Couch, Fergus J.

Purpose The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for breast cancer screening exceeds that of mammography. If MRI screening reduces mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, it is expected that the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancers should be reduced in women undergoing MRI screening compared with those undergoing conventional screening. Patients and Methods We followed 1,275 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation for a mean of 3.2 years. In total, 445 women were enrolled in an MRI screening trial in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and 830 were in the comparison group. The cumulative incidences of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), early-stage, and late-stage breast cancers were estimated at 6 years in the cohorts. Results There were 41 cases of breast cancer in the MRI-screened cohort (9.2%) and 76 cases in the comparison group (9.2%). The cumulative incidence of DCIS or stage I breast cancer at 6 years was 13.8% (95% CI, 9.1% to 18.5%) in the MRI-screened cohort and 7.2% (95% CI, 4.5% to 9.9%) in the comparison group (P = .01). The cumulative incidence of stages II to IV breast cancers was 1.9% (95% CI, 0.2% to 3.7%) in the MRI-screened cohort and 6.6% (95% CI, 3.8% to 9.3%) in the comparison group (P = .02). The adjusted hazard ratio for the development of stages II to IV breast cancer associated with MRI screening was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.72; P = .008). Conclusion Annual surveillance with MRI is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The centrosome is the primary microtubule organizing center of the cell. Numerical or functional defects of the centrosome can result in improper chromosome segregation, leading to aneuploidy and polyploidy. Because many cancer cells have aberrant numbers of chromosomes, many have suggested a link between centrosomes and cancer. We conducted an association study to determine whether common genetic variations in 100 genes involved in maintaining and regulating centrosome structure and function account in part for the contribution of the pathway to breast cancer risk. METHODS: Incident cases of BC were identified at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN from 2001 through 2005. Controls (N=843) were frequency matched to cases (N=798) on age and region of residence. Seven hundred-eighty-two tagging and candidate functional SNPs were selected from 100 genes involved in the structure and/or function of the centrosome. Genotyping was performed on an Illumina BeadLab using the Illumina GoldenGate genotyping assay. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for BC. Women having two copies of the most common allele were defined as the referent category. Linear regression was used to estimate mean and 95% CI for PD for each additional copy of the variant allele. All models were adjusted for age, residence, and confounding factors. RESULTS: Forty-eight SNPs from 29 genes (out of 782 SNPs examined) showed evidence of significant associations with breast cancer risk in our population in the log-additive (1 degree of freedom (d.f.)) model (Ptrend< 0.05). One SNP, rs1374468 SNP in TACC3, displayed the most significant association with risk in the overall analyses (Ptrend = 0.001). Two SNPs from each of seven genes (AJUBA, CHUK, MCPH1, NEK7, PAK1, PIK3CB, and PINS) were significantly associated with risk of breast cancer (Ptrend < 0.05). Three genes, AXIN2, NIN, NUMA1, had four or more SNPs that were significantly associated with breast cancer risk (Ptrend < 0.05). All of the SNPs in these four genes were in strong linkage disequilibrium (r2>0.6). No single SNP association was significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons via permutation testing. Haplotype analyses showed 20 genes for which global haplotypes were significantly associated with breast cancer risk. Of these, haplotype blocks in six genes (14-3-3 Epsilon, CDC16, CD-TOG, KIF2, NEK9, NPM2) were significantly associated with risk (global P<0.05), although none of the individual SNPs in these six genes displayed significant associations. This suggests that the associations of these specific combinations of alleles with risk were not due to the effects of individual SNPs. CONCLUSION: These analyses provide some evidence to support an association between genetic variation in centrosomal genes and risk of breast cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2852.

