Jin, Zhaohui

4099 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality has decreased since the 1970s but the incidence is increasing in young adults (age 20-49). The incidence of early onset CRC (eoCRC) will keep increasing significantly based on the trends of the SEER CRC registry data. There is limited data suggesting eoCRC may have different behaviors compared to traditional CRC (tCRC, age ≥ 50). Methods: Individual pt data of 47184 stage II/III CRC pts from 25 randomized studies in the ACCENT database were pooled. The distributions of demographics, clinicopathological features, biomarker status, and treatment-related data were summarized by age group. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free rate (RFR), and survival after recurrence (SAR) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models stratified by treatment arms within studies, adjusting for stage, performance status (PS), BMI and grade. Results: Using 5% difference between age groups as clinically meaningful cutoff, eoCRC had similar gender, race, ethnicity, PS, risk group, disease sidedness and T stage as tCRC. eoCRC were less likely overweight (30 vs 36%) and more pts had ≥ 12 lymph nodes resected (63 vs 51%). eoCRC had more frequent dMMR status (18 vs 12%), less BRAF mutations (5 vs 13%), and more dMMR/BRAF wild type (WT) status (17 vs 7%). Overall, eoCRC had better OS, DFS, and SAR, with the most significant differences between the < 30 and > = 70 age groups. Similar results were observed within pMMR pts. eoCRC experienced less hematological side effects, diarrhea, and stomatitis, but had more nausea and/or vomiting. Conclusions: eoCRC have unique characteristics; although statistically significant, the clinical differences in outcomes between eoCRC and tCRC are potentially due to the difference seen in extremely young and old pts. eoCRC have a different adverse events panel compared to tCRC. [Table: see text]

TPS594 Background: Effective treatment options are very limited for patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC). Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen such as 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan are frequently utilized for these patients after first-line therapy despite lack of FDA approval. Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is a novel oral nucleoside with antitumor activity in both fluoropyrimidine sensitive and resistant tumors due to its unique mechanisms of action. Given early toxicity and efficacy data from our previous study on single-agent trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in advanced BTC, the clinical evaluation of its combination with irinotecan represents a rational approach for the treatment of advanced refractory BTC. Methods: This is a single-arm phase II trial with a two-stage design to assess the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and irinotecan in advanced refractory BTC. Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed advanced, unresectable BTC who have progressed on at least one line of systemic therapy and have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Target accrual is 25. Treatment includes trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) 25 mg/m2 on days 1-5 and irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 in 14-day cycles. Patients will be evaluated for response every 4 cycles and in the absence of disease progression, therapy may be given up to 2 years. The primary end point is the progression-free survival rate at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and incidence of adverse events. Correlative biomarker studies include evaluations of circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells at baseline, after 4 cycles and at progression; and development of patient-derived tumor organoids from pre-treatment biopsies for parallel treatments. This study was approved and funded in part by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program from general research support provided by Taiho Oncology, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT 04072445.

204 Background: More than 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients will develop metastatic disease. Brain metastasis (BM) from colorectal cancer is uncommon (0.6-1.36%). This study aims to investigate the patient characteristics, treatment modalities and prognostic factors in this rare population. Methods: 104 patients with brain metastasis disease from CRC were identified from over 30,000 colorectal cancer patients at the Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1/1994 and 6/2019. A retrospective review was conducted by using data from electronic medical records (EMR). Statistical analysis utilized the Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among the 104 patients, 62 were male (59.6%) and 42 were female (40.4%). Median age at CRC diagnosis was 58.4 and at BM diagnosis was 61. Thirty-three patients had right-sided colon cancers, 27 patients had left-sided colon cancers and 39 patients had rectal cancer. Median time from CRC diagnosis to BM was 30.7 months. The majority of patients (58.7%) presented with a solitary brain lesion. Eighty-six patients (82.7%) had extracranial metastatic disease at BM diagnosis. Median survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 2.6-16.9) from BM diagnosis. Age <70, solitary BM, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were associated with statistically significant improved survival on univariate and multivariate analysis. Multi-modality treatment including surgical brain lesion resection, postoperative stereotactic radiation (SRS) with/without whole brain radiation (WBRT), and chemotherapy significantly improved median overall survival (Table). Conclusions: Although BM from CRC carries poor prognosis, multi-modality treatment (surgery, radiation and systemic chemotherapy) for patients with limited BM improves clinical outcome. [Table: see text]

