Johnston, Patrick B.

Abstract Background: A significant percentage of DLBCL patients present with a composite histology, often seen as a node containing both follicular lymphoma and DLBCL or DLBCL in the node and discordant indolent lymphoma in the bone marrow. Literature from the pre-rituximab era suggests DLBCL patients with transformed lymphoma or composite histology have worse outcome than de novo DLBCL. Here we report on early events in a cohort of R-CHOP treated patients. Goal: To determine whether patients with composite lymphoma have an inferior event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma when treated with R-CHOP. Methods: Newly diagnosed patients treated with an R-CHOP containing regimen were prospectively enrolled in our Lymphoma SPORE registry from 9/2002 through 6/2007. Pathology was centrally reviewed. All patients were followed for retreatment, disease progression, and death. Results: 401 DLBCL patients were enrolled; 14% (57/401) had a composite histology. 33 patients had DLBCL and another histology, predominantly follicular lymphoma (n=29), in the same node. 20 patients had a non-DLBCL histology in a distinct location from the DLBCL; this was primarily indolent lymphoma in the bone marrow (n=15). 4 patients had both. 19% (75/401) of patients died during follow-up and 30% (121/401) had an event (death due to any cause, progression, or retreatment). Median follow-up for living patients was 34 months (range, 5–73). Composite DLBCL patients had higher event-free (3 year EFS = 79%) and overall (3 year OS = 93%) survival then de novo DLBCL (3 year OS = 66%, 3 year EFS 79%), p=0.05 and p=0.005 respectively. These differences remained statistically significant after adjusting for the International Prognostic Index (IPI): EFS HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29–0.97, p=0.02; OS HR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.10–0.76, p=0.002. OS and EFS for composite DLBCL more closely resembled R-CHOP treated grade III follicular lymphoma (A,B) from the same cohort (3 year EFS = 81%, 3 year OS = 93%). Improved outcome for composite DLBCL was consistent whether the additional histology was in the same node or distinct from the DLBCL. Conclusions: R-CHOP treated DLBCL patients with indolent discordant bone marrow involvement or other composite histology have improved early OS and EFS compared to de novo DLBCL. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term prognosis of composite DLBCL in the rituximab era. Histology N Age > 60 Stage III/IV LDH > ULN PS > 1 >2 EN Sites 3 YR EFS 3 YR OS * Denotes statistically significant difference at p=0.05 de novo DLBCL 344 58% 56% 56% 17% 22% 66% 78% Composite DLBCL 57 65% 77%* 34%* 18% 32% 79%* 93%* Figure Figure

Abstract Background: Germinal center B cell-like (GCB) DLBCL, as determined by gene expression profiling or immunohistochemistry, is more likely to be cured by initial conventional chemoimmunotherapy than non-germinal center B cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL. For patients with relapsed or refractory chemosensitive DLBCL, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplant is considered standard-of-care treatment, but it is unknown whether the outcome of these patients is similarly influenced by the subtype of DLBCL. We therefore explored the differences between patients with GCB and non-GCB DLBCL as regards their clinical features at relapse after first line therapy and their outcome following salvage autologous HSC transplant. Methods: Patients undergoing BEAM conditioning and autologous HSC transplantation for relapsed or refractory chemosensitive DLBCL at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 2001 and 2006 were included. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for CD10, BCL-6 and MUM1 allowing classification in GCB and non-GCB-like DLBCL, as well as for BCL-2. GCB and non-GCB groups were compared in terms of known prognostic factors at time of progression and outcome after HSC transplant Results: Fifty-nine patients were included and had retrievable tumor samples to allow immunohistochemical analysis. Median follow-up of survivors was 25 months; median age at the time of transplant was 60 years (range 17–77); All patients had failed at least one previous anthracycline-based regimen (15 had refractory disease). Overall, 25/59 cases (42%) were positive for CD10, 32/58 (55%) for BCL-6, and 19/58 (32%) for MUM1. Thirty-two patients (54%) were classified as having GCB and 27 (46%) non-GCB-like DLBCL. Patients in the GCB and non-GCB group had similar time to progression (TTP) (median 12.5 months vs. 11 months, Wilcoxon P=0.81) after first line therapy and similar IPI-R scores (Chi-square, P=0.38). In univariate analysis, GCB and non-GCB did not differ in time to relapse after HSC transplant (log rank test P=0.77) or survival (log rank test P=0.48; figure). The lack of demonstrable difference in survival persisted even after correction for IPI-R and TTP, factors know to affect transplant outcome (Cox regression, RR=0.80 for GCB; P=0.28). BCL-2 was highly expressed in both GCB (81%) and non-GCB (96%) and did not correlate with outcome in the entire population nor in any of the two groups. Conclusion: Patients with chemosensitive relapsed or refractory GCB and non-GCB-like DLBCL derive similar benefit from autologous HSC transplant. Figure Figure

