Petrucelli, Leonard

AbstractMutations in microtubule‐associated protein tau gene (MAPT) cause frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP‐17). Here, we describe a patient with FTDP‐17 and a novel missense mutation in exon 13 of MAPT, p.E372G. We compare clinicopathologic features of this patient to two previously unreported patients with another exon 13 mutation, p.G389R. The patient with the p.E372G mutation was a 40‐year‐old man with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), who subsequently developed agrammatic speech and parkinsonism. One of the FTDP‐17 patients with p.G389R mutation presented at age 24 with agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia, and subsequently behavioral dysfunction. The other presented at age 53 with bvFTD, followed by agrammatic speech and corticobasal syndrome. Neuropathologic features of FTDP‐17 due to p.E372G were similar to those of p.G389R, including tau‐immunoreactive Pick body‐like neuronal inclusions and swollen, tapering thread‐like processes in white matter immunoreactive for 3‐repeat and 4‐repeat tau. Biochemical analysis of insoluble tau showed similar isoform compositions in p.E372G and p.G389R. Functional studies of the p.E372G mutation showed marked increase in tau filament formation and its reduced ability to promote microtubule assembly. Together these findings indicate that p.E372G is a pathogenic MAPT mutation that causes FTDP‐17 similar to p.G389R.

Targeting three defects with one strategy The neurodegenerative diseases amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia are most commonly caused by a mutation in the C9orf72 gene. The mutation is an expanded hexanucleotide repeat in a noncoding region. The expanded repeat produces sense and antisense RNA transcripts, which accumulate in patient cells and appear to sequester RNA-binding proteins. The sense and antisense transcripts are also translated into dipeptide repeat proteins, which are aggregation-prone and accumulate in the brain and spinal cord. Last, loss of function from reduced expression of C9orf72 in neurons and glia could contribute to the disease. Kramer et al. targeted both sense and antisense repeats by blocking a single gene called SPT4 , which mitigated degeneration in human cells by reducing all three types of pathologies. Science , this issue p. 708

AbstractThe identification of a hexanucleotide repeat expansion in a non‐coding region of C9orf72 as a major cause of both frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) drastically changed the field of research on both of these conditions. Yet, despite the vast amount of work aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of this repeat in disease, the exact pathomechanisms are still unclear. A reduction in the expression of the C9orf72 gene is observed in patients, but a gain‐of‐function model is now preferred. The hexanucleotide repeat expansion forms RNA foci in the central nervous system (CNS) of repeat‐positive FTD and ALS patients, and these foci are believed to sequester RNA‐binding proteins (RBPs) and impair their function in RNA processing. At the same time, the repeat undergoes repeat‐associated non‐ATG translation to produce dipeptide repeat proteins that also form inclusions in the patient CNS. Studies from cells and flies suggest that these proteins may also be an important factor in the disease. Finally, the hexanucleotide repeat also induces the mislocalization and aggregation of TAR DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) through an as yet unknown mechanism. This review covers the different potential pathogenic factors that have been put forth for C9orf72‐repeat‐associated FTD and ALS (C9‐FTD/ALS), while highlighting some remaining questions. image A repeat expansion in C9orf72 is a common cause of both frontal temporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Although there is a decrease in C9orf72 expression in patients, this repeat is believed to induce disease primarily through an unknown gain‐of‐function mechanism involving the RNA, repeat‐associated non‐AUG translation, or both. This review summarizes and discusses current knowledge on C9orf72 repeat‐associated pathophysiology.This article is part of the Frontotemporal Dementia special issue.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether the frequency of TAR DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) deposition in Alzheimer's disease (AD) differs across pathologically defined AD subtypes (hippocampal sparing [HpSp]; typical and limbic) and further examine the relationship between TDP‐43, pathological subtype, and clinical features in AD.MethodsWe identified all cases with pathologically confirmed AD (NIA‐Reagan intermediate‐high probability, Braak stage IV–VI) independent of cognitive status (n = 188). Neurofibrillary tangle counts were performed using thioflavin‐S microscopy in hippocampus and three neocortical regions, and all cases were subtyped: HpSp AD pathology (n = 19); typical AD pathology (n = 136); and limbic AD pathology (n = 33). TDP‐43 immunoreactivity was performed in multiple brain regions to assess for the presence of TDP‐43 and TDP‐43 stage. All cases were clinically subclassified at presentation as amnestic AD dementia versus atypical AD dementia. Statistical analysis was performed using linear and penalized logistic regression to assess associations with pathological subtype, and the effects of TDP‐43, accounting for possible interactions between pathological subtype and TDP‐43.ResultsTDP‐43 deposition was frequent in typical (59%) and limbic AD pathologies (67%), but not HpSp AD pathology (21%; p = 0.003). The observed associations of TDP‐43 with greater memory loss, naming and functional decline, and smaller hippocampal volumes, closest to death, did not differ across AD pathological subtype. Clinical presentation was associated with pathological subtype (p = 0.01), but not TDP‐43 (p = 0.69).InterpretationAlthough the frequency of TDP‐43 deposition in AD varies by pathological subtype, the observed effects of TDP‐43 on clinical/magnetic resonance imaging features are consistent across pathological subtypes. Clinical presentation in AD is driven by pathological subtype, not by TDP‐43. Ann Neurol 2015;78:Ann Neurol 2015;78:679–696

A mouse model for ALS A G4C2 repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is known to be the major genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (c9FTD/ALS). However, a lack of animal models recapitulating key disease features has hindered efforts to understand and prevent c9FTD/ALS-related neurodegeneration. Until now. Chew et al. describe a mouse model that mimics both neuropathological and clinical phenotypes of c9FTD/ALS. Science , this issue p. 1151