Halyard, Michele Y.

PURPOSE For patients with breast cancer undergoing breast conservation, escalating the dose (boost) of radiation to the lumpectomy cavity after whole-breast irradiation (WBI) reduces ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) but extends treatment duration. This phase III trial investigated whether boost delivery during WBI versus after WBI provides noninferior IBR and preserves cosmetic appearance. METHODS NRG/RTOG 1005 randomly assigned patients at higher risk for IBR after lumpectomy and axillary surgery to either a sequential boost of 12 Gy in six fractions(F) or 14 Gy in 7F after WBI of 50 Gy in 25F or 42.7 Gy in 16F (sequential arm) or a concurrent boost of 8 Gy in 15F of 0.53 Gy per day with WBI of 40 Gy in 15F (concurrent arm) using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (RT) or intensity-modulated RT. Based on 1.59% 5-year IBR for the sequential arm, defining the noninferiority margin as a hazard ratio upper limit on the 90% CI of 2.12, 2,312 patients provide 80% power for noninferiority of IBR as first recurrence for the concurrent arm. Secondary end points included disease-free survival and overall survival, adverse events (AEs), and cosmetic outcomes. RESULTS Between May 24, 2011, and June 20, 2014, 2,354 patients were randomly assigned, with 2,255 eligible for analysis (sequential arm, n = 1,118; concurrent arm, n = 1,137). With median follow-up of 7.3 years, there were 56 IBR events; 5- and 7-year IBR were 2.1% and 2.2% on the sequential arm and 1.9% and 2.6% on the concurrent arm, respectively. The noninferiority criterion was met: HR (90% CI): 1.31 (0.84 to 2.04), P = .037. No differences were observed in AEs, cosmetic outcomes, or survival between arms. CONCLUSION Concurrent boost during WBI results in noninferior IBR compared with sequential boost without worsening toxicity or cosmetic outcomes and reduces overall treatment time.

Background: Sharing of family cancer history (FCH) in Black families has been documented as lower than in other populations. There has been limited exploration as to the factors and circumstances that facilitate or hinder FCH communication in these communities. Objective: To explore intersecting factors influencing FCH discussion in Black families with a breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis. Interventions/Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with socioeconomically diverse breast and ovarian cancer patients or family members. Interviews were thematically analyzed for iterative themes on FCH. Results: A total of 107 participants completed an interview. Discussion of FCH was reported as being influenced by several factors, including relationship and family dynamics, personality of family members, involvement in caregiving and support, and perceived importance and responsibility of communicating FCH for cancer prevention. Participants also described how inequitable access to medical care influenced disclosure of a cancer diagnosis, and socioeconomic concerns can influence family communication and documentation of FCH in the medical record. Conclusion: Our analysis indicates that disclosure of FCH is improving over time as access to healthcare has increased for Black families. Implications for Oncology Nursing Practice: Strategies to collect FCH outside of clinic settings, such as digital tools or chatbots, should be considered for increased capture of cancer pedigrees in families where discussion is limited. Patient education on options for preventative care and communications tools may assist patients with family discussions, although patients with adverse social determinants of health are likely to experience additional barriers to genetic screening based on FCH alone.

Abstract Purpose: Head and neck (HN) radiotherapy contour quality directly impacts local control (LC) and survival; however, few departments peer review (PR) contours prior to radiotherapy planning (RTP). This study reports outcomes of a single institution’s formal HN contour PR process. Methods: A formal HN contour PR process was implemented. Prior to RTP, HN radiation oncologists reviewed contours, provided feedback and assigned contour grades as follows: R0 (no change), R1 (minor revision, not high risk) or R2 (major revision; high risk). The PR task was completed and the contour grade was recorded. Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed. Results: Pilot PR process was performed over a 7-month period for 88 patients, followed by a maintenance phase. Contours were graded as follows: R0 ( N = 51), R1 ( N = 20) and R2 ( N = 17). Over time, the number of R2 revisions decreased ( p = 0.0001); month 1 ( N = 7), month 2 ( N = 3), month 3 ( N = 5), month 4 ( N = 2) and months 5–7 ( N = 0). Conversely, the number of R0 revisions improved over time ( p = 0.0203); month 1 ( N = 5), months 2–3 ( N = 9), month 4 ( N = 5), month 5 ( N = 8), month 6 ( N = 12) and month 7 ( N = 3). Each radiation oncologist demonstrated reduction in R2 revisions during the pilot. During maintenance, all 3 radiation oncologists demonstrated low rates of R2 revisions of less than 3 cases per year. Conclusion: Incorporation of HN contour PR into routine clinical workflow is feasible. The collective experience of multiple high-volume HN radiation oncologists led to improved contour quality in the pilot for each radiation oncologist and continued to ensure high quality in the maintenance phase.

