Jenkins, Robert B.

Abstract Purpose: Current clinical parameters do not stratify indolent from aggressive prostate cancer. Aggressive prostate cancer, defined by the progression from localized disease to metastasis, is responsible for the majority of prostate cancer–associated mortality. Recent gene expression profiling has proven successful in predicting the outcome of prostate cancer patients; however, they have yet to provide targeted therapy approaches that could inhibit a patient's progression to metastatic disease. Experimental Design: We have interrogated a total of seven primary prostate cancer cohorts (n = 1,900), two metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer datasets (n = 293), and one prospective cohort (n = 1,385) to assess the impact of TOP2A and EZH2 expression on prostate cancer cellular program and patient outcomes. We also performed IHC staining for TOP2A and EZH2 in a cohort of primary prostate cancer patients (n = 89) with known outcome. Finally, we explored the therapeutic potential of a combination therapy targeting both TOP2A and EZH2 using novel prostate cancer–derived murine cell lines. Results: We demonstrate by genome-wide analysis of independent primary and metastatic prostate cancer datasets that concurrent TOP2A and EZH2 mRNA and protein upregulation selected for a subgroup of primary and metastatic patients with more aggressive disease and notable overlap of genes involved in mitotic regulation. Importantly, TOP2A and EZH2 in prostate cancer cells act as key driving oncogenes, a fact highlighted by sensitivity to combination-targeted therapy. Conclusions: Overall, our data support further assessment of TOP2A and EZH2 as biomarkers for early identification of patients with increased metastatic potential that may benefit from adjuvant or neoadjuvant targeted therapy approaches. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 7072–83. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Aims: Androgen-targeted therapies (ATTs) are the mainstay treatment for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, ATTs promote adaptation of tumour cells and lead to castration resistant disease (CRPC). We have recently identified the cell surface receptor, Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) as increased during EMT and in CRPC. However, the role of NRP1 in the prostate epithelium is poorly understood. This study aims to determine whether the inhibition of NRP1 will be a feasible therapeutic strategy for blocking PCa metastasis and therapy resistance. Methods: qPCR and western blotting were used to assess NRP1 expression in PCa cell lines. NRP1 expression in CRPC was assessed using a murine LNCaP xenograft model of castration. NRP1 was knocked down with shRNA sequences from the pLKO.1 lentiviral construct. For metastasis assays, PC3 cells were microinjected into the zebrafish yolk sac and metastatic dissemination imaged 5 days later. NRP1 expression in radical prostatectomy (RP) samples from Mayo Clinic (545 patients) and Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (JHMI; 188 patients) cohorts was quantified by Affymetrix exon arrays and multivariable analysis performed. Wound scratch migration and invasion assays were performed with the WoundMaker™ tool and IncuCyte™ FLR imaging systems. Results: NRP1 levels were elevated in humanCRPC xenografts, metastatic and castrate resistant clinical PCa samples (p <0.0001), and PCa cell lines. NRP1 suppression significantly reduced metastasis of human xenografts in zebrafish and the migratory and invasive behaviour of metastatic PCa cells (p=0.0002). Multivariable analysis identified NRP1 as a significant independent prognostic indicator of metastasis and prostate cancer specific mortality in two large clinical cohorts (Mayo Clinic and JHMI; p=0.008/0.048 and 0.013/0,034 respectively). We show that NRP1 knockdown promotes E-Cadherin expression and loss of vimentin in mesenchymal PCa cells. Conclusion: These results will provide the preclinical data necessary to rationalise the use of anti-NRP1 directed adjuvant therapies for clinical use in PCa patients receiving ATTs, and will pave the way for larger scale preclinical and clinical trials in the PCa setting. Citation Format: Marianna Volpert, Brian Tse, Ellca Ratther, Nataly Stylianou, Mannan Nouri, Melanie Lehman, Stephen McPherson, Mani Roshan-Moniri, Mandeep Takhar, Nicholas Erho, Mohamed Alshalafa, Elai Davicioni, Robert Jenkins, Ashley Ross, Jeffrey Karnes, Robert Den, Ladan Fazli, Martin Gleave, Elizabeth Williams, Paul Rennie, Ralph Buttyan, Pamela Russell, Colleen Nelson, Brett Hollier. Neuropilin-1 is up-regulated in the adaptive response of prostate tumors to androgen targeted therapies and is prognostic of metastatic progression and patient mortality [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4908. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4908

