Citations 18

Meta‐analysis: Risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | February 19, 2024 | Volume: 59 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 918-927

10.1111/apt.17919 | PMID 38372406

SummaryBackgroundStudies exploring the association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and pancreatic cancer have reported inconsistent results.AimsTo provide a comprehensive overview of the risk of pancreatic cancer development in patients with IBD.MethodsWe searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus and ProQuest from inception to 31 October 2023. We included population‐based cohort studies examining the risk of incident pancreatic cancer in adult patients with IBD compared to the non‐IBD population. We also retrieved Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies investigating the relationship of IBD with pancreatic cancer risk. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analyses and provided pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsWe included 13 studies. Among 11 cohort studies, the risk of developing pancreatic cancer increased by 79% in patients with IBD (RR = 1.79 [95% CI: 1.16–2.75]; I2 = 95.7%). Patients either with Crohn's disease (RR = 1.42 [95% CI: 1.24–1.63]) or ulcerative colitis (RR = 1.50 [95% CI: 1.17–1.92]) had increased risk (p for interaction = 0.72). The annual incidence of pancreatic cancer potentially attributable to IBD increased by 55 cases (95% CI: 17–103) per million. Two MR studies demonstrated that genetic liability to IBD was associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer.ConclusionsOur results suggest a moderate increase in the risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with IBD, which may be further heightened by genetic predisposition to IBD. The increased risk of pancreatic cancer is probably similar in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
S877 Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated Peripheral Arthritis: A Systematic Review

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 18, 2023 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 10S | Pages: S653-S653

10.14309/01.ajg.0000953148.19534.de

Economic Burden of Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Crohn's & Colitis 360 | April 20, 2023 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/crocol/otad020 | PMID 37663925

AbstractBackgroundThis retrospective study gathered medical/pharmacy claims data on patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) between January 01, 2000 and March 31, 2019 from the IBM MarketScan commercial claims database to assess the real-world impact of fatigue on healthcare costs in patients newly diagnosed with IBD.MethodsEligible participants were ≥18 years, newly diagnosed with IBD (≥2 separate claims), and had ≥12 months of continuous database enrollment before and after fatigue diagnosis. The date of fatigue diagnosis was the index date; participants were followed for 12 months post-index. Patients with (cases) or without (controls) fatigue were matched 1:1 by propensity score matching. Patients with evidence of prior IBD diagnosis/treatment, or those with a chronic disease other than IBD wherein fatigue is the primary symptom, were excluded. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), including hospitalizations, inpatient and outpatient visits, and associated costs were compared between cases and controls.ResultsMatched IBD cohorts (21 321 cases/21 321 controls) were identified (42% Crohn’s disease [CD] and 58% ulcerative colitis [UC]) with similar baseline characteristics (average age: 46 years; 60% female). Cases versus controls had significantly more all-cause outpatient visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 1.64 [1.61, 1.67], P < .001) and all-cause hospitalizations (IRR [95% CI]: 1.92 [1.81, 2.04], P < .001); as well as significantly higher all-cause total direct healthcare costs (mean: $24 620 vs. $15 324; P < .001). Similar findings were observed for IBD-related outcomes, as well as in CD- and UC-specific subgroups.ConclusionsPresence of fatigue is associated with an increase in HCRU and total medical costs among patients newly diagnosed with IBD.
Genetic coding variant in complement factor B (CFB) is associated with increased risk for perianal Crohn’s disease and leads to impaired CFB cleavage and phagocytosis

Gut | April 20, 2023 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2068-2080

10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329689 | PMID 37080587

Objective Perianal Crohn’s disease (pCD) occurs in up to 40% of patients with CD and is associated with poor quality of life, limited treatment responses and poorly understood aetiology. We performed a genetic association study comparing CD subjects with and without perianal disease and subsequently performed functional follow-up studies for a pCD associated SNP in Complement Factor B ( CFB ). Design Immunochip-based meta-analysis on 4056 pCD and 11 088 patients with CD from three independent cohorts was performed. Serological and clinical variables were analysed by regression analyses. Risk allele of rs4151651 was introduced into human CFB plasmid by site-directed mutagenesis. Binding of recombinant G252 or S252 CFB to C3b and its cleavage was determined in cell-free assays. Macrophage phagocytosis in presence of recombinant CFB or serum from CFB risk, or protective CD or healthy subjects was assessed by flow cytometry. Results Perianal complications were associated with colonic involvement, OmpC and ASCA serology, and serology quartile sum score. We identified a genetic association for pCD (rs4151651), a non-synonymous SNP (G252S) in CFB , in all three cohorts. Recombinant S252 CFB had reduced binding to C3b, its cleavage was impaired, and complement-driven phagocytosis and cytokine secretion were reduced compared with G252 CFB. Serine 252 generates a de novo glycosylation site in CFB. Serum from homozygous risk patients displayed significantly decreased macrophage phagocytosis compared with non-risk serum. Conclusion pCD-associated rs4151651 in CFB is a loss-of-function mutation that impairs its cleavage, activation of alternative complement pathway, and pathogen phagocytosis thus implicating the alternative complement pathway and CFB in pCD aetiology.
Recommendations on the Appropriate Management of Steroids and Discharge Planning During and After Hospital Admission for Moderate-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a RAND Appropriateness Panel

American Journal of Gastroenterology | April 13, 2022 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1288-1295