ABSTRACTBackgroundPsychological safety is critical to early and continued engagement with healthcare providers, yet no studies have explored this concept in relationship to cancer care. Black/African American (“Black”) individuals experience disparities in breast and ovarian cancer beyond what can be explained biologically.AimsWe explored factors influencing psychological safety among Black breast and ovarian cancer patients and their family members.MethodsSocioeconomically diverse patients with a personal diagnosis or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were invited to complete a semi‐structured qualitative interview on their cancer and healthcare experiences between September 2020 and April 2021. Informed by principles of grounded theory, interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for thematic content related to psychological safety.ResultsBlack breast and ovarian cancer patients and their family members described personal and community experiences and structural components of the healthcare system that suggested they may receive differential cancer care due to their race, placing them on guard. This posture was mediated by several self‐identified factors that added to or detracted from their comfort, including provider racial and gender concordance in healthcare, personalized care, and effective communication. The priorities and perceptions of care in participants receiving care in safety net clinics were more focused on what was feasible given resource limitations rather than what was ideally desired.ConclusionsImplementation of strategies to promote psychological safety with Black cancer patients may foster improved patient experiences, as well as encourage early screening, patient engagement, and treatment continuation.

Abstract Black women experience significant disparities in morbidity and mortality related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Early identification of women with HBOC is essential for proactive screening and timely diagnosis. However, evidence suggests that Black women receive genetic testing for HBOC at lower rates than their White counterparts. We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 107 Black women with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer, to understand their perceptions of their familial risk of HBOC and interest in genetic testing. In phase 1 of this study, participants were recruited from the networks of patient support organizations and historically Black sororities representing mostly highly educated and well insured patients. In phase 2, participants were recruited from a family medicine safety net clinic in Jacksonville, FL for socioeconomic diversity. Participants in both cohorts frequently expressed a lack of awareness about their family cancer history and identified many barriers to family disclosure of a cancer diagnosis. These include a culture of silence around medical issues and a belief that personal difficulties should be kept to oneself. Practical and cultural barriers to family history sharing were magnified among those with lower socioeconomic status. Many participants in both cohorts indicated a strong desire to understand their own risk of HBOC. They also expressed interested in genetic testing to proactively mitigate risk to themselves and future generations. Understanding of the potential relevance of HBOC testing to one’s personal health and post-test actionability was variable across both groups, although perceptions of genetic testing were generally favorable. These findings suggest that culturally tailored educational materials and alternative clinical modalities to collect family health history may be beneficial to improve timely identification of Black women who meet NCCN Guidelines for HBOC testing. Specifically, greater attention should be given to addressing barriers that led to underestimation of HBOC risk among patients experiencing disparities driven by adverse social determinants of health. Citation Format: Kirsten Riggan, Jane Yap, Ewan Cobran, Michele Halyard, Sarah James, Marion Kelly, Daphne Phillips, Megan Allyse. Perceptions and Experiences of Black Women on Family History Sharing and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-09-08.

Abstract Black women experience significant disparities in morbidity and mortality related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Early identification of women with HBOC is essential for proactive screening and timely diagnosis but evidence suggests that Black women receive genetic testing for HBOC at lower rates than their White counterparts. To understand Black women’s perspectives on HBOC genetic testing and potential factors influencing this decision, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 107 Black women with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Participants were recruited via the networks of patient support organizations and sororities as well as at a family medicine safety net clinic in Jacksonville, FL. Participants frequently expressed a lack of awareness about their family cancer history; many cancer patients stated that they only became aware of extensive family history upon their own diagnosis. Lack of family history sharing was attributed to a culture of silence around medical issues and a desire to protect family members from difficult information. However, most participants indicated a strong desire to understand their own risk of HBOC and were interested in genetic testing. Participants with a personal diagnosis were motivated to undergo HBOC genetic testing to reduce the risk for future generations. Clinical experiences with the offer of HBOC genetic testing were variable, with a few expressing that they had to make repeated inquiries from a provider to understand the relevance of the test to their own health. These findings suggest that investigation into alternative clinical modalities to collect family health history may be beneficial to identify Black women who meet NCCN Guidelines for HBOC testing. In contrast to the literature suggesting hesitancy for HBOC genetic testing, many participants perceived genetic results as having a positive impact for their medical decision-making and family's health. The development of patient materials and provider education on cultural and social factors that influence the uptake of HBOC genetic testing is also needed. Citation Format: Kirsten A. Riggan, Michele Halyard, Sarah E. James, Marion Kelly, Daphne Phillips, Megan A. Allyse. Perceptions and experiences of Black women on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A067.

