Kitange, Gaspar J.

Abstract Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including talazoparib, potentiate temozolomide efficacy in multiple tumor types; however, talazoparib-mediated sensitization has not been evaluated in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) models. This study evaluates talazoparib ± temozolomide in clinically relevant GBM models. Talazoparib at 1–3 nmol/L sensitized T98G, U251, and GBM12 cells to temozolomide, and enhanced DNA damage signaling and G2–M arrest in vitro. In vivo cyclical therapy with talazoparib (0.15 mg/kg twice daily) combined with low-dose temozolomide (5 mg/kg daily) was well tolerated. This talazoparib/temozolomide regimen prolonged tumor stasis more than temozolomide alone in heterotopic GBM12 xenografts [median time to endpoint: 76 days versus 50 days temozolomide (P = 0.005), 11 days placebo (P < 0.001)]. However, talazoparib/temozolomide did not accentuate survival beyond that of temozolomide alone in corresponding orthotopic xenografts [median survival 37 vs. 30 days with temozolomide (P = 0.93), 14 days with placebo, P < 0.001]. Average brain and plasma talazoparib concentrations at 2 hours after a single dose (0.15 mg/kg) were 0.49 ± 0.07 ng/g and 25.5±4.1 ng/mL, respectively. The brain/plasma distribution of talazoparib in Bcrp−/− versus wild-type (WT) mice did not differ, whereas the brain/plasma ratio in Mdr1a/b−/− mice was higher than WT mice (0.23 vs. 0.02, P < 0.001). Consistent with the in vivo brain distribution, overexpression of MDR1 decreased talazoparib accumulation in MDCKII cells. These results indicate that talazoparib has significant MDR1 efflux liability that may restrict delivery across the blood–brain barrier, and this may explain the loss of talazoparib-mediated temozolomide sensitization in orthotopic versus heterotopic GBM xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2735–46. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Objectives To develop and evaluate a real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (RT-MSP) MGMT assay, with a particular focus on small biopsies and indeterminate testing results. Methods We assessed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded glioblastoma or gliosarcoma specimens (n = 641). A test-validation group (n = 51) with previously obtained reference laboratory (RL) results was used to determine performance characteristics of the RT-MSP assay. An indeterminate (equivocal) category was established for cases that could not be clearly classified as positive or negative. Results Overall agreement of RT-MSP and RL results was 91% (41/45 nonindeterminate cases). Discordant cases were tested by pyrosequencing, and results were most concordant with RT-MSP. Among cases with limited amounts of tissue (n = 7), six yielded valid results by RT-MSP (all negative); the single invalid result consisted of a stereotactic biopsy specimen obtained 14 years prior. A subset of indeterminate cases obtained during clinical testing (n = 18/575 [3%]) was also evaluated by pyrosequencing and showed a heterogeneous pattern of methylation across the eight interrogated CpG sites. Conclusions The RT-MSP assay that we developed in-house is a robust clinical detection method for the heterogeneous process of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma.

