Jin, Zhaohui

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor outcomes. This review examines recent advancements in locoregional therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, focusing on external beam radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization (TARE), hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy, and liver transplantation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy and proton beam therapy have shown promise in achieving local control and improving survival. TARE, with personalized dosimetry, has demonstrated encouraging results in select patient populations. HAIP chemotherapy, primarily studied using floxuridine, has yielded impressive survival outcomes in phase II trials. Liver transplantation, once contraindicated, is now being reconsidered for carefully selected patients with localized disease. While these locoregional approaches show potential, randomized controlled trials comparing them to standard systemic therapy are lacking. Patient selection remains crucial, with factors such as liver function, tumor burden, and molecular profile influencing treatment decisions. Ongoing research aims to optimize treatment sequencing, explore combination strategies with systemic therapies, and refine phenotype identification and patient selection criteria. As the landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma management evolves, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to tailor treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with this challenging disease.

639 Background: Limited treatment options exist for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Recently, several clinical trials provided preliminary evidence for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) as a new target for patients with HER2 expressing BTC. We conducted a systematic review and pooled analysis of the safety and efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in patients with advanced BTC. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to identify phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical trials published between January 2019 and March 2024 that evaluated anti-HER2 therapy in locally advanced or metastatic BTC. Primary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), rate of treatment discontinuation, and death. Forest plots were generated to summarize the results and demonstrate the effect size estimates for each study, along with their confidence intervals and the pooled estimate from the random-effects model. The random-effects models were configured to use the Restricted Maximum Likelihood method for estimating between-study variance for all analyses. Results: After excluding duplicate and irrelevant articles, data extraction and analysis were performed on eight selected clinical trials. The analysis included 368 patients with a median age of 64 (range 49-68), with 55% being female. Patients were treated with several anti-HER2 agents, including zanidatamab, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, tucatinib plus trastuzumab, trastuzumab deruxtecan, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, trastuzumab-pkrb plus chemotherapy and neratinib. The pooled ORR and DCR were 34% (95% CI 24-44) and 64% (95% CI 51-77) respectively. The pooled weighted PFS and median OS survival were 4.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. The pooled duration of response was 5.0 months. In our subset analysis, which included only patients who had received ≥1 prior therapy, the pooled ORR was 30% (95% CI 22-39), the pooled DCR was 62% (95% CI 48-75), and the pooled median PFS was 4.4 months. In the study cohort, 82.6% of patients experienced any adverse event, and 32.1% experienced a grade 3-4 adverse event. Only 5.7% of the patients discontinued treatment secondary to TRAEs. Conclusions: In patients with HER2 expressing BTCs, anti-HER2 therapies demonstrated preliminary signals of efficacy with manageable toxicities, particularly in the second-line setting.

5 Background: Metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma is rare and associated with a poor prognosis. There is limited evidence on the impact of local interventions on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic disease. We aimed to evaluate the survival of patients with liver-only metastatic anal cancer following definitive local management of liver lesions. Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients with liver-limited metastatic anal cancer who underwent curative-intent local therapy. Clinical characteristics were collected and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors associated with DFS and OS were assessed using Cox-proportional hazards models. Results: Twenty-five patients were included, median age was 59 years, and 92% were female. None of the patients had known HIV infection, 92% had HPV-positive disease and 76% had metachronous liver metastases following locoregional disease. All patients received chemoradiation for the primary lesion Unilobar hepatic involvement was present in 76% of the patients, with 56% having a single metastatic lesion. Pre-intervention systemic therapy was provided to 52% of the patients, including 8 who received carboplatin and paclitaxel, with a median duration of 3 months and ORR of 69%. Definitive treatment of metastatic disease included surgical resection (60%), non-surgical interventions (20%), and multimodal therapy (20%). All patients had viable tumor in the pathological specimen. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median DFS was 7.3 months, and median OS was 51.3 months. An ECOG performance status of 2, poorly differentiated histology, and extrahepatic recurrence were identified as significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate potential for long-term survival in liver-limited metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma amenable to local therapeutic intervention combined with systemic therapy. These findings warrant further prospective study of local therapy in oligometastatic anal cancer. Characteristics N=25 (%) Median number of liver metastases (range), lesions- 1- 2-3- >3 1 (1-20)14 (56)8 (32)3 (12) Median maximal diameter of liver metastases (range), cm 3 (0.9-11.9) Best response of liver metastases to chemotherapy (N=13)- Complete response- Partial response- Stable disease- Progressive disease 2 (15)7 (54)3 (23)1 (8) Surgical procedure (N=20)- Right/left hemi-hepatectomy- Segmentectomy- Wedge resection 4 (20)14 (70)2 (10) Non-surgical procedure (N=10)- Local ablation- Radiotherapy- Other 5 (50)3 (30)2 (20) Hepatic surgical margins (N=20)- Positive margins- Close margins (<1mm)- Negative margins 02 (10)18 (90) Recurrent disease- Yeso Intrahepatico Extrahepatic- No 20 (80)14 (70)6 (30)5 (20)

