Minard, Charles G.

Abstract Introduction: Selinexor is a first-in-class, central nervous system (CNS) penetrant, oral inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), the sole nuclear exporter of many key tumor suppressors. Selinexor is FDA-approved for refractory multiple myeloma and DLBCL and has been evaluated in a phase 1 trial in children with leukemia. We report a phase 1 trial of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent CNS and solid tumors, including lymphoma (NCT02323880). Methods: A rolling-six design was used to evaluate selinexor (10 or 25 mg tablets) administered twice or once weekly during a 28-day cycle. Dose determination was based on protocol-defined dose limiting toxicity (DLT) using CTCAEv4 during cycle 1. First dose pharmacokinetics (PK) were performed. Results: 43 subjects were enrolled (17 males); median (range) age was 15 (6-20) years. 27 (63%) had CNS tumors, most commonly high-grade glioma (n=12); 16 (37%) had extracranial solid tumors. 42 were evaluable for DLT. At the starting dose (35 mg/m2/dose, twice weekly), no DLTs were observed in 6 subjects, however, 2 subjects had unexpected late myelosuppression delaying initiation of cycle 2. The dosing schedule was amended to twice weekly for 3 weeks followed by a 1 week break. 12 subjects received 35 mg/m2/dose; 4 experienced DLTs [grade 3 fatigue (n=2), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n=1), or grade 3 ALT increase (n=1)]. The dose was de-escalated to 20 mg/m2/dose, 3 weeks on, 1 week off. 12 subjects enrolled; 3 experienced a DLT [grade 3 increased AST/ALT, acute reversible neurologic changes, or neutropenia (each n=1)]. At the 20 mg/m2 (n=12) and 35 mg/m2 (n=19) dose levels, respectively, the mean ± SD Cmax (ng/ml) was 324±116 and 535±174, and AUC (hr•ng/ml) was 3092 ± 842 and 5156 ± 1227. This was comparable to PK in adults receiving 35 and 50 mg/m2. Based on a desire to achieve a higher Cmax and avoid breaks in schedule, and emerging evidence for similar effectiveness with decreased toxicity in adults receiving continuous once weekly dosing, we evaluated a dosing schedule with once weekly dosing for all 4 weeks of each cycle. At the initial dose level (45 mg/m2 weekly), 2 of 6 subjects had DLTs [prolonged grade 2 thrombocytopenia or grade 3 seizure in a primary CNS tumor patient]. Six subjects received 35 mg/m2/dose once weekly; 1 DLT [grade 3 thrombocytopenia] was observed. Non-dose-limiting toxicity (Grade ≥2 occurring in >10% of subjects during cycle 1) included lymphopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, nausea, and vomiting. Subjects received a median (range) of 1 (1-9) cycle; 13 received 2-3 cycles, and 6 received 5-9 cycles. Conclusions: Selinexor-related toxicities were primarily hematological and gastrointestinal. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent solid and CNS tumors is 20 mg/m2/dose twice weekly for 3 weeks followed by one week off. On a continuous once weekly schedule, the MTD and recommended phase 2 starting dose of selinexor is 35 mg/m2/dose. Citation Format: Adam L. Green, Charles G. Minard, Xiaowei Liu, Joel M. Reid, Kerice Pinkney, Stephan Voss, Marvin D. Nelson, Elizabeth Fox, Brenda J. Weigel, Julia Glade Bender. Phase 1 trial of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent/refractory solid and CNS tumors (ADVL1414): A Children’s Oncology Group Phase 1 Consortium trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P162.

Background: Pediatric brain tumor survivors are at risk for poor social outcomes. It remains unknown whether cognitive sparing with proton radiotherapy (PRT) supports better social outcomes relative to photon radiotherapy (XRT). We hypothesized that survivors treated with PRT would outperform those treated with XRT on measures of cognitive and social outcomes. Further, we hypothesized that cognitive performance would predict survivor social outcomes. Procedure: Survivors who underwent PRT (n=38) or XRT (n=20) participated in a neurocognitive evaluation >1 year post-radiotherapy. Group differences in cognitive and social functioning were assessed using ANCOVA. Regression analyses examined predictors of peer relations and social skills. Results: Age at evaluation, radiation dose, tumor diameter, and sex did not differ between groups (all p>0.05). However, XRT participants were younger at diagnosis (XRT M=5.0 years, PRT M=7.6 years) and further out from radiotherapy (XRT M=8.7 years, PRT M=4.6 years). The XRT group performed worse than the PRT group on measures of processing speed (p=0.01) and verbal memory (p<0.01); however, social outcomes did not differ by radiation type. The proportion of survivors with impairment in peer relations and social skills exceeded expectation (2(1)=38.67, p<0.001; 2(1)=5.63, p<0.05), and verbal memory approached significance as a unique predictor of peer relations (t=-2.01, p=0.05). Total tumor RT dose significantly predicted social skills (t=-2.23, p<0.05). Conclusions: Regardless of radiation modality, survivors are at risk for social challenges, with one-quarter being socially excluded or undervalued. Deficits in verbal memory may place survivors at particular risk. Results support monitoring of cognitive and social functioning throughout survivorship.

