Mesa, Ruben A.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary(idiopathic) myelofibrosis (PMF). In this systematic review, we provide a comprehensive report on the incidence and prevalence of MPNs across the globe. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science) were searched from their inception to August 2012 for articles reporting MPN incidence or prevalence rates. A random effects meta‐analysis was undertaken to produce combined incidence rates for PV, ET, and PMF. Both heterogeneity and small study bias were assessed. Thirty‐four studies were included. Reported annual incidence rates ranged from 0.01 to 2.61, 0.21 to 2.27, and 0.22 to 0.99 per 100,000 for PV, ET, and PMF, respectively. The combined annual incidence rates for PV, ET, and PMF were 0.84, 1.03, and 0.47 per 100,000. There was high heterogeneity across disease entities (I2 97.1–99.8%) and evidence of publication bias for ET and PMF (Egger test, P = 0.007 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively).The pooled incidence reflects the rarity of MPNs. The calculated pooled incidence rates do not reflect MPN incidence across the globe due to the high unexplained heterogeneity. Improved, widespread registration of MPNs would provide better information for global comparison of the incidence and prevalence of MPNs. Am. J. Hematol. 89:581–587, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Background Primary myelofibrosis ( PMF ), essential thrombocythemia ( ET ), and polycythemia vera ( PV ) are BCR ABL ‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasms ( MPN ). Published epidemiology data are scarce, and multiple sources are needed to assess the disease burden. Methods We assembled the most recent information available on the incidence and prevalence of myelofibrosis ( MF ), ET , and PV by conducting a structured and exhaustive literature review of the published peer‐reviewed literature in EMBASE and by reviewing online documentation from disease registries and relevant health registries in European countries. The search was restricted to human studies written in English or French and published between January 1, 2000, and December 6, 2012. Results Eleven articles identified from EMBASE , three online hematology or oncology registries, and two Web‐based databases or reports were used to summarize epidemiological estimates for MF , PV , and ET . The incidence rate of MF ranged from 0.1 per 100 000 per year to 1 per 100 000 per year. Among the various registries, the incidence of PV ranged from 0.4 per 100 000 per year to 2.8 per 100 000 per year, while the literature estimated the range of PV incidence to be 0.68 per 100 000 to 2.6 per 100 000 per year. The estimated incidence of ET was between 0.38 per 100 000 per year and 1.7 per 100 000 per year. While a few studies reported on the MPN s' prevalences, it is difficult to compare them as various types of prevalence were calculated (point prevalence vs. period prevalence) and standardization was made according to different populations (e.g., the world population and the European population). Conclusion There is a wide variation in both prevalence and incidence estimates observed across European data sources. Carefully designed studies, with standardized definitions of MPN s and complete ascertainment of patients including both primary and secondary MF s, should be conducted so that estimates of the population aimed to receive novel treatments for these neoplasms are better understood assist public health planning and provide valuable information about the burden of illness to policy makers, funding agencies, resource planners, healthcare insurers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are composed of essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and myelofibrosis (MF), the etiology of which is largely unknown. We investigated the role of anthropometric, medical and lifestyle factors with risk of MPN in a prospective cohort of 27,370 women aged 55–69 years at enrollment. After >250,000 person‐years of follow‐up, 257 cases of MPN were identified (172 ET, 64 PV, 21 MF). Risk factor profiles were mostly unique for the two most common types, ET and PV. ET was associated with energy balance factors including body mass index (RR = 1.52 for >29.3vs. <23.4 kg/m2;p‐trend = 0.042), physical activity (RR = 0.66 for highvs. low;p‐trend = 0.04) and adult onset diabetes (RR = 1.82;p = 0.009), while PV was not. PV was associated with current smoking (RR = 2.83;p‐trend = 0.016), while ET was not. Regular use of aspirin was associated with lower risk of ET (RR = 0.68;p = 0.017). These results broadly held in multivariate models. Our results suggest distinct etiologies for these MPN subtypes and raise mechanistic hypotheses related to obesity‐related inflammatory pathways for ET and smoking‐related carcinogenic pathways for PV. Regular aspirin use may lower risk for ET.

Key Points Treatment response criteria for MF must capture drug benefit in terms of symptom burden. The current document includes stricter definitions of red cell transfusion need and independence.