Abstract Background: High-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is curative in about 40% of patients with relapsed chemosensitive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The international prognostic index obtained at the time of relapse (IPI-R) and the time from initial treatment to relapse (TTR) have been suggested in different series to be predictors of outcome after HSC transplantation. We explored the concomitant effect of IPI-R and TTR on therapeutic outcome in a modern and uniform cohort of patients with relapsed chemosensitive DLBC undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral HSC transplantation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 80 consecutive patients treated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 2001 and 2006 who received a peripheral HSC transplant (except for 3 patients who receive bone marrow) after being conditioned with BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) for relapsed chemosensitive DLBCL. Results: Median follow-up of survivors was 31.4 months, Median age at the time of transplant was 62 (interquartile range 53–65; range 26–77), 65% were males; median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2. All patients had received at least one previous anthracycline-based regimen, 78% had been previously exposed to rituximab and all achieved at least CRu after the initial treatment. The median time from diagnosis to relapse was 19 months (interquartile range 10–43), 25% of patients had a high or high-intermediate IPI-R. The median survival from the time of transplant for patients with TTR>18 months v. ≤ 18 months was not reached and 50 months respectively (P=0.005). Median survival for patients with high or high-intermediate IPI-R at the time of relapse (IPI score ≥3) was 23.3 months and not reached for patients with low or low-intermediate IPI (P=0.01). These two factors were independent in multivariate analysis with RR for death of 1.8 (1.2–2.9; P=0.004) for TTR ≤ 18 months and 1.7 (1.1–2.5; P=0.017) for high or high-intermediate IPI and therefore combined in a prognostic system were patients with none (n=32), one (n=39) or two (n=9) of these prognostic factors had median disease free survival not reached v. 50 months v. 3.3 months (P=0.001) and overall survival not reached v. 50 months v. 5 months (P=0.0001) (Figure). Conclusion: TTR and IPI-R provide an easy and powerful prognostic system in patients with DLBCL undergoing modern high-dose chemotherapy with HSC support. Figure Figure

Abstract Background: mTOR inhibition has produced responses in mantle cell lymphoma as well as other non-Hodgkin lymphomas. This phase II study tested the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) in simultaneous two-stage phase II lymphoma studies, including one arm involving Hodgkin lymphoma. The goals were to learn the toxicity profile and to assess the anti-tumor response. A total of 17 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma were enrolled in the uncommon arm at completion of enrollment. Methods: Patients (pts) received 10 mg PO daily for each 28 day cycle (up to 12, with a possible extension in responders) and restaged after 2, 6, and 12 cycles. The primary endpoint is the confirmed response rate, including CR, CRu or PR. Results: The median age of the 17 pts with Hodgkin lymphoma was 37 yrs (range: 27–68), with a median of 6 (range, 4–14) prior therapies. Fourteen pts (82.4%) had a prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Pts completed a median of 6 (range, 1–13) cycles of therapy. Fifteen of 17 patients were evaluable for response as of this analysis. The overall response rate was 47% (7/15), all partial responses. Ten patients are continuing on study while 6 have gone off due to disease progression and 1 due to other reasons. Common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) include thrombocytopenia (5 pts), anemia (5 pts) and alkaline phosphatase elevation (1 pts). 1 patient was reported to have grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Oral everolimus has promising activity with acceptable toxicity in Hodgkin lymphoma. These results provide the rationale for additional studies with this novel class of agents and to integrate mTOR inhibitors into salvage treatment regimens for Hodgkin lymphoma.