496 Background: Incidence of early-onset gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (eoGEA, ages <50 years) has been increasing in the United States since the 1990s, the etiology of which is still unclear, and limited data exists on molecular drivers. This study evaluates somatic and germline profiles in eoGEA compared to average-onset GEA (aoGEA, ages≥ 50 years). Methods: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study utilizing data from de-identified records of GEA (esophageal, gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinomas) patients who underwent somatic NGS testing via the Tempus xT assay (595-648 gene DNA panel) from 12/2017 to 07/2024. This assay assesses somatic tumor mutations (including SNVs, Indels, CNVs, and select SVs), MSI, TMB, and incidentally detected germline SNVs and small indels in matched normal tissue. Clinical characteristics and immunotherapy markers were compared between eoGEA and aoGEA by Wilcoxon Rank Sum or Chi-squared test. Somatic and germline mutations were compared between two age groups with false discovery rate adjustments. Results: We compared the demographic, clinical, and molecular features of a total of 5863 patients with eoGEA (n=785, median age 43) and aoGEA (n=5078, median age 68). Over 80% of patients were diagnosed with stage IV disease. The eoGEA group had a higher proportion of females, non-white, and Hispanic or Latino patients compared to the aoGEA group (p<0.001). Prevalence of MSI-H/ dMMR, and TMB-H was lower in eoGEA vs aoGEA (p<0.001), while PD-L1 expression was similar. Prevalence of somatic CDH1 , CDKN2A , and TP53 SNVs, and FGFR2 and KRAS CNAs were higher in eoGEA vs aoGEA (q<0.001). In a subset of 3286 patients with tumor/normal match testing (eoGEA=464 and aoGEA=2822), eoGEA also had a higher prevalence of germline CDH1 mutations (q<0.001). Conclusions: eoGEA has a unique somatic and germline mutation profile compared to aoGEA; further study evaluating the molecular landscape including epigenetic changes could shed light on underlying mechanisms responsible for the rising incidence of eoGEA. eoGEA (n=785) aoGEA (n=5078) p-value/q-value* Baseline characteristics Median age at diagnosis (IQR) 43 (38, 47) 68 (61,74) <0.001 Gender: male 509 (65%) 3798 (75%) <0.001 Race (white) 280 (69%) 2347 (80%) <0.001 Ethnicity (not hispanic or latino) 206 (60%) 1768 (86% <0.001 Stage IV 495 (85%) 2883 (81%) 0.073 Immunologic markers TMB ≥ 10 25 (3.2%) 519(10%) <0.001 MSI-H 13 (1.7%) 261 (5.1%) <0.001 dMMR 7 (2.2%) 120 (5.9%) 0.007 Somatic mutations profiles * CDH1 126 (16%) 334 (6.6%) <0.001 TP53 515 (66%) 3764 (74%) <0.001 CDKN2A 101 (13%) 1011 (20%) <0.001 KRAS 92 (12%) 931 (18%) <0.001 NOTCH1 12 (1.5%) 228 (4.5%) 0.002 Germline mutation profiles * eoGEA (N=464) aoGEA (N= 2,822) Overall prevalence 46 (9.9%) 207 (7.3%) CDH1 10 (2.2%) 8 (0.3%) 0.001 TP53 3 (0.6%) 0 (0%) 0.039 BRCA2 2 (0.4%) 38 (1.3%) 0.6 BRIP1 4 (0.9%) 10 (0.4%) 0.6