10.14309/ajg.0000000000001775 | PMID 35416799

INTRODUCTION: Limited guidance exists for the postdischarge care of patients with ulcerative colitis hospitalized for moderate-severe flares. METHODS: RAND methodology was used to establish appropriateness of inpatient and postdischarge steroid dosing, discharge criteria, follow-up, and postdischarge biologic or small molecule initiation. A literature review informed on the panel's voting, which occurred anonymously during 2 rounds before and after a moderated virtual session. RESULTS: Methylprednisolone 40–60 mg intravenous every 24 hours or hydrocortisone 100 mg intravenous 3 times daily is appropriate for inpatient management, with methylprednisolone 40 mg being appropriate if intolerant of higher doses. It is appropriate to discharge patients once rectal bleeding has resolved (Mayo subscore 0–1) and/or stool frequency has returned to baseline frequency and form (Mayo subscore 0–1). It is appropriate to discharge patients on 40 mg of prednisone after observing patients for 24 hours in hospital to ensure stability before discharge. For patients being discharged on steroids without in-hospital biologic or small molecule therapy initiation, it is appropriate to start antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy after discharge for anti-TNF-naive patients. For anti-TNF-exposed patients, it is appropriate to start vedolizumab or ustekinumab for all patients and tofacitinib for those with a low risk of adverse events. It is appropriate to follow up patients clinically within 2 weeks and with lower endoscopy within 4–6 months after discharge. DISCUSSION: We provide recommendations on the inpatient and postdischarge management of patients with ulcerative colitis hospitalized for moderate-severe flares.
A United States expert consensus to standardise definitions, follow‐up, and treatment targets for extra‐intestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | March 12, 2022 | Volume: 55 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1179-1191

10.1111/apt.16853 | PMID 35277863

SummaryBackground and aimsExtra‐intestinal manifestations (EIMs) are a common complication of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), affecting up to half of the patients. Despite their high prevalence, information on standardised definitions, diagnostic strategies, and treatment targets is limited.MethodsAs a starting point for a national EIM study network, an interdisciplinary expert panel of 12 gastroenterologists, 4 rheumatologists, 3 ophthalmologists, 6 dermatologists, and 4 patient representatives was assembled. Modified Delphi consensus methodology was used. Fifty‐four candidate items were derived from the literature review and expert opinion focusing on five major EIMs (erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, uveitis, peripheral arthritis, and axial arthritis) were rated in three voting rounds.ResultsFor use in a clinical practice setting and as part of the creation of a prospective registry of patients with EIMs, the panel developed definitions for erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, uveitis, peripheral arthritis, and axial arthritis; identified the appropriate and optimal subspecialists to diagnose and manage each; provided methods to monitor disease course; offered guidance regarding monitoring intervals; and defined resolution and recurrence.ConclusionsConsensus criteria for appropriate and optimal means of diagnosing and monitoring five EIMs have been developed as a starting point to inform clinical practice and future trial design. Key findings include straightforward diagnostic criteria, guidance regarding who can appropriately and optimally diagnose each, and monitoring options that include patient and physician‐reported outcomes. These findings will be used in a national multicenter study network to optimise the management of EIMs.
Disease and Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Pouch-related Conditions in a Cohort of Large Tertiary Care Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centers in the United States

Crohn's & Colitis 360 | May 8, 2020 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/crocol/otaa039 | PMID 32744536

AbstractBackgroundGaps exist in our understanding of the clinical course of pouch-related disorders.MethodsWe evaluated baseline disease activity and longitudinal treatment patterns among patients with inflammatory conditions of the pouch.ResultsAmong 468 patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), 94 (20%) had acute pouchitis, 96 (21%) had chronic pouchitis, and 192 (41%) had Crohn disease of the pouch. Following an IPAA, 38% of patients were treated with a biologic and 11% underwent inflammatory bowel disease- or bowel-related surgery.ConclusionsTreatment patterns after IPAA indicate that pouch-related disorders have a significant impact on individual patients and the healthcare system.
The benefit of combination therapy depends on disease phenotype and duration in Crohn's disease

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | May 4, 2017 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 162-168

10.1111/apt.14125 | PMID 28470787

SummaryBackgroundThe impact of combination therapy on disease‐related morbidity in patients with established Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) remains to be well‐defined.AimTo examine the effect of combination therapy on disease outcomes in CD and UC.MethodsUsing a multicenter prospective cohort, we classified CD and UC patients as being on monotherapy with anti‐TNF or on combination with an immunomodulator. The primary outcome was a composite of new IBD‐related surgery, hospitalisations, penetrating complications, need for corticosteroids or new biological at 1 year. Multivariable regression models adjusted for potential confounders.ResultsWe included 707 patients with CD (45% combination therapy) and 164 with UC (38% combination therapy). Combination therapy was not associated with reduction in the composite outcome in either CD (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.63‐1.22) or UC (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.63‐3.38). However, while no difference was noted in those with nonstricturing, nonpenetrating CD, a significant reduction in the likelihood of the outcome was seen in those with stricturing or penetrating CD (30% vs 39%, OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37‐0.90). A stronger effect was also observed in those with disease duration <5 years (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14‐0.87) compared to those with a longer duration (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.45‐1.27). A similar reduction in occurrence of composite outcome was noted with infliximab and with other anti‐TNF biologics.ConclusionThe benefit of combination immunomodulator‐biological therapy is stronger in those with complicated Crohn's disease, particularly early on in their disease course.