SummaryMyelofibrosis (MF) is a Philadelphia chromosome–negative stem cell myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) associated with cytopenias, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and poor prognosis. MF patients commonly express JAK2 V617F mutation and activation of Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signalling. Agents targeting the JAK/STAT pathway have demonstrated efficacy in patients with MF. This study evaluated panobinostat, a pan‐deacetylase inhibitor that depletes JAK2 V617F levels and JAK/STAT signalling in MPN cells, in patients with primary MF, post–essential thrombocythaemia MF, and post–polycythaemia vera MF. Patients received panobinostat 40 mg administered three times per week. Dose reductions were permitted for toxicities. The primary endpoint was response rate at 6 months using International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG‐MRT) consensus criteria. Analyses of peripheral blood cells from treated patients revealed that panobinostat inhibited JAK/STAT signalling, decreased inflammatory cytokine levels, and decreased JAK2 V617F allelic burden. However, panobinostat was poorly tolerated at the dose and schedule evaluated, and only 16 of 35 patients completed ≥2 cycles of treatment. One patient (3%) achieved an IWG‐MRT response. Common adverse events were thrombocytopenia (71·4%) and diarrhoea (80·0%). Although molecular correlative analyses suggested that panobinostat inhibits key intracellular targets, limited clinical activity was observed because of poor tolerance.

SummaryPatients with myelofibrosis (MF) have significant debilitating symptoms, physical disabilities, and poor health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Here, we report post‐hoc analyses of the impact of ruxolitinib, a potent and selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, on disease‐related symptoms and HRQoL in MF patients from the large phase 3 COMFORT‐II study (N = 219). During the follow‐up period of 48 weeks, HRQoL and MF‐associated symptoms improved from baseline for ruxolitinib‐treated patients but remained the same or worsened for best available therapy (BAT)‐treated patients. Based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire core 30 items (EORTC QLQ‐C30), treatment‐induced differences in physical and role functioning, fatigue, and appetite loss significantly favoured ruxolitinib versus BAT from week 8 (P < 0·05) up to week 48 (P < 0·05). Ruxolitinib resulted in significantly higher response rates in global health status/QoL and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Lymphoma (FACT‐Lym) summary scores versus BAT at most time points (P < 0·05). Significant improvements in the Lymphoma subscale (including symptoms of pain, fever, itching, fatigue, weight loss, loss of appetite, and other patient concerns), FACT‐General, FACT‐Lym trial outcome index, and FACT‐Lym total were also observed with ruxolitinib versus BAT starting at week 8 and continuing thereafter. Overall, these data demonstrated that ruxolitinib improved HRQoL in MF patients and further support the use of ruxolitinib for the treatment of symptomatic MF.

Key Points Evidence exists that ELN criteria for response in ET and PV issued in 2009 do not provide relevant measures of benefit for patients. Revised recommendations for assessing response are provided.

SummaryMyelofibrosis (MF) patients can present with a wide spectrum of disease characteristics. We analysed the consistency of ruxolitinib efficacy across patient subgroups in the COntrolled MyeloFibrosis Study With ORal JAK Inhibitor Treatment (COMFORT‐I,) a double‐blind trial, where patients with intermediate‐2 or high‐risk MF were randomized to twice‐daily oral ruxolitinib (n = 155) or placebo (n = 154). Subgroups analysed included MF subtype (primary, post‐polycythaemia vera, post‐essential thrombocythaemia), age (≤65, > 65 years), International Prognostic Scoring System risk group, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0, 1, ≥2), JAK2 V617F mutation (positive, negative), baseline haemoglobin level (≥100, <100 g/l), baseline platelet count (100–200 × 109/l, >200 × 109/l), baseline palpable spleen size (≤10, >10 cm), and baseline quartile of spleen volume and Total Symptom Score (TSS; Q1 = lowest, Q4 = highest). Mean percentage change from baseline to week 24 in spleen volume and TSS were calculated for ruxolitinib and placebo in each subgroup. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier method according to original randomization group. In ruxolitinib‐treated patients, reductions in spleen volume and TSS and evidence of improved survival relative to placebo across subgroups were consistent with those seen in the COMFORT‐I population, confirming that ruxolitinib is an effective therapy for the spectrum of MF patients studied in COMFORT‐I.