Smyrk, Thomas C.

AimsTo characterise the clinicopathological features of amyloidosis due to EGF‐containing fibulin‐like extracellular matrix protein 1 (EFEMP1), a newly described amyloid type.Methods and resultsWe identified cases by searching the Mayo Clinic amyloid liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry typing database for specimens with the universal amyloid signature proteins, abundant EFEMP1 spectra and absence of other specific amyloid precursor proteins. We also developed an immunohistochemical stain for EFEMP1 applicable to formalin‐fixed tissue sections and performed electron microscopy in one case. We identified 33 specimens from 32 patients with EFEMP1 amyloid. Most patients were female (91%) with a mean age of 75 years, and most specimens (94%) were from the bowel. EFEMP1 amyloid was incidentally identified in specimens biopsied/resected for a variety of clinical indications. In bowel specimens, EFEMP1 amyloid involved blood vessels and interstitium of the lamina propria, submucosa and/or muscularis propria. Although the EFEMP1 deposits were weakly to moderately Congo red‐positive with absent to weak birefringence, they were strongly positive for EFEMP1 by immunohistochemistry, had the characteristic fibrillar ultrastructure of amyloid and were readily identified by mass spectrometry.ConclusionsEFEMP1 amyloid is a recently described novel amyloid type that predominantly affects the bowel of elderly females. Because EFEMP1 amyloid is only weakly Congo red‐positive, it may be overlooked without a high index of suspicion. However, its characteristic microanatomical distribution is highlighted by immunohistochemistry and its identity is readily confirmed by mass spectrometry. Based on its distinctive features, we propose that EFEMP1 amyloidosis be considered a new amyloid type.

Abstract Background: Discovery of methylated DNA markers (MDM) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has sparked interest in assessing these markers in tissue. We evaluated MDMs in ESCC from three geographically and ethnically distinct populations, and explored the feasibility of assaying MDMs from DNA obtained by swallowed balloon devices. Methods: MDMs were assayed in ESCC and normal tissues obtained from the populations of United States, Iran, and China, and from exfoliative cytology specimens obtained by balloons in a Chinese population. Areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of MDMs discriminating ESCC from normal tissues were calculated. Random forest prediction models were built, trained on U.S. cases and controls, and calibrated to U.S.-only controls (model 1) and three-country controls (model 2). Statistical tests were used to assess the relationship between dysplasia and MDM levels in balloons. Results: Extracted DNA from 333 ESCC and 322 normal tissues was analyzed, in addition to archival DNA from 98 balloons. For ESCC, model 1 validated in Iranian and Chinese tissues with AUCs of 0.90 and 0.87, and model 2 yielded AUCs of 0.99, 0.96, and 0.94 in tissues from the United States, Iran, and China, respectively. In Chinese balloons, MDMs showed a statistically significant trend of increasing levels with increasing grades of dysplasia (P < 0.004). Conclusions: MDMs accurately discriminate ESCC from normal esophagus in tissues obtained from high- and low-incidence countries. Preliminary data suggest that levels of MDMs assayed in DNA from swallowed balloon devices increase with dysplasia grade. Larger studies are needed to validate these results. Impact: MDMs coupled with minimally invasive collection methods have the potential for worldwide application in ESCC screening.

INTRODUCTION: Nonendoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening may help improve esophageal adenocarcinoma outcomes. We previously demonstrated promising accuracy of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for the nonendoscopic diagnosis of BE using samples obtained from a capsule sponge-on-string (SOS) device. We aimed to assess the accuracy of these MDMs in an independent cohort using a commercial grade assay. METHODS: BE cases had ≥ 1 cm of circumferential BE with intestinal metaplasia; controls had no endoscopic evidence of BE. The SOS device was withdrawn 8 minutes after swallowing, followed by endoscopy (the criterion standard). Highest performing MDMs from a previous study were blindly assessed on extracted bisulfite-converted DNA by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQAS) assays. Optimal MDM combinations were selected and analyzed using random forest modeling with in silico cross-validation. RESULTS: Of 295 patients consented, 268 (91%) swallowed the SOS device; 112 cases and 89 controls met the pre-established inclusion criteria. The median BE length was 6 cm (interquartile range 4–9), and 50% had no dysplasia. The cross-validated sensitivity and specificity of a 5 MDM random forest model were 92% (95% confidence interval 85%–96%) and 94% (95% confidence interval 87%–98%), respectively. Model performance was not affected by age, gender, or smoking history but was influenced by the BE segment length. SOS administration was well tolerated (median [interquartile range] tolerability 2 [0, 4] on 10 scale grading), and 95% preferred SOS over endoscopy. DISCUSSION: Using a minimally invasive molecular approach, MDMs assayed from SOS samples show promise as a safe and accurate nonendoscopic test for BE prediction.

