Sarkaria, Jann N.

Abstract When unrepaired, alkylated DNA can induce cell death or trigger mutagenesis. Cellular capacity for repair of these lesions by O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) dictates the equilibrium between cell viability and genetic diversity. Treatment of glioblastoma cells with temozolomide (TMZ) induced ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase dependent polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase 1 (PNPT1) degradation of miR-181d. miR-181d suppresses MGMT expression; its degradation increases the mean MGMT expression of the cell population. miR-181d degradation also magnifies the cell-to-cell variability in MGMT expression, expanding the genetic heterogeneity of the population. This expanded heterogeneity enhances the “fitness” of the population and constitutes a novel form of chemotherapeutic resistance. These effects can be suppressed by overexpression of miR-181d, suggesting miRNA delivery as a strategy for glioblastoma therapy. To characterize the mechanism of acquired resistance, we profiled the expression of 2400 miRNAs before and after TMZ treatment. In independent patient-derived neurosphere lines, the majority of miRNAs remained unchanged after treatment. However, miR-181d was consistently suppressed after TMZ treatment. Our previous work demonstrated miR-181d as the master regulator of MGMT. We confirmed TMZ-induced suppression of miR-181d using independent in vitro and in vivo models as well as matched pre- and post-TMZ treated clinical specimens. TMZ-induced miR-181d suppression persisted after transcriptional inhibition, suggesting degradation as the primary mechanism. We performed an siRNA screen and identified polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase 1 (PNPT1) as the gene responsible for miR-181d degradation. CRISPR inactivation of PNPT1 eliminated TMZ-induced suppression of miR-181d; this was rescued by wild-type PNPT1 but not by PNPT1 harboring RNAse-inactivating mutations. TMZ-induced degradation of miR-181d requires ATR kinase. Silencing or inhibition of ATR eliminated binding of PNPT1 to miR-181d and prevented degradation of miR-181d. TMZ-sensitizing effects of ATR inhibition were reversed by anti-miR-181d, suggesting miR-181d is essential in this process. In addition to elevating the mean MGMT expression of the population, single-cell analysis revealed that miR-181d degradation broadened the cell-to-cell variability in MGMT expression in vitro. In matched clinical pre- and post-TMZ treated specimens, variability in MGMT expression was significantly elevated in post-TMZ samples. This was recapitulated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We propose that miR-181d degradation-mediated expansion of genetic heterogeneity enhances the “fitness” of the population, constituting a novel form of chemotherapeutic resistance. These effects are suppressed by miR-181d overexpression, suggesting miRNA delivery as a strategy for glioblastoma therapy. Citation Format: Valya Ramakrishnan, Johnny Akers, Thien Nguyen, Aaron Wang, Bandita Adhikari, Brian Hirshman, Jie Li, Jann Sarkaria, Wei Hua, Mao Ying, Masayuki Nitta, Tao Jiang, Bob Carter, Clark C. Chen. miR-181d degradation mediated genetic heterogeneity and acquired resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1956.

Abstract Controversy exists surrounding whether heterogeneous disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), as seen in glioblastoma (GBM), leads to adequate drug delivery sufficient for efficacy in GBM. This question is especially important when using potent, targeted agents that have a poor penetration across an intact BBB. Efficacy of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) inhibitor SAR405838 was tested in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of GBM. In vitro efficacy of SAR405838 was evaluated in PDX models with varying MDM2 expression and those with high (GBM108) and low (GBM102) expression were evaluated for flank and orthotopic efficacy. BBB permeability, evaluated using TexasRed-3 kDa dextran, was significantly increased in GBM108 through VEGFA overexpression. Drug delivery, MRI, and orthotopic survival were compared between BBB-intact (GBM108-vector) and BBB-disrupted (GBM108-VEGFA) models. MDM2-amplified PDX lines with high MDM2 expression were sensitive to SAR405838 in comparison with MDM2 control lines in both in vitro and heterotopic models. In contrast with profound efficacy observed in flank xenografts, SAR405838 was ineffective in orthotopic tumors. Although both GBM108-vector and GBM108-VEGFA readily imaged on MRI following gadolinium contrast administration, GBM108-VEGFA tumors had a significantly enhanced drug and gadolinium accumulation, as determined by MALDI-MSI. Enhanced drug delivery in GBM108-VEGFA translated into a marked improvement in orthotopic efficacy. This study clearly shows that limited drug distribution across a partially intact BBB may limit the efficacy of targeted agents in GBM. Brain penetration of targeted agents is a critical consideration in any precision medicine strategy for GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(9); 1893–901. ©2018 AACR.