188 Background: Unplanned subgroup analyses from several studies have suggested primary tumor sidedness (PTS) as a potential prognostic and predictive parameter in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to investigate the prognostic and predictive impact of PTS on outcomes. Methods: PTS data of 7,828 mCRC patients (pts) from 10 first-line randomized trials in the ARCAD database were pooled. PTS was defined as right-sided (RS) or left-sided (LS) if tumor arose from the cecum to the hepatic flexure or from the splenic flexure to the rectum, respectively; transverse colon cancers were not included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models adjusting for age, sex, performance status (PS), prior radiation/chemo, and stratified by treatment arm. Predictive value was tested by interaction term between PTS and treatment (anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone). Results: Compared to RS pts (2407, 31%), LS pts (5421, 69%) had better OS (median: 21.6 v 16.8 mos; HRadj: 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.78, P < .001) and PFS (median 8.4 v 7.2 mos; HRadj: 0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.86, P < .001). Results were consistent among subgroups defined by age, sex, PS, metastatic sites and chemo backbone (irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based). Interaction between PTS and KRAS mutation was significant (Pinteraction< .001): LS is associated with better prognosis only among KRAS wild-type (wt) (HRadj: OS 0.62, 95% CI, 0.55-0.70; PFS 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.80), but not among KRAS mutated pts. Among KRAS wt pts, survival benefit from anti-EGFR was observed for LS, but not for RS (table). Conclusions: The prognostic value of PTS is restricted to the KRAS wt population. PTS is predictive of anti-EGFR efficacy, with a significant improvement of survival for LS mCRC pts. These results suggest treatment stratification in mCRC studies by both PTS and KRAS status. [Table: see text]

147 Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths with liver being most common site of CRC metastasis. More than 50% of the CRC patients will develop metastatic liver lesion that eventually leads to death in about 70% of them. In this retrospective review we reviewed the outcome of pts who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection of liver lesion for metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: 304 pts who had preoperative chemotherapy were identified from 1045 metastatic colorectal cancer patients who had liver metastasectomy at Mayo Clinic between 1997 and 2018. A retrospective review was conducted by using data from electronic medical records. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 113 (37%) female and 191 (63%) male pts. Median age at primary disease diagnosis was 56.5 yrs. Two hundred forty-nine pts presented with stage IV metastatic colorectal cancer. Primary tumor locations were: 53 right-sided, 117 left-sided and 133 rectum. 152 (50%) pts had extrahepatic metastases. Two pts were found to be MSI-H, 113 MSS, 189 unknown. BRAF mutation was found in 6 patients. RAS mutation was present in 84 patients, with 124 unknown. Pts received chemotherapy for median of 2.82 months. Single agent fluoropyrimidine was administered in 38 (12%) pts and rest receiving chemotherapy doublet or triplet with fluropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin being most common regimen. The median overall survival from primary diagnosis for the entire group was 74.5 months. Median overall survival from liver metastasectomy was 60.0 months. In univariate analysis, metachronous disease, age < 60 yrs, and an absence of extrahepatic lesions led to statistically significant improvement of overall survival from primary diagnosis. Metachronous and extrahepatic lesions remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver metastasectomy is beneficial for highly-selected metastatic colorectal cancer pts. Compared to a historical control of 30-36 months, our patient population had a median overall survival of about 5 years from resection.

e15799 Background: Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) has been described as a prognostic factor in many solid tumors including colorectal adenocarcinoma. LMR has not been investigated as a prognostic factor in small bowel cancers. In this study, we aimed to evaluate prognostic factors in resected small bowel adenocarcinoma including LMR. Methods: Two hundred forty-one patients who underwent resection for stage I-III small bowel adenocarcinoma were retrospectively identified utilizing the pathology database at a single tertiary referral institution from 1994 to 2015. All patients had complete follow up data and were included in the survival analysis. One hundred sixty-nine patients had preoperative peripheral blood counts available for analysis. Plot of martingale residuals against LMR were used to establish best cutoff points for LMR. A training set for LMR included consecutively identified patients from 2006 to 2015, and a validation cohort including patients identified from 1994 to 2005 was used. Overall survival was performed utilizing Kaplan-Meier method, and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. Cox proportional hazards were performed and all tests were two sided. P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Median overall survival for the entire group was 54.5 months (95% CI: 37.2-81.2 months) with 5- and 10-year overall survival of 48% and 35%. The training set for LMR included 81 patients, and the validation set included 88 patients. The cutoff of 1.56 was chosen based on most significant p value (p = 0.002). When combined, the overall area under the curve (AUC) for LMR was 0.63, p < 0.01, (specificity 37.3%, sensitivity 90.1%, positive predictive value 33.1%, and negative predictive value 92.2%). There were 126 patients with LMR > 1.56 and 43 patients with LMR < 1.56 in the entire cohort. In multivariate analysis, LMR under 1.56 was a negative prognostic factor, HR = 2.20 (95% CI: 1.27-3.84, p < 0.01). In addition to LMR, age > 60 years and advanced T stage were independently negative predictors of overall survival in all patients. Conclusions: Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 1.56 is a validated negative prognostic factor in resected small bowel adenocarcinoma.