Abstract Cancer cells can resist the effects of DNA-damaging therapeutic agents via utilization of DNA repair pathways, suggesting that DNA repair capacity (DRC) measurements in cancer cells could be used to identify patients most likely to respond to treatment. However, the limitations of available technologies have so far precluded adoption of this approach in the clinic. We recently developed fluorescence-based multiplexed host cell reactivation (FM-HCR) assays to measure DRC in multiple pathways. Here we apply a mathematical model that uses DRC in multiple pathways to predict cellular resistance to killing by DNA-damaging agents. This model, developed using FM-HCR and drug sensitivity measurements in 24 human lymphoblastoid cell lines, was applied to a panel of 12 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of glioblastoma to predict glioblastoma response to treatment with the chemotherapeutic DNA-damaging agent temozolomide. This work showed that, in addition to changes in O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) activity, small changes in mismatch repair (MMR), nucleotide excision repair (NER), and homologous recombination (HR) capacity contributed to acquired temozolomide resistance in PDX models and led to reduced relative survival prolongation following temozolomide treatment of orthotopic mouse models in vivo. Our data indicate that measuring the combined status of MMR, HR, NER, and MGMT provided a more robust prediction of temozolomide resistance than assessments of MGMT activity alone. Cancer Res; 77(1); 198–206. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Talazoparib (TAL) is a potent poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that robustly enhances in vitro sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) in several tumor models. We assessed the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of TAL combined with TMZ in glioblastoma (GBM) models. METHODS: Established glioma cell lines (T98G, U251) and the GBM12 patient derived xenograft (PDX) line were treated in vitro with TAL (1-10 nM) ± TMZ (2-300 μM). Antitumor efficacy was assessed with CyQUANT, clonogenic and primary neurosphere assays; cell cycle analysis with flow cytometry; DNA damage signaling with phospho-specific western blots for pKap1, pChk1, pChk2 and fluorescent immunocytochemistry for γH2AX and replication protein A foci. Brain and plasma concentrations of TAL in wild-type (WT), Mdr1a/b(-/-), Bcrp(-/-) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) knockout (KO) mice were assessed with LC-MS/MS. The tolerability of TAL (0.05 - 0.30 mg/kg/day orally, divided twice daily (div. bid)) and TMZ (5-50 mg/kg/day orally) was tested in athymic nude mice. Subsequently, in vivo combination TAL/TMZ efficacy was assessed with survival analyses in intracranial and flank GBM12 PDX models. RESULTS: TAL 1-3 nM sensitizes the TMZ resistant T98G glioma cell line to TMZ at high TMZ concentrations (30-300 μM) and is associated with G2 cell cycle arrest and enhanced DNA damage signaling. TAL 1-3 nM also enhances the cytotoxic efficacy of lower concentrations of TMZ (10-30 μM) in the TMZ sensitive U251 cell line. At least 3 nM TAL is required to enhance the in vitro efficacy of low TMZ concentrations (2-10 μM) in the TMZ sensitive GBM12 PDX line. PK studies in non-tumor bearing WT FVB mice treated with a single dose of TAL 0.15 mg/kg revealed mean brain and plasma concentrations of 0.49 ng/g (1.3 nM) and 25.5 ng/ml (67.1 nM) respectively at 2 hours. The mean brain/plasma ratio at 2 hours was unchanged in Bcrp(-/-) KO mice compared to WT mice (1.2% vs. 2.0%), but was significantly increased in Mdr1a/b(-/-) KO mice (22.8%) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) KO mice (23.9%). Standard doses of TMZ (50 mg/kg/day, days 1-5) combined with low doses of TAL (0.05 mg/kg/day, div. bid) were toxic in nude mice. Higher doses of TAL (0.30 mg/kg/day, div. bid) required substantial TMZ dose reductions (5 mg/kg/day, days 1-5) for tolerability. The addition of TAL (0.30 mg/kg/day, div. bid) to low-dose TMZ (5 mg/kg/day) prolonged tumor stasis in flank GBM12 xenografts (median time to endpoint 76 vs. 50 days, p = 0.005). However this regimen was ineffective in intracranial GBM12 xenografts (median survival 37 vs. 30 days, p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: TAL is a potent PARP inhibitor that enhances the efficacy of TMZ in both in vitro GBM models and flank GBM12 PDX models, but not in the corresponding GBM12 intracranial xenografts. This lack of intracranial efficacy is associated with limited brain distribution due to active efflux mediated by Mdr1 at the blood-brain barrier. Citation Format: Sani H. Kizilbash, Kenneth Chang, Shiv K. Gupta, Ryo Kawashima, Karen Parrish, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina K. Bakken, Mark A. Schroeder, Gaspar J. Kitange, Paul A. Decker, Yuqiao Shen, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Talazoparib enhances low-dose temozolomide efficacy in flank glioblastoma models, but intracranial efficacy is constrained by limited brain distribution. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 340.

Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating disease. Recent studies suggest that the stem cell properties of GBM contribute to the development of therapy resistance. Experimental Design: The expression of Survivin and Ran was evaluated by immunohistochemistry with GBM tissues, and quantitative reverse transcriptase (qRT)-PCR and immunocytochemistry with patient-derived GBM sphere cultures. With a computational structure-based drug design, 11 small-molecule compounds were designed, synthesized, and evaluated as inhibitor candidates for the molecular interaction of Survivin protein. The molecular mechanism of the lead compound, LLP-3, was determined by Western blot, ELISA, in situ proximity ligation assay, and immunocytochemistry. The effects of LLP-3 treatment on GSCs were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. Quantitative immunohistochemistry was carried out to compare Survivin expression in tissues from 44 newly diagnosed and 31 recurrent post-chemoradiation GBM patients. Lastly, the sensitivities of temozolomide-resistant GBM spheres to LLP-3 were evaluated in vitro. Results: Survivin and Ran were strongly expressed in GBM tissues, particularly in the perivasculature, and also in patient-derived GSC cultures. LLP-3 treatment disrupted the Survivin–Ran protein complex in cancer cells and abolished the growth of patient-derived GBM spheres in vitro and in vivo. This inhibition was dependent on caspase activity and associated with p53 status of cells. Immunohistochemistry showed that Survivin expression is significantly increased in recurrent GBM compared with newly diagnosed tumors, and temozolomide-resistant GBM spheres exhibited high sensitivities to LLP-3 treatment. Conclusions: Disruption of the Survivin–Ran complex by LLP-3 abolishes survival and growth of GSCs both in vitro and in vivo, indicating an attractive novel therapeutic approach for GBM. Clin Cancer Res; 19(3); 631–42. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The L-Type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) transports large neutral amino acids across the plasma membrane in a variety of cells. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with the amino acid tracer 6-18F-fluoro-L-dopa (18F-FDOPA) provides useful histological information in human gliomas in addition to providing better localizing information then CT or MRI alone. This study is the first to correlate LAT1 expression with uptake of the 18F-FDOPA analog, 3H-L-DOPA in human glioblastomas. METHODS: Endogenous expression of LAT1 was evaluated in two established glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines and three primary GBM xenografts using Western blotting and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Uptake of FDOPA was assessed in vitro using 3H-L-DOPA as an analog to 18F-FDOPA. Knockdown of LAT1 expression was achieved by lentiviral expression of anti-LAT1 shRNA in GBM lines with high LAT1 expression. The effect of LAT1 knockdown on 3H-L-DOPA uptake was then quantified. RESULTS: Results from Western blotting and qRT-PCR demonstrate that LAT1 is variably expressed in GBM. Levels of 3H-L-DOPA uptake were directly related to LAT1 expression (p<0.001) across the 5 lines. Knockdown of LAT1 was achieved in T98 cells (knockdown efficiency = 82.8%) and xenograft GBM 28 (knockdown efficiency = 73.7%) as confirmed by qRT-PCR and Western blotting. Knockdown of LAT1 reduced 3H-L-DOPA uptake by 57.2% (p<0.0001) in T98 and 52.1% in GBM 28 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of 3H-L-DOPA uptake being driven by LAT1 in human GBM. Our findings suggest LAT1 as a transporter of 18F-FDOPA in GBM. Additional studies are underway to correlate LAT1 expression with PET 18F-FDOPA uptake in patients with GBM. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4543. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4543

Abstract Purpose/Background: The first-line chemotherapeutic temozolomide (TMZ) does not offer any therapeutic benefit in some cases of glioblastoma (GBM) and emergence of resistance leads to tumor progression in almost all patients. While the expression of O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) correlates well with TMZ resistance, its expression varies among GBM tumors. The goal of this study is to identify additional genes with potential roles in TMZ resistance. Materials and Methods: Five primary GBM xenografts were generated from patient samples, and subsequent secondary models for resistance were developed by subjecting tumor-bearing mice to escalating doses of TMZ. Triplicate samples from parental and TMZ-resistant xenografts were analyzed for gene expression using the Illumina BeadChip microarray platform. The top 100 differentially expressed genes for each line were considered candidates. Genes were selected for qRT-PCR validation after ontological and pathway analysis. A lentivirus-mediated shRNA knockdown was performed to validate the role of several candidate genes in TMZ resistance in U87 and primary GBM12 cell lines. Knockdown was confirmed with qRT-PCR and western blots. TMZ responsiveness was assessed using CyQUANT and Neurosphere assays. Results: Upregulated MGMT expression was found in 3 of the 5 xenografts (GBM12TMZ, GBM14TMZ and GBM28TMZ) and was mechanistically linked with TMZ resistance in these lines using O6-benzylguanine to reverse the resistance phenotype. Differential expression of other DNA damage response genes included CCND2, CDKN1A, GADD45B, UBB as well as apoptosis regulators NFKB2 and BIRC3. In lines with unchanged MGMT expression (GBM22TMZ and GBM39TMZ), changes in anti-apoptosis genes NFKB2 and MAP3K1, transcription factor SRF and signal transduction gene PRKCDBP were validated by qRT-PCR. In GBM12TMZ, in addition to MGMT upregulation, expression of Ubiquitin B (UBB) was found to be the most significantly down-regulated gene both on microarray (Log2FC = −4.55, Fold change = 0.043) and qRT-PCR (Log2RQ =-4.04, RQ = 0.061). To test a possible role of UBB in TMZ resistance, knockdown was achieved in U87 (knockdown efficiency=91.2%) and in primary xenograft line GBM12 (knockdown efficiency=84.4%). The CyQUANT assay for U87UBB-KD and U87NT treated with escalating doses of TMZ revealed no significant difference in cell survival (10 M TMZ relative survival= 89.7% for U87UBB-KD and 79.2% for U87NT; p-value=0.53). Similarly, a neurosphere assay for GBM12UBB-KD and GBM12NT also yielded no significant difference in cell survival (10 M TMZ relative survival= 25.13% for GBM12UBB-KD and 23.35% for GBM12NT; p-value=0.83). Conclusions: We have used a TMZ resistance xenograft model to identify candidate TMZ resistance genes. The current data provides evidence on the role of MGMT in the development of acquired TMZ resistance while ruling out UBB as potential TMZ resistance gene in GBM. Additional studies are underway to assess the functional significance of other candidate genes, particularly those with differential expression in the setting of constant MGMT expression. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B68.