532 Background: HCC accounts for 80% of primary liver cancers, and worldwide, is the third common cause of cancer-related death. Two FDA approved 1st line systemic treatment options include atezo/bev and durva ± treme. Herein we report outcomes of these regimens in the 1st line setting via a real-world, multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Methods: We reviewed clinical outcomes of patients (pts) who initiated 1st line atezo/bev or durva ± treme for unresectable HCC between March 2017 and February 2024, across 5 institutions (Mayo Clinic, University of Alabama, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and University of Michigan). Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Best (objective) response was tabulated. Multivariable analyses were performed using Cox models and logistic regression for time-to-event and binary outcomes, respectively, while adjusting for age, sex, race, HCC etiology, Child-Pugh class, and ALBI grade. Results: A total of 433 HCC pts were included; atezo/bev (336), durva ± treme (97). Median age at the start of therapy was 68 years; 77% were male, 82% were Caucasian. Etiologies of HCC were viral hepatitis (38%), MASLD (20%), alcohol (10%), non-viral multifactorial (10%), or unknown (22%). Pts receiving durva ± treme were less likely to have cirrhosis (11% vs. 28%, p<0.01) but similar in terms of macrovascular invasion (63% vs. 58%, p=0.35) compared to pts receiving atezo/bev. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were similar between the two groups, with the most common being disease progression - atezo/bev (56%) and durva ± treme (47%). The differences in clinical outcomes were not statistically significantly and remained consistent after multivariable adjustment. (Table, atezo/bev as the reference group). Outcomes were significantly different between Child-Pugh classes (CP: A,B,C) respectively, OS: 19.0 m, 6.4 m, 1.9 m (p<0.001); TTF: 6.1 m, 2.7 m, 1.3 m (p<0.001). Conclusions: In this real-world retrospective cohort study of unresectable HCC, the differences in overall survival, objective response, and time to treatment failure were not statistically significant between atezo/bev and durva ± treme in the 1st line setting. Outcome Atezo/bev Durva±treme Univariate p-value Multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) Multivariable adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) Overall Survival, Median (month) 14.0 14.6 0.77 0.78 (0.54-1.14) --- Time to Treatment Failure, Median (month) 4.9 4.1 0.71 0.95 (0.72-1.26) --- Objective response, % 26.3% 21.1% 0.31 --- 0.78 (0.43-1.39)

163 Background: CRC with PM has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Immunotherapy has shown promise in improving outcomes for patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), and high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) tumors. However the peritoneal niche has a unique microenvironment, which can influence the effectiveness of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs). We assessed the impact of ICI on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in CRC patients (pts) and PM, considering key clinical and molecular characteristics. Methods: A retrospective review aiming to identify CRC pts with MSI-H/dMMR and PM treated with immunotherapy between 2015 and 2023 was performed. Data collected included pt demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details. Responses were evaluated using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Results: 37 pts were included, 9 (24%) had Lynch syndrome. The median age of diagnosis was 61 years and most pts were females (65%). Most pts had MSI-H/dMMR tumors, while one pt was treated based on ultra-hypermutated phenotype (TMB 202) and POLE mutation. Among those with available TMB data, the median TMB was 52 mutations/Mb (0-202). Common mutations were PMS2 (51%), MLH1 (38%), MSH6 (16.2%), and MSH2 (16.2%). Right-sided tumors were in 54%, mucinous histology in 62%, and ascites in 54%. Pts received a median of 11 cycles of ICI (2-52). Pembrolizumab was the most frequently used ICI (78%), while Nivolumab was used either alone (11%) or in combination with Ipilimumab (11%). Median PFS in our cohort was 7.8 months and median OS was 29.9 months. The disease control rate (DCR) was 81%, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 51.3% (9 complete responses, 12 partial responses). At the time of data collection, 30% of pts were off systemic therapy and 5-FU-based chemotherapy combined with a biologic agent was the most common subsequent treatment in 32% who had PD. Univariate analysis showed no significant differences in PFS or OS based on tumor sidedness, isolated PM, liver metastases, mucinous vs. non mucinous histology or BRAF / RAS status (WT vs mutant). Malignant ascites was associated with worse OS(HR 0.3; p= 0.03). Conclusions: Treatment with ICIs in pts with MSI-H/dMMR and/or TMB-H CRC and PM improved disease control in CRC pts with PM, however, as compared to historical controls for patients with MSI-H/d-MMR disease treated with ICI, this group showed less favorable outcomes. Malignant ascites was associated with poorer overall survival. Further research of the immune response and tumor microenvironment in the peritoneal cavity is warranted.

