Lloyd, James W.

Background: Carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) typically affects tricuspid and pulmonary valves and is associated with poor survival. To date, the role of right ventricular (RV) and atrial (RA) strain has not been evaluated in such cohort. Research Questions: To evaluate RV and RA strain patterns and assess their impact on survival and congestive heart failure (CHF) development. Methods: Retrospective study of CaHD patients (ICD 9/10 diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor and echocardiographic evidence of CaHD prior to any surgical intervention; 2004-2019). Longitudinal strain was evaluated using speckle-tracking, RV/RA-focused view was used. RV strain was averaged from 3 and 6 segments for free wall (FWS) and global strain (GS), respectively. Auto-tracking with manual adjustment was done to ensure optimal tracking. The tracing of RV/RA endocardium was done with 15 points using the tricuspid valve annulus as a reference. The impact of strain parameters on mortality and CHF was evaluated with the Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results: A total of 138 patients were included (mean age was 63 ± 10 years; 47% females). Median follow-up was 5.0 years (3.7-8.2). Significant RA and RV enlargement (72 and 79%, respectively) was more common than RV dysfunction (10%). The most common valvular disease > moderate was tricuspid regurgitation (TR; 97%) followed by pulmonary regurgitation (PR; 70%). RV GS mean was -21 + 6%, with FWS of -23 + 7%. The mean RA strain analysis revealed (93% sinus rhythm): a reservoir of 26 + 11%, a conduit of 14 + 8%, and an atrial contraction of 12 + 8%. Strain parameters were not associated with overall mortality. As opposed to PR/TR severity and RV/RA enlargement/dysfunction, patients with low RA reservoir strain (<23%) were more likely to develop CHF (adjusted-HR=1.80, p=0.04, 95% CI 1.04 - 3.134). Conclusions: Our findings suggests that CaHD patients have RV/RA dysfunction with overall reduced strain parameters. Patients with low RA reservoir had higher risk of CHF, but none of the RV/RA strain parameters were associated with excess mortality. This shows how strain analysis could complement other echocardiographic parameters in CaHD morbidity assessment.

AbstractBackgroundMitral transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (MTEER) is an established therapeutic approach for mitral regurgitation (MR). Functional mitral regurgitation originating from atrial myopathy (A‐FMR) has been described.ObjectivesWe sought to assess the clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic considerations in A‐FMR patients undergoing MTEER.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2020, patients undergoing MTEER for degenerative MR (DMR), functional MR (FMR), and mixed MR were assessed. A‐FMR was defined by the presence of MR > moderate in severity; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%; and severe left atrial (LA) enlargement in the absence of LV dysfunction, leaflet pathology, or LV tethering. The diagnosis of A‐FMR (vs. ventricular‐FMR [V‐FMR]) was confirmed by three independent echocardiographers. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes as well as clinical and echocardiographic follow‐up are reported. Device success was defined as final MR grade ≤ moderate; MR reduction ≥1 grade; and final transmitral gradient <5 mmHg.Results306 patients underwent MTEER, including DMR (62%), FMR (19%), and mixed MR (19%). FMR cases included 37 (63.8%) V‐FMR and 21 (36.2%) A‐FMR. Tricuspid regurgitation (≥ moderate) was higher in A‐FMR (80.1%) compared to V‐FMR (54%) and DMR (42%). Device success did not significantly differ between A‐FMR and V‐FMR (57% vs. 73%, p = 0.34) or DMR (57% vs. 64%, p = 1.0). The A‐FMR cohort was less likely to achieve ≥3 grades of MR reduction compared to V‐FMR (19% vs. 54%, p = 0.01) and DMR (19% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.01). Patients with V‐FMR and DMR demonstrated significant reductions in mean left atrial pressure (LAP) and peak LA V‐wave, though A‐FMR did not (LAP −0.24 ± 4.9, p = 0.83; peak V‐wave −1.76 ± 9.1, p = 0.39). In follow‐up, echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were similar.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing MTEER, A‐FMR represents one‐third of FMR cases. A‐FMR demonstrates similar procedural success but blunted acute hemodynamic responses compared with DMR and V‐FMR following MTEER. Dedicated studies specifically considering A‐FMR are needed to discern the optimal therapeutic approaches.

AbstractBackgroundTranscatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as a feasible alternative to redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) in patients with degenerated mitral prostheses, with limited comparative data.MethodsWe compared mid‐term outcomes in patients with degenerated mitral valve prostheses treated with TMVR or redo SMVR. The primary endpoint was survival at 5 years of follow‐up.ResultsFrom 2014 to 2020, 215 patients presented with degenerated mitral valve prostheses. Of whom 86 (40%) were treated with TMVR (75[87%] valve‐in‐valve and 11[13%] valve‐in‐ring), while 129 patients (60%) underwent SMVR. The TMVR cohort was older (p < 0.0001), more symptomatic (p = 0.0003) and had more chronic lung disease (p = 0.02), worse renal function (p = 0.02) and higher right ventricular systolic pressures (p < 0.0001). Thirty‐day mortality was lower with TMVR versus SMVR (2.4% vs. 10.2%, OR4.69 [95% CI 1.25–30.5], p = 0.04) with probability of mortality at 1, 2, and 5 years being 14.7% versus 17.5%, 24.5% versus 20.7%, and 49.9% versus 34.0%, respectively. Mode of prosthesis degeneration, baseline hemodynamics, and valve selection did not appreciably impact outcomes.ConclusionsTMVR for degenerated mitral prostheses is associated with better early survival compared to SMVR despite a greater burden of comorbidities. In contrast, 5 year survival rates appear more favorable with SMVR, which may reflect the lower baseline risk of this population. Clinical, hemodynamic, and echocardiographic follow‐up support the mid‐term durability of TMVR for degenerated mitral prostheses. Further dedicated studies, however, are required to optimize outcomes in this challenging patient cohort and to navigate the choice of approach for each individual patient.

AbstractIn pacemaker‐dependent patients with a newly implanted cardiac device, acute lead dislodgement constitutes one of the most common causes of loss of capture and ventricular asystole. In a biventricular system, it would be expected that such a potentially catastrophic event would be prevented with back‐up right ventricular pacing unless both leads dislodge.

AbstractMitral valvulopathy presents as regurgitation, stenosis, or mixed disease and can occur in both native and prosthetic valves. Such disease develops in conjunction with pathophysiologic changes in the left atrium (LA) and drives changes in LA compliance, pressure, and thus clinical syndromes. With advances in the understanding and treatment of structural heart disease and in the setting of higher‐risk patient populations, less‐invasive transcatheter approaches have become increasingly commonplace in the treatment of mitral valve disease. Over time, transcatheter mitral valve interventions have evolved to include paravalvular leak closure, mitral valve repair, and mitral valve replacement. Parallel to this evolution, advances in invasive intracardiac pressure monitoring, particularly at the level of the LA, have also occurred. These advances emphasize the unique interplay between mitral valve disease and LA function; account for limitations of noninvasive assessment; and guide beneficial outcomes in each area of transcatheter mitral valve intervention. As a result, continuous transseptal LA pressure monitoring has developed into an indispensable instrument in successful percutaneous mitral valve intervention, complementing traditional noninvasive assessment.

