Hampel, Paul J.

Abstract Introduction: CAR-T therapy has transformed cancer therapy. with its first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved product in August 2017. Given the expanding indications and growing experience, particularly with management of immediate toxicities requiring specialized expertise such as Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), FDA recently removed the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for CD19 and BCMA targeting CAR-T on June 26th2025. In particular, given that CRS and ICANS typically occur in the first 2 weeks post CAR-T infusion, the minimum required stay near CAR-T treatment center is reduced from one month to 2 weeks. While this could reduce treatment burden for patients (pts) who need to travel away from home to receive CAR-T, there is a need to update the transition of care from CAR-T center to pts' local oncology practice. Pts carry in their rate of recovery and have varying supportive care needs in the second half of the month post CAR-T infusion. To assist with care transition and planning, we examine the use of AI multimodal large language model (LLM) to predict patients' supportive care needs 2 weeks after CAR-T infusion based on the clinical data at the time of CAR-T evaluation, prior to leukapheresis. This timepoint was selected to also maximize travel, lodging and caregiver planning for pts and family as well. Methodology: Pts who were treated with FDA-approved CAR-T at Mayo Clinic Rochester between December 2022 and June 2025 were examined. Based on experiences with referral practices in the Midwest region, we defined patients with high monitoring needs as those who between day 14-30 post CAR-T had either hospital admission due to recurrent CRS or ICANS or required transfusion of more than 1 blood product per week (red blood cell or platelets). Others were classified as low monitoring needs. Clinical notes, labs, vital signs and electrocardiogram at the time of CAR-T evaluation were abstracted and summarized by Gemini LLM for association with patients with high versus low monitoring needs post CAR-T. Model was developed and tested for predicted needs and concordance with actual outcome of these pts. Results: Among the 362 pts who received FDA approved CAR-T in the timeframe, 84 pts had high monitoring needs. An additional 84 pts with low monitoring needs were randomly selected from 278 pts. These were divided into a training cohort and test cohort of 84 pts each, with 42 pts with high and 42 pts with low monitoring needs. Demographics of the two cohorts displayed no statistical difference. LLM analysis of the clinical data at the time of CAR-T eval identified 5 categories associated with risk for high monitoring needs: 1) Disease status (clinical notes about bulky, progressive disease or CNS involvement); 2) inflammatory and tumor burden markers (CRP, LDH); 3) hematologic status (platelet, plt; neutrophil count ANC); 4) renal function; 5) performance status. Using common clinical lab parameter convention (platelets <100, ANC< 1, CrCl< 30ml/min), and prioritizing for not missing pts with high monitoring needs, LLM model was defined to predict patients for high monitoring needs if high risk feature was identified in category 1 or any category combinations; whereas patients with no high risk feature or only 1 category that is not disease status was predicted as low monitoring needs. In this model, the sensitivity was 85.7%, specificity 23.8%, F1 score 65.5%. Applying this model to test cohort 2, the sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity 28.6%, and F1 score 65.4%. Discussion: We demonstrate proof-of-concept that LLM can be used to analyze clinical data at the time of evaluation for CAR-T eligibility to predict for supportive care needs post treatment. Not surprisingly, features identified by LLM to be associated with high monitoring needs are those previously reported by us and others at the time of CAR-T evaluation and or pre-lymphodepletion to be associated with risk for cytopenia, infection, hospitalization and non-relapse mortality. Based on the summary output generated by LLM, additional opportunities for classification methods were identified to improve specificity and balanced accuracy of the LLM model. This is a promising tool for further development to assist clinicians and patients to plan their treatment journey.

