Hevesi, Mario

Abstract Introduction Abductor tendon pathology is a common cause of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. The gluteus minimus tendon inserts on the anterior facet of the greater trochanter; the gluteus medius tendon inserts at both the lateral and posterosuperior facets. The Dunn view brings the anterior facet into profile and allows for differentiation of the anterior facet and the insertion of the gluteus minumus from the insertion site of gluteus medius. We hypothesize isolated enthesophytes at the anterior facet best seen on the Dunn view are associated with gluteus minimus tendon pathology. Methods Fifty patients with a history of lateral hip pain with hip radiographs and ipsilateral hip MRI were reviewed. Patients were excluded if the time between radiographs and MRIs >6months or if the patient had prior surgery on the affected side. The radiographs were reviewed by a single-reader to identify enthesophytes (≥ 2mm) at the anterior facet on the Dunn views and lateral facet on the AP view. MRIs were reviewed to categorize the gluteus minimus and medius tendons into the following: normal, tendinopathy, partial thickness tear and full thickness tear. Results The mean age of the fifty patients was 62 (range 19-79; 80% were females). 28 patients had left hip pathology and 22 had right hip. The mean difference between the time between radiograph and MRI was 53 days. Out of the 50 patients, 38 had anterior facet enthesophytes on Dunn views. 97% of these patients had gluteus minimus tendon pathology on MRI, including 76% with tendon tears (positive predictive value [PPV] of 89%). 30 patients had lateral enthesophytes on AP views. 87% of these patients had gluteus medius pathology, including 70% tears (PPV of 83%). Only 3 out of 50 patients had posterosuperior facet enthesophytes. All 3 of these patients had abductor pathology (PPV of 67%). Conclusion There is a correlation between enthesophytes at the greater trochanter anterior facet and lateral facet with respective gluteus minimus and medius tendon pathology. Dunn views add value in detecting anterior facet enthesophytes not visible on AP views and are highly predictive of gluteus minimus tendon pathology.

Abstract Introduction Understanding factors that impact outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) can aid clinical decision-making and patient counselling. The purpose of this study was to investigate functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates among patients undergoing primary THA after hip arthroscopy (HA-THA) compared to a matched cohort of primary THA patients without prior arthroscopy (THA-only). Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent primary THA after prior hip arthroscopy from 2009-2022 at a single institution. Patients with a history of revision arthroscopy were excluded. Cases were propensity-matched with primary THA controls in a 1:4 ratio by age at time of THA, sex, body mass index, surgical approach, and year of surgery. At minimum 2-year follow-up, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (HOOS pain), and Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) were analyzed. Results Sixty-three hips in 60 patients (age: 47.3±9.4 years, BMI: 29.8±6.2 kg/m2) were matched to 252 THA-only hips, with patients converting to THA at a mean 3.1 years (range 0.3-10.3) following hip arthroscopy. While both HA-THA and THA patients demonstrated significant (p<0.001) postoperative improvements in PROs, HA-THA patients reported significantly lower postoperative FJS, mHHS, HOOS pain, and VAS pain scores (p<0.001) as compared to THA-only controls. At mean 6.6±3.2 years follow-up, HA-THA patients with preoperative Tönnis grades 2-3 reported significantly increased FJS, mHHS, and HOOS pain compared to those with preoperative Tönnis grades of 0-1 (p≤0.03). Additionally, HA-THA patients with preoperative Tönnis grades 0-1 exhibited worse PROs (p<0.001) as compared to THA-only controls. While there were no differences in complication rates between HA-THA patients and THA-only controls (8% vs. 5%, p=0.49), all-cause reoperation was greater amongst HA-THA patients compared to THA-only (10% vs. 2%, p=0.01). Conclusion While improved compared to preoperatively, patients undergoing THA after prior hip arthroscopy demonstrated inferior outcomes at mid-term follow up as compared to a demographically age-matched cohort without prior arthroscopy. When considering conversion to THA following arthroscopy, clinicians should consider counseling patients regarding improved outcomes in the setting of advanced radiographic osteoarthritis, and potentially increased all-cause reoperation.

