Smith, Glenn E.

There is currently limited and mixed evidence for the cognitive benefits of Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) and yoga in persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (pwMCI). The objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of computerized cognitive training (CCT) vs. physical (yoga) intervention on cognitive abilities. Participants in this study were part of the larger Mayo Clinic’s Healthy Action to Benefit Independence and Thinking (HABIT) program comparative effectiveness trial. The HABIT program is designed for pwMCI and their care partner and consists of five behavioral interventions: CCT, Memory Support System-Calendar (MSS-Calendar), wellness education, support groups, and yoga. The subtractive study design randomly withheld one of the interventions for a total of five study arms. Longitudinal mixed-effects regression models were used to investigate the hypothesis that CCT and yoga has a greater positive impact on psychomotor and basic attention abilities at 12 months post-intervention as compared to the other HABIT interventions. Findings showed CCT had a positive impact compared to yoga on the Cogstate psychomotor/attention composite at 12 months post-intervention (ES = 0.54; unadjusted p value = 0.007, adjusted p value = 0.021). The impact of yoga or combining CCT with yoga did not show statistically significant improvement. Continued CCT practice at home showed further benefit on psychomotor/attention at 12 months post-intervention. There was no significant benefit of CCT or yoga on Cogstate learning/working memory composite.

AbstractBackgroundThe American Academy of Neurology Practice Guidelines recommends physical exercise to help maintain cognition in people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (pwMCI). We previously demonstrated yoga’s benefit in maintenance of memory related activities of daily living at one year follow‐up in pwMCI (Chandler et al., 2019), and yoga may be beneficial in offsetting a sense of burden in care partners at 12 months (Amofa et al., submitted). In this analysis, we sought to examine the impact of yoga training on physical performance in pwMCI and their care partners.MethodIn this multisite, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 272 patients meeting National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for MCI and a care partner. The intervention program was modeled on the 10 day Mayo Clinic HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence and Thinking® program. Of 5 possible interventions (memory compensation training, computerized cognitive training, yoga, patient and partner support groups, and wellness education), 1 of 5 interventions was randomly selected to be withheld for each intervention group, thus allowing us to examine comparative effectiveness. Participants and their partners had 1‐day booster sessions at 6 and 12 months after intervention. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a measure of balance, gait speed, and repeated chair stands was used to assess physical function outcomes.ResultThere was a general pattern of physical decline on the SPPB over the year in pwMCI, regardless of yoga training (d=‐0.04, p=0.78) (Figure 1, Panel A). Among care partners, those randomized to the no yoga group had a worse decline in physical function compared to those receiving yoga (d=‐0.31, p=0.034) (Figure 1, Panel B). While not reaching statistical significance in subgroup comparisons, yoga training tended to have a greater effect on SPPB than computerized cognitive training (d = 0.35, p = .06) or wellness education (d = 0.32, p =.09) (Table 1).ConclusionParticipation in yoga had a positive impact on physical performance outcomes at one year for care partners, but did not counteract general physical decline in pwMCI.

AbstractBackgroundOne nonpharmacological intervention for persons with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is development of a compensatory memory notebook/planner system. De Wit et al. (2019) showed that global cognitive status is the primary predictor of learning success with training on a memory notebook system and that learning success predicts ongoing adherence to the tool. The purpose of our work is to validate their analysis in a new sample and evaluate whether or not patient or partner personality traits predict learning success over and above that explained by cognitive status.MethodTraining in the Memory Support System (MSS) is one component of the multi‐disciplinary behavioral intervention program called Healthy Action to Benefit Independence and Thinking (HABIT) offered at Mayo Clinic. 183 patient and partner dyads completed the HABIT program and enrolled in our IRB approved ongoing research registry to allow use of their clinical data for research purposes. Personality traits were measured with the self‐report Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) based on the five‐factor model of personality (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness, and Extraversion) completed by both the patient and the partner. For our analyses, we fit logistic regression models to predict full MSS mastery at the end of the two‐week program and dichotomized TIPI into “high” or “low” for each trait based on its median (low was the reference group).ResultConsistent with De Wit et al. (2019), global cognitive status again was the only significant predictor of MSS learning mastery when considering age, education, baseline depression score and baseline global cognitive status (Table 2). When adding patient personality traits, only openness significantly added to the model with higher openness predicting learning success (Table 3). Adding both patient and partner personality traits resulted in a significant interaction between patient and partner openness (Table 4). The direction of this interaction indicates that learning success is highest when either the partner or patient is high in openness (but not both).ConclusionHigh openness to experience in the patient with MCI or their partner (but not both) significantly improves learning success for a cognitive rehabilitation memory support tool in patients with MCI.