4065 Background: Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor budding (linked to epithelial mesenchymal transition) may influence metastatic potential and patient prognosis. We analyzed these features and their relative contribution to survival among low (T1-3 N1) and high (T4 and/or N2) risk groups, defined by the IDEA study, used to inform the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer. Methods: Among 1,532 patients (low risk n=804; high risk n=728) treated in a phase III adjuvant trial of FOLFOX + cetuximab (x 6 months), intraepithelial TIL densities and tumor budding were quantified at microscopy in routine histologic sections. Optimal cutpoints were determined in association with 5-yr disease-free survival (DFS). Relative contribution of variables to DFS was calculated using χ2 from Harrell’s rms R package based on multivariable Cox regression models. Results: In the overall cohort, the tumor budding/TILs combined variable was more robust for predition of DFS than either alone. Budding/TILs was significantly associated with DFS in both low (HRadj, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.48; p=.0273) and high (HRadj, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.72-4.63; p<.0001) risk patients. We then determined its relative contribution (%) to DFS (Table). Among low risk, budding/TILs ranked second (24.4%) behind KRAS status (45.5%) and ahead of treatment arm (7.2%) and mismatch repair (MMR) status (6.1%). Among high risk, budding/TILs contributed the most to DFS (45.4%) followed by primary tumor sidedness (13.0%), performance status (12.0%), and MMR (10.4%). Conclusions: Tumor budding/TILs provides robust prognostic stratification by risk group to improve anatomic tumor staging. The relative contribution of budding/TILs to DFS was second only to KRAS status in low risk patients, and was the most important predictor of DFS in high risk patients. Evaluation in patients treated with 3 vs 6 mos of adjuvant chemotherapy is warranted. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and other prognostic tools fail to account for stage-independent variability in outcome. We developed a prognostic classifier adding Immunoscore to clinicopathological and molecular features in patients with stage III colon cancer. Methods Patient (n = 559) data from the FOLFOX arm of adjuvant trial NCCTG N0147 were used to construct Cox models for predicting disease-free survival (DFS). Variables included age, sex, T stage, positive lymph nodes (+LNs), N stage, performance status, histologic grade, sidedness, KRAS/BRAF, mismatch repair, and Immunoscore (CD3+, CD8+ T-cell densities). After determining optimal functional form (continuous or categorical) and within Cox models, backward selection was performed to analyze all variables as candidate predictors. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Poorer DFS was found for tumors that were T4 vs T3 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 2.60; P = .004), right- vs left-sided (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.04; P = .005), BRAF V600E (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.26 to 2.40; P &lt; .001), mutant KRAS (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.55; P = .02), and low vs high Immunoscore (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.22 to 2.33; P = .001) (all P &lt; .02). Increasing numbers of +LNs and lower continuous Immunoscore were associated with poorer DFS that achieved significance (both Ps&lt; .0001). After number of +LNs, T stage, and BRAF/KRAS, Immunoscore was the most informative predictor of DFS shown multivariately. Among T1–3 N1 tumors, Immunoscore was the only variable associated with DFS that achieved statistical significance. A nomogram was generated to determine the likelihood of being recurrence-free at 3 years. Conclusions The Immunoscore can enhance the accuracy of survival prediction among patients with stage III colon cancer.

3514 Background: Activating mutations in the BRAF oncogene (mutBRAF) are associated with deficient MMR (dMMR) in sporadic colon cancers and are mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations (mutKRAS). We evaluated BRAF and KRAS in relation to MMR and disease-free survival (DFS) in stage III pts treated with adjuvant FOLFOX +/-cetuximab; study was amended mid-way to require prospective KRAS testing (Alberts SR, ASCO 2010). Methods: Extracted DNA from archival tumors was analyzed for BRAF exon 15 (V600E) and KRAS exon 2 mutations by allele specific RT-PCR. Tumors with loss of any MMR protein (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6) were categorized as dMMR vs proficient (pMMR). DFS was censored at 4 yrs; median follow-up was 3.1 yrs. Results: Among 2,686 pts, 12% (314/2580) of tumors were dMMR; 28% (716/2579) had mutKRAS, and 14% (346/2515) had mutBRAF of which 43% (150/346) were dMMR. mutBRAF was associated with high grade, proximal site, T3-4, >4 LNs, and dMMR (all p<0.002); mutKRAS with low grade, proximal, <3 LNs, and pMMR (all p<0.02). Among dMMR tumors, mutKRAS was more frequent in distal vs proximal cancers (28% vs. 8%, p=0.0004). Both mutKRAS (HR=1.42, p=0.0001) and mutBRAF (HR=1.34, p=0.02) were associated with worse DFS and remained significant after adjustment for treatment, MMR, grade, site, T stage and LNs. mutBRAF (p=0.003) and mutKRAS (p=0.003) were each prognostic for DFS in pMMR, but not dMMR tumors (KRAS, p=0.79; BRAF, p=0.60). While MMR was not significant univariately, proximal dMMR tumors had favorable DFS [HR 0.8, 95% CI (0.6-1)] and distal dMMR tumors had poor DFS [HR 2 (1.1-3.4)] after adjusting for KRAS, BRAF, grade, T stage and LNs (pinteraction=0.02). pMMR/mutBRAF (p=0.027) and pMMR/mutKRAS (p<0.001) had worse DFS vs pMMR/bothWT. Conclusions: mutBRAF and mutKRAS were significantly associated with worse DFS independent of treatment, covariates, and each other, with the DFS impact restricted to pMMR tumors. Prognostic impact of MMR was dependent upon tumor site after adjusting for covariates. Support: NIH Grant CA 25224, NCI K05CA 142885, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImClone, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer.

3576 Background: BRAF encodes a serine-threonine kinase that is a downstream effector of activated RAS. A point mutation (V600E) in BRAF occurs in a subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and is associated with adverse outcome and may predict non response to anti-EGFR antibodies. Detection of a BRAFV600E mutation in a CRC with microsatellite instability indicates a sporadic origin and excludes Lynch Syndrome. While BRAFV600E mutation status is determined using a DNA-based assay, antibodies against the BRAFV600E protein have recently been developed. We examined mutant BRAFV600E protein expression and its concordance with mutation status. Methods: Primary stage III colon carcinomas (50 BRAFV600E mutation carriers and 25 wild-type cases) were studied from a completed phase III adjuvant trial comparing FOLFOX +/- cetuximab (NCCTG N0147). In archival resection specimens, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using a pan-BRAF antibody and a V600E mutation-specific antibody raised against an immunogenic synthetic peptide derived from the internal region of the BRAFV600E protein. BRAFV600E mutations in codon 15 were analyzed in extracted DNA using a multiplex, allele specific PCR–based assay. BRAF staining was scored independently by two pathologists blinded to mutation status. Results: In primary colon carcinomas stained with a pan-BRAF antibody, diffuse cytoplasmic staining for BRAF proteins was detected in 74 of 75 carcinomas with one case deemed non-evaluable. Using the mutation-specific BRAFV600E antibody, diffuse cytoplasmic staining was detected in 49 of 74 tumors without appreciable heterogeneity of expression. Among these 49 tumors expressing mutant BRAFV600E proteins, all (100%) were found to carry a BRAFV600E mutation according to a DNA-based assay. In contrast, absent BRAFV600E staining was observed in all 25 tumors that were found to have wild-type copies of BRAFV600E detected using a PCR-based assay. Conclusions: For the detection of mutant BRAFV600E, complete concordance was found between IHC and a DNA-based method in colon carcinomas. This finding supports the use of IHC as a simplified strategy to screen CRCs for mutant BRAFV600E proteins in routine clinical practice to inform clinical decision-making.

