Sarkaria, Jann N.

Abstract Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) mutations are common in astrocytic glioma and are frequently coupled with TP53 and ATRX mutations. Collectively, these alterations cause genomic instability leading to high basal DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Understanding how IDH/TP53/ATRX mutant cells process endogenous DSBs may help exploit inhibitors of DNA damage response (DDR) for the treatment of patients with IDH mutant gliomas. Through systematic effort to uncover the mechanisms involved in repair of endogenous DSBs in IDH1/2 mutant GBMs, we have discovered that high basal phosphorylated DNA-PK (p-DNA-PK) was characteristic of an IDH1/TP53/ATRX mutant GBM164 patient derived xenograft (PDX) but not in another IDH1 mutant GBM196 PDX. Immunofluorescence (IF) studies in patient specimen from which GBM164 was derived showed that p-DNA-PK co-localized with g-H2AX, 53BP1 or H4K20me2 (but not p-RPA) the known surrogates of DSBs. In contrast, p-DNA-PK was absent in the patient specimen from which GBM196 was derived, which otherwise had equally intense g-H2AX immunostaining colocalized with p-RPA. An independent IF study involving 11 IDH1 wild-type (WT) and 11 IDH1 mutant GBM patient samples, the p-DNA-PK was observed in 3 (27%) of 11 IDH1 mutant samples while IDH1 WT tumors were negative for p-DNA-PK. A telomere specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (Tel-FISH) confirmed elevated alternative lengthening of telomere (ALT) activity in GBM196 (but not in GBM164) indicative of HR proficiency. Consistently, HR related genes, including BRCA1 and MRE11A, were found upregulated in ALT-positive GBM196 as compared to those in GBM164. Interestingly, ALT+ GBM196 cells were highly vulnerable to inhibitors of ATM and ATR pathways. In conclusion, IDH1/TP53/ATRX mutant gliomas can be subdivided into HR-mediated ALT-positive group, which repairs the endogenous DSBs by HR (e.g. GBM196) and an ALT-negative/p-DNA-PK group, which repairs DSBs by c-NHEJ (e.g. GBM164) and this subdivision can be developed as a prescient biomarker of sensitivity to DDR inhibitors.

Abstract Choosing effective chemotherapies for intravenous delivery to brain tumors is challenging, especially given the protective nature of the blood brain barrier (BBB). Connecting drug distribution to non-invasive, pre-surgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could allow for predictive insight into drug distribution. In a previous study, we found that T2Gd images were predictive of a low BBB penetrant drug (Cefazolin), and FLAIR images were predictive of a high BBB penetrant drug (Levetiracetam). While these results are promising, we further seek to explore how advanced MRI sequences might inform image-based models of drug distribution. Prior to surgery, we acquired advanced dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) MRI sequences for eight brain tumor patients (7 gliomas and 1 metastatic adenocarcinoma) in addition to the anatomic MRIs. All resulting quantitative maps and acquired images were co-registered. Prior to incision, patients received injections of cefazolin and levetiracetam. Next, multiple blood samples and biopsies were collected during surgery. Biopsies and plasma samples were analyzed for drug concentration using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS), and biopsy drug levels were reported as Brain-Plasma Ratio (BPR). Mean image intensity was extracted from a 15x15 voxel window surrounding the biopsy location. We performed linear regression analyses to determine which combination of images were predictive of BPR. We found that considering quantitative imaging improved our initial ability to predict BPR for both drugs. For cefazolin, the third diffusion tensor eigenvalue (L3) map was significantly correlated with BPR (p< 0.001, R2= 0.36). For levetiracetam, the best model consisted of a combination of images and maps with the L3 map and the isotropic diffusion map (P) being the most influential (p= 0.001, R2= 0.63). Advanced MRI-based modeling is a promising tool for forecasting drug distribution in brain tumors and could be of great importance for understanding efficacy and selecting therapeutic strategies.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most common adult brain cancer, with a dismal average patient survival of less than two years. No new treatments have been approved for GBM since the introduction of the alkylating agent temozolomide in 2005. Even then, temozolomide treatment only increases the average survival of GBM patients by a few months. Thus, novel therapeutic options are direly needed. The aurora kinases A and B are targetable and overexpressed in GBM, and their expression is highly correlated with patient survival outcomes. Our lab has found that small molecule aurora kinase inhibition reduces GBM tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, however, eventually tumors still grow. Computational analysis integrating compound transcriptional response signatures from the LINCS L1000 dataset with the single-cell RNA-sequencing data of patient GBM tumors resected at the University of Miami predicts that aurora inhibition targets a subset of cells present within any GBM tumor. Results of in vivo single-cell perturbation experiments with the aurora kinase inhibitor alisertib coincide with our predictions and reveal a cellular transcriptional phenotype resistant to aurora kinase inhibition, characterized by a mesenchymal expression program. We find that small molecules that are predicted to target different cell populations from alisertib, including this resistant mesenchymal population, synergize with alisertib to kill GBM cells. As a whole, we have identified the cellular population resistant to aurora kinase inhibition and have developed an analytical framework that identifies synergistic small molecule combinations by identifying compounds that target transcriptionally distinct cellular populations within GBM tumors.