Expression of histone H3.3K27M mutant proteins in human diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) results in a global reduction of tri-methylation of H3K27 (H3K27me3), and paradoxically, H3K27me3 peaks remain at hundreds of genomic loci, a dichotomous change that lacks mechanistic insights. Here, we show that the PRC2 complex is sequestered at poised enhancers, but not at active promoters with high levels of H3.3K27M proteins, thereby contributing to the global reduction of H3K27me3. Moreover, the levels of H3.3K27M proteins are low at the retained H3K27me3 peaks and consequently having minimal effects on the PRC2 activity at these loci. H3K27me3-mediated silencing at specific tumor suppressor genes, including Wilms Tumor 1, promotes proliferation of DIPG cells. These results support a model in which the PRC2 complex is redistributed to poised enhancers in H3.3K27M mutant cells and contributes to tumorigenesis in part by locally enhancing H3K27me3, and hence silencing of tumor suppressor genes.

BACKGROUNDMitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)‐dependent signaling are hallmarks of glioblastoma. In the current study, the authors conducted a phase 1/2 study of sorafenib (an inhibitor of Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [VEGFR‐2]) and the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.METHODSPatients with recurrent glioblastoma who developed disease progression after surgery or radiotherapy plus temozolomide and with ≤2 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. The phase 1 endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), using a cohorts‐of‐3 design. The 2‐stage phase 2 study included separate arms for VEGF inhibitor (VEGFi)–naive patients and patients who progressed after prior VEGFi.RESULTSThe MTD was sorafenib at a dose of 200 mg twice daily and temsirolimus at a dose of 20 mg weekly. In the first 41 evaluable patients who were treated at the phase 2 dose, there were 7 who were free of disease progression at 6 months (progression‐free survival at 6 months [PFS6]) in the VEGFi‐naive group (17.1%); this finding met the prestudy threshold of success. In the prior VEGFi group, only 4 of the first 41 evaluable patients treated at the phase 2 dose achieved PFS6 (9.8%), and this did not meet the prestudy threshold for success. The median PFS for the 2 groups was 2.6 months and 1.9 months, respectively. The median overall survival for the 2 groups was 6.3 months and 3.9 months, respectively. At least 1 adverse event of grade ≥3 was observed in 75.5% of the VEGFi‐naive patients and in 73.9% of the prior VEGFi patients.CONCLUSIONSThe limited activity of sorafenib and temsirolimus at the dose and schedule used in the current study was observed with considerable toxicity of grade ≥3. Significant dose reductions that were required in this treatment combination compared with tolerated single‐agent doses may have contributed to the lack of efficacy. Cancer 2018;124:1455‐63. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Abstract Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including talazoparib, potentiate temozolomide efficacy in multiple tumor types; however, talazoparib-mediated sensitization has not been evaluated in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) models. This study evaluates talazoparib ± temozolomide in clinically relevant GBM models. Talazoparib at 1–3 nmol/L sensitized T98G, U251, and GBM12 cells to temozolomide, and enhanced DNA damage signaling and G2–M arrest in vitro. In vivo cyclical therapy with talazoparib (0.15 mg/kg twice daily) combined with low-dose temozolomide (5 mg/kg daily) was well tolerated. This talazoparib/temozolomide regimen prolonged tumor stasis more than temozolomide alone in heterotopic GBM12 xenografts [median time to endpoint: 76 days versus 50 days temozolomide (P = 0.005), 11 days placebo (P < 0.001)]. However, talazoparib/temozolomide did not accentuate survival beyond that of temozolomide alone in corresponding orthotopic xenografts [median survival 37 vs. 30 days with temozolomide (P = 0.93), 14 days with placebo, P < 0.001]. Average brain and plasma talazoparib concentrations at 2 hours after a single dose (0.15 mg/kg) were 0.49 ± 0.07 ng/g and 25.5±4.1 ng/mL, respectively. The brain/plasma distribution of talazoparib in Bcrp−/− versus wild-type (WT) mice did not differ, whereas the brain/plasma ratio in Mdr1a/b−/− mice was higher than WT mice (0.23 vs. 0.02, P < 0.001). Consistent with the in vivo brain distribution, overexpression of MDR1 decreased talazoparib accumulation in MDCKII cells. These results indicate that talazoparib has significant MDR1 efflux liability that may restrict delivery across the blood–brain barrier, and this may explain the loss of talazoparib-mediated temozolomide sensitization in orthotopic versus heterotopic GBM xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2735–46. ©2017 AACR.