUX-R and RUX-N pts than BAT pts. RUX-N and RUX-R pts were also more likely to consider their symptoms to be “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGIC compared with BAT pts (RUX-N, 57%; RUX-R, 74%; BAT, 13%). Conclusion: Among pts receiving RUX who did not achieve protocol-defined HCT control, the median time to subsequent phlebotomy eligibility was 1 year. In contrast, pts on BAT had a median time to subsequent phlebotomy eligibility of 21 wks. Furthermore, pts in the RUX arm achieved meaningful improvements in PV-related symptoms, regardless of meeting the endpoint of HCT control, while pts treated with BAT showed worsening or no improvement. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Kiladjian:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Jones:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Habr:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vannucchi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction: The clinical phenotype of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) including primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocytosis (ET) who manifest WHO grade 1 (on a 0-3 scale) for intramedullary fibrosis is poorly defined, and may represent MPN patients in a transitional state. We have specifically observed patients with existing PV and ET who manifest clinical progression towards a post PV/ET phenotype (IWG-MRT criteria) yet fail to progress to a 2+ marrow fibrosis. In contrast, the 2008 WHO definition of PMF does not require a minimum fibrosis threshold as long as patients meet the diagnostic criteria. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of MPN patients with 1+ marrow fibrosis. Methods: MPN patients with WHO grade 1 (scale 0-3) fibrosis within two institutional databases were identified. The clinical characteristics, laboratory, and outcome data were collected. Data were compared between PMF and PV/ET patients. 2008 IWG-MRT criteria were applied to PV/ET patients with exclusion of fibrosis component. Results: 91 MPN patients with WHO grade 1 fibrosis were identified, PMF in 33 patients (36%), PV in 37 (41%), ET in 20 (22%), and MPN-U in 1 (1%). The population characteristics are reported in Table 1. The majority (56%) of patients exhibited one or more symptoms (weight loss, night sweats, early satiety, bone pain, fatigue). The presence of symptomatic disease was similar between groups, with 52% PMF versus 57% PV/ET exhibiting at least one symptom. Symptoms were more severe in the PMF group with DIPSS risk of intermediate 2 or higher being present in 39%(PMF) versus 29% (PV/ET). Erythrocyte transfusion dependence occurred in a small percentage of overall population (9%), and was seen primarily in the PMF group (6/8 patients). Incidence and severity of splenomegaly was higher in the PMF group, with 55% having splenomegaly versus 43% of the PV/ET group. A higher incidence of a leukoerythoblastic blood smears was seen in PMF (45%) than PV/ET (38%). Two or more prior medical therapies were utilized in 45/90 (49%) of patients, with the most common prior therapies including hydroxyurea (71%), pegylated interferon (28%), anagrelide (18%), Jak inhibitor (13%), lenalidomide (4%), and prednisone (4%). At the time of this analysis, 78/91 patients (86%) were alive. When IWG-MRT criteria were applied to the PV/ET group, 38/58 (66%) of patients fulfilled criteria for diagnosis of post-PV/ET myelofibrosis (except for the 2+fibrosis requirement). Table 1 Patient characteristics UPN Age (yrs) Sex System Risk Activity Tx BRAFV600E (%) 1 56 F Multi High Inactive Yes 0 2 38 F Single High Inactive Yes 0 3 65 F Multi High Active Yes 2.59 4 48 M Single High Inactive Yes 0 5 41 F Single High Inactive Yes 0 6 28 M Multi High Inactive Yes 0 7 29 M Multi High Active No 1.00 8 47 F Multi High Active Yes 6.16 Discussion and Conclusion: PV and ET patients with WHO grade 1 marrow fibrosis manifest a phenotype that suggests progression to post-PV/ET myelofibrosis, and clinically overlap with PMF phenotype; however, these patients currently fail to meet 2008 IWG-MRT diagnostic criteria for this diagnosis on basis of sub-threshold fibrosis. MPN progression represents a biological spectrum and definitions of progression in ET/PV may benefit from other criteria not restricted by degree of fibrosis. Disclosures Mesa: Incyte, CTI, NS pharma, Gilead, Celgene: Research Funding.