AbstractObjectiveTo understand the clinical and hemodynamic response of patients with stenotic versus regurgitant prosthetic mitral valve degeneration to transseptal transcatheter mitral valve‐in‐ring/‐valve replacement (TMVR).BackgroundPatients with prosthetic mitral valve repair/replacement failure frequently present high‐risk surgical challenges. TMVR has been employed as an alternative to surgery.MethodsForty‐four patients with stenotic/regurgitant degeneration of prior prosthetic mitral annuloplasty and replacement (38) underwent mitral TMVR. Clinical, echocardiographic, and invasive hemodynamic monitoring was conducted at baseline and follow‐up.ResultsRelative to patients with regurgitant degeneration (28), patients with stenotic degeneration had baseline higher mitral valve gradients (12 ± 4 vs. 7 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.01) and smaller areas (1.0 ± 0.4 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4 cm2, p = 0.01). TMVR yielded significant reduction in left atrial v‐wave pressures in stenotic and regurgitant cohorts (−7 ± 11, p = 0.03, and −11 ± 12 mmHg, p < 0.01, respectively) and significant, sustained symptomatic improvement. Intracardiac pressures overall, including left ventricular end diastolic pressures, remained elevated.ConclusionDespite baseline differences in valvular disease, TMVR leads to significant hemodynamic and clinical improvement in both stenotic and regurgitant prosthetic mitral valve disease. In both cohorts, TMVR reduced intracardiac pressures to similar postprocedural levels, but pressures remained supranormal. This outcome suggests a multifactorial process defines the pathophysiology of patients undergoing TMVR, including contributions from prosthetic degeneration, changes in left atrial compliance, and diastolic dysfunction, and highlights the need to consider such factors in patient evaluation and treatment.

AbstractObjectivesTo measure the intraprocedural change in left atrial pressure (LAP) with saline administration during transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR).BackgroundTMVR with MitraClip offers an alternative to surgery in select patients. During this procedure, large volumes of fluid are routinely administered with anesthesia and to facilitate transcatheter valve repair. LAP, a measure used to guide repair, may thereby change as a result of volume expansion, suggesting a need for continuous intracardiac pressure monitoring.MethodsConsecutive patients with severe mitral regurgitation underwent TMVR with MitraClip and continuous LAP monitoring through a dedicated sampling catheter. Specific LAP values were acquired immediately after transseptal access; before first clip deployment; and after deployment of the last clip.Results151 patients (age 80 ± 8 years, 64% male) underwent TMVR with MitraClip and continuous LAP monitoring. Mean LAP and v‐wave pressure increased significantly from baseline to pre‐MitraClip deployment (P < 0.0001) and decreased significantly from deployment to procedure end (P < 0.0001). Linear regression of v‐wave pressure change (from procedure start to clip deployment) relative to volume administration yielded a significantly nonzero slope (0.28 mmHg/min, P < 0.0001, r = 0.30).ConclusionFluid administration during TMVR leads to time‐dependent increases in LAP. Such intraprocedural change underscores the need for targeted, if not continuous, LAP measurement during TMVR to optimize MitraClip placement and mitral regurgitation reduction.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to demonstrate the physiologic effects of percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak (PVL) closure through pre‐ and post‐closure left and right heart catheterization.BackgroundMitral PVL represents a significant source of morbidity and mortality following mitral valve repair and replacement. Although percutaneous PVL closure is an effective treatment with improvements in symptoms and mortality, data regarding the acute hemodynamic effects of such closure are lacking.MethodsConsecutive patients with clinically significant heart failure and/or hemolysis attributed to mitral PVL underwent percutaneous mitral PVL closure with pre‐ and post‐procedural right and left heart catheterization. Hemodynamic measurements of cardiovascular function obtained in this manner were compared and stratified according to pre‐ and post‐procedural echocardiographic severity of PVL.ResultsTwenty‐four patients (age 68 ± 9.4 years, 75% male) underwent percutaneous mitral PVL closure. Significant improvements were found in left atrial pressure (LAP) (mean LAP lowered from 21 ± 4 to 19 ± 3 mm Hg, P = 0.005), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) (mean PAP lowered from 36 ± 11 to 33 ± 9, P = 0.04), and cardiac index (increased from 2.8 ± 0.8 to 3.0 ± 0.7 L/min/m2, P = 0.01). Left atrial v‐wave reduction of 20% was associated with ≤ mild residual PVL by transesophageal echocardiography (P = 0.09).ConclusionsPercutaneous mitral PVL closure is associated with significant reductions in LAP and PAP and an increase in cardiac index. These hemodynamic effects underlie the clinical benefits of PVL closure and may be a useful tool for intraprocedural guidance. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.