Abstract Using data from patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, we sought to examine whether overall survival was associated with common inherited variation in candidate genes and genomic regions including those involved in angiogenesis, mitosis, and regions of interest from genome-wide association and expression studies. We conducted a two-stage analysis based on Mayo Clinic patients with replication of peak results in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Ovarian cancer patients (N=312) seen at the Mayo Clinic diagnosed from 1999 to 2006 with median follow-up of 3.7 years (range, 0.1 − 9.5 years) and 172 observed deaths were analyzed at 993 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 179 genes. For all patients and for serous patients only (N=192 with 129 observed deaths), Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each SNP, adjusted for other prognostic factors. Twenty-nine SNPs in ten genes revealed p < 0.01 among all cases or among serous cases only, including 21 independent SNP at r2=0.9; analyses within four genes (HGF, PLG, PRKACB, and DCTN5) yielded p < 0.001. The strongest result was in HGF at rs1800793 (all cases: HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 − 2.2, p-trend 1.9 E-5; serous cases: HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 − 2.2, p-trend 1.8 E-3). A correlated SNP rs2214825 also showed association (r2=0.76; all cases: HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 − 1.8, p-trend 3.3 E-3; serous cases: HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 − 1.9, p-trend 0.03), and PCA gene-level tests of the HGF locus were also significantly associated with survival (all cases, p=3.7 E-4; serous cases, p=0.01). Among all cases, differential survival was also associated with DCTN5 rs12447304 (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6; p=7.1 E-4), and among serous cases, with PLG rs783173 (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 − 2.0, p = 8.1 E-4) and PRKACB rs1402694 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 − 2.2, p=3.2 E-4). We then examined SNPs in the most suggestive gene, HGF, using data from TCGA which had genotyped four overlapping HGF SNPs in 350 invasive cases (188 deaths). Covariate-adjusted TCGA analysis at rs2214825 revealed consistent results (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2, p=1.4 E-4) as did analyses of three other HGF SNPs (HR range 1.3 to 1.5, p range 3.4 E-3 to 0.049); correlation between SNP genotypes and HGF expression was also observed (p=1.4 E-3, rs2214825, probe 210997_at). While this is the first report of SNPs in HGF, it has long been known that the HGF signaling pathway, activated by HGF ligation of c-MET, plays a key role ovarian cancer cell growth, migration, and invasion. c-MET is overexpressed in 40%-60% of ovarian tumors, and high overexpression is associated with lower overall survival. In addition, HGF has been shown to enhance the response of ovarian cancer cells to low doses of paclitaxel and cisplatin by activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, leading to cancer cell death. These results now suggest that inherited differences in HGF among women with invasive disease may play a role in survival, holding potential clues for tailored avenues of treatment. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 897.

Abstract Epidemiologic studies suggest that breast cancer risk factor associations vary by tumor marker expression; however, individual studies have had limited power to address this question. We pooled data from up to 35,568 invasive breast cancer cases from 34 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) to evaluate associations between established risk factors (age at menarche, nulliparity, age at first full time birth [AFFTB], body mass index [BMI] and family history) and breast cancer subtypes, defined by immunohistochemical expression of ER, PR, HER2, and basal markers (CK5/6 or CK5, EGFR). We used polychotomous logistic regression to evaluate relationships between risk factors and tumor subtypes in case-only analyses and to estimate case-control odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the associations between risk factors and specific tumor subtypes in 11 population-based studies including up to 12,841 cases and 17,032 controls. In case-only analyses, we found that reproductive risk factors were more common in hormone receptor positive tumors: early age at menarche was most strongly related to PR status (34.6% vs. 32.4% of women with age at menarche ≤12 years among PR+ and PR- cases, respectively, P= 0.001); whereas nulliparity, and late AFFTB in parous women were most strongly related to ER status (15.3% vs. 13.6% nulliparous women, 17.1% vs. 15.2% women with late AFFTB [≥30 years], among ER+ and ER- cases, respectively, P=2.6×10−6 for nulliparity and P=2.0×10−7 for late AFFTB). Nulliparity and late AFFTB were less common among triple negative (TN) tumors overall and among TN tumors expressing basal markers. Elevated BMI in women aged 50 years or younger was more common in ER-&PR- than ER+&PR+ tumors (17.0% vs 13.6% women with BMI ≥30, respectively, P=1.3×10−7), whereas above age 50 years, elevated BMI was more common in ER+&PR+ than ER+&PR- tumors (20.9% vs 16.7% women with BMI ≥30, respectively, P=2.8×10−8 comparing BMI ≥30 to BMI <25). In case-control analyses, early age at menarche was associated with increased risk of PR+ tumors; nulliparity and late AFFTB were most strongly associated with increased risk of (ER+ or PR+)&HER2- tumors, and did not increase the risk of TN tumors. Having a family history of breast cancer increased the risk of all tumor subtypes, although the association was strongest for TN tumors expressing basal markers. Our data provide convincing evidence for etiological heterogeneity with respect to breast cancer risk factors stratified by ER and PR status. Stratification by additional markers provides additional insights about etiologic differences in breast cancer risk. Note: This abstract was not presented at the AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010 because the presenter was unable to attend. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 870.