Abstract Background Proton radiotherapy (PRT) may be associated with less neurocognitive risk than photon RT (XRT) for pediatric brain tumor survivors. We compared neurocognitive and academic outcomes in long‐term survivors treated with XRT versus PRT. Methods Survivors underwent neurocognitive evaluation >1 year after craniospinal (CSI) or focal PRT or XRT. Groups were compared using separate one‐way analyses of covariance for the CSI and focal groups. Results PRT ( n = 58) and XRT ( n = 30) subgroups were similar on gender (66% male), age at RT (median = 6.5 years), age at follow‐up (median = 14.6 years), and government assistance status (32%). PRT and XRT focal groups differed on follow‐up interval, shunt history, and total RT dose (all p < .05), whereas PRT and XRT CSI groups differed on follow‐up interval, baseline neurocognitive performance score, boost volume, and CSI dose (all p < .05). The PRT focal group outperformed the XRT focal group on inhibition/switching ( p = .04). The PRT CSI group outperformed the XRT CSI group on inattention/impulsivity (both p < .05). Several clinical variables (i.e., RT dose, boost field, baseline performance) predicted neurocognitive outcomes (all p < .05). The PRT focal group performed comparably to population means on most neurocognitive measures, while both CSI groups performed below expectation on multiple measures. The XRT CSI group was most impaired. All groups fell below expectation on processing speed, fine motor, and academic fluency (most p < .01). Conclusions Findings suggest generally favorable neurocognitive and academic long‐term outcomes following focal PRT. Impairment was greatest following CSI regardless of modality. Dosimetry and baseline characteristics are important determinants of outcome alone or in combination with modality.

10019 Background: Pevonedistat (PEV), a first in class inhibitor of NEDD8 activating enzyme (NAE), prevents the activation of Cullin-RING ligases (CRL) necessary for proteasome mediated degradation of key regulatory proteins important in cell survival. In adults with solid tumors, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in combination with chemotherapy is 20-25 mg/m2. Antitumor activity of PEV has been demonstrated in preclinical models of childhood cancer. In vivo additive activity has been demonstrated for PEV in combination with IRN and alkylating agents. The objectives of this study are to determine the MTD and recommended Phase 2 dose of PEV in combination with IRN and TMZ and describe the toxicities, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) properties of this combination. Methods: We conducted a phase 1 trial of PEV in combination with IRN and TMZ in pediatric patients (pts) with recurrent or refractory solid tumors and brain tumors. During cycle 1, PEV was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 10, and 12, with IRN (IV, 50mg/m2) and TMZ (orally, 100mg/m2), on days 8-12 of a 28 day cycle. In subsequent cycles, PEV was administered on days 1, 3, and 5, with IRN and TMZ on days 1-5 of a 21 day cycle. Dose escalation was determined using the Rolling 6 Design. Results: 30 pts enrolled. All pts were eligible and evaluable for cycle 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment. Median (range) age was 13 (1-21) years; 19 (63%) were male. Eleven pts had brain tumors, and 19 pts had solid tumors. Six pts each enrolled on PEV dose levels (DL) 1 (15mg/m2), 2 (20mg/m2), 3 (25mg/m2) and 4 (35mg/m2) as well as an expanded PK cohort at DL4. Cycle 1 grade 3/4 toxicities include lymphopenia (n = 5), leukopenia (n = 4), neutropenia (n = 2), elevated ALT (n = 2), elevated AST (n = 1), diarrhea (n = 1), flu-like symptoms (n = 1). The most frequent non-dose limiting AEs in cycle 1 were anemia (87%), WBC decreased (77%), nausea (57%), diarrhea (53%), ALT increased (50%), AST increased (50%), and vomiting (50%). PK analyses showed the mean area under the curve at the 25 mg/m2 dose level on day 8 (in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide) was 1300 hr•ng/mL, half-life (T ½) was 5-6 hours, time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 1 hour, and mean clearance was 20 L/hr/m2. There were 3 DLTs, 2 of which were related to protocol therapy (diarrhea and thrombocytopenia), among 12 patients on DL4. Thus the MTD was not exceeded at any dose level. PK at the 25 mg/m2 dose level are comparable to those in adult patients. PK from the 12 patients on DL4 (35mg/m2) as well as responses of all patients are pending. Conclusions: PEV in combination with IRN and TMZ is well tolerated in children with solid or brain tumors. PEV PK was not altered by the addition of irinotecan and temozolomide. Further PK and PD analyses are ongoing to establish the recommended phase 2 dose. Clinical trial information: NCT03323034.

10018 Background: Outcomes for children with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML and MDS are poor and new therapies are needed. Pevonedistat is an inhibitor of the NEDD-8 activating enzyme, a key regulator of the ubiquitin proteasome system that is responsible for protein turnover, cell growth and survival. In preclinical models, pevonedistat was synergistic with cytarabine (AraC) and azacitidine (aza). The combination of pevonedistat + aza in adults with AML demonstrated improved responses compared to either single agent. We evaluated the feasibility, toxicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of pevonedistat in combination with aza, fludarabine, AraC (Aza-FLA) in children with R/R AML and MDS. Methods: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m2, IV days 1, 3, 5, the recommended adult dose, was administered in combination with aza (75 mg/m2, days 1-5), fludarabine (30 mg/m2, days 6-10), and AraC (2000 mg/m2, days 6-10). Intrathecal AraC was administered at the start of therapy and additional doses given to patients with CNS leukemia. If < 33% of the initial 6 enrolled patients experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1 the regimen would be considered tolerable and 6 additional patients could enroll to further assess tolerability and PK. Pevonedistat PK was determined during cycle 1 following doses 1 and 5. Response was evaluated after cycle 1. Results: A total of 12 patients were enrolled, median age was 13 years (range 1-21). All patients received prior chemotherapy, median number of prior regimens was 2 (range 1-5) and 3 (25%) patients had prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Diagnoses were AML NOS (n = 10, 83%), acute monocytic leukemia (n = 1), and therapy related AML (n = 1). One of the initial 6 patients had DLTs (hypertension, GGT elevation, and proteinuria); pevonedistat 20 mg/m2 + Aza-FLA was considered tolerable. Six additional patients were enrolled, two had DLTs (weight loss, hypoxia). Overall, 3/12 (25%) of patients experienced DLTs. As expected, using the intensive Aza-FLA backbone, myelosuppression, electrolyte abnormalities, and hepatic transaminase elevation were common. Day 1 PK parameters (n = 12, mean±SD) were: Cmax= 223±91 ng/mL, AUC0-24h= 892±216 ng/hr/mL, T1/2=4.3±1.2 hours, CL = 23.2±6.9 L/hr/m2. PK parameters were similar following doses 1 and 5, for patients < 12 (n = 6) and ≥ 12 (n = 6) years, and to adult PK profiles. Ten patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 30% (95% CI: 7,75) with 3 patients achieving a CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). Conclusions: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m2 combinedwith Aza-FLA was tolerable in children with R/R AML. The toxicity of the regimen was similar to other intensive AML regimens. PK parameters were similar among the two age groups and were comparable to adults. Within the confines of a phase I study, there was limited anti-leukemic activity of the combination of pevonedistat +Aza-FLA in R/R AML. Clinical trial information: NCT03813147.

AbstractBackgroundPrexasertib (LY2606368) is a novel, second‐generation, selective dual inhibitor of checkpoint kinase proteins 1 (CHK1) and 2 (CHK2). We conducted a phase 1 trial of prexasertib to estimate the maximum‐tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), to define and describe the toxicities, and to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of prexasertib in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumors.MethodsPrexasertib was administered intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 15 of a 28‐day cycle. Four dose levels, 80, 100, 125, and 150 mg/m2, were evaluated using a rolling‐six design. PK analysis was performed during cycle 1. Tumor tissue was examined for biomarkers (CHK1 and TP53) of prexasertib activity.ResultsThirty patients were enrolled; 25 were evaluable. The median age was 9.5 years (range: 2‐20) and 21 (70%) were male. Twelve patients (40%) had solid tumors and 18 patients (60%) had CNS tumors. There were no cycle 1 or later dose‐limiting toxicities. Common cycle 1, drug‐related grade 3/4 toxicities (> 10% of patients) included neutropenia (100%), leukopenia (68%), thrombocytopenia (24%), lymphopenia (24%), and anemia (12%). There were no objective responses; best overall response was stable disease in three patients for five cycles (hepatocellular carcinoma), three cycles (ependymoma), and five cycles (undifferentiated sarcoma). The PK appeared dose proportional across the 80‐150 mg/m2 dose range.ConclusionsAlthough the MTD of prexasertib was not defined by this study, 150 mg/m2 administered i.v. on days 1 and 15 of a 28‐day cycle was determined to be the RP2D.