Abstract Background Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B. Patients and Methods We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy. Results Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival. Conclusion Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.

AbstractBackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) negatively impact fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer. This study assessed PPI impact on major pathologic response (mPR) rates of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients receiving fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy.MethodsAn institutional retrospective review of resected PDAC patients receiving neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy (98% FOLFIRINOX) from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. Outcomes were stratified by use or nonuse of PPIs within 6 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy initiation. Primary outcome was mPR defined as complete or near complete response.ResultsAmong 540 patients included, the median age was 64 (IQR: 60–70) years, 297 (55%) were male, and 202 (37%) were PPI users. 170 (31%) patients had mPR with similar rates among PPI users and nonusers (29% vs. 33%, p = 0.38). No difference in mPR was seen between PPI users and nonusers receiving chemoradiation (35% vs. 36%, p = 0.89) or ≥8 cycles of NAC (33% vs. 36%, p = 0.55). Median OS for PPI users was 30.9 versus 31.7 months for nonusers (p = 0.62). On multivariable analysis, PPI therapy was not associated with decreased survival.ConclusionPPI usage did not significantly influence mPR or OS following neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients. Further analysis of all patients, not just those who underwent resection, is required.

50 Background: A+B is commonly used as first line systemic therapy in HCC patients with CP-B liver function, although in the IMbrave150 clinical trial, its efficacy was only assessed in patients with CP-A liver function. We evaluated outcomes in patients with CP-B liver function and compared to those with CP-A. Methods: We completed a multi-institution, retrospective review of patients with HCC from Mayo Clinic and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, who had received A+B in the first line setting between March 2018 and November 2023. CP score was calculated at time of treatment, response was assessed, and progression free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: Among 322 patients with HCC, median age was 66.5 years, 78.6% were male, and 82.6% were white. Eighty-six patients (27%) had CP-B liver function, while 226 (70%) had CP-A and 10 (3%) had CP-C. Etiology of liver disease in patients with CP-B included hepatitis B in 7.0%, hepatitis C in 38.4%, alcohol use in 30.2%, and metabolic associated steatohepatitis in 20.9%. Median OS in patients with CP-B liver function was 6.4 months, while mOS was 21.6 months for those with CP-A ( p<0.0001). Further stratifying, mOS in those with CP-B7 was 9.1 months, CP-B8 was 5.5 months, and CP-B9 was 4.0 months. 12-month OS in patients with CP-B was 32.4%, compared to 69.3% in CP-A. Median PFS was 4.8 months in those with CP-B and 8.9 months in those with CP-A. Median PFS in those with CP-B7, -B8, and -B9 was 6.4 months, 2.7 months, and 2.7 months, respectively. Among those with CP-B, 1 patient had a complete response, 17 (19.8%) had a partial response, 29 (33.7%) had stable disease, and 37 (43.0%) had progressive disease. Adverse events in CP-B patients included hypertension in 14.0% (grade 3 in 1 patient), bleeding in 16.3% (grade 3 or greater in 11.6%), fatigue in 38.4%, and an immune-related adverse event in 17.4% (grade 3 in 5.8%). Conclusions: Patients with advanced HCC and CP-B7 liver function may still benefit from A+B. Importantly, no additional safety risks were identified in this subgroup. Those with CP-B8 and CP-B9 have significantly worse survival than those with CP-B7 and the likelihood of benefit from systemic therapy is minimal. It is important for providers to address the impact of baseline liver function on expected outcomes in patient with HCC.