Background: Plasma NfL (pNfL) levels are elevated in many neurological disorders. However, the utility of pNfL in a clinical setting has not been established. Objective: In a cohort of diverse older participants, we examined: 1) the association of pNfL to age, sex, Hispanic ethnicity, diagnosis, and structural and amyloid imaging biomarkers; and 2) its association to baseline and longitudinal cognitive and functional performance. Methods: 309 subjects were classified at baseline as cognitively normal (CN) or with cognitive impairment. Most subjects had structural MRI and amyloid PET scans. The most frequent etiological diagnosis was Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but other neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders were also represented. We assessed the relationship of pNfL to cognitive and functional status, primary etiology, imaging biomarkers, and to cognitive and functional decline. Results: pNfL increased with age, degree of hippocampal atrophy, and amyloid load, and was higher in females among CN subjects, but was not associated with Hispanic ethnicity. Compared to CN subjects, pNfL was elevated among those with AD or FTLD, but not those with neuropsychiatric or other disorders. Hippocampal atrophy, amyloid positivity and higher pNfL levels each added unique variance in predicting greater functional impairment on the CDR-SB at baseline. Higher baseline pNfL levels also predicted greater cognitive and functional decline after accounting for hippocampal atrophy and memory scores at baseline. Conclusion: pNfL may have a complementary and supportive role to brain imaging and cognitive testing in a memory disorder evaluation, although its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as a stand-alone measure is modest. In the absence of expensive neuroimaging tests, pNfL could be used for differentiating neurodegenerative disease from neuropsychiatric disorders.

ObjectivesWe adapted a self‐efficacy measure for managing chronic illness to be specific to persons with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI). The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the scale, the self‐efficacy for managing MCI scale, for use in research.MethodsAnalyses involved data from pwMCI enrolled in a behavioral intervention study that completed the measure five times from intervention enrollment to 18‐month post‐intervention. Factor structure, construct validity, internal consistency, and test‐retest reliability were analyzed.ResultsFactor analysis identified two factors, related to self‐efficacy for daily activities and managing MCI, which corresponded with domains from the original chronic illness self‐efficacy scale. Consistent with prior research, construct validity analysis suggested an association between memory‐loss self‐efficacy and psychosocial distress, but not cognitive or functional ability. Further analyses supported the scale's internal and test‐retest reliability.ConclusionsCurrently, no “gold standard” scale of memory‐loss self‐efficacy for pwMCI exists, despite the positive impact self‐efficacy may have on modifiable health behaviors. Overall, results supported the notion that the scale is a valid and reliable measure of memory‐loss self‐efficacy for pwMCI.

Background: Research has shown that individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) value quality of life (QoL) above and beyond cognitive function or other potential outcomes in MCI. There is evidence supporting the negative impact of poor physical function on QoL ratings. Objective: The study explored whether a modified measure of self-efficacy for managing MCI and education mediated and/or moderated the relationship between physical function and QoL in persons with MCI. Methods: Baseline data from 200 participants with MCI were obtained from a larger study assessing the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention. Physical function was assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery. QoL was assessed with the Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s Disease scale. Memory-related self-efficacy was assessed using a modified 9-item version of the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales. Mediation and moderation analyses tested the hypotheses that self-efficacy and education alter the association between physical function and QoL in individuals with MCI. All analyses were adjusted for age, cognitive severity, and sex. Results: Self-efficacy for managing MCI was a significant mediator of the association between physical function and perceived QoL. Individuals with better physical function reported higher self-efficacy which was associated with higher QoL ratings. Conclusions: Greater self-efficacy for managing MCI mediated the negative association between physical function and quality of life in this exploratory study. Interventions aimed at enhancing memory self-efficacy in MCI may improve perceived QoL, even in the presence of poor physical function. Future research is needed to investigate this further.