7526 Background: Stem cell transplant (SCT) was considered to be beneficial in CLL patients with Richter transformation (RT). We report a single center experience of SCT for RT. Methods: CLL patients with biopsy-confirmed RT to DLBCL who underwent SCT were identified from Mayo Clinic CLL database, and clinical information was abstracted by chart review. Survival analysis was done with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Twenty-four of 204 RT patients underwent SCT, 20 autologous and 4 allogeneic. The median lines of prior CLL therapy was 1 (range 0-4). Only 4 patients were exposed to ibrutinib prior to RT. The median age at RT diagnosis was 62 (range 41-73). Five of 17 (29%) patients had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm), 12 of 20 (60%) had elevated LDH, and 6 of 15 (40%) had TP53 disruption (del(17p) or TP53 mutation). The median lines of RT therapy prior to SCT was 2 (range 1-4); treatments included R-CHOP-like alone (n = 7), platinum-based alone (n = 1), both R-CHOP-like and platinum-based (n = 11), novel agents (n = 2), and high dose MTX-based (n = 3). Response prior to SCT was CR in 12 (50%) and PR in 12 (50%) patients. The median time from RT diagnosis to SCT was 6.8 months (range 3.3-42.3). After a median follow-up of 52.7 months after SCT, there were 10 RT relapses, 4 CLL progression, and 11 deaths (7 RT, 1 CLL and 3 unrelated). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.5 months (95% CI 8.3-NA; 1-year PFS 61.8%, 2-year PFS 50.5%). The median post-SCT survival was 56.3 months (95% CI 30.6-76.6; 2-year survival 82.0%, 4-year survival 65.6%). Elevated LDH was associated with worse PFS (median 8.9 months vs NA, P= 0.014) and a trend of worse post-SCT survival (53.7 vs 67.4 months, P= 0.153). Other factors including age, prior CLL treatment (untreated vs treated), bulky disease, response prior to SCT, and TP53 disruption were not associated with PFS or post-SCT survival. Among the 4 allogeneic SCT patients, 1 had RT relapse 10.5 months after SCT and was treated with venetoclax, ibrutinib and obinutuzumab and remained alive at last follow-up (12.9 months after SCT). All 3 other patients remained in remission and alive at last follow up (15.6, 16.1 and 108.5 months after SCT, respectively). Conclusions: SCT may benefit select RT patients. The role of SCT in the novel agent era needs further study.

7041 Background: Prognostic factors for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) at day 100 post-autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APBHSCT) have not been evaluated. We previously reported that absolute monocyte (AMC)/lymphocyte count (ALC) prognostic score (AMLCPS) at diagnosis of DLBCL patients is a prognostic factor of survival, stratifying patients into three risk groups: low- (AMC<630/μL and ALC>1000/μL), intermediate- (AMC ≥ 630/μL or ALC ≤ 1000/μL) and high-risk (AMC ≥ 630/μL and ALC ≤ 1000/μL) (Leukemia 25: 1502-9, 2011). Therefore, we evaluated day 100 AMLCPS as a prognostic factor of survival by landmark analysis from day 100 post-APBHSCT in DLBCL patients. Methods: DLBCL patients that achieved complete response by day 100 post-APBHSCT qualified for the study. From 2000 to 2007, 134 consecutive DLBCL patients were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The median follow up from day 100 for the cohort was 5.5 years (range: 0.17-12.17 years) and for living patients (N=93) was 6.9 years (range: 2.5-12.17 years). Day 100 AMLCPS was able to stratify patients into three risk groups low-, intermediate-, and high-risk for OS [low: median OS = not reached, 5-year survival rate = 94% (95%CI 83.3%-98.1%); intermediate: median OS = not reached, 5-year survival rate = 70% (95%CI 58.0%-79.8%); high: median OS = 2.2 years, 5-year survival rate = 13% (95%CI 3.4%-40.5%); p<0.0001] and PFS [low: median PFS = not reached, 5-year progression free rate = 87% (95%CI 74.5%-94.3%); intermediate: median PFS = 10.9 years, 5-year progression free rate = 67% (95%CI 55.4%-77.5%); high: median PFS = 1 year, 5-year progression free rate = 13% (95%CI 3.4%-40.5%); p<0.0001]. The day 100 AMLCPS was balanced in relation to the International Prognostic Index (IPI; p=0.22), infused CD34+ stem cells (p=0.92), and disease status pre-APBHSCT (complete remission versus partial response; p=0.11). Conclusions: The day 100 AMLCPS is a simple biomarker that can help identify DLBCL patients post-APBHSCT with poor clinical outcomes.