Abstract Purpose To investigate clinical outcomes, including patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), subjective anterior groin pain and hip flexion strength, and reoperation rates following arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Patients who were indicated for arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening after ipsilateral THA were prospectively identified between 2023-2025 at a single institution. Pre- and post-operative PROMs, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Tegner activity scale, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and subjective anterior groin pain and hip flexion strength were analyzed. Reoperations at final follow-up were also evaluated. Results A total of 44 hips in 41 patients (23 females and 18 males) were included (mean age: 64.7 ± 10.2, mean BMI: 29.9 ± 5.9 kg/m2). Fifty-five percent of patients underwent surgery on their right hip. The mean postoperative follow-up timeframe was 10.0 ± 7.1 months. There was a significant improvement in postoperative PROMs compared to pre-operative levels for VAS at rest (1.3 ± 1.9 vs. 2.9 ± 2.2), VAS with use (3.1 ± 3.8 vs. 8.0 ± 1.6), Tegner activity scale (2.9 ± 1.3 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1), and SANE (74.0 ± 20.3 vs. 47.9 ± 23.4) (p<0.001 for all). Over 90% of patients reported feeling much better or slightly better regarding their anterior groin pain at 2-weeks post-operatively (93%), 6 weeks post-operatively (90%), 3 months post-operatively (93%), and at final follow-up (91%). Regarding hip flexion strength, 73% reported feeling much better or slightly better at 2-weeks post-operatively, 95% at 6-weeks post-operatively, 85% at 3 months post-operatively, and 61% at final follow-up. Only 2 patients (5%) reported feeling much weaker at final follow-up. Two of 44 hips (5%) underwent reoperation at final follow-up. One patient underwent a 2-stage revision THA at 5 months postoperatively due to infection, while 1 patient underwent an open iliopsoas release with acetabular screw removal and liner exchange. Overall, the mean surgery satisfaction was 8.1 ± 2.6 on a scale of 1-10. Conclusion Patients who underwent arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening following THA demonstrated satisfactory postoperative outcomes, with over 90% reporting durably improved anterior groin pain and nearly two-thirds reporting increased hip flexor strength throughout follow-up.

Objective The incidence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is increasing with the aging population, leading to interest in intra-articular orthobiologic injections to alleviate symptoms and potentially slow disease progression. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with six orthobiologic therapies for hip OA: hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), autologous cells therapy (ACT), microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and its concentration (BMAC). Methods We conducted a literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included in our review if they used at least one of the four orthobiologic therapies and reported on the clinical outcome using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Since there is a large variability among clinical outcomes, we focused on the three most utilized PROMs (VAS, WOMAC, and HHS) and the latest follow-up time point. Results Of the 716 studies reviewed, thirty-six studies (n=36) fit inclusion criteria. There were 21 studies examining HA, 11 on PRP, 3 for MFAT, 2 for ACT, and 3 on BMA/BMAC. Eight studies were randomized controlled trials and 28 were cohort studies. The mean age of the patient population ranged from 45 ± 17.0 to 74 ± 8.0. The baseline grade of osteoarthritis ranged from 1-4 but was most reported as moderate (2-3). Overall, there was an improvement in PROMs at the latest follow-up after receiving orthobiologic interventions. Discussion Orthobiologic injections have shown promise for improving PROMs in patients with hip OA. Future studies should evaluate long-term efficacy and include randomized trials to establish efficacy.