Abstract Background: Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL), a precursor to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), is an understudied yet common premalignant condition present in ~8 million adults in the United States. Based on flow cytometry, MBL can be classified into two immunophenotypes: CLL-type (CD5, CD23, and CD20 co-expression) and non-CLL-type (CD5-negative). While the majority of the data to date pertains to CLL-type MBL, the available evidence indicates non-CLL-type MBL is also associated with an increased risk of hematologic malignancies. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is another precursor condition associated with hematologic malignancies. The relationship between non-CLL-type MBL and CHIP and their combined effect remains unknown. Herein, we report findings on these two precursor conditions in the largest screening cohort to date. Methods: Using flow cytometry, we screened for MBL in the Mayo Clinic Biobank participants who were 40 years or older with no prior history of hematologic cancers. Using whole-exome sequencing of whole-blood DNA, CHIP was screened on 291 genes related to myeloid (56 genes) or lymphoid malignancies (235 genes). Incident hematologic malignancies were detected during follow-up using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in the medical record. All diagnoses were manually reviewed for confirmation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between non-CLL-type MBL and CHIP. Time to incident hematologic malignancy was calculated from date of MBL screening to the earliest date of incident malignancy, withdrawal, death, last medical visit, or study end. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of MBL screening to date of death or last known alive. Multivariable Cox regression, adjusted for age, sex and residency, was used to investigate associations between non-CLL-type MBL and CHIP with clinical outcomes; with results reported using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: In total, 8,802 individuals with MBL screening and CHIP data were analyzed. Non-CLL-type MBL was detected in 249 (2.8%) individuals; 121 (49%) were male, and median age was 78 years (range, 47-95). We identified 757 (8.6%) individuals with CHIP in at least one of the 291 genes tested. The most frequently mutated CHIP genes were DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, PPM1D, and TP53. A total of 47 (0.5%) individuals had both non-CLL-type MBL and CHIP; the four genes with the highest number of CHIP variants in these individuals were DNMT3A (n=16), TET2 (n=10), ASXL1 (n=3), and ATM (n=3). An association between non-CLL-type MBL and any CHIP (OR=1.6, 95%CI:1.2-2.3, P=0.006) was observed. When analyzing CHIP in genes related to myeloid malignancies, the association with non-CLL-type MBL was also significant (OR=1.6, 95%CI:1.1-2.3, P=0.012); however, the association was not statistically significant for genes related to lymphoid malignancies (OR=1.6, 95%CI:0.8-3.3, P=0.165). With a median follow-up of 5.4 years, 104 individuals developed incident hematologic malignancies (66 lymphoid and 38 myeloid malignancies). Non-CLL-type MBL (HR=3.5, 95%CI:1.9-6.5, P<0.001) and CHIP (HR=3.2, 95%CI:2.1-5.1, P<0.001) were each associated with increased risk of incident hematologic malignancies. Co-existence of both precursor conditions was associated with a substantially higher risk of incident hematologic malignancies (HR=10.3, 95%CI:4.0-26.2, P<0.001) compared to individuals with neither precursor condition. Among individuals with non-CLL-like MBL, any CHIP was a borderline significant predictor for incident hematologic malignancy (HR=3.6, 95%CI:1.0-12.9, P=0.049). Compared to individuals with no precursor conditions, OS was not significantly different in those with non-CLL-type MBL-only (HR=1.1, 95%CI:0.8-1.5, P=0.40), those with CHIP-only (HR=1.2, 95%CI:0.99-1.4, P=0.06), or those with both CHIP and non-CLL-type MBL (HR=1.3, 95%CI:0.8-2.1, P=0.39). Conclusions: In the largest screening cohort to date evaluating the relationship of CHIP and non-CLL-type MBL, we found that non-CLL-type MBL and CHIP are associated with each other. Individuals with non-CLL-type MBL were more likely to have CHIP variants in DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, and ATM. Among individuals with non-CLL-type MBL, the presence of any CHIP was associated with increased risk of developing hematologic malignancy.

Abstract Background The treatment (tx) landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved, with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-preferred novel therapies (NTs), such as acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and venetoclax-based regimens, now preferred over ibrutinib and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in front-line (1L) settings. We previously showed that patients (pts) from different racial/ethnic groups may not have equitable access to NTs. Here, we examined racial/ethnic inequities in 1L NT utilization among US pts with CLL and potential social determinants of health (SDOH) drivers of these inequities. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized the US-based, electronic health record-derived de-identified Flatiron Health Research Database, linked to neighborhood (US Census track or block group) data from American Community Survey and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality datasets. Eligible pts included adults with CLL who started 1L tx 01/01/2019-07/31/2024. The primary outcome was receipt of 1L therapy (CIT vs preferred NTs, ibrutinib vs preferred NTs), with NCCN guideline-preferred NTs (v2.2023-v3.2025) as a reference. Associations between race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and 1L tx types were assessed using logistic regressions, adjusting for age, sex, year of 1L start, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region status, and del17p/TP53 status. To better understand which SDOH factors contribute to racial and ethnic inequities in tx utilization, we performed mediation analysis using Multiple Mediation Analysis implemented through nonlinear multiple additive regression tree models. Individual-level (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, practice type, insurance) and 20 area-level SDOH factors measuring social deprivation (defined as limited access to economic, social, neighborhood, physical, or healthcare resources) were assessed as potential mediators. Results Of the 4452 pts included in the study, 3717 were White (83%), 371 were Black (8%), 209 were Hispanic (5%), and 155 were Other race (4%). Black and Hispanic pts were more likely to live in neighborhoods with higher social deprivation, such as residential segregation (predominant race/ethnicity in the area: White, Black, Hispanic, Diverse), with no internet access, no vehicle ownership, and no health insurance coverage. Overall, 37% of pts received a preferred NT, highest among White (38%) pts, followed by Black (35%) and Hispanic (26%) pts. Compared with White pts, Hispanic pts were more likely to receive CIT than preferred NTs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46-3.09); Black (aOR 1.44; 95% CI 1.05-1.97) and Hispanic pts (aOR 1.83; 95% CI 1.17-2.85) were more likely to receive ibrutinib than preferred NTs. Pts living in areas with the highest social deprivation were less likely than their counterparts in lowest social deprivation neighborhoods to receive preferred NTs. Specifically, residence in predominantly Black or Hispanic neighborhoods (26% or 27% vs 39% predominantly White), areas with lowest socioeconomic status (32% vs 40%), and neighborhoods with the lowest levels of internet access (32% vs 39%), vehicle ownership (32% vs 39%), and health insurance coverage (34% vs 41%) was associated with lowest receipt of preferred NTs. In the mediation analysis, individual- and area-level SDOH factors explained 94.4% (95% CI 2.9-185.9) of the observed Black-White inequity in receipt of ibrutinib versus preferred NTs; residential segregation appeared to be the most important mediator (59.7%; 95% CI −3.5 to 123.0). Similarly, the Hispanic-White inequity in receipt of preferred NTs was driven by the combined effect of area-level SDOH and individual-level variables (88.5%; 95% CI 45.6-131.3), with residential segregation as the main driver (48.3%; 95% CI 10.7-85.9), followed by practice setting (9.8%; 95% CI −3.5 to 23.1). In contrast, measured SDOH factors did not explain the inequity in receipt of CIT versus preferred NTs between Hispanic and White pts (21.5%; 95% CI −8.3 to 51.4), suggesting that other factors may contribute to the observed inequities. Conclusion Black and Hispanic pts with CLL were less likely than White pts to receive preferred NTs. A significant proportion of these disparities was explained by area-level SDOH, particularly residential segregation. These findings underscore the need to address structural barriers to ensure equitable access to emerging, guideline-recommended treatments.

Abstract Background Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is the most common leukemia in US adults and incidence increases with age. Although the treatment (tx) landscape has evolved, it is unclear whether tx selection differs for older patients (pts), given concerns around comorbidities, toxicity, and efficacy. There is a need to better understand pt characteristics, tx patterns, and biomarker use among pts aged ≥65 yrs with CLL/SLL in the current therapeutic era. Methods A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted using the de-identified 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) Research Identifiable Files. Included pts were diagnosed with CLL/SLL at age ≥65 and initiated first-line (1L) tx 1/1/2020-9/30/2024 (with ≥12 mo in database prior to 1L tx start). Index date was defined as date of 1L tx start, and pts were followed to death, end of Medicare enrollment, or study end, whichever occurred first. 1L tx was defined as any CLL pharmacologic tx within the first 90 days of index date. Tx utilization was summarized as the number and proportion of pts who received each tx at each line. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and social characteristics and baseline comorbidities, in all pts and by 1L tx. Proportion and timing of documented biomarker orders any time prior to index were summarized by test type (CLL fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH], TP53 DNA sequencing and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region [IGHV] test) and by 1L tx. Results Of the 21,008 pts included, median age was 76.4 yrs at 1L tx, with 43% of pts aged 65-74 yrs, 43% aged 75-84 and 14% aged ≥85. The majority of pts were male (58%) and White (91%). About 8% and 9% of pts had dual eligibility status and low-income subsidy, respectively. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4 (range: 1-21), with 40% of pts having CCI ≥5. Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) monotherapies (mono) were most common at 1L tx (41%), including 10% zanubrutinib (zanu), 15% ibrutinib (ibr), and 16% acalabrutinib (acala). B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2)+anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was less common (11%), and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was used by 13% of pts, mostly BR (8%) and FCR (3%). Other less common tx included cBTKi+anti-CD20mAb (6%) or cBTKi+BCL2 therapies (1%). Among remaining pts, most received anti-CD20mAb (22%). The use of cBTKi mono increased from 41.7% in 2020 (ibr 30.6%; acala 11.1%) to 47.6% in 2024, driven by increased use of zanu (27.8%; acala 15.7%; ibr 4.2%). BCL2+anti-CD20mAb increased from 9.2% in 2020 to 12.6% in 2024. Pts treated with cBTKi mono were older than those with BCL2+anti-CD20mAb (median age 77.2 vs 74.5), and more likely to have dual eligibility status (10% vs 4%) or low-income subsidy (11% vs 5%). More pts who received zanu mono had CCI ≥5 (39%) versus acala (36%), ibr (35%), or BCL2+anti-CD20mAb (32%). Pts with BCL2+anti-CD20mAb were less likely to have diabetes (23% vs 26%), congestive heart failure (CHF; 16% vs 19%), chronic pulmonary disease (23% vs 27%), and renal diseases (23% vs 27%). Pts with ibr were less likely to have myocardial infarction (29% vs 34%), coronary artery disease (22% vs 25%), CHF (16% vs 19%), and atrial fibrillation (12% vs 18%). Overall, 69% of pts had FISH testing prior to 1L tx, but test orders for TP53 (12%) or IGHV (28%) status were infrequent. Pts with ibr had the lowest rates of TP53 tests (6%), whereas pts with CIT had the lowest rates of IGHV tests (16%). The timing of tests showed a binomial distribution where most pts received FISH, TP53, or IGHV tests either ≤60 days prior to 1L tx (46%, 50%, 33%), or >1 yr before 1L tx (30%, 22%, 43%). Among pts who received ≥2 lines of therapy for CLL (n=4428; 21%), cBTKi mono was the most common in 2L (41%), including 14% zanu, 17% acala, and 10% ibr. CIT and BCL2+anti-CD20mAb were used in 12% and 9% of pts, respectively. Only 634 (3%) pts had 3L+ tx, of whom 33% received cBTKi mono, including 16% zanu, 12% acala, and 5% ibr (5%). Conclusion This large real-world study found that cBTKi mono was the most common 1L tx choice among pts aged ≥65 with CLL/SLL, with increased use of next-generation cBTKi. Pts with more baseline comorbidities were less likely to receive ibr or BCL2-based tx. FISH testing was not performed in nearly one-third of pts, and most pts did not have TP53 or IGVH sequencing prior to tx. Future studies are needed to continue to evaluate evolving tx paradigms in older pts with CLL/SLL.

Abstract Background: The synergistic mechanisms of BCL-2 inhibitors and CD20-directed antibodies in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) often lead to deep and durable responses. Although the use of venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-O) in the frontline setting (1L) for CLL/SLL has led to a paradigm shift in the disease management, there are limited data on its efficacy in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ven-O in both 1L and R/R CLL among patients treated outside the context of clinical trials at our institution. Methods We used the Mayo Clinic CLL Database to identify patients with CLL who were treated with Ven-O, both in 1L and R/R settings. Patients seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2017 and 2025 were included. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of Ven-O initiation until last known alive date. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated from date of Ven-O initiation until the next line of treatment or last known alive date. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated EFS and OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to explore the association between baseline factors and EFS and OS; results are reported as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Finally, we compared the OS to the age- and sex-matched general population of the state of Minnesota. Results A total of 154 patients (91 1L, 63 R/R) were included in the study. The median age was 68 years (69 1L, 68 R/R), and 68% were male (64% 1L, 73% R/R). Overall, TP53 disruptions (either del17p by FISH or TP53 mutation) were noted in 22 (15%) patients (9% 1L, 23% R/R). CLL FISH findings demonstrated del11q in 24 (19%) patients (19% 1L, 18% R/R), del13q in 46 (36%) patients (36% 1L, 36% R/R), and trisomy 12 in 21 (16%) patients (16% 1L, 18% R/R). IGHV genes were unmutated in 95 (68%) patients (60% 1L, 80% R/R). The CLL-IPI risk score was high in 54 (51%) patients (51% 1L, 53% R/R) and very-high in 18 (17%) patients (8% 1L, 34% R/R). A total of 121 (89%) patients completed planned treatment (1 year of venetoclax in 73 [90%] 1L and 2 years of venetoclax in 48 [87%] R/R). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 1.8 years (2.2 1L, 1.5 R/R). Neither median EFS nor OS was reached for the overall cohort or within the 1L and R/R subgroups. The 1, 3, and 5-year EFS estimates for the overall cohort were 91% (86-96%), 85% (78-92%), and 67% (51-89%), respectively; corresponding EFS values for the 1L subgroup were 95% (91-100%), 89% (82-98%), and 67% (47-95%), respectively; and for the R/R subgroup were 85% (76-95%), 77% (65-92%), and 77% (65-92%), respectively. The 1, 3, and 5-year OS estimates were 98% (95-100%), 95% (91-99%), and 88% (76%-100%), respectively; corresponding OS values for the 1L subgroup were 99% (96-100%), 97% (94-100%), and 97% (94-100%) and for the R/R subgroup were 96% (91-100%), 91% (82-100%), and 61% (27-100%), respectively. Univariable analyses showed that TP53 disruption was associated with shorter EFS (HR 3.8, 95%CI 1.4-10.2, p=0.01), although IGHV mutation status was not associated with shorter EFS. A higher level of serum beta-2 microglobulin (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.01-1.59, p=0.04) and R/R status (HR 4.9, 95%CI 0.9-25.8, p=0.06) were associated with a shorter OS. Interestingly, TP53 mutation status and IGHV mutation status were not associated with inferior OS. There was no difference in the observed and expected OS for both the 1L (p-0.23) and R/R (p=0.14) Ven-O treated cohorts compared to the age- and sex-matched general population of the state of Minnesota. Conclusions Our study shows that Ven-O is a well-tolerated regimen with demonstration of durable treatment responses both in the 1L and R/R groups, when used outside the context of a clinical trial. To the best of our knowledge, these data for the first time demonstrate no difference in OS of patients treated with Ven-O compared to age- and sex-matched general population, in both the 1L and R/R settings.