426 Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy affecting approximately 2,000 patients per year. There is a paucity of evidence prognosticating patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma. We aimed to evaluate multiple factors in patients with resected small bowel adenocarcinoma to determine any association with survival outcomes. Methods: Ninety three patients who underwent resection for stage I-III small bowel adenocarcinoma were retrospectively identified utilizing the pathology database at a single tertiary referral institution. All patients had complete follow up data and were included in the survival analysis. JMP software was used for statistical analysis. Overall survival was performed utilizing Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used for statistical comparisons. Cox proportional hazards were performed to control for age, gender, location of tumor, tumor size, tumor stage, and adjuvant therapy. Sensitivity analysis was performed to establish best cutoff points for continuous variables. All tests were two sided and a P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range 32-90). 61% were male. Median tumor size was 4.5 cm. There were 20, 36, and 37 patients with stage I, stage II, and stage III disease, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 151 months, 104 months, and 44 months for stages I, II, and III disease. In a multivariate analysis, independent predictor factors included presurgical lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) > 4.0, with a Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.13 (95% CI 0.007-0.69, p = 0.01), presurgical neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 8.0, HR 0.39 (95% CI 0.17-0.96, p = 0.04), and tumor size < 7.5 cm, HR 0.22 (95% CI 0.07-0.85, p = 0.03). Stage, age, T stage, and N stage influenced overall survival in univariate analysis, but were not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: LMR and NLR independently predict survival in patients with resected small bowel adenocarcinoma.

864 Background: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for localized or locally advanced ACSCC, while surgery is typically reserved for salvage therapy. Outcome of treatment with local excision alone is unknown and is currently not recommended by NCCN. We retrospectively analyzed outcome of the patients with small (T1 lesion) incidentally found ACSCC who were treated with local excision alone. Methods: On retrospective analysis, a cohort of 12 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I ACSCC treated at Mayo Clinic between 1994 and 2014 was identified who were managed with local excision alone. Baseline as well as followup data were obtained by electronic chart review. Results: Median age of the patients at diagnosis was 68 years (range: 36-81 years) and majority were females (76.9%). Median follow-up duration was 7.5 years. Of the 12 patients, 2 patients did not receive standard CRT due to co-morbid conditions and other 10 patients chose surveillance over CRT. There was only one patient with disease recurrence at 3 years which was salvaged by abdominoperineal resection (APR). This subject remains alive and disease free at the time of data collection (4 years out from APR). There were 4 deaths, all unrelated to ACSCC. Of 12 patients, 10 patients (83%) remained disease free at 5 years and beyond, 1 patient had recurrence and 1 patient was lost to follow up at 5 months from diagnosis. Conclusions: Local excision as a single modality of treatment may be safe and effective for highly selected small stage I ACSCC. Further clinical study is warranted to accurately define the patient population who can be treated with local excision alone, potentially sparing them long term toxicities.

Background: Our purpose was to evaluate the prognostic impact of pathologically confirmed esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) and its association with HER2 status and clinicopathologic characteristics. Methods: Among 796 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection, surgical pathology reports were reviewed, and suspected ASC was confirmed utilizing p63 and CK5/6 immunostaining. HER2 status was determined using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cox models were used to assess the impact of ASC on disease-specific survival and overall survival. Results: Overall, 2.0% (16/796) of patients had esophageal ASC, mostly demonstrating a close intermingling of squamous and adenocarcinoma cells within the same tumor. The percentage of squamous versus adenocarcinoma cells in the primary was generally recapitulated in nodal metastases, and intrapatient internodal heterogeneity was uncommon. Patients with esophageal ASC were statistically significantly more likely to be female (vs. male), have normal (vs. excess) body mass index, and harbor HER2-negative (vs. positive) tumors, as compared with patients with adenocarcinoma only. No ASC tumor was HER2-positive as compared with 16% of adenocarcinoma only tumors (P=0.018). Compared with patients with adenocarcinoma only, those with ASC demonstrated profoundly worse disease-specific survival (5-year event-free rate, 34% vs. 6%; multivariate hazard ratio, 2.87 [95% confidence interval, 1.59-4.76]; P=0.0010) and overall survival (P=0.0027) that was independent of known prognostic factors and HER2 status. Conclusion: ASC identifies a rare aggressive HER2-negative subgroup of esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.