Pardanani, Animesh

AbstractMonocytosis (absolute monocyte count, AMC ≥ 1 × 109/L) might accompany a spectrum of myeloid neoplasms, other than chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In the current study, we examined the prevalence, laboratory and molecular correlates, and prognostic relevance of monocytosis in polycythemia vera (PV). Among 267 consecutive patients with World Health Organization (WHO)‐defined PV, 55 (21%) patients displayed an AMC of ≥1 × 109/L and 18 (7%) an AMC of ≥1.5 × 109/L. In general, PV patients with monocytosis were significantly older and displayed higher frequencies of leukocytosis (81% vs. 50% at AMC ≥1 × 109/L) and TET2/SRSF2 mutations (57%/29% vs. 19%/1% at AMC ≥ 1.5 × 109/L). In univariate analysis, AMC ≥1.5 × 109/L adversely affected overall (OS; P = .004; HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.4‐4.8) and myelofibrosis‐free (MFFS; P = .02; HR 4.4, 95% CI 1.3‐15.1) survival; during multivariable analysis, significance was borderline sustained for OS (P = .05) and MFFS (P = .06). Other independent risk factors for OS included unfavorable karyotype (P = .02, HR 3.39, 95% CI 1.17‐9.79), older age (P < .0001, HR 3.34 95% CI 1.97‐5.65), and leukocytosis ≥15 × 109/L (P = .004, HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.26‐3.29). In conclusion, in the current study, we encountered a higher than expected prevalence of monocytosis in patients with PV and the mutation profile and age distribution of PV patients with monocytosis is akin to those of patients with CMML and might partly contribute to their worse prognosis.

AbstractThe 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) underscore the prognostically‐relevant distinction between essential thrombocythemia (ET) and prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre‐PMF). In addition, leukocytosis has been identified as an important prognostic marker in otherwise WHO‐defined ET. However, controversy remains regarding the objectivity of morphologic criteria in distinguishing ET from pre‐PMF and the precise prognostic cutoff values for leukocytosis. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level might be a biologically more accurate measure of leukocyte turnover and a more sensitive marker of pre‐PMF, in otherwise WHO‐defined ET. In the current study of 183 consecutive patients with WHO‐defined ET, the presence of grade 1 bone marrow (BM) fibrosis did not affect presenting clinical or laboratory features; in contrast, increased serum LDH at diagnosis was associated with leukocytosis (p = .002), thrombocytosis (p < .001), palpable splenomegaly (p = .03) and higher international prognostic score (IPSET) (p = .002); serum LDH did not correlate with BM fibrosis, JAK2/CALR/MPL or TET2/ASXL1 mutations. In univariate analysis, risk factors for survival included age ≥60 years (p = .002; HR 10.2, 95% CI 2.3‐44.6), male sex (p = .02; HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2‐8.2), leukocyte count ≥15 × 109/L (p = .007; HR 4.7, 95% CI 1.5‐14.6), and increased serum LDH (p = .002; HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5‐9.1), but not BM fibrosis (p = .17). In multivariable analysis, age, sex and serum LDH remained significant; serum LDH also remained significant, in the context of IPSET (p = .003) and in patients with leukocytosis (p = .003). We conclude that serum LDH level carries an independent prognostic value for survival in ET and might represent a biologically more accurate surrogate for leukocytosis.

Key Points More than half of patients with PV or ET harbor DNA mutations/variants other than JAK2/CALR/MPL. The presence of some of these mutations adversely affects overall, leukemia-free, or myelofibrosis-free survival.

Key Points More than 80% of patients with PMF harbor DNA variants/mutations other than JAK2/CALR/MPL. Some of these variants/mutations adversely affect overall or leukemia-free survival independent of conventional risk stratification.

Disease overview:Systemic mastocytosis (SM) results from a clonal proliferation of abnormal mast cells (MC) in one or more extra‐cutaneous organs.Diagnosis: The major criterion is presence of multifocal clusters of morphologically abnormal MC in the bone marrow. Minor diagnostic criteria include elevated serum tryptase level, abnormal MC expression of CD25 and/or CD2, and presence of KITD816V.Risk stratification: The 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of SM has been shown to be prognostically relevant. Classification of SM patients into indolent (SM), aggressive SM (ASM), SM associated with a clonal non‐MC lineage disease (SM‐AHNMD) and mast cell leukemia (MCL) subgroups is a useful first step in establishing prognosis.Management: SM treatment is generally palliative. ISM patients have a normal life expectancy and receive symptom‐directed therapy; infrequently, cytoreductive therapy may be indicated for refractory symptoms. ASM patients have disease‐related organ dysfunction; interferon‐α (±corticosteroids) can control dermatological, hematological, gastrointestinal, skeletal and mediator‐release symptoms, but is hampered by poor tolerability. Similarly, cladribine has broad therapeutic activity, with particular utility when rapid MC debulking is indicated; the main toxicity is myelosuppression. Imatinib has a therapeutic role in the presence of an imatinib‐sensitive KIT mutation or in KITD816‐unmutated patients. Treatment of SM‐AHNMD is governed primarily by the non‐MC neoplasm; hydroxyurea has modest utility in this setting; there is a role for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in select cases.Investigational drugs: Recent data confirms midostaurin's significant anti‐MC activity in patients with advanced SM. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1147–1159, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

In routine practice, the World Health Organization classification of systemic mastocytosis (SM) is also the de facto prognostic system; a core value is distinguishing indolent (ISM) from advanced SM (includes aggressive SM [ASM], SM with associated hematological neoplasm [SM‐AHN] and mast cell leukemia [MCL]). We sequenced 27 genes in 150 SM patients to identify mutations that could be integrated into a clinical‐molecular prognostic model for survival. Forty four patients (29%) had ISM, 25 (17%) ASM, 80 (53%) SM‐AHN and 1 (0.7%) MCL; overall KITD816V prevalence was 75%. In 87 patients, 148 non‐KIT mutations were detected; the most frequently mutated genes were TET2 (29%), ASXL1 (17%), and CBL (11%), with significantly higher mutation frequency in SM‐AHN > ASM > ISM (P < 0.0001). In advanced SM, ASXL1 and RUNX1 mutations were associated with inferior survival. In multivariate analysis, age > 60 years (HR = 2.4), hemoglobin < 10 g/dL or transfusion‐dependence (HR = 1.7), platelet count < 150 × 109/L (HR = 3.2), serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL (HR = 2.6), and ASXL1 mutation (HR = 2.3) were associated with inferior survival. A mutation‐augmented prognostic scoring system (MAPSS) based on these parameters stratified advanced SM patients into high‐, intermediate‐, and low‐risk groups with median survival of 5, 21 and 86 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). These data should optimize risk‐stratification and treatment selection for advanced SM patients. Am. J. Hematol. 91:888–893, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.