Abstract Introduction: The first-generation BCL2 inhibitor,venetoclax, is an effective treatment for CLL/SLL, but its usage may be limited by toxicity. Sonrotoclax, a next-generation BCL2 inhibitor, is a more selective and pharmacologically potent inhibitor of BCL2 than venetoclax, with a shorter half-life and no drug accumulation. BGB-11417-101 (NCT04277637) is an ongoing, phase 1/1b, dose-escalation/expansion study in patients with B-cell malignancies. Presented here are preliminary data for sonrotoclax + obinutuzumab in patients with treatment-naive (TN) CLL/SLL in BGB-11417-101. Methods: Obinutuzumab is administered intravenously at 100 mg on day (D) 1, 900 mg on D2, 1,000 mg on D8 and D15 of cycle (C) 1, and then 1,000 mg on D1 of C2-6 of each 28-day cycle. Beginning on C2D1, sonrotoclax is administered orally once daily with ramp-up to the target doses, 160 or 320 mg. Patients can continue treatment until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD4; <1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes [<0.01%]) in peripheral blood (PB) by next-generation sequencing (NGS; ClonoSEQ) after 15 treatment cycles. Study endpoints include safety per NCI-CTCAE v5.0, overall response rate (ORR) per iwCLL guidelines, and MRD status in PB per modified ERIC flow cytometry (FC) assay or NGS, depending on the timepoint. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is assessed per Howard (2011) criteria. Results: As of May 16, 2025, 55 patients with TN CLL/SLL were enrolled (160 mg, n=20; 320 mg, n=35), and 21 patients (all 320 mg) have discontinued sonrotoclax + obinutuzumab (due to uMRD4 per NGS as protocol-mandated [n=17], PI decision uMRD4 per FC [n=2], and PD [n=2]). Four patients discontinued obinutuzumab only per PI decision (160 mg, n=1), thrombocytopenia (320 mg, n=2), and prostate cancer prior to starting sonrotoclax (160 mg, n=1). For all patients, the median age was 62 y, 65% were male, and 89% were White. At baseline, 14% of patients (8/55) had high tumor burden and 58% (31/53) had unmutated IGHV. Median study follow-up was 8.9 months (range, 0.4-25.4 months) for all patients; 6.4 months (range, 0.4-9.0 months) for 160 mg; and 16.0 months (range, 2.9-25.4 months) for 320 mg. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common any-grade treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were thrombocytopenia (56%), infusion-related reaction (56%), and neutropenia (49%). Neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 TEAE (38%). No deaths due to TEAEs occurred, and no TEAEs led to sonrotoclax discontinuation. Two cases of laboratory TLS occurred after C1D1 of obinutuzumab prior to starting sonrotoclax; no clinical or laboratory TLS occurred during sonrotoclax ramp up. No meaningful safety differences were observed among sonrotoclax dose cohorts. In 37 efficacy-evaluable patients (160 mg, n=7; 320 mg, n=30), the ORR was 89%; for the 320-mg cohort, ORR was 93% (28/30). Complete response (CR) rates (CR + CR with incomplete marrow recovery [CRi]) were 46% (all patients) and 43% (320 mg). For 23 patients in the 320 mg cohort who reached the C15 MRD assessment, the best C15 uMRD4 rate per FC was 87% (20/23; 2 not evaluable; 1 missing); per NGS, the uMRD4 rate at C15 was 78% (18/23; 5 missing). All patients with an available C15 MRD assessment achieved uMRD4 and remain in remission as of the data cutoff date. The median time from reaching sonrotoclax target dose to uMRD4 was 2.3 months (range, 1.4-5.6 months) in the 320-mg cohort. Three patients experienced PFS events: 1 died from an indeterminate cause (160 mg, discontinued treatment after C1D9 of obinutuzumab) and 2 had PD (320 mg; both Richter's transformation at C6 and C2). Conclusions: Sonrotoclax + obinutuzumab was generally well tolerated in patients with TN CLL/SLL, with no sonrotoclax discontinuations or deaths due to TEAEs. No laboratory or clinical TLS events occurred during sonrotoclax ramp-up. Encouraging antitumor activity was observed with sonrotoclax 320 mg. High rates of blood uMRD4 occurred early and deepened over time. All patients with an available C15 MRD assessment by NGS or FC achieved uMRD4 and remain in remission. A registrational phase 3 study (CELESTIAL-RRCLL, BGB-11417-303) assessing this combination with sonrotoclax 320 mg is currently recruiting.