Abstract Introduction: Patients with brain metastases await a dismal prognosis. Regardless of the continuous progress in drug development, a major problem is the delivery of drugs across the blood brain barrier (BBB) and into the metastatic neoplasms. The BBB excludes almost all compounds, in particular highly charged, hydrophilic or large compounds, and most of the current chemotherapeutic agents are thus unable to penetrate the BBB. Varying strategies to transiently open the BBB have been studied previously. Here, we describe a peptide transporter comprising 16 lysine residues and 20 amino acid residues corresponding to the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) binding domain of apolipoprotein E (ApoE). We show that the peptide (K16ApoE) is able to transiently open the BBB for drug-delivery into experimental brain metastases. Experimental procedures: A systemic study of the ability of the peptide to open the BBB was conducted by dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) in nonobese diabetic/severe combined (nod/scid) mice. The BBB permeability was studied after administering 200 μg of the peptide intravenously. Further, cellular effects after treatment with the peptide was investigated in vitro using confocal microscopy, flow cytometry and impedance experiments. The biodistribution of the peptide was studied in blood plasma and several organs using 125I labeled K16ApoE. Finally, a treatment study was initiated, treating the animals with the peptide in combination with the B-RAF inhibitor Dabrafenib, only Dabrafenib or vehicle. Summary: After injecting the K16ApoE peptide into the mice, a transient opening of the BBB for up to 4 hours was clearly demonstrated by DCE-MRI. Microscopy showed that the peptide disrupted brain endothelial cell monolayers, reducing the barrier properties of the cells. The impedance experiments displayed that the permeability through endothelial cell barriers was increased after treatment with K16ApoE, and a dose-dependent cell death pattern was observed at higher concentrations of K16ApoE.The peptide did not affect endothelial cell tight junctions. The biodistribution study showed that the peptide was eliminated from blood plasma in less than five minutes through the kidneys. The treatment study displayed that the group of animals receiving K16ApoE followed by Dabrafenib had smaller tumor volumes than the other two animal groups. Conclusions: We have shown that the peptide opens the BBB and facilitates a therapeutic window of 4 hours. The peptide did in combination with Dabrafenib decrease the number of experimental brain metastases in our studies. Thus, the current strategy could also have the potential to improve the treatment of patients with brain metastatic disease. Citation Format: Synnøve Nymark Aasen, Heidi Espedal, Olivier Keunen, Christopher Florian Holte, Habib Baghirov, Rolf Bjerkvig, Tine Veronica Karlsen, Olav Tenstad, Dag Erlend Olberg, Gobinda Sarkar, Robert B Jenkins, Frits Thorsen. The peptide transporter K16ApoE increases drug delivery across the blood brain barrier in an experimental animal model of melanoma brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2865. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2865

Abstract BACKGROUND: Incidence of glioma varies significantly by sex, and most glioma histologies occur with greater incidence in males. Previous analyses have examined the impact of estrogen exposure as a risk factor for these tumors, but have found results of varying significance and low effect size. There may be differences in effect of previously discovered risk alleles that contribute to sex differences. METHODS: Using data collected for three previous glioma GWAS in European-ancestry populations (MD Anderson Cancer Center, the San Francisco Adult Glioma Study, and the Glioma International Case Control Study) we assessed sex-specific effects for 14 previously identified and 13 newly identified glioma risk SNPs (27 total) overall and for glioblastoma (GBM) and non-GBM tumors separately. There were 3,892 male cases (59% GBM), 4,522 male controls, 2,500 female cases (52% GBM) and 4,940 female controls. Sex-specific odds ratios (ORM and ORF), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and p values (pM and pF) were generated using stratified logistic regression models. Data from each study were analyzed separately and combined using inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. Results were considered statistically significant at p<6.2x10-4. RESULTS: In GBM, rs11979158 (7p11.2, pM=1.01x10-10, ORM=1.43 [95% CI: 1.28-1.59]; pF=3.43x10-3, ORF=1.22 [95% CI: 1.07-1.39]) and