Abstract Purpose: The epigenetic mechanisms involved in transcriptional regulation leading to malignant phenotype in gliomas remains poorly understood. Topoisomerase IIB (TOP2B), an enzyme that decoils and releases torsional forces in DNA, is overexpressed in a subset of gliomas. Therefore, we investigated its role in epigenetic regulation in these tumors. Experimental Design: To investigate the role of TOP2B in epigenetic regulation in gliomas, we performed paired chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing for TOP2B and RNA-sequencing analysis of glioma cell lines with and without TOP2B inhibition and in human glioma specimens. These experiments were complemented with assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing, gene silencing, and mouse xenograft experiments to investigate the function of TOP2B and its role in glioma phenotypes. Results: We discovered that TOP2B modulates transcription of multiple oncogenes in human gliomas. TOP2B regulated transcription only at sites where it was enzymatically active, but not at all native binding sites. In particular, TOP2B activity localized in enhancers, promoters, and introns of PDGFRA and MYC, facilitating their expression. TOP2B levels and genomic localization was associated with PDGFRA and MYC expression across glioma specimens, which was not seen in nontumoral human brain tissue. In vivo, TOP2B knockdown of human glioma intracranial implants prolonged survival and downregulated PDGFRA. Conclusions: Our results indicate that TOP2B activity exerts a pleiotropic role in transcriptional regulation of oncogenes in a subset of gliomas promoting a proliferative phenotype.

Abstract Background Response to targeted therapy varies between patients for largely unknown reasons. Here, we developed and applied an integrative platform using mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), phosphoproteomics, and multiplexed tissue imaging for mapping drug distribution, target engagement, and adaptive response to gain insights into heterogeneous response to therapy. Methods Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines of glioblastoma were treated with adavosertib, a Wee1 inhibitor, and tissue drug distribution was measured with MALDI-MSI. Phosphoproteomics was measured in the same tumors to identify biomarkers of drug target engagement and cellular adaptive response. Multiplexed tissue imaging was performed on sister sections to evaluate spatial co-localization of drug and cellular response. The integrated platform was then applied on clinical specimens from glioblastoma patients enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial. Results PDX tumors exposed to different doses of adavosertib revealed intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity of drug distribution and integration of the heterogeneous drug distribution with phosphoproteomics and multiplexed tissue imaging revealed new markers of molecular response to adavosertib. Analysis of paired clinical specimens from patients enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial informed the translational potential of the identified biomarkers in studying patient’s response to adavosertib. Conclusions The multimodal platform identified a signature of drug efficacy and patient-specific adaptive responses applicable to preclinical and clinical drug development. The information generated by the approach may inform mechanisms of success and failure in future early phase clinical trials, providing information for optimizing clinical trial design and guiding future application into clinical practice.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is an incurable disease with few approved therapeutic interventions. Radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) remain the standards of care. The efficacy and optimal deployment schedule of the orally bioavailable small-molecule tumor checkpoint controller lisavanbulin alone, and in combination with, standards of care were assessed using a panel of IDH-wildtype GBM patient-derived xenografts. Methods Mice bearing intracranial tumors received lisavanbulin +/−RT +/−TMZ and followed for survival. Lisavanbulin concentrations in plasma and brain were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, while flow cytometry was used for cell cycle analysis. Results Lisavanbulin monotherapy showed significant benefit (P < .01) in 9 of 14 PDXs tested (median survival extension 9%-84%) and brain-to-plasma ratios of 1.3 and 1.6 at 2- and 6-hours postdose, respectively, validating previous data suggesting significant exposure in the brain. Prolonged lisavanbulin dosing from RT start until moribund was required for maximal benefit (GBM6: median survival lisavanbulin/RT 90 vs. RT alone 69 days, P = .0001; GBM150: lisavanbulin/RT 143 days vs. RT alone 73 days, P = .06). Similar observations were seen with RT/TMZ combinations (GBM39: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 502 days vs. RT/TMZ 249 days, P = .0001; GBM26: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 172 days vs. RT/TMZ 121 days, P = .04). Immunohistochemical analyses showed a significant increase in phospho-histone H3 with lisavanbulin treatment (P = .01). Conclusions Lisavanbulin demonstrated excellent brain penetration, significant extension of survival alone or in RT or RT/TMZ combinations, and was associated with mitotic arrest. These data provide a strong clinical rationale for testing lisavanbulin in combination with RT or RT/TMZ in GBM patients.

Abstract Background Appropriately designed preclinical patient-derived xenograft (PDX) experiments are important to accurately inform human clinical trials. There is little experimental design guidance regarding choosing the number of PDX lines to study, and the number of mice within each PDX line. Methods Retrospective data from IDH-wildtype glioblastoma preclinical experiments evaluating a uniform regimen of fractionated radiation (RT), temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, and concurrent RT/TMZ across 27 PDX lines were used to evaluate experimental designs and empirically estimate statistical power for ANOVA and Cox regression. Results Increasing the number of PDX lines resulted in more precise and reproducible estimates of effect size. To achieve 80% statistical power using ANOVA, experiments using a single PDX line required subsampling of 6 mice per PDX for each treatment group to detect a difference in survival of 135 days, and 9 mice per PDX to detect a difference of 100 days. Alternatively, a design that used 10 PDX lines had greater than 80% power to detect a difference of 135 days with a single mouse per PDX per treatment group, a difference of 100 days with 2 mice per PDX per treatment, and 35 days with more than 10 mice per PDX per treatment. Power for Cox regression was slightly smaller than ANOVA for very small experiments regardless of effect size and slightly higher than ANOVA for detecting a smaller effect size of 35 days difference in survival for moderate-to-large experiments. Conclusions Experimental designs using few mice across many PDX lines can provide robust results and account for inter-tumor variability.

Abstract Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important. Methods PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics. Results Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment. Conclusions Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.