Abstract Introduction: T-PLL is a rare, aggressive leukemia with poor prognosis and limited therapies. Previous studies on T-PLL patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) are limited by small numbers with limited data on disease and transplant characteristics. Further, recent data from our large national cohort of patients demonstrated significant survival difference between TCL1A+ and TCL1A- T-PLL, and CD8+ T-PLL vs CD8- T-PLL. In this large multi-center series, utilizing comprehensive disease subtype and alloSCT clinical data, we evaluated prognostic and survival therapeutic outcomes in T-PLL patients that had an alloSCT with a particular focus on T-PLL disease subtypes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 572 diagnosed with T-PLL at 21 academic cancer centers throughout the USA between 2000-2023, of which we performed a further evaluation on the169 that proceeded with alloSCT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Among n=169 alloSCT recipients with T-PLL, the median follow-up time was 20.9 months post-alloSCT (range: 0.2-182.9), the median age at transplant was 59 years (range: 35-77) and 52% were male. In evaluated patients (n=109), TCL1A was positive by cytogenetics or FISH in 69%. As our recent analysis demonstrated significant differences in survival among specific subtypes of T-PLL, we evaluated outcomes in patients with CD4+CD8- T-PLL (n=90, 53%), CD4-CD8+ (n=17, 10%) T-PLL, and CD4+CD8+ T-PLL (n=52, 31%). 53% (87/164) had known nodal involvement at diagnosis identified by PET or CT scan and 45% (43/96) of known patients had minimal residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplant [defined as <5% T-PLL in marrow by flow, or +cytogenetics (e.g. TCL1A)] prior to alloSCT. At the time of alloSCT, 136 (80%) patients were in CR and 23 (14%) patients were in PR. Forty-nine (30%) had a myeloablative (MAC)conditioning regimen and 114 (70%) had a reduced intensity chemotherapy (RIC) conditioning regimen. Eighty (49%) patients had TBI as part of their regimen. The most common regimens were fludarabine (flu)/melphalan based regimens (n=44; 26.0%), flu/cyclophosphamide (cy) based regimens (n=33; 19.5%), flu/busulfan based regimens (n=22; 13.0%), flu/total body irradiation (TBI) (n=8; 4.7%), and cy/TBI (n=4; 2.4%). Across the whole cohort, the median OS and PFS post-alloSCT was 32.6 months (95% CI: 21.0-41.9) and 20.8 months (95% CI: 14.4-30.5) months while the 1-year cumulative incidences (CI) of NRM and relapse were 17% and 20%, respectively. The incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD and cGVHD were 19% and 23%. There was no difference between patients with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (n=49, 29%) when compared to patients that received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) (n=114, 67%) in OS (33.1 vs 29.2; p=0.68) and PFS (20.2 vs 20.8; p=0.97). Patients that were MRD+ (n=31) had worse OS (22.2 vs 48.6; p=0.1) and PFS (14.1 vs 32.5; p=0.04) and higher rates of relapse (1-year relapse 20% vs 8%; p=0.08) than patients that were MRD- (n=50). PFS was improved in those who received alloSCT though only trended towards significance due to low numbers (HR 0.76, p=0.09). In subtype analysis, TCL1A+ T-PLL had significantly worse outcomes compared to TCL1A negative T-PLL. TCL1A+ disease had significantly worse OS (21.6 vs 63.1; p=0.01) and PFS (12.4 vs 50.7; p=0.01) compared to TCL1A-. Additionally, in TCL1A+ disease CI of NRM (24% vs 3%; p=0.02) and relapse (25% vs 12%; p=0.86) was higher vs TCL1A- PLL. CD4+CD8-, CD4-CD8+, and CD4+CD8+ disease had no difference in survival via either OS (28.0 vs 34.4 vs 21.0; p=0.17) or PFS (29.4 vs 23.5 vs 13.6; p=0.09) as well as no difference 1-year CI of NRM ( 11.6 vs 23.5 vs 26.2; p=0.35) and relapse (18.5 vs 23.5 vs 20.0; p=0.67).Conclusions: AlloSCT significantly improved outcomes for patients with T-PLL compared to those who did not proceed to alloSCT and remains he only curative therapy for those with T-PLL. OS, PFS, and CI relapse were significantly worse for patients with TCL1A+ subtype of T-PLL, or those with MRD positivity or PR prior to alloSCT. Novel strategies to decrease relapse such as post-alloSCT maintenance therapy to improve outcomes are urgently needed in these patients.