rs2562152 (16p13.3, pM=5.59x10-4, ORM=1.23 [95% CI: 1.09-1.39]; pF=1.22x10-1, ORF=1.12 [95% CI: 0.97-1.29]) had significant effect in males only. In non-GBM gliomas, rs12076373 (1q44, pM=3.56x10-7, ORM=1.41, 95% CI: 1.23-1.61; pF=1.76x10-2, ORF=1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.38), rs11979158 (7p11.2, pM=1.77x10-5, ORM=1.32 [95% CI: 1.16-1.49]; pF=2.73x10-1, ORF=1.08 [95% CI: 0.94-1.24]), and rs3751667 (16p13.3, pM=9.44x10-7, ORM=1.30 [95% CI: 1.17-1.44]; pF=5.18x10-2, ORF=1.13 [95% CI: 1.00-1.28]) had significant effect in males only. Effect size for rs55705857 (8q24.21) varied significantly by sex, with ORM=2.63 (95% CI: 2.24-3.09, pM=4.42x10-32), as compared to ORF=3.95 (95% CI: 3.28-4.76, pF=1.82x10-47). A sensitivity analysis was performed due to allele frequency heterogeneity by study and results did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences and other demographic differences in cancer susceptibility can provide important clues to etiology, and these differences can be leveraged for discovery in genetic association studies. Significant differences in effect size may suggest variation in genetic effect of risk alleles or in unidentified risk factors that vary in prevalence or effect by sex. There may also be differences in the distribution of molecular subtypes within each histology by sex. Further investigation using an agnostic approach may further elucidate the relationship between effect of risk alleles and sex. Citation Format: Quinn T. Ostrom, Ben Kinnersley, Margaret Wrensch, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Georgina Armstrong, Terri Rice, Yanwen Chen, John Wiencke, Lucie McCoy, Helen Hansen, Christopher Amos, Jonine L. Bernstein, Elizabeth B. Claus, Dora Il'yasova, Christoffer Johansen, Daniel Lachance, Rose Lai, Ching C. Lau, Ryan T. Merrell, Sara H. Olson, Siegal Sadetzki, Joellen Schildkraut, Sanjay Shete, Richard S. Houlston, Robert B. Jenkins, Beatrice Melin, Melissa Bondy, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan. Estimating sex-specific effects of genetic loci associated with glioma risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1315. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1315

Abstract BACKGROUND: Glioma accounts for ~27% of all primary brain tumors and is responsible for ~13,000 cancer-related deaths in the US each year. Glioma tumors can be broadly classified into glioblastoma (GBM) and lower-grade non-GBM. Typically gliomas have a poor prognosis irrespective of medical care, with the most common form, GBM, having a five-year survival rate of only 5%. While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have transformed our understanding of glioma susceptibility, individual studies have had limited power to identify risk loci. METHODS: We performed the largest glioma GWAS to date, comprising a meta-analysis of six existing GWAS (6,405 cases, 14,100 controls) as well as new GWAS from the Glioma International Case Control Consortium (GICC; 4,572 cases and 3,286 controls) and University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)-Mayo (1,519 cases, 804 controls), totaling 12,496 cases (6,191 classified as GBM, 5,819 as non-GBM) and 18,190 controls. RESULTS: We identified five new risk loci for GBM at 1p31.3 (rs12752552; near JAK1, P=2.04×10-9, odds ratio (OR)=1.22), 11q14.1 (rs11233250; P=9.95×10-10, OR=1.24), 16p13.3 (rs2562152; near MPG, P=1.93x10-8, OR=1.21), 16q12.1 (rs10852606; HEATR3, P=1.29×10-11, OR=1.18), 22q13.1 (rs2235573; P=1.76×10-10, OR=1.15) and eight for non-GBM at 1q32.1 (rs4252707; MDM4, P=3.34×10-9, OR=1.19), 1q44 (rs12076373; AKT3, P=2.63×10-10, OR=1.23), 2q33.3 (rs7572263; near IDH1, P=2.18×10-10, OR=1.20), 3p14.1 (rs11706832; LRIG1, P=7.66×10-9, OR=1.15), 10q24.33 (rs11598018; OBFC1, P=3.39×10-8, OR=1.14), 11q21 (rs7107785; P=3.87×10-10, OR=1.16), 14q12 (rs10131032; P=5.07x10-11, OR=1.33) and 16p13.3 (rs3751667; P=2.61×10-9, OR=1.18). Case-only analyses confirmed the specificity of 11q14.1, 16p13.3 and 22q13.1 associations for GBM and 1q44, 2q33.3, 3p14.1, 11q21 and 14q12 for non-GBM tumors. In the combined meta-analysis, among previously published glioma risk SNPs, those for all glioma at 17p13.1 (TP53), GBM at 5p15.33 (TERT), 7p11.2 (EGFR), 9p21.3 (CDKN2B-AS1) and 20q13.33 (RTEL1) and for non-GBM at 8q24.21 (CCDC26), 11q23.2, 11q23.3 (PHLDB1) and 15q24.2 (ETFA) showed even greater evidence for association. SNPs at 10q25.2 and 12q12.1 for non-GBM tumors retained genome-wide significance (i.e. P<5.0x10-8). Associations at the previously reported loci for GBM at 3q26.2 (near TERC) and 12q23.33 (POLR3B) did not retain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings substantiate genetic susceptibility to GBM and non-GBM glioma being highly distinct, consistent