Abstract Background: We previously identified a panel of genes associated with outcome of ovarian cancer. The purpose of the current study was to assess whether variants in these genes correlated with ovarian cancer risk. Methods and Findings: Women with and without invasive ovarian cancer (749 cases, 1,041 controls) were genotyped at 136 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 13 candidate genes. Risk was estimated for each SNP and for overall variation within each gene. At the gene-level, variation within MSL1 (male-specific lethal-1 homolog) was associated with risk of serous cancer (p=0.03); haplotypes within PRPF31 (PRP31 pre-mRNA processing factor 31 homolog) were associated with risk of invasive disease (p=0.03). MSL1 rs7211770 was associated with decreased risk of serous disease (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; p=0.03). SNPs in MFSD7, BTN3A3, ZNF200, PTPRS, and CCND1A were inversely associated with risk (p<0.05), and there was increased risk at HEXIM1 rs1053578 (p=0.04, OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.02-1.91). Conclusions: Tumor studies can reveal novel genes worthy of follow-up for cancer susceptibility. Here, we found that inherited markers in the gene encoding MSL1, part of a complex that modifies the histone H4, may decrease risk of invasive serous ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4718.

Abstract Background: Mitosis is a highly regulated process that serves to ensure the fidelity of cell division. The disruption of mitotic regulators leading to aneuploidy and polyploidy is commonly observed in cancer cells. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in regulators of mitosis may promote chromosome missegregation and influence pancreatic cancer and/or survival. Methods: Thirty-four SNPs, previously associated with breast cancer risk, from 33 genes involved in the regulation of mitosis, were investigated for associations with pancreatic cancer risk in 1,143 Caucasian patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 1,097 unaffected controls from the Mayo Clinic. Associations with survival from pancreatic cancer were also assessed using 1,030 pancreatic cancer cases with known outcome. Results: Two SNPs in the APC (rs2431238) and NIN (rs10145182) loci, of 34 examined, were significantly associated with pancreatic cancer risk (P = 0.035 and P = 0.038, respectively). Further analyses of individuals categorized by smoking and body mass index identified several SNPs displaying significant associations (P < 0.05) with pancreatic cancer risk, including APC rs2431238 in individuals with high body mass index (≥30; P = 0.031) and NIN rs10145182 in ever smokers (P = 0.01). In addition, survival analyses detected significant associations between SNPs in EIF3S10 and overall survival (P = 0.009), SNPs from five genes and survival in resected cancer cases (P < 0.05), and SNPs from two other genes (P < 0.05) and survival of locally advanced cancer cases. Conclusion: Common variation in genes encoding regulators of mitosis may independently influence pancreatic cancer susceptibility and survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(1); 251–7

Abstract Background: Inherited risk of pancreatic cancer has been associated with mutations in several genes, including BRCA2, CDKN2A (p16), PRSS1, and PALB2. We hypothesized that common variants in these genes, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), may also influence risk for pancreatic cancer development. Methods: A clinic-based case-control study in non-Hispanic white persons compared 1,143 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 1,097 healthy controls. Twenty-eight genes directly and indirectly involved in the Fanconi/BRCA pathway (includes BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2) were identified and 248 tag SNPs were selected. In addition, 11 SNPs in CDKN2A, PRSS1, and PRSS2 were selected. Association studies were done at the gene level by principal components analysis, whereas recursive partitioning analysis was used to investigate pathway effects. At the individual SNP level, adjusted additive, dominant, and recessive models were investigated, and gene-environment interactions were also assessed. Results: Gene level analyses showed no significant association of any genes with altered pancreatic cancer risk. Multiple single SNP analyses showed associations, which will require replication. Exploratory pathway analyses by recursive partitioning showed no association between SNPs and risk for pancreatic cancer. Conclusion: In a candidate gene and pathway SNP association study analysis, common variations in the Fanconi/BRCA pathway and other candidate familial pancreatic cancer genes are not associated with risk for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(9):2549–52)

Abstract Acquired platinum resistance is a serious problem in the treatment of ovarian carcinomas. However, the mechanism of the drug resistance has not been elucidated. Here, we show functional significance of restoration of BRCA2 protein by secondary BRCA2 mutations in acquired drug resistance of BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma. Three ovarian cancer cell lines (PEO1, PEO4, and PEO6) were derived from a BRCA2 mutation [5193C>G (Y1655X)] carrier with ovarian carcinoma with acquired cisplatin resistance and a secondary BRCA2 mutation [5193C>T (Y1655Y)] that canceled the inherited mutation. PEO1 was BRCA2 deficient and sensitive to cisplatin and a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, AG14361, whereas PEO4 was resistant. PEO4 and PEO6, derived from ascites at the time of relapse with cisplatin resistance, had the secondary mutation and were BRCA2 proficient. In vitro cisplatin/AG14361 selection of PEO1 led to restoration of BRCA2 due to another secondary BRCA2 mutation. BRCA2 depletion sensitized BRCA2-restored PEO1 clones and PEO4 to cisplatin/AG14361. Thus, restoration of BRCA2 due to secondary BRCA2 mutation is involved in acquired drug resistance of BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma. [Cancer Res 2009;69(16):6381–6]