Purpose Hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive procedure which has been increasingly used among athletes for several hip joint related pathologies as it allows for a faster recovery. However, objective return to sport criteria have not been described previously among this population. Objective To systematically review the literature to evaluate and describe the objective return-to-sport (RTS) criteria to release patients back to sport following hip arthroscopy. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included in the review if patients underwent a hip arthroscopy procedure and the study described criteria for their patients to RTS. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion and extracted study characteristics and objective RTS criteria. Results Of the 306 that were a part of our original search, 6 studies fit our inclusion criteria. There were 250 athletes (average age: 26.1) and 263 hips which underwent hip arthroscopy surgery. Of these athletes, the cohort was on average 46.5% female and an average of 91.2% of athletes returned to sport about 6 months following surgery. The primary sports these athletes participated in were soccer, swimming, skiing/snowboarding, and hockey. The objective RTS measures that were generally described included sport specific tests, range-of-motion, hip strength, and performance-based criteria. Conclusion There are minimal studies who described objective RTS criteria to release patients back to sport following hip arthroscopy procedures. Sports specific tests, hip strength, and performance-based criteria were mentioned as objective criteria to release patients back to sport.

Background: Chronic hamstring tears can result in challenging surgical repairs. Allografts may be used to augment the repair; however, there is limited clinical evidence supporting their use. Purposes: To (1) evaluate clinical outcomes of patients who underwent proximal hamstring repair with allograft augmentation or interposition and (2) compare them to matched controls who underwent primary hamstring repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 117 patients who underwent proximal hamstring repair were included, consisting of 19 allograft augmentations, 20 allograft interpositions, and 78 primary repairs. Allograft cohorts were propensity-matched with those who underwent primary repair in a 1 to 2 ratio. Clinical outcomes were obtained at the final follow-up. Data were extracted using continuous variables, with normality reported as mean values ± standard deviation, and non-normality reported as median values with interquartile ranges (IQR). Results: The median follow-up of the augmentation cohort was 1.9 [IQR, 0.8-3.9] years, while it was 3.2 [IQR, 1.6-5.1] years ( P = .182) for the primary repair cohort. The mean follow-up for the interposition cohort was 3.5 ± 2.4 years, while it was 4.2 ± 2.5 years for the primary repair cohort ( P = .227). Forty-two percent of the augmentation cohort had undergone previous surgery, compared with 5% of the interposition cohort. The time from injury to surgery for the augmentation and primary repair cohorts was 6.4 and 1.3 months, respectively ( P < .001). For the interposition and primary repair cohorts, the durations were 17.8 and 1 months, respectively ( P < .001). Clinical outcomes, including the Tegner Activity Scale (3 vs 3), pain with activity (47.4% vs 23.7%), and muscle spasms (36.8% vs 26.3%), did not show significant differences between the augmentation and primary repair cohorts. The augmentation cohort had a significantly worse Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) score (64 vs 75; P < .001) and were more likely to experience pain with sitting (52.6% vs 21.1%; P = .034) than the primary repair cohort. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the interposition and primary repair cohorts (LEFS: 69 vs 75.5, Tegner Activity Scale: 4 vs 4; pain with sitting: 26.3% vs 27.5%; pain with activity: 42.1% vs 30%; muscle spasms: 26.3% vs 30%). Revision rates were similar between cohorts ( P ≥ .255). Conclusion: Proximal hamstring repair for chronic tears with allograft augmentation or interposition is a reproducible procedure that results in satisfactory, yet poorer clinical outcomes compared with patients who underwent primary hamstring repair. These procedures should be considered in symptomatic patients with chronic tears that are not amenable to primary repair.

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain in female athletes. There are limited data on midterm outcomes for female athletes undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To evaluate return-to-sport rates and clinical outcomes in female athletes with FAI after primary hip arthroscopic surgery with labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a single institution’s database was performed to identify female athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery with labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty from July 2011 to October 2019 with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Preoperative radiographs were evaluated for the lateral center-edge angle, Tonnis angle, Tonnis grade, and alpha angle. Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores, including those for the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, Tegner Activity Scale, and visual analog scale for pain, as well as patient satisfaction with surgery were analyzed postoperatively. Results: A total of 63 hips (27 left, 36 right) in 56 female patients (mean age, 21.6 ± 8.0 years; mean body mass index, 24.7 ± 4.8 kg/m 2 ) were included and followed for a mean of 8.4 ± 2.1 years (range, 5.0-13.2 years). Preoperatively, patients participated in basketball (n = 18), dance (n = 21), hockey (n = 8), and soccer (n = 12). Of the 56 patients, 41 attempted to return to sport. There were 28 (68%) female athletes who successfully returned to their preoperative sport. Of the total cohort, 21 (38%) patients cited non–hip-related factors for discontinuing their sport. All postoperative PROM scores improved significantly compared with preoperatively ( P ≤ .002) for patients with available preoperative data. Those who returned to sport had significantly improved Hip Outcome Score values compared with those who did not return to sport ( P ≤ .010). Conclusion: Female athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI had significant improvements in PROM scores and moderate return-to-sport rates at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Most athletes discontinued sports because of non–hip-related factors, although hip-related issues were also cited. Our analysis highlights the need for thorough perioperative counseling and establishing appropriate patient expectations for female athletes before hip arthroscopic surgery.