AbstractBackgroundEntinostat is an oral small molecule inhibitor of class I histone deacetylases (HDAC), which has not previously been evaluated in pediatrics. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (MTD/RP2D), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of entinostat in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors including central nervous system (CNS) malignancies.MethodsA rolling six dose escalation design evaluated two dose levels. Entinostat oral tablet formulation was administered once per week, four doses per 28‐day cycle. PK and PD studies were performed.ResultsTwenty‐one eligible patients’ median (range) age was 14 years (6‐20). Six subjects were treated at 3 mg/m2dose level and 15 were treated in 4 mg/m2dose level. The study included patients with CNS tumors (n = 12), sarcomas (n = 6), or other solid tumors (n = 3). Eight patients were not fully evaluable for toxicity due to progression of disease prior to receiving the required percentage of protocol therapy. No cycle one dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at either dose level. A three‐fold higher area under the curve (AUC) was achieved in our cohort compared to adults using a similar dosing schedule. The PD studies showed increase in acetylated lysine in peripheral blood leukocytes at both doses.ConclusionsEntinostat was well tolerated with no DLT observed. All patients experienced progression within the first two cycles, except one patient with ependymoma with stable disease. Based on PK and PD, the R2PD in pediatric patients with solid tumors is 4 mg/m2orally administered once weekly.

Background: Despite improvements in outcomes for children with B- and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-ALL, T-ALL, B-LLy and T-LLy), the outcome of patients with primary resistant or relapsed disease remains very poor, particularly for children with second or greater relapses and with T-cell disease. Deregulation of cell cycle machinery is essential for both the induction and progression of ALL (Sicinska et al. Cancer Cell 4:451-61, 2003). Additionally, targeting cell cycle regulators CDK4 and 6 efficiently suppresses ALL growth and disease progression in vivo (Sawei et al. Cancer Cell 22:452-65, 2012) and this effect is augmented by conventional chemotherapy. These data provided the rationale for investigating the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in relapsed/refractory ALL and LLy. Preliminary results from the ongoing Children's Oncology Group (COG) AINV18P1 trial are reported. Methods: Patients aged 1-30 years with first or greater isolated or combined marrow relapses of T-ALL or T-LLy and second or greater relapses of B-ALL or B-LLy are eligible for COG AINV18P1 (NCT03792256). Patients with refractory disease with at least 2 prior induction attempts or first relapse refractory to at least one prior re-induction attempt are also eligible. This is a 2-part study conducted at selected COG sites. In Part 1 of the study (dose determination), palbociclib was administered orally once daily for 21 consecutive days, first as a single agent (days 1-3) and subsequently in combination with 4-drug re-induction chemotherapy (Table 1). Study treatment consisted of a single cycle of therapy. A starting palbociclib dose of 50 mg/m2/dose was explored with one dose de-escalation (35 mg/m2/dose) using the rolling six design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Part 2 (expansion cohort) is accruing 6 additional patients (pts) at the MTD for further assessment of the safety and feasibility of combination therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), defined as hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities exceeding baseline toxicities observed with re-induction chemotherapy alone, are assessed throughout the treatment cycle. The primary aims of the study are safety, determination of the MTD/RP2D and assessment of palbociclib pharmacokinetics (PK). Secondary aims are assessment of the biological and preliminary clinical activity of combination therapy in this patient population. Results: As of June 30, 2020, 8 pts have enrolled; 6 in Part 1 and 2 in Part 2. All 6 pts in Part 1 completed one full cycle (32 days) of protocol therapy. The median (range) age of pts is 10 (6-21) years and 62% are male (Table 2). Three pts had T-ALL, 4 B-ALL and 1 T-LLy. Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1-6) prior chemotherapy regimens and 2 pts underwent prior allogeneic stem cell transplant. All 6 pts in Part 1 experienced grade 3-4 toxicities, most commonly hematologic: anemia (3 pts), neutropenia (5 pts) and thrombocytopenia (4 pts). Three pts had grade 3 infections and one pt had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, which resolved. No hematologic or non-hematologic DLTs were observed at the 50 mg/m2/dose of palbociclib in Part 1 and accrual to the expansion phase of the trial at this dose continues. PK and pharmacodynamic studies assessing cell cycle inhibition are also ongoing. Conclusions: Palbociclib in combination with 4-drug re-induction chemotherapy is safe and well tolerated in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL and LLy. Further assessment of the feasibility and activity of combination therapy is ongoing in the expansion phase of this trial. Disclosures Raetz: Celgene: Other: DSMB member; Pfizer: Other: Institutional research funding. Teachey:La Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Norris:Merck: Other: Travel funding. Gore:Amgen, Novartis, Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: Institutional Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: This study includes off-label use of palbociclib in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma.