Abstract Introduction: Patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) exhibit an elevated risk of developing other cancers (OC) relative to the general population. Historically, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) represented the cornerstone of CLL/SLL management. A systematic review of clinical trials of CIT for CLL that included 28 studies reported 352/3297 (12.6%) patients developed OC (Csanadi 2022). The introduction of targeted agents beginning in the mid-2010's, including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and BCL2 inhibitors, has shifted the standard of care toward these novel therapies. In this study, we determined the risk of OC in newly diagnosed CLL/SLL patients cared for at the US Department of Veteran Affairs (VA), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Methods: We identified patients with newly diagnosed CLL/SLL after 1/1/2016 using the VA Central Cancer Registry, MD Anderson, and the Mayo Clinic CLL Databases. The baseline clinical characteristics, CLL treatments, and the occurrence of OC were abstracted by electronic health record (EHR) review. Receipt of CLL directed therapy was categorized into a) CIT only; b) targeted therapy only; c) CIT and targeted therapy; and d) other (including monotherapy with monoclonal antibody therapy). The occurrence of OC was modeled using CLL treatment as a time-dependent variable. Prior and concurrent OC diagnosed within 3 months of CLL/SLL were excluded from analyses, to reduce ascertainment bias. Results: We identified 6844 patients with CLL/SLL who met inclusion criteria. Median follow up was 3.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.9-5.8). The median age at diagnosis of CLL/SLL was 71 years (range, 23 - 102); most patients were white (81%) and male (90%). Although many patients had missing values, among those with available information, IGHV genes were unmutated in 884 (51%), CLL FISH panel showed del17 in 213 (7%), del11q in 389 (13%), trisomy 12 in 674 (23%), and del13q in 1508 patients (50%). A total of 2344 patients received CLL directed therapy during follow-up: 278 (12%) received CIT only, 1809 (77%) received targeted therapy (+/- monoclonal antibody), only 99 (4%) received CIT and targeted therapy and 150 (6%) monoclonal antibody therapy only. Among patients treated with targeted therapies, 950 (50%) received ibrutinib, 381 (20%) received acalabrutinib, 164 (9%) received zanubrutinib, 4 (<1%) received orelabrutinib, 280 (15%) received venetoclax, and 3 (<1%) received sonrotoclax. Other treatments included combinations of a covalent BTKi (cBTKi) and BCL2i in 52 (3%) patients, among others. A total of 583 patients were diagnosed with OC during the study period. Types of OC observed included neoplasms of the prostate (n=129, 22%), lung (n=118, 20%), hematologic malignancies (n=91, 16%), gastrointestinal tract (n=68, 12%), melanoma (n=66, 11%), kidney and bladder (n=44, 8%), head and neck (n=19, 3%), and other/unknown (n=48, 8%). Estimated risk of occurrence of OC was 4.2% (95%CI 3.8-4.8%) at 24 months and 9.7% (95%CI 8.9-10.6%) at 60 months after a diagnosis of CLL/SLL. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that older age (HR: 1.013, 95%CI: 1.00-1.021), male sex (HR: 1.6, 95%CI: 1.1-2.3), and receipt of CLL directed therapy (HR: 1.4, 95%CI: 1.2-1.7) were associated with an increased risk of OC. When considering different types of CLL directed treatments, those who received CIT with or without targeted therapies had the highest risk of development of OC (HR: 1.6, 95%CI: 1.2-2.1). Risk of OC were also increased for those who received CIT only (HR: 1.41, 95%CI: 0.97-2.05) and those who received targeted treatments alone (HR: 1.27, 95%CI: 1.02-1.58). Conclusion: In this large dataset of newly diagnosed patients with CLL/SLL in the past ten years, approximately 10% patients developed OC at 5 years. Receipt of CLL directed therapy was associated with a 40% increased risk of development of OC compared to those patients who did not receive therapy. The risk was highest among patients who received CIT with or without targeted therapy and was still elevated in those who received CIT only or targeted therapy only.

