Maurer, Mathew S.

ABSTRACTIntroduction/AimsThe degree of change in neuropathic impairment and quality of life (QoL) that is clinically meaningful to patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv‐PN) is not established. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude of treatment differences that are meaningful to patients in measures of neuropathy and QoL and to determine whether eplontersen achieved a meaningful improvement versus placebo.MethodsData from the NEURO‐TTRansform trial on patients with ATTRv‐PN treated with eplontersen (n = 141) or historical placebo (n = 59) were used. Anchor‐based approaches were used to estimate thresholds for meaningful differences in the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 (mNIS+7) composite score, Norfolk QoL‐Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL‐DN) total score, Neuropathy Symptoms and Change (NSC) total score, and modified body mass index (mBMI). Differences between the least squares means of the treatment groups were analyzed.ResultsMeaningful improvement in mNIS+7 was estimated as −4.0 points and deterioration as 1.8 points. The estimated ranges of meaningful improvement and deterioration in Norfolk QoL‐DN were −12.8 to −4.0 points, and 5.9 to 14.7 points, respectively. For NSC, ranges were −2.4 to −1.3 points for meaningful improvement, and 0.6 to 5.8 points for deterioration. The estimated meaningful improvement in mBMI was 9.8 kg/m2 × g/L and deterioration was −40.9 kg/m2 × g/L. Improvements in each measure with eplontersen versus placebo were greater than the estimates of meaningful differences.DiscussionEplontersen demonstrated a clinically meaningful effect on neuropathic impairment, QoL, and nutritional status. Such estimates have implications for clinical practice and trials.

Abstract Aims HELIOS-A was a Phase 3, open-label study of vutrisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic, in patients with hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. This analysis evaluated vutrisiran's impact on exploratory cardiac endpoints in HELIOS-A patients. Methods and results Patients were randomized 3:1 to subcutaneous vutrisiran 25 mg every 3 months or intravenous patisiran 0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (reference group) for 18 months. Exploratory cardiac endpoints included change from baseline in N-terminal prohormone of brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and echocardiographic parameters versus external placebo (APOLLO study). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised randomized patients receiving any study drug (n = 122). A cardiac subpopulation with evidence of cardiac amyloid involvement (n = 40) was prespecified. 99mTc scintigraphy exploratory assessments in a planned vutrisiran-treated cohort at select sites were compared with baseline. At Month 18, vutrisiran demonstrated beneficial effects on NT-proBNP versus external placebo in the mITT and cardiac subpopulations (adjusted geometric mean fold change ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.480 [0.383–0.600], p = 9.606 × 10−10 and 0.491 [0.337–0.716], p = 0.0004, respectively). Benefits or trends towards benefit in echocardiographic parameters versus external placebo were observed for both populations. In 99mTc scintigraphy assessments, 32/47 (68.1%) and 31/48 (64.6%) patients exhibited reduced normalized left ventricular total uptake and heart-to-contralateral lung ratio, respectively. Perugini grade was reduced or unchanged versus baseline in 55/57 (96.5%) evaluable patients. No increase in cardiac adverse events was observed with vutrisiran versus external placebo. Conclusions Vutrisiran demonstrated evidence of potential benefit on cardiac manifestations in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy, with an acceptable safety profile.

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in conjunction with atrial fibrillation (AF) presents unique management challenges. CHA2DS2VASc score in these patients is believed to underestimate the risk of ischemic stroke, necessitating a better predictive model in these patients. Methods: Data was obtained from the National Readmission Database (NRD). Outcomes between CA-AF and no-CA-AF were compared using multivariate regression analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR). AutoScore; an interpretable machine learning framework, was used to develop a stroke risk prediction model, the predictive accuracy of which was evaluated with an area under the curve (AUC) using the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: A total of 11,860,804 (CA-AF 22,687 [0.19%] and no-CA-AF 11,838,117) patients were identified from 2015-2019. The adjusted odds of mortality (aOR 1.41 and 1.29), stroke (aOR 1.78 and 1.74), non-intracranial hemorrhage (aOR 2.10 and aOR 1.85), and intracranial hemorrhage (aOR 14.4 and aOR 4.26) were significantly higher in CA-AF compared with non-CA-AF at both index admission and 30-days, respectively. The CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score had a poor discriminative accuracy for stroke at 30-days in CA-AF (AUC 49%, 95%CI 47%-51%, p=0.54). The machine learning autoscore integrative model revealed that the predictive ability of our newly proposed E-CHADS score (end-stage renal disease (ESRD), congestive heart failure, hypertension, active cancer, dementia, and diabetes mellitus) for 30-day risk of ischemic stroke in CA-AF was excellent (for a cutoff of 52 points random forest score) with an AUC of 80% (95%CI 74%-86%) Conclusion: Cardiac amyloidosis carries a high risk of ischemic stroke that is not accurately predicted by the CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score. Our proposed model (E-CHADS) identifies 3 new variables (ESRD, dementia, and cancer) that have higher discriminative accuracy for ischemic stroke in these patients.