with their distinctive molecular profiles presumably resulting from different etiological pathways. Functional analyses should lead to further insights into the biological basis of the different glioma histologies. Such information can inform gene discovery initiatives and therefore have a measurable impact on the successful development of new therapeutic agents. Citation Format: Ben Kinnersley, Beatrice S. Melin, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, Margaret R. Wrensch, Christoffer Johansen, Dora Il’yasova, Quinn Ostrom, and members of GICC, Karim Labreche, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Paul A. Decker, Marianne Labussière, Ahmed Idbaih, Khe Hoang-Xuan, Anna-Luisa Di Stefano, Karima Mokhtari, Jean-Yves Delattre, Pilar Galan, Konstantinos Gousias, Johannes Schramm, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Sarah J. Fleming, Stefan Herms, Stefanie Heilmann, Marcus M. Nöthen, Heinz-Erich Wichmann, Stefan Schreiber, Anthony Swerdlow, Mark Lathrop, Matthias Simon, Marc Sanson, Preetha Rajaraman, Stephen Chanock, Martha Linet, Zhaoming Wang, Meredith Yeager, Rose K. Lai, Elizabeth B. Claus, Sara H. Olson, Robert B. Jenkins, Richard S. Houlston, Melissa L. Bondy. Genome-wide association study of glioma reveals specific differences in genetic susceptibility to glioblastoma and non-glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1302. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1302

Abstract Background: Preclinical evidence indicates that increased insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF1R) signaling interferes with the action of trastuzumab suggesting a possible mechanism of trastuzumab resistance. Thus, we evaluated IGF1R prevalence, relationship with demographic data, and association with disease-free survival (DFS) of patients randomized to chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C) in the prospective phase III HER2+ adjuvant N9831 trial. Experimental Design: IGF1R protein expression was determined in tissue microarray sections (three cores per block; N = 1,197) or in whole tissue sections (WS; N = 537) using IHC (rabbit polyclonal antibody against IGF1R β-subunit). A tumor was considered positive (IGF1R+) if any core or WS had ≥1+ membrane staining in >0% invasive cells. Median follow-up was 8.5 years. Results: Of 1,734 patients, 708 (41%) had IGF1R+ breast tumors. IGF1R+ was associated with younger age (median 48 vs. 51, P = 0.007), estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positivity (78% vs. 35%, P < 0.001), nodal positivity (89% vs. 83%, P < 0.001), well/intermediate grade (34% vs. 24%, P < 0.001), tumors ≥2 cm (72% vs. 67%, P = 0.02) but not associated with race or tumor histology. IGF1R did not affect DFS within arms. Between Arms A and C, patients with IGF1R+ and IGF1R− tumors had DFS HRs of 0.48 (P ≤ 0.001) and 0.68 (P = 0.009), respectively (Pinteraction = 0.17). Between Arms A and B, patients with IGF1R+ and IGF1R− tumors had DFS HRs of 0.83 (P = 0.25) and 0.69 (P = 0.01), respectively (Pinteraction = 0.42). Conclusions: In contrast to preclinical studies that suggest a decrease in trastuzumab sensitivity in IGF1R+ tumors, our adjuvant data show benefit of adding trastuzumab for patients with either IGF1R+ and IGF1R− breast tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4203–11. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Objectives To develop and evaluate a real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (RT-MSP) MGMT assay, with a particular focus on small biopsies and indeterminate testing results. Methods We assessed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded glioblastoma or gliosarcoma specimens (n = 641). A test-validation group (n = 51) with previously obtained reference laboratory (RL) results was used to determine performance characteristics of the RT-MSP assay. An indeterminate (equivocal) category was established for cases that could not be clearly classified as positive or negative. Results Overall agreement of RT-MSP and RL results was 91% (41/45 nonindeterminate cases). Discordant cases were tested by pyrosequencing, and results were most concordant with RT-MSP. Among cases with limited amounts of tissue (n = 7), six yielded valid results by RT-MSP (all negative); the single invalid result consisted of a stereotactic biopsy specimen obtained 14 years prior. A subset of indeterminate cases obtained during clinical testing (n = 18/575 [3%]) was also evaluated by pyrosequencing and showed a heterogeneous pattern of methylation across the eight interrogated CpG sites. Conclusions The RT-MSP assay that we developed in-house is a robust clinical detection method for the heterogeneous process of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma.