Carlson, Brett L.

Abstract Background RBBP4 activates transcription by histone acetylation, but the partner histone acetyltransferases are unknown. Thus, we investigated the hypothesis that RBBP4 interacts with p300 in a complex in glioblastoma (GBM). Methods shRNA silencing of RBBP4 or p300 and RNAseq was used to identify genes co-regulated by RBBP4 and p300 in GBM43 patient-derived xenograft (PDX). RBBP4/p300 complex was demonstrated using proximity ligation assay (PLA) and ChIPseq delineated histone H3 acetylation and RBBP4/p300 complex binding in promoters/enhancers. Temozolomide (TMZ)-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) were evaluated by γ-H2AX and proliferation by CyQuant and live cell monitoring assays. In vivo efficacy was based on survival of mice with orthotopic tumors. Results shRBBP4 and shp300 downregulated 4768 genes among which 1485 (31%) were commonly downregulated by both shRNAs, while upregulated genes were 2484, including 863 (35%) common genes. The pro-survival genes were the top-ranked among the downregulated genes, including C-MYC. RBBP4/p300 complex was demonstrated in the nucleus, and shRBBP4 or shp300 significantly sensitized GBM cells to TMZ compared to the control shNT in vitro (P < .05). Moreover, TMZ significantly prolonged the survival of mice bearing GBM22-shRBBP4 orthotopic tumors compared with control shNT tumors (median shNT survival 52 days vs. median shRBBP4 319 days; P = .001). CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 inhibitor CPI-1612 suppressed H3K27Ac and RBBP4/p300 complex target proteins, including C-MYC, and synergistically sensitized TMZ in vitro. Pharmacodynamic evaluation confirmed brain penetration by CPI-1612 supporting further investigation to evaluate efficacy to sensitize TMZ. Conclusions RBBP4/p300 complex is present in GBM cells and is a potential therapeutic target.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is an incurable disease with few approved therapeutic interventions. Radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) remain the standards of care. The efficacy and optimal deployment schedule of the orally bioavailable small-molecule tumor checkpoint controller lisavanbulin alone, and in combination with, standards of care were assessed using a panel of IDH-wildtype GBM patient-derived xenografts. Methods Mice bearing intracranial tumors received lisavanbulin +/−RT +/−TMZ and followed for survival. Lisavanbulin concentrations in plasma and brain were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, while flow cytometry was used for cell cycle analysis. Results Lisavanbulin monotherapy showed significant benefit (P < .01) in 9 of 14 PDXs tested (median survival extension 9%-84%) and brain-to-plasma ratios of 1.3 and 1.6 at 2- and 6-hours postdose, respectively, validating previous data suggesting significant exposure in the brain. Prolonged lisavanbulin dosing from RT start until moribund was required for maximal benefit (GBM6: median survival lisavanbulin/RT 90 vs. RT alone 69 days, P = .0001; GBM150: lisavanbulin/RT 143 days vs. RT alone 73 days, P = .06). Similar observations were seen with RT/TMZ combinations (GBM39: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 502 days vs. RT/TMZ 249 days, P = .0001; GBM26: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 172 days vs. RT/TMZ 121 days, P = .04). Immunohistochemical analyses showed a significant increase in phospho-histone H3 with lisavanbulin treatment (P = .01). Conclusions Lisavanbulin demonstrated excellent brain penetration, significant extension of survival alone or in RT or RT/TMZ combinations, and was associated with mitotic arrest. These data provide a strong clinical rationale for testing lisavanbulin in combination with RT or RT/TMZ in GBM patients.

Abstract Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important. Methods PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics. Results Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment. Conclusions Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.

Abstract Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.

Abstract Non-genotoxic reactivation of p53 by MDM2 inhibitors represents a promising therapeutic strategy for tumors with wild-type TP53, particularly tumors harboring MDM2 amplification. MDM2 controls p53 levels by targeting it for degradation, while disruption of the MDM2-p53 interaction causes rapid accumulation of p53 and activation of the p53 pathway. We examined the efficacy of the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor KRT-232, alone and in combination with radiation therapy (RT), in MDM2-amplified and/or p53 wildtype patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, glioblastoma PDX explant cultures showed sensitivity to KRT-232, both tumors with MDM2 amplification (GBM108 and G148) and non-amplified but TP53-wildtype lines (GBM10, GBM14, and GBM39), with IC50s ranging from 300-800 nM in FBS culture conditions. A TP53 p.F270C mutant PDX (GBM43) was inherently resistant, with IC50 >3000 nM. In the MDM2-amplified GBM108 line, KRT-232 led to a robust (5-6 fold) induction of p53-target genes p21, PUMA, and NOXA, with initiation of both apoptosis and senescence. Expression of p21 and PUMA was greater with KRT-232 in combination with RT (25-35 fold induction), while stable knock-down of p53 in GBM108 led to complete resistance to KRT-232. In contrast, GBM10 showed lower induction of p21 and PUMA (2-3 fold) and was more resistant to KRT-232. In an orthotopic GBM108 xenograft model, treatment with KRT-232 +/- RT for one week extended survival from 22 days (placebo) to 46 days (KRT-232 alone); combination KRT-232 + RT further extended survival (77 days) over RT alone (31 days). KRT-232 is an effective treatment in a subset of glioblastoma pre-clinical models alone and in combination with RT. Further studies are underway to understand the mechanisms conferring innate sensitivity or resistance to KRT-232.

Abstract Radio-resistance mechanisms limit the benefit of radiation therapy (RT) for melanoma brain metastases. A key pathway for radiation-induced DNA double-strand break repair is non-homologous end joining, which is critically mediated by DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). Here we evaluated radio-sensitizing effects of M3814, a selective oral inhibitor of DNA-PKcs, in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of melanoma brain metastases. In a clonogenic survival assay, M3841 augmented RT-induced killing of M12 cells at concentrations of ≥300 nM, and a minimum of 16 h exposure with ~300 nM M3814 was required for effective sensitization. M3814 inhibited RT-induced (5 Gy) auto-phosphorylation of serine-2056 of DNA-PKcs in primary cultures of M12, M15 and M27 PDX lines. Interestingly, inhibition of RT-induced DNA-PKcs by M3814 coincided with increased KAP1 phosphorylation, a DNA damage signaling regulated via ATM. Persistent γH2AX foci were observed in 28% M12 cells at 24 hours after co-treatment with M3814 and RT as compared to 12% cells following RT alone. In vivo pharmacokinetic analysis after single oral dose of 20 mg/kg M3814, showed reasonably short half-life (~2.44 hours) and poor brain distribution in wild-type FBV mice (Kpuu, 0.027). Consistent with an efflux liability, brain distribution of M3814 in triple knockout mice for BCRP/MDR1A/B was ~11 fold higher (Kpuu, 0.215). Compared to normal brain, much higher M3814 concentrations were detected in intracranially implanted M12 tumors (~23 fold and ~20 fold) 2 and 6 hours after a single oral dose of 50mg/kg respectively. The relative exclusion of M3814 from normal brain as compared to brain metastases suggests that this drug may have a favorable toxicity profile when combined with radiation for treatment of melanoma brain metastases, and this hypothesis is being tested in ongoing efficacy studies.

Abstract There is an unmet need to identify novel targets that can sensitize temozolomide (TMZ) or prevent resistance in GBM. We have demonstrated that retinoblastoma binding protein 4 (RBBP4) interacts with p300 to modulate expression of genes involved in homologous recombination (HR), including RAD51. In vitro, RBBP4- or p300-shRNA significantly sensitized TMZ in patient derived xenograft (PDX) GBM43 cells (relative fluorescence for 100µM TMZ treated control shNT cells was 0.89 ± 0.1 vs 0.47± 0.09 and 0.39 ± 0.01 for shRBBP4 and shp300, respectively (p< 0.01)). TMZ sensitization increased DNA damage signaling through phosphorylation of KAP1 (p-KAP1) and p-CHK1. Moreover, RBBP4- or p300-shRNA delayed the repair of TMZ-induced DSBs evidenced by persistent gH2AX. Silencing RBBP4 or p300 reduced acetylation of lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27Ac) within promoters of HR genes regulated by RBBP4/p300 complex. Thus, RBBP4/p300 complex controls gene expression through p300-mediated histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, suggesting that p300 inhibitors could sensitize GBM to TMZ. Accordingly, CBP/p300 inhibitor CPI1612 significantly suppressed H3K27Ac and HR repair genes, including RAD51. Moreover, CPI1612 sensitized TMZ in GBM43 (synergy score = 258), and TMZ/CPI1612 significantly suppressed growth of GBM39 PDX cells compared with either drug alone (confluence (%) was 92 ± 1.0 (DMSO), 76.5 ± 4.6 (10 µM TMZ), 62 ± 3.4 (10 nM CPI1612) and 21.9 ± 3.2 (TMZ 10 µM/CPI-CPI1612 10 nM). CPI1612 enhanced TMZ-induced DSBs with increased damage signaling through p- KAP1 and persistent gH2AX. Pharmacodynamics studies in GBM39 orthotopic mice models revealed that oral CPI1612 penetrates the brain and accumulate in tumor regions and suppresses H3K27Ac without significant weight loss in mice that received placebo, TMZ, CPI1612 alone or combined TMZ/CPI-1612, demonstrating good animal tolerability. Collectively, these findings are encouraging that CBP/p300 inhibition by the brain penetrant CPI-1612 is a potential strategy for enhancing the efficacy of TMZ in GBM.

Abstract The efficacy of standard radiation therapy (RT) in glioblastoma (GBM) is limited, and there is a strong rationale to develop effective radiosensitizing agents. ATM is a key regulator of DNA damage induced by RT, and small molecule ATM inhibitors have shown radio-sensitizing effects in cancer cells, and may improve radio-sensitivity in GBM. Here, we evaluated the brain penetrant ATM inhibitor AZD1390 in combination with RT in GBM cell lines and patient derived xenografts (PDXs). AZD1390 (30 nM and higher) suppressed ionizing radiation-(5 Gy, IR) induced phosphorylation of ATM-Serine1981 and downstream signaling proteins Kap1, Chk2 and H2AX in GBM established cell lines (U251 and U87) and PDX lines (GBM12, GBM39 and GBM43). In cell cycle analysis, 30nM AZD1390 enhanced the IR induced G2/M arrest in U251 (80.6% with AZD1390/IR vs. 64.6% with IR alone, p= 0.01) and PDX lines GBM43 (61.9% vs. 25.7%, p= 0.01) and GBM39 (40.9% vs. 25.4%, p= 0.01). Moreover, in a U251 clonogenic survival assay, AZD1390 sensitized cells to IR-(5 Gy) induced killing (0.24% survival with AZD1390/RT vs. 2.3% with IR alone, P=0.01). For in vivo radiation combination studies, mice with established orthotopic tumors were irradiated to the cerebrum through opposed laterals with a 225 kVp stereotactic animal irradiator. While the hard palate and upper tongue were in the radiation target, the oropharynx and hypopharynx were spared with this radiation set up. A pilot study of RT combined with AZD1390 was evaluated in mice with established U251 orthotopic tumors using cohorts of 5 mice per arm. AZD1390 was given concurrently with conventionally fractionated radiation (2 Gy x 5 fractions) at a dose of 20 mg/kg PO delivered either daily or twice daily, with or without the efflux inhibitor elacridar. RT alone was well tolerated with minimal weight loss but was ineffective (median survival 30 days vs. 33 days in control group, p=0.5). In contrast, all of the RT/AZD1390 treatment arms exhibited enhanced but tolerable weight loss and had significant extension in symptom-free survival that currently extends beyond 65 days (median survival no reached). In conclusion, AZD1390 is an effective radio-sensitizer in vitro, and survival benefit from AZD1390 combined with conventionally fractionated RT in U251 models is encouraging. Further evaluation of efficacy across additional PDX models and careful analysis of the pharmacodynamic effects in tumor vs. normal tissues will be important to understand the therapeutic window for this agent in combination with RT. Citation Format: Jiajia Chen, Shiv K. Gupta, Gaspar J. Kitange, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Lihong He, Zeng Hu, Katrina K. Bakken, Danielle M. Burgenske, Margaret A. Connors, Jann N. Sarkaria. Targeting ATM with AZD1390 for radio-sensitization of glioblastoma patient derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6506.

Abstract Despite aggressive treatment that involves surgery, radiation and temozolomide therapy, a significant morbidity from glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence highlights the pressing unmet medical need to develop effective novel therapies for GBM. Murine Double Minute 2 (MDM2) is an important regulator of the p53 tumor suppressor, which promotes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Here we have assessed the efficacy of RG7388, a purported brain penetrant MDM2-inhibitor, alone or combined with radiation therapy (RT) in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of GBM. In vitro, RG7388 suppressed viability of GBM PDX short-term stem cell cultures of p53 wildtype lines with MDM2-amplification (GBM46 and 108, IC50 25 and 11 nM, respectively) or without MDM2-amplification (GBM10 and 14, IC50 43.5 and 9.1 nM, respectively). Serum proteins appear to reduce efficacy of RG7388, which is supported by the notion that adding 2.5% bovine serum albumin to a serum free stem cell cultures increased the IC50 by 3 to 5 fold. At the molecular level, both RG7388 and RT could induce p53 signaling in GBM10, but a more robust induction was observed with the combination. In athymic nude mice, RG7388 readily distributes into normal brain as measured by LCMS-MS at 1 hour after five daily oral doses (70 mg/kg) the average RG7388 concentrations in brain and plasma were 2167 ng/g and 4423 ng/ml, respectively. In an initial efficacy study using flank tumors established from GBM10, one week of dosing at 70 mg/kg/day RG7388 alone was ineffective, while combining RG7388 with focal radiation (4 daily doses of 5 Gy each) had a moderate 15 day delay in tumor progression. However, in an MDM2-amplified GBM108 line with a relatively intact blood-brain barrier, one week of daily RG7388 dosing, either alone or in combination with RT was remarkably effective (median survival 71 days with RG7388 alone vs. 29 days with vehicle, p<0.0001; and 262 days for RG7388/RT vs. 74 days with RT, p=0.017). Taken together, RG7388 alone or in combination with RT is highly effective in an MDM2-amplified pre-clinical model of GBM. Determining impact of serum protein binding on drug pharmacokinetics and further evaluation of pharmacodynamic effects and orthotopic therapy in additional p53 wildtype PDX lines will help to increase our understanding if RG7388/RT therapy can be used in a larger population of GBM tumors. Citation Format: Shiv K. Gupta, Ann C. Mladek, Surabhi Telele, Afroz S. Mohammad, Lihong He, Zeng Hu, Katrina K. Bakken, Danielle M. Burgenske, Brett L. Carlson, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Brain penetrant MDM2 inhibitor RG7388 extends survival benefit of radiation treatment in select glioblastoma patient-derived xenograft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6276.

Abstract Robust function of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway is critical when treating with DNA-damage inducing agents such as radiation therapy (RT), which is a key component of standard care for GBM. MDM2 is an important negative regulator of p53 stability and MDM2 is amplified in approximately 14% of GBM. Based on the concept that suppression of MDM2 can reactivate p53 function and potentially have single agent or combinatorial effects, multiple MDM2 inhibitors have been developed. Here we report in vitro and in vivo efficacy and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of a BBB-penetrant MDM2-p53 antagonist, BI-MDM2, in GBM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In vitro studies in p53 wild-type (WT) lines with or without MDM2 amplification demonstrate IC50 values in cell viability assays of 2-12 nM in serum-free culture and 5-35 nM in serum-containing culture after seven days of treatment. In vivo studies were performed in p53 WT lines: the MDM2-amplified GBM108, and the non-amplified GBM14, grown as orthotopic tumors in nude mice. Weekly oral treatment at 2 mg/kg of BI-MDM2 doubled median survival (placebo, 28 days (d) vs 2 mg/kg BI-MDM2, 57 d. p<0.0001) while weekly dosing at 10 mg/kg extended the median over 5 fold (176 d. p<0.0001) with half of the mice still living at 223 days post-inoculation. To assess the PD properties of this compound, mice bearing orthotopic GBM108 were treated three weeks after inoculation with a single dose of 2 or 10 mg/kg BI-MDM2. Normal brain, tumor, and plasma were collected at 24 and 48 hours (h) after dosing and downstream p53 transcriptional targets, p21 and PUMA were evaluated by qRT-PCR. p21 mRNA relative quantification detection at 24h increased by 1.5-10.5-fold in the 2 mg/kg group of animals compared to vehicle while the 10 mg/kg dose led to an increase by 2-25 fold compared to vehicle. PUMA was minimally affected by the 2 mg/kg dose but increased 1.2-17-fold over vehicle in the 10 mg/kg group at 24h. The observed increases in p21 and PUMA varied little between the 24 and 48h timepoints. In an orthotopic GBM14 PDX efficacy study, BI-MDM2 was combined with 20 Gy RT delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks with dosing limited to 2 weeks of therapy or until mice reached a moribund state. While two doses of 10 mg/kg BI-MDM2 alone had a modest effect on survival (41 d vs 31 d with placebo; p=0.002), continued dosing until moribund further extended median survival (82 d with BI-MDM2; p=0.001). The combination of two doses of BI-MDM2 with 2 weeks of RT extended survival as compared to RT alone (107 d vs. 69 d, respectively; p=0.019), while with extended drug dosing combined with 2 weeks of RT, median survival has not yet been reached (>125 d). Taken together, these results suggest that BI-MDM2 is a promising therapeutic agent that may provide significant anti-tumor efficacy either alone or in combination with RT in both MDM2 amplified and non-amplified p53 WT patients. Citation Format: Ann C. Mladek Tuma, Shiv Gupta, Surabhi Talele, Afroz Shareef Mohammad, Katrina K. Bakken, Helen He, Zeng Hu, Margaret A. Connors, Danielle M. Burgenske, Brett L. Carlson, William F. Elmquist, Ulrike Weyer-Czernilofsky, Jann N. Sarkaria. A promising blood-brain-barrier penetrant MDM2-p53 antagonist, BI-MDM2, increases survival in orthotopic, glioblastoma patient-derived xenograft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4190.