Abstract Introduction Transthyretin–mediated (ATTR) amyloidosis is a progressive, multisystem, fatal disease. Patisiran, an IV RNAi therapeutic, is approved for the treatment of hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. The safety and efficacy of patisiran in patients with wild–type or hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (CM) is being investigated in the ongoing APOLLO–B study. Methods Patients were 18–85 yrs old with evidence of cardiac amyloidosis by echocardiography, and ATTR amyloid by tissue biopsy or fulfilling nonbiopsy diagnostic criteria for ATTR amyloidosis with CM. Medical history of heart failure (HF) due to ATTR amyloidosis with ≥1 prior hospitalization or current clinical evidence of HF was required. Patients were randomized 1:1 to patisiran IV 0.3 mg/kg or placebo Q3W for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 6–MWT at Month 12 (M12) with patisiran vs placebo. Results APOLLO–B enrolled 360 patients (patisiran, n=181; placebo, n=179): median age (range), 76.0 (41, 85) yrs; male, 89%; wtATTR, 80%. Baseline characteristics were consistent between patients on tafamidis at baseline (91/360 [25%]) and those who were not. Patisiran achieved a rapid and sustained reduction in serum TTR, irrespective of baseline tafamidis treatment. At M12, patisiran showed a significant benefit vs placebo in 6–MWT (median [95% CI] change from baseline: patisiran, –8.15 [–16.42, 1.50]; placebo, –21.35 [–34.05, –7.52]; HL estimate of median difference: 14.69 [0.69, 28.69]; p=0.0162) and KCCQ–OS (LS mean [SEM] change from baseline: patisiran, 0.300 [1.263]; placebo, –3.408 [1.277]; LS mean [SEM] difference: 3.709 [1.796]; p=0.0397). Consistent benefits with patisiran in 6–MWT and KCCQ–OS were observed across predefined patient subgroups. Time to first event of all–cause hospitalization, urgent HF visit, or death directionally favored patisiran vs placebo (HR [95% CI], 0.839 [0.557, 1.263]), as did all–cause mortality (HR [95% CI], 0.355 [0.110, 1.138]), but all composite outcomes endpoints did not achieve statistical significance over 12 months. Patisiran was well tolerated; most AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and there were no cardiac safety concerns. Conclusions Benefits at 12 months were observed with patisiran vs placebo in functional capacity, and health status and quality of life, in patients with ATTR amyloidosis with CM. The efficacy and safety of patisiran continues to be studied in the APOLLO–B open–label extension.

ImportanceTafamidis reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and minimized patient-reported health status deterioration at 30 months in patients with transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis. However, the clinical significance of health status changes remains unclear, particularly in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III symptoms who experienced more cardiovascular-related hospitalizations than those with NYHA class I-II symptoms.ObjectiveTo evaluate the health status of patients taking tafamidis with baseline NYHA class III symptoms.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized clinical trial post hoc analysis evaluated data for patients with transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis and NYHA class I-III symptoms at baseline who were enrolled in ATTR-ACT, a placebo-controlled study of tafamidis held at 48 sites in 13 countries.InterventionsTafamidis meglumine, 80 mg or 20 mg (pooled cohort), vs placebo.Main Outcomes and MeasuresEstablished thresholds for clinical benefit on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) were used to define response groups (very large decline to very large improvement); the proportion of patients in each group was calculated within each baseline NYHA class.ResultsAmong 441 patients (264 tafamidis, 177 placebo), the mean (SD) age was 74.3 (7.0) years; 398 (90%) were male and 43 (10%) were female. Mean (SD) baseline KCCQ-OS scores were 67.3 (21.4) in the tafamidis group and 65.9 (21.7) in the placebo group (range: 0-100, with 100 indicating the best health). There was a significant shift toward better KCCQ-OS scores in patients receiving tafamidis (odds ratio for 10-point improvement 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4; P < .001). More patients taking tafamidis were alive and not worse at all time points (37% vs 15% at month 30). These findings were similar in patients with NYHA class III symptoms. In patients with NYHA class III symptoms alive at 30 months, improvements in health status were more common (35% vs 10%) and declines were less common (38% vs 57%) with tafamidis vs placebo.Conclusions and RelevanceIn ATTR-ACT, although patients with baseline NYHA class III symptoms had worse overall outcomes, treatment with tafamidis yielded better health status compared with placebo.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01994889