BACKGROUND: Promotions in academic medicine are frequently based on number of publications and leadership positions held. While prior study has established women publish less than men, many evaluations are limited to individual specialties and do not evaluate involvement with educational activities. OBJECTIVE: To compare gender differences in academic output, intramural leadership positions, and educational leadership positions of academic physicians. METHODS: The curriculum vitae and de-identified demographic data of all permanent physicians employed at a multi-site academic medical center were reviewed from April to May 2020. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions evaluated leadership positions and number of publications. RESULTS: Of 3,359 physicians in the demographic database, 32.3% (n = 1,087) were women and 72.5% were white (n = 2,510). Of the 3,015 physicians in the curriculum vitae database, 32% (n = 962) were women. Women were more likely (p < 0.001) to be assistant professor (54% vs. 42.7%) and less likely to be associate (18.1% vs. 20.3%) or full professor (14.6% vs. 29.1%). Women assistant professors published 22% fewer articles (ratio estimate = 0.78, p < 0.001), associate professors 18% less (coefficient = 0.82, p < 0.001), and full professors 23% less (coefficient = 0.77, p < 0.001). Fewer women were program directors for residencies (1.6% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.02) or fellowships (5.4% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.04), and held fewer division or department leadership positions (OR 0.8, 95% CI as [0.6, 1.0], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Women physicians do not outperform men across any education, leadership, or publication category. A cultural shift is needed to redefine traditional metrics for leadership appointments if academic medicine hopes to achieve equity.

AbstractBackgroundBlack breast and ovarian cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical cancer trials disproportionate to the prevalence of these cancers in Black females. Historically, lower enrollment has been attributed to individualized factors, including medical mistrust, but more recently structural factors, including systemic racism, have received additional scrutiny. We interviewed Black women with a personal or family history of breast and ovarian cancer to understand their views and experiences related to research participation.MethodsQualitative interviews were conducted via telephone or video conference and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for iterative themes related to the offer and participation in cancer clinical trials and research studies, impact on cancer care, and recommendations to increase enrollment of Black patients.ResultsSixty‐one Black women completed an interview. Participants expressed that Black women are underrepresented in cancer research, and that this negatively impacted their own care. Many cited past historical abuses, including the Tuskegee syphilis trial, as a potential factor for lower enrollment but suggested that lower enrollment was better understood in the context of the entirety of their healthcare experiences, including present‐day examples of patient mistreatment or dismissal. Participants suggested that proactive community engagement, transparency, and increased representation of Black research team members were strategies likely to foster trust and bolster research participation.Conclusion(s)Medical mistrust is only a partial factor in the lower participation of Black patients in cancer research. Researchers should implement the strategies identified by our participants to promote diverse enrollment and ensure that Black patients are included in future therapeutic advances.

AbstractBackgroundBoth dose and linear energy transfer (LET) could play a substantial role in adverse event (AE) initialization of cancer patients treated with pencil‐beam‐scanning (PBS) proton therapy. However, not all the voxels within the AE regions are directly induced from the dose and LET effect. It is important to study the synergistic effect of dose and LET in AE initialization by only including a subset of voxels that are dosimetrically important.PurposeTo perform exploratory investigation of the dose and LET effects upon AE initialization in PBS using seed spots analysis.MethodsA total of 113 head‐and‐neck (H&N) cancer patients receiving curative PBS were included. Among them, 20 patients experienced unanticipated CTCAEv4.0 grade ≥3 AEs (AE group) and 93 patients did not (control group). Within the AE group, 13 AE patients were included in the seed spot analysis to derive the descriptive features of AE initialization and the remaining 7 mandible osteoradionecrosis patients and 93 control patients were used to derive the feature‐based volume constraint of mandible osteoradionecrosis. The AE regions were contoured and the corresponding dose–LET volume histograms of AE regions were generated for all patients in the AE group. We selected high LET voxels (the highest 5% of each dose bin) with a range of moderate‐to‐high dose (≥∼40‐Gy relative biological effectiveness) as critical voxels. Critical voxels that were contiguous with each other were grouped into clusters. Each cluster was considered a potential independent seed spot for AE initialization. Seed spots were displayed in a 2D dose–LET plane based on their mean dose and LET to derive the descriptive features of AE initialization. A volume constraint of mandible osteoradionecrosis was then established based on the extracted features using a receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsThe product of dose and LET (xBD) was found to be a descriptive feature of seed spots leading to AE initialization in this preliminary study. The derived xBD volume constraint for mandible osteoradionecrosis showed good performance with an area under curve of 0.87 (sensitivity of 0.714 and specificity of 0.807 in the leave‐one‐out cross‐validation) for the very limited patient data included in this study.ConclusionOur exploratory study showed that both dose and LET were observed to be important in AE initializations. The derived xBD volume constraint could predict mandible osteoradionecrosis reasonably well in the very limited H&N cancer patient data treated with PBS included in this study.