Quiñones‐Hinojosa, Alfredo

OBJECTIVE High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are among the rarest yet most aggressive tumor types in neurosurgical practice. In the current literature, few studies have assessed the drivers of early outcomes following resection of these tumors and investigated their association with quality of care. The authors aimed to identify the clinical predictors for 30-day readmission and reoperation following HGG surgery using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database and sought to create web-based applications predicting each outcome. METHODS Using the ACS NSQIP database, the authors conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort analysis of patients who underwent resection of supratentorial HGGs between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020. Demographics and comorbidities were extracted. The primary outcomes were 30-day unplanned readmission and reoperation. A stratified 80:20 split of the available data was carried out. Supervised machine learning algorithms were trained to predict 30-day outcomes. RESULTS A total of 9418 patients were included in our cohort. The observed rate of unplanned readmission within 30 days of surgery was 13.0% (n = 1221). In terms of predictors, weight, chronic steroid use, preoperative blood urea nitrogen level, and white blood cell count were associated with a higher risk of readmission. The observed rate of unplanned reoperation within 30 days of surgery was 5.2% (n = 489). In terms of predictors, increased weight, longer operative time, and more days between hospital admission and operation were associated with an increased risk of early reoperation. The random forest algorithm showed the highest predictive performance for early readmission (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.967), while the XGBoost algorithm showed the highest predictive performance for early reoperation (AUC = 0.985). Web-based tools for both outcomes were deployed ( https://glioma-readmission.herokuapp.com/ and https://glioma-reoperation.herokuapp.com/ ). CONCLUSIONS In this study, the authors provide the first nationwide analysis for short-term outcomes in patients undergoing resection of supratentorial HGGs. Multiple patient, hospital, and admission factors were associated with readmission and reoperation, confirmed by machine learning predicting patients’ prognosis, leading to better planning preoperatively and subsequently improved personalized patient care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical approaches to the ventral brainstem and petroclival regions are complex, and standard retrosigmoid and subtemporal approaches are often inadequate. Retrosigmoid suprameatal tubercle (RSMTA) and anterior subtemporal transpetrosal (ASTA) approaches may provide extended surgical exposure with less brain retraction. The objective of this study was to evaluate advantages and disadvantages of RSMTA vs ASTA, and illustrate the surgical corridors and 3-dimensional microsurgical anatomy of the related structures. METHODS: Four silicone-injected adult cadaver heads (8 sides) were dissected to evaluate the accessibility of lesions located at the petrous apex, ventral brainstem, and pontomedullary region using ASTA and RSTMA. RESULTS: Both ASTA and RSMTA provide access from the petrous apex to the ventral lower pons and pontomedullary junction. A greater extent of safely resected bone was found in ASTA vs RSMTA. ASTA provides a larger surgical view to the ventrolateral midpons, peritrigeminal region, superior neurovascular complex, pontomesencephalic junction, and posterior cavernous sinus. Meanwhile, through cranial nerve V mobilization, RSMTA provides a larger surgical view to the lower half part of the pons, ventrolateral part of the pontomedullary junction, and middle and lower neurovascular structures. CONCLUSION: The choice of surgical approach is determined by considering the area where the lesion originates, lesion size, the anatomic structures to which it extends, and evaluation of the area that can be surgically exposed. Our study highlights the differences between these approaches and important surgical anatomic considerations.

In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approach (TCA). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the criteria for selecting different approaches. To explore the current results of EEA and discuss its role in the management of craniopharyngiomas, we performed MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS searches from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, the extent of resection, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed through an X2 and Fisher exact test, and a comparison between quantitative variables through a Kruskal–Wallis and verified with post hoc Bonferroni. The tumor volume was similar in both groups (EEA 11.92 cm3, -TCA 13.23 cm3). The mean follow-up in months was 39.9 for EEA and 43.94 for TCA, p = 0.76). The EEA group presented a higher visual improvement rate (41.96% vs. 25% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 7.7). Permanent DI was less frequent with EEA (29.20% vs. 67.40% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 0.2). CSF Leaks occurred more frequently with EEA (9.94% vs. 0.70% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 15.8). Recurrence rates were lower in the EEA group (EEA 15.50% vs. for TCA 21.20%, p = 0.04, OR 0.7). Our results demonstrate that, in selected cases, EEA for resection of craniopharyngiomas is associated with better results regarding visual preservation and extent of tumor resection. Postoperative CSF leak rates associated with EEA have improved compared to the historical series. The decision-making process should consider each person’s characteristics; however, it is noticeable that recent data regarding EEA justify its widespread application as a first-line approach in centers of excellence for skull base surgery.

Introduction There have been several studies of Moyamoya disease (MMD) with concurrent autoimmune (AI) disease. It has been proposed that there may be a causal or synergistic effect of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions in patients with MMD. As such, in the present study we seek to characterizethe surgical outcomes of adults and children with MMD and coexisting AI conditions. Methods A systematic review was performed of published studies reporting patient level data of Moyamoya disease and concomitant autoimmune disease. Relevant studies were identified using Preferred reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis criteria. Results A total of 149 studies were included, encompassing 257 patients. Of the 257 patients with concurrent AI and MMD, 107 (88 females, 19 males) underwent surgery. The average age was 31.3 years (Range 5–65; SD 12.5). Five cases presented with hemorrhagic symptoms, 87 ischemic, and 15 were unspecified. The most commonly associated AI conditions were Graves’ disease (71 cases, 66.4%), Lupus (17 cases, 15.9%), and T1DM (6 cases, 5.6%).Follow‐up was reported in 25 cases and was an average of 17.8 months. Surgical outcomes were reported in 82 cases; 63 (76.8%) improved, 7 (8.5%) were stable, 9 (10.9%) developed a new deficit, and 3 (3.7%) died at most recent follow up. Eight patients (7.5%) had disease progression. 63 (58.8%) patients were treated with additional autoimmune therapy although this therapy did not lead to any difference in outcomes. Twenty patients (18.7%) required additional supportive medical therapy (eg: aspirin, statins). Conclusions Moyamoya disease may be multifactorial. Patients with concomitant AI and Moyamoya disease may be at increased risk and warrant additional surveillance or intervention. The ideal therapy for these patients remains to be understood. These findings warrant further study into optimal diagnostic and therapeutic techniques for concomitant MMD and AI conditions.

Abstract Glioblastomas (GBM), also known as glioblastoma multiforme, are the most aggressive type of brain cancers. Currently, there is no real treatment for GBM and thus there is a compelling need for new therapeutic strategies for such type of cancers. Recently, we demonstrated that specific combinations of epigenetic modifiers significantly affect the metabolism and proliferation rate of two most aggressive GBM cell lines D54 and U-87. Importantly, these combinations exhibited minimal effect on normal stem cells growth. In this study we demonstrated that the combinations of modulators of histone and DNA covalent modifying enzymes that synergistically suppress D54 and U87 cell lines growth, also impair the viability of a patient freshly-derived GBM stem cell line. These data suggest that epigenetic modifiers alone or in specific combinations exhibit cytotoxic effect on established and low passage patient derived GB cell lines and thus could be a promising therapeutic approach for such type of brain cancers.