Abstract Background Mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) are large-scale somatic gains, losses, or copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CNLOH) detectable by genotyping of peripheral blood DNA. They represent a form of clonal hematopoiesis and are observed in 0.5-5% of cancer-free individuals. The presence of any autosomal mCA has been associated with >3-fold risk of hematological malignancies. In particular, mCAs occurring in regions related to lymphoid malignancies have an 11-fold increased risk of lymphoid malignancies and a 68.6-fold risk for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL), the precursor state to CLL, is defined by <5×10⁹/L clonal B cells in otherwise healthy individuals and is classified as low-count (<0.5x109/L) or high-count (0.5-5x10⁹/L) based on clonal B-cell count. MBL is also associated with increased risk of lymphoid malignancy (beyond CLL), with 4.3-fold and 74-fold risk in individuals with low- and high-count MBL, respectively. We previously reported a significant enrichment of autosomal mCAs in MBL, demonstrating a 1.7-fold association in those with low-count MBL and a 50.5-fold association in those with high-count MBL. Whether mCAs independently predict lymphoid malignancy risk after accounting for MBL status is unknown. Here, we evaluated the impact of mCAs on risk of incident lymphoid malignancies in individuals with MBL and in individuals screened negative for MBL. Methods CLL-type MBL (CD5 positive) was identified using flow cytometry assay on peripheral blood. Participants were age ≥40, had no prior hematologic malignancy, and were enrolled through the Mayo Clinic Biobank or the Division of Hematology at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Participants were followed for incident lymphoid malignancy, including CLL, with diagnoses confirmed by medical record review. mCAs with cell fraction >1% were detected from array-based genotyping of whole blood DNA. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age and sex, estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of developing an incident lymphoid malignancy in individuals with autosomal mCA versus those without an autosomal mCA. Results In 4,331 participants with available MBL and mCA status, the median age was 67 years, and 45% were male. Flow cytometry identified 3,231 individuals who screened negative for MBL, 754 individuals with low-count MBL, and 346 individuals with high-count MBL. Autosomal mCAs were present in 6.5% of individuals without MBL, 7.6% with low-count MBL, and 71.1% with high-count MBL. Over a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 237 individuals developed an incident lymphoid malignancy. The most common types were CLL, multiple myeloma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ignoring MBL status, the presence of an autosomal mCA was associated with increased risk of lymphoid malignancy (HR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.45–4.86; P = 0.002), replicating previous results. However, after excluding individuals with MBL, this association attenuated; those with mCA alone did not have a significantly elevated risk (HR = 1.60; 95% CI: 0.57-4.52; P = 0.38) compared to individuals without MBL or mCA. We next examined the effect of mCAs among individuals with MBL. In those with low-count MBL, the most frequent mCA events were 13q loss (2.1%), 12 gain (1.9%), and 4q CNLOH (1.2%), and individuals with an mCA had a borderline significant risk of developing a lymphoid malignancy (HR = 2.78; 95% CI: 1.01–7.67; P = 0.049) compared to those without an mCA. Similarly, in those with high-count MBL, the most frequent mCA events were 13q loss/CNLOH (31.2%), 12 gain (13.0%), and 11q loss (4.9%), and the presence of an mCA conferred an increased risk compared to those without mCA (HR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.09-2.08; P = 0.012). Conclusions Autosomal mCAs were more frequent in individuals with high-count MBL compared to those with low-count or no MBL. mCAs showed limited predictive value for lymphoid malignancy among individuals without MBL. In contrast, in individuals with low-count MBL, autosomal mCAs emerged as a potential biomarker for identifying those at risk of developing a lymphoid malignancy. In high-count MBL, mCAs were also a biomarker, but were driven by known chromosomal abnormalities identified through clinical testing. These findings suggest that the utility of mCAs as a predictive marker for lymphoid malignancy is contingent on the presence of MBL and may inform risk stratification and surveillance strategies in this population.