Abstract Purpose: The therapeutic benefit of temozolomide in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is limited by resistance. The goal of this study was to elucidate mechanisms of temozolomide resistance in GBM. Experimental Design: We developed an in vivo GBM model of temozolomide resistance and used paired parental and temozolomide-resistant tumors to define the mechanisms underlying the development of resistance and the influence of histone deacetylation (HDAC) inhibition. Results: Analysis of paired parental and resistant lines showed upregulation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression in 3 of the 5 resistant xenografts. While no significant change was detected in MGMT promoter methylation between parental and derivative-resistant samples, chromatin immunoprecipitation showed an association between MGMT upregulation and elevated acetylation of lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9-ac) and decreased dimethylation (H3K9-me2) in GBM12 and GBM14. In contrast, temozolomide resistance development in GBM22 was not linked to MGMT expression, and both parental and resistant lines had low H3K9-ac and high H3K9-me2 within the MGMT promoter. In the GBM12TMZ-resistant line, MGMT reexpression was accompanied by increased recruitment of SP1, C-JUN, NF-κB, and p300 within the MGMT promoter. Interestingly, combined treatment of GBM12 flank xenografts with temozolomide and the HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) favored the evolution of temozolomide resistance by MGMT overexpression as compared with treatment with temozolomide alone. Conclusion: This study shows, for the first time, a unique mechanism of temozolomide resistance development driven by chromatin-mediated MGMT upregulation and highlights the potential for epigenetically directed therapies to influence the mechanisms of resistance development in GBM. Clin Cancer Res; 18(15); 4070–9. ©2012 AACR.

Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a common occurrence and is associated with treatment resistance. Erlotinib, a selective EGFR inhibitor, was combined with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) in a phase I/II trial. Patients and Methods Adults not taking enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants after resection or biopsy of GBM were treated with erlotinib (150 mg daily) until progression. Erlotinib was delivered alone for 1 week, then concurrently with TMZ (75 mg mg/m2 daily) and RT (60 Gy), and finally, concurrently with up to six cycles of adjuvant TMZ (200 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 28 days). The primary end point was survival at 1 year. Results Ninety-seven eligible patients were accrued with a median follow-up time of 22.2 months. By definition, the primary end point was successfully met with a median survival time of 15.3 months. However, there was no sign of benefit in overall survival when comparing N0177 with the RT/TMZ arm of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/National Cancer Institute of Canada trial 26981/22981 (recursive partitioning analysis [RPA] class III, 19 v 21 months; RPA class IV, 16 v 16 months; RPA class V, 8 v 10 months, respectively). Presence of diarrhea, rash, and EGFRvIII, p53, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), combination EGFR and PTEN, and EGFR amplification status were not predictive (P > .05) of survival. Conclusion Although the primary end point was successfully met using nitrosourea-based (pre-TMZ) chemotherapy era historic controls, there was no sign of benefit compared with TMZ era controls. Analyses of molecular subsets did not reveal cohorts of patients sensitive to erlotinib. TMZ chemotherapy combined with RT resulted in improved outcomes compared with historical controls who received nitrosourea-based chemotherapies.

Abstract Purpose: Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling through disruption of PTEN function is common in glioblastoma multiforme, and these genetic changes are predicted to enhance sensitivity to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors such as RAD001 (everolimus). Experimental Design: To test whether PTEN loss could be used as a predictive marker for mTOR inhibitor sensitivity, the response of 17 serially transplantable glioblastoma multiforme xenografts was evaluated in an orthotopic therapy evaluation model. Of these 17 xenograft lines, 7 have either genomic deletion or mutation of PTEN. Results: Consistent with activation of Akt signaling, there was a good correlation between loss of PTEN function and elevated levels of Akt phosphorylation. However, of the 7 lines with disrupted PTEN function, only 1 tumor line (GBM10) was significantly sensitive to RAD001 therapy (25% prolongation in median survival), whereas 1 of 10 xenograft lines with wild-type PTEN was significantly sensitive to RAD001 (GS22; 34% prolongation in survival). Relative to placebo, 5 days of RAD001 treatment was associated with a marked 66% reduction in the MIB1 proliferation index in the sensitive GBM10 line (deleted PTEN) compared with a 25% and 7% reduction in MIB1 labeling index in the insensitive GBM14 (mutant PTEN) and GBM15 (wild-type PTEN) lines, respectively. Consistent with a cytostatic antitumor effect, bioluminescent imaging of luciferase-transduced intracranial GBM10 xenografts showed slowed tumor growth without significant tumor regression during RAD001 therapy. Conclusion: These data suggest that loss of PTEN function is insufficient to adequately predict responsiveness to mTOR inhibitors in glioblastoma multiforme.