2058 Background: We present a tertiary center experience with high-dose methotrexate, rituximab and temozolomide (MRT) chemotherapy in both primary and secondary CNS lymphoma. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for a total of 27 patients (20 male, 7 female) who underwent treatment at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between November 2010 and October 2012. The median age was 63 years (range 23-73). Of these, 12 patients were diagnosed with primary CNS lymphoma, while 15 patients had secondary CNS lymphoma. All patients received at least 1 cycle of MRT. The most common histological subtype was diffuse large cell lymphoma (23 of 27 patients). Other histological subtypes were high grade lymphoma (2 patients), Burkitt’s lymphoma (1 patient) and Mantle cell lymphoma (1 patient). Results: Of 26 patients, who underwent imaging studies for response assessment after MRT, 14 patients achieved complete response (CR), 4 patients achieved partial response (PR), 2 patients had stable disease, while 6 patients had evidence of disease progression. Overall, the median number of chemotherapy cycles with MRT was 3 (range 1-6). For patients, who achieved CR, the median number of MRT cycles was 4 (range 2-6). MRT was well tolerated. Of 27 patients, who underwent their entire treatment at Mayo Clinic, grade 3 or higher treatment related toxicity were noted to be as follows – neutropenia (9/27), thrombocytopenia (4/27), anemia (7/29), and transaminitis (10/27). 16 of 27 patients proceeded to high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant. Out of 16 patients, 14 received BCNU/Thiotepa as conditioning regimen, while 2 patients underwent BEAM conditioning. All 16 patients who underwent transplantation remain in CR at this time. Of the remaining 11 patients, 4 are being planned for autologous transplantation, 2 received and responded to salvage chemotherapy, while 5 patients died of progressive disease. Conclusions: Overall, the MRT regimen was well tolerated. Overall response rate was noted to be 67% (18 of 27 patients) and achieved CR in 54% patients (14 of 26 patients). Patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation as consolidation therapy continue to do well at a median followup of 12.5 months (range 2-20 months).

8028 Background: Effective treatment for relapsed/refractory cHL is lacking. The oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor EVE showed promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in cHL. We conducted a study to confirm EVE safety and efficacy in relapsed/refractory cHL. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, 2-step, phase 2 study, adults with cHL that progressed after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) or a gemcitabine-, vinorelbine-, or vinblastine-containing regimen received EVE 10 mg/d until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every 12 wk via integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) with contrast or CT with contrast. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per modified response criteria for malignant lymphoma. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed during, and for ≥4 wk after, EVE treatment. Results: 55 patients were enrolled. Of the 38 currently evaluable patients, 37% were men, median age was 32.5 y, 53% were pretreated with AHSCT, and 95% were pretreated with gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or vinblastine; 71% had disease progression during previous therapies or discontinued previous treatment due to progression. 23 patients discontinued treatment, most commonly due to disease progression (n = 11). ORR was 37% (Table). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 mo. The most common hematologic AEs were thrombocytopenia (39%) and anemia (24%); the most common nonhematologic AEs were fatigue (47%), cough (29%), dyspnea (26%), headache (21%), and rash (21%). Grade 3/4 AEs, most commonly thrombocytopenia (18%), were observed in 45% of patients. Conclusions: EVE showed a favorable ORR and median PFS in the first 38 evaluable patients with highly pretreated, relapsed/refractory cHL. The AE profile was consistent with that previously observed for EVE. These preliminary results confirm those of an earlier study and support further evaluation of EVE in cHL. [Table: see text]

7623 Background: Survival for patient with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), in general, is poor with patients requiring frequent chemotherapy treatments or receiving whole-brain radiation therapy, which can potentially result in significant neurologic decline and dementia. Because of the improved survival of high risk patients with aggressive lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), we began ASCT for patients with PCNSL in first or later remission with chemotherapy sensitive disease. We now report on outcomes of patients who have had at least 1 year follow up post ASCT. Methods: Between June, 2000 and September, 2004, 11 patients underwent ASCT for PCNSL. The medical records of consenting patients were abstracted for the following information. Median age at transplant was 47 years old (range 30–67). Median number of prior treatments 1 (range 1–3). Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 7.5 months (range 2.9 to 75.8). Median International Extranodal Working Study Group Prognostic Score: 2 (range 0–3). Disease status at transplant: First CR 5 patients, later CR or PR 6 patients. Results: Eleven patients underwent ASCT for PCNSL and have a minimum of 1 year follow-up. All patients received BEAM conditioning. Median follow up was 28.3 months. Four patients have relapsed at a median of 200 days (range 40–523). Of the patients who relapsed, one has died of disease progression and the remaining three are alive after additional therapy. Median overall survival and progression free survival from transplant have not been reached. Two year overall and event free survival are 89% and 61%, respectively. Conclusions: Although limited by patient selection and retrospective biases, this review suggests that ASCT for PCNSL demonstrates improved overall survival when compared to historical controls with similar PCNSL Prognostic Scores (2 year survival for patients from diagnosis with PS 2–3 was 48% in a prior published study). ASCT in first remission in patients with PCNSL appears promising and may limit the need for additional therapy which can be myelosuppressive or result in neurologic decline. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

7586 Background: The immunologic mechanisms of action of rituximab have been described as complement mediated lysis, vaccine like effect, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and the cellular microenvironment. We hypothesized that in the treatment of follicular grade 1 lymphoma (FL), the presence of a stronger host immune status prior to rituximab therapy would result in a prolonged time to progression (TTP). As a surrogate marker for immune status, we evaluated the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) prior to rituximab treatment. Methods: Between 1996 and 2002, 1,104 consecutive FL patients were evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Of these patients, we retrospectively analyzed a group of all FL patients who received rituximab (375 mg/m2 once a week for four weeks) alone at any time during their lymphoma treatment at the Mayo Clinic (n=79). The primary end-point was to assess the impact of ALC just prior to rituximab therapy on TTP for FL. Results: The median age of the cohort was 56.6 years (range: 25–98 years). The median follow-up was 12.5 months (range: 1–76 months). An ALC count of ≥ 890 cells/μL prior to rituximab therapy predicted a longer TTP compared with an ALC < 890 cells/μl (25 months versus 8 months, respectively, p < 0.0124). A higher complete response rate was observed in the ALC ≥ 890 cells/μL group compared with the ALC < 890 cells/μL group [15/40 (38%) vs 5/39 (13%), p < 0.035]. The groups were balanced regarding the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) (p = 0.794). Multivariate analysis demonstrated ALC ≥ 890 cells/μL prior to rituximab therapy as an independent prognostic factor for TTP when compared to hemoglobin, LDH, and Ann Arbor stage. The ALC was independent of the FLIPI in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: This data supports the hypothesis that a higher lymphocyte count, as a marker of the immune status of the patient, predicts for a longer TTP following rituximab therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.