Abstract The acetabular labrum is a fibrocartilaginous structure that deepens the acetabular socket and helps maintain a suction seal. In patients with hip dysplasia, a distinct labral tear pattern called an inside‐out labral tear is often seen. This tear pattern is particularly challenging to correct via conventional techniques since the labrum can potentially remain everted and insufficiently restore the native hip labral suction seal after repair. An inverted hip labral repair technique is performed for this pathology at our institution and focuses on achieving optimal labral orientation to enhance the suction seal and joint stability, particularly in dysplastic hips. This Technical Note aims to describe the key surgical principles and clinical considerations of inverted hip labral repair. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Objectives: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is utilized for the treatment of hip dysplasia, with a growing trend towards hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO or in a planned, staged manner prior to PAO in order to address intra-articular pathology such as labral tears. For patients with persistent or new pain following isolated PAO, a subset undergo unplanned, primary hip arthroscopy. To date, there is a paucity of available evidence regarding the risk factors for and outcomes of unplanned hip arthroscopy for persistent or new pain after PAO. The purpose of this study was to determine demographic and radiographic characteristics of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for persistent pain after PAO and also to compare radiographic parameters, surgical characteristics, and postoperative PROMs between patients that underwent hip arthroscopy following PAO and a demographically similar group of controls without acetabular dysplasia that underwent primary hip arthroscopy. Methods: An institutional database of 3014 hip arthroscopies performed between 1988 and 2022 was reviewed for patients having undergone unplanned (i.e. non-staged) first-time hip arthroscopy after PAO. These patients were propensity-matched on a 1:2 ratio with demographically similar, non-dysplastic patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair. All patients were contacted at final-follow-up to collect outcomes including subsequent procedures, progression to THA, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT), Tegner Activity Scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and surgery satisfaction. Demographics, radiographic characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. All statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1). Results: We identified 22 hips in 21 patients (17 female, 4 male; age: 24.6 ± 8.5 years; BMI: 29.3 ± 7.4 kg/m²) who underwent first-time arthroscopy after ipsilateral PAO and were followed for a mean of 7.2 ± 2.8 years (Table 1). The median post-PAO LCEA was 28° (IQR: 24.6 – 31.7) and the mean Tönnis angle was 4.2° ± 5.9. The median time from the date of PAO to date of subsequent hip arthroscopy was 1.6 years (IQR: 1.1 - 3.4). Compared to the control group, there was a significantly lower rate of femoral osteochondroplasty (50% vs, 86%, p < 0.01), as well as trends towards lower rate of labral repair (77% vs. 95% p = 0.11), and higher rate of capsular repair (64% vs. 75%, p = 0.34). No differences were found between the PAO and control groups in any of the postoperative PROMs (Table 2). Among the PAO patients, 3 (20%) progressed to total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to 1 (9%) in the control group (p=0.62). Conclusions: Hip arthroscopy after prior PAO was associated with postoperative improvements in pain and moderate rates of conversion to THA. When patients undergoing hip arthroscopy following PAO were compared to a demographically similar matched cohort of nondysplastic hips who underwent primary hip arthroscopy without a prior PAO, similar postoperative outcome scores were observed. This data provides valuable counselling information for clinicians discussing hip arthroscopy in the setting of patients with persistent pain following PAO.