e21521 Background: Pevonedistat, a first in class inhibitor of NEDD8 activating enzyme (NAE), prevents the activation of Cullin-RING ligases (CRL) necessary for proteasome mediated degradation of key regulatory proteins important in cell survival. In adults with solid tumors, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in combination with chemotherapy is 20-25 mg/m2. Antitumor activity of pevonedistat has been demonstrated in preclinical models of childhood cancer. In vivo additive activity has been demonstrated for pevonedistat in combination with IRN and alkylating agents. The objectives of this study are to determine the MTD and recommended phase 2 dose of pevonedistat in combination with IRN and TMZ and describe the toxicities, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) properties of this combination. Methods: Using a rolling six design, we conducted a phase 1 trial of pevonedistat in combination with IRN and TMZ in pediatric patients (pts) with recurrent or refractory solid tumors and brain tumors. During cycle 1, pevonedistat was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 10, and 12, with IRN (IV, 50mg/m2) and TMZ (orally, 100mg/m2), on days 8-12 of a 28 day cycle. In subsequent cycles, pevonedistat was administered on days 1, 3, and 5, with IRN and TMZ on days 1-5 of a 21 day cycle. Results: 18 pts enrolled. All pts were eligible and evaluable for cycle 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment. Median (range) age was 13 (1-21) years; 11 (61%) were male. Six pts had brain tumors, and 12 pts had solid tumors. Six pts each enrolled on pevonedistat dose levels 1 (15mg/m2), 2 (20mg/m2), and 3 (25mg/m2). There were no DLTs; DLT assessment is pending for 1 pt on dose level 3. Grade 3/4 toxicities included grade 4 lymphocyte count decreased (n = 2), grade 3 white blood cell decreased (n = 2), and 1 pt each with grade 3 anemia, elevated AST, and elevated ALT. The most frequent AEs were anemia (83%), nausea (61%), elevated AST (61%), and diarrhea (61%). Pharmacokinetic analysis is pending. Conclusions: Pevonedistat in combination with IRN and TMZ is well tolerated in pts with solid or brain tumors. PK and PD analyses are ongoing to establish the recommended dose. Clinical trial information: NCT03323034.

e21519 Background: Semaphorins regulate tumor progression, immune responses, and angiogenesis. SEMA4D was identified as a candidate proto-oncogene by a Sleeping Beauty forward genetic screen that induced osteosarcoma in mice. SEMA4D is expressed on tumors, including osteosarcoma, and in the tumor microenvironment. VX15/2503, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody, binds SEMA4D, blocks receptor interaction and enhances the anti-tumor immune response in preclinical studies. This trial aimed to determine the tolerability and recommended dose of VX15/2503 in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and activity in patients with osteosarcoma. Methods: Part A enrolled patients age≤ 21y with refractory solid tumors to assess the tolerability of VX15/2503 (20 mg/kg) IV every 14 days x 2 doses/cycle. The recommended dose was one that was tolerated and achieved sustained target saturation. Up to 6 additional children were enrolled to assess pharmacokinetics (PK). In part B, a two-stage design was used to assess the activity of VX15/2503 in patients with measurable, relapsed /refractory osteosarcoma. In part B1 patients > 21-30y accrued concurrently with part A; Part B2 (patients £ 21y) was initiated after the pediatric recommended dose was determined. Correlative studies including target saturation by VX15/2503 were required. Results: 18 eligible patients enrolled, 16 evaluable for toxicity. In part A (n = 12) the median (range) age was 12.5 (1-20) y. Diagnoses included osteosarcoma (8), neuroblastoma (2), other (2). No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. In Part B1, (n = 6) median (range) age was 22.5 (22-30) y; one patient had cycle 1 DLTs (grade 3 acute kidney injury, creatinine increase, arthralgia and myalgia); a second patient had a later cycle DLT (grade 4 pericardial effusion). Given only 1/18 had a cycle 1 DLT, this did not impact dose selection. T-cell saturation by VX15/2503 was adequate and sustained in all patients. Conclusions: VX15/2503 was well tolerated at 20 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks and is the recommended dose in children, adolescents and young adults. The activity in osteosarcoma is under evaluation. Future trials combining VX15/2503 with novel agents are in development. Clinical trial information: NCT03320330.