3523 Background: The association of KRAS or BRAFV600E mutations with prognosis in colon cancers has been inconsistent. Since primary tumor site may influence outcome, we analyzed KRAS and BRAFV600E stratified by tumor site in resected stage III colon cancers from a randomized adjuvant trial of mFOLFOX6 + cetuximab chemotherapy (N= 2,686) where no survival difference by treatment was found. Methods: 2,580 tumors were analyzed for mutations in BRAFV600E (exon 15) or KRAS (codons 12, 13), and for deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR). Cox models were used, adjusting for mutation status, age, sex, treatment, T-stage, histologic grade, nodal status, tumor site, and MMR. After study initiation, eligibility was restricted to patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (WT) tumors. At a median follow-up 4.1 yrs, 83% of pts are alive. Results: KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations were detected in 716 (28%) and 346 (14%) tumors, respectively; dMMR was found in 314 (12%). Proximal (to splenic flexure) tumors (50%) were associated with older age and were more likely to be high grade (33 vs 18%), T-stage3,4 (88 vs 82%), mutated for KRAS (33 vs 23%) or BRAFV600E (23 vs 4%), and dMMR (21 vs 3%)[all p <0.02]. Pts with distal vs proximal tumors showed improved disease-free survival (DFS)[ HR 0.7, 95% CI (0.6-0.9); p<0.01 unadjusted for KRAS or BRAF;]. Mutant KRAS [HR=1.5 (1.2-1.7); p<.0001] or mutant BRAF [HR=1.4 (1.1-1.7); p=0.02] were each independently associated with worse DFS. The KRAS and tumor site interaction was significant (unadjusted pinteraction=0.02; adjusted pinteraction=0.07), with poorer DFS among distal tumors having mutant KRAS [HR 1.7 (1.3-2.2); p<.0001]. No interaction was observed for BRAFV600E and tumor site, despite worse DFS for mutant BRAFV600E among proximal tumors [HR 1.3 (1-1.8); p=0.04]. Conclusions: The adverse prognostic impact of KRAS, but not BRAFV600E, mutations was confined to the distal colon. This finding underscores the importance of tumor site in the interpretation of the prognostic impact of KRAS status, and motivates similar analyses in pts with advanced disease.

21046 Background: The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase that is important for colon cancer cell growth and represents a therapeutic target. We studied EGFR expression in relation to rates of apoptosis and cell proliferation. Methods: TNM stage II and III colon carcinomas (n= 361) from patients treated in a 5-FU-based adjuvant trial were studied. EGFR expression (EGFR pharmDx™) and extent were analyzed and their relationship to rates of cell turnover, histologic grade, mismatch repair (MMR) status (defective if instability at BAT 26 locus plus loss of hMLH1, hMSH2 or hMSH6 proteins) and clinical outcome were determined. Results: EGFR plasma membrane staining was detected in 214 (59.3 %) colon carcinomas. Increased EGFR intensity (2+, 3+) was associated with a higher number of caspase-3- (p= 0.02) and Ki-67- (p< 0.001)positive tumor cells. Increased EGFR intensity (p= 0.02) and extent (p= 0.03) were associated with poor differentiation, and did not depend upon MMR status (Breslow-Day test p ≥ 0.46). Diffuse (vs. focal) EGFR extent was increased in tumors with defective MMR [22 of 32 (69%)] compared to those with intact MMR [136 of 271 (50%)] (p= 0.047). EGFR intensity was unrelated to MMR status. Neither EGFR intensity nor extent was significantly associated with patient survival. Conclusions: Stage II and III colon cancers with EGFR overexpression show adverse prognostic variables, i.e., increased rates of cell turnover and poor histologic grade, suggesting that EGFR may be an important target for adjuvant therapy. *Chi-square test for categorical data, Wilcoxin rank-sum test for continuous data [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.