Vincristine, Actinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Compared With Vincristine, Actinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Alternating With Vincristine, Topotecan, and Cyclophosphamide for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: Children's Oncology Group Study D9803
Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 21, 2009 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 31 | Pages: 5182-5188
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated with standard VAC (vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy to that of patients treated with VAC alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide (VAC/VTC). Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to 39 weeks of VAC versus VAC/VTC; local therapy began after week 12. Patients with parameningeal RMS with intracranial extension (PME) were treated with VAC and immediate x-ray therapy. The primary study end point was failure-free survival (FFS). The study was designed with 80% power (5% two-sided α level) to detect an increase in 5-year FFS from 64% to 75% with VAC/VTC. Results A total of 617 eligible patients were entered onto the study: 264 were randomly assigned to VAC and 252 to VAC/VTC; 101 PME patients were nonrandomly treated with VAC. Treatment strata were embryonal RMS, stage 2/3, group III (33%); embryonal RMS, group IV, less than age 10 years (7%); alveolar RMS or undifferentiated sarcoma (UDS), stage 1 or group I (17%); alveolar RMS/UDS (27%); and PME (16%). At a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 4-year FFS was 73% with VAC and 68% with VAC/VTC (P = .3). There was no difference in effect of VAC versus VAC/VTC across risk groups. The frequency of second malignancies was similar between the two treatment groups. Conclusion For intermediate-risk RMS, VAC/VTC does not significantly improve FFS compared with VAC.
Age Is a Risk Factor for Chemotherapy-Induced Hepatopathy With Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide
Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 13, 2004 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1894-1901
Purpose To evaluate the spectrum of and determine the risk factors for the development of liver toxicity (hepatopathy) after therapy with vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) for rhabdomyosarcoma in children and adolescents. Patients and Methods We prospectively captured all events of hepatopathy occurring on the ongoing Children's Oncology Group intermediate risk protocol, D9803, for children with rhabdomyosarcoma. Patients enrolled onto this trial were randomly assigned to receive either VAC alone or VAC alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide. In addition, we reviewed the toxicity database and requested additional information for all patients with elevated bilirubin or transaminase levels. Risk factors were analyzed. Results Of 339 patients enrolled through August 2002, 18 developed hepatopathy. All events were captured by mandated toxicity reporting and filing of MedWatch forms, with no additional cases found after the additional search of the database. Four children died after developing this toxicity. All cases occurred after cycles of VAC (n = 16) or vincristine and cyclophosphamide with concomitant abdominal radiotherapy (n = 2). The onset of hepatopathy was 5 to 16 days from the start of a treatment cycle. For the 89 patients under 36 months of age, the risk of hepatopathy was 15%, with two deaths. For the 239 children 3 years of age or older, the risk for hepatopathy was 4%, with two deaths. Conclusion The greatest risk factor for development of hepatopathy after VAC therapy was age. Dose modifications for younger children receiving VAC therapy are recommended.
Clinicopathologic Study of Ectomesenchymomas from Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Groups III and IV
Pediatric and Developmental Pathology | July 25, 2002 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 290-300
Ectomesenchymomas (EM) are rare malignant neoplasms usually consisting of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with a neural component. Only 21 cases have been previously reported. Here we extend the clinicopathologic spectrum of EM by describing our findings in 15 cases. Only 5 patients were infants; 10 were ≤3 years old and 5 were ≥6 years old. No male predilection was observed; 7 were female. The originating institutional diagnoses were; RMS (12), undifferentiated sarcoma (1), or EM (2), suggesting underdiagnosis of this entity. The primary tumor sites included external genital (5), pelvis/abdomen (6), head and neck (3), and extremity (1). The size of the primary neoplasm was usually ≥5 cm at diagnosis but dissemination only occurred in a minority. Local infiltration was not uncommon. These neoplasms were typically multilobate, thinly encapsulated, hemorrhagic, and necrotic. Light microscopic features were highly variable, but embryonal RMS with scattered or clustered ganglion cells, often in lacunae, was characteristic. In some cases, primitive neuroblastic or neuroectodermal areas were found and/or a component of alveolar RMS was seen. Focal anaplasia was occasionally observed. Mitotic activity appears higher than previously appreciated and some necrosis was invariably present. Electron microscopy was performed in 11 cases, which confirmed skeletal muscle ± neural differentiation. Cytogenetic studies performed in five cases revealed no specific abnormality. Monoclonal neuron-specific enolase was the best marker of ganglion cells and primitive neural elements. MIC-2 (CD99) membrane expression was not definitively present in any of the six cases examined. A number of the above parameters appear to be of some prognostic significance, but overall, these neoplasms appear to have a similar outcome as would be predicted for their RMS element alone (exclusive of any neural component), with respect to the RMS subtype, age of the patient, and anatomic location of the neoplasm.