Couch, Fergus J.

Abstract BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate and/or strenuous exercise and muscle-strengthening activities each week for adults. Exercise has been associated with decreased breast cancer mortality and adverse symptoms. This study’s purpose is to understand prevalence and predictors of inadequate aerobic exercise in patients recently diagnosed with breast cancer to inform interventions to increase exercise participation. METHODS: Patients seen at least once at Mayo Clinic Rochester were prospectively enrolled within one year of an initial breast cancer diagnosis in the Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry after providing informed consent. This analysis includes those who completed a baseline survey with self-reported exercise data using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire. This longitudinal cohort study was approved by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board. RESULTS: 1,738 participants reported their usual weekly quantity of moderate and strenuous exercise an average of 95 days (SD 71 days, range 0-365) after diagnosis. Table 1 displays participant characteristics overall and by whether participants reported at least 150 minutes of moderate and/or strenuous activity weekly (“met guidelines”) or not (“did not meet guidelines”). Overall, 39% of participants met guidelines, including 56% of those aged 18-39 years, 40% of those aged 40-69 years, and 27% of those aged 70+ years. CONCLUSION: Older age was associated with less likelihood of meeting exercise guidelines (all age groups vs 70+, p < 0.05). A more diverse cohort will be needed to evaluate differences by gender and race/ethnicity. There did not appear to be any obvious impact on exercise level by time since diagnosis (during the first year after diagnosis) or educational status, though substantial missing data limit conclusions related to the latter. Additional research is needed to assess exercise levels later in survivorship and the impact of various treatment modalities on exercise habits Table 1. Patient and tumor characteristics Citation Format: Paulina S. Marell, Janet E. Olson, Joerg Herrmann, Nicole L. Larson, Nathan K. LeBrasseur, Stacy D. D'Andre, Andrea L. Cheville, Toure Barksdale, Charles L. Loprinzi, Fergus J. Couch, Kathryn J. Ruddy. Factors associated with exercise participation in patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5868.

Abstract Background: Medical financial hardship, encompassing material, behavioral, and psychologic domains, is becoming an increasingly common consequence of illness in cancer patients. Identifying at-risk patients is the first step to develop proactive approaches to mitigate this problem. To try and address this need, Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry (MCBDR) is prospectively collecting data about financial concerns in addition to the usual sociodemographic and clinical information. Methods: We used data from Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry, a prospective cohort of consenting patients seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester within one year of initial breast cancer diagnosis. Participants completed baseline and annual follow-up surveys rating their financial concerns on a linear analogue scale from 0 (“none”) to 10 (“constant concerns”). We compared patient-reported financial concern at baseline to that on each patient’s most recent survey, with worsening concerns defined as a 1+-point increase. Logistic regression evaluated for predictors of worsening financial concerns. Results: 1,957 participants responded to financial concern questions on a baseline and at least one follow-up survey between 2015 and 2020. Mean age was 58.5 years (SD 12.5), and mean time between diagnosis and the most recent follow-up was 25.6 months (SD 16.2). 357 (18.2%) reported worsening financial concerns. Only lower baseline financial status was associated with a greater likelihood of worsening financial concerns (see Table). Conclusions: More than one in seven breast cancer survivors develop worsening financial concerns within 5-years of diagnosis, and those with less financial security at baseline appear to be most vulnerable. Funding: Breast Cancer Research Foundation (CLL) and NR015259 (KJR). Patient and tumor characteristics, compared by whether financial status worsened over time Full Cohort (n=1957) Worsening, ≥ 1-point change (n=357) Stable/Improved (n=1600) p value Full Cohort (n=1957) Worsening, ≥ 1-point change (n=357) Stable/Improved (n=1600) p value Age at diagnosis II or III 502 (25.7%) 98 (27.5%) 404 (25.3%) 0.239 ≤ 50 546 (27.9%) 105 (29.4%) 441 (27.6%) IV 67 (3.4%) 17 (4.8%) 50 (3.1%) 0.086 51-64 757 (38.7%) 136 (38.1%) 621 (38.8%) 0.562 Unknown 351 (17.9%) 65 (18.2%) 286 (17.9%) 0.536 ≥65 654 (33.4%) 116 (32.5%) 538 (33.6%) 0.506 ER and/or PR positive Race No/Unknown 482 (24.6%) 92 (25.8%) 390 (24.4%) White 1863 (95.2%) 337 (94.4%) 1526 (95.4%) Yes 1475 (75.4%) 265 (74.2%) 1210 (75.6%) 0.580 Non-white 24 (1.2%) 5 (1.4%) 19 (1.2%) 0.729 Her2 positive Other/Unknown/Choose not to respond 70 (3.6%) 15 (4.2%) 55 (3.4%) 0.478 No/Unknown 1746 (89.2%) 314 (88.0%) 1432 (89.5%) Educational status Yes 176 (9.0%) 37 (10.4%) 139 (8.7%) 0.321 Less than bachelor’s degree 880 (45.0%) 168 (47.1%) 712 (44.5%) Borderline 35 (1.8%) 6 (1.7%) 29 (1.8%) 0.898 Bachelor's degree or higher 1065 (54.4%) 187 (52.4%) 878 (54.9%) 0.384 Radiation Unknown 12 (0.6%) 2 (0.6%) 10 (0.6%) 0.832 No/Unknown 781 (39.9%) 140 (39.2%) 641 (40.1%) Financial status near time of diagnosis Yes 1176 (60.1%) 217 (60.8%) 959 (59.9%) 0.768 Pay bills, money for special things 1412 (72.2%) 244 (68.3%) 1168 (73.0%) Chemotherapy/targeted therapy Pay bills, no money for special things 367 (18.8%) 80 (22.4%) 287 (17.9%) 0.046 No/Unknown 1264 (64.6%) 221 (61.9%) 1043 (65.2%) Pay bills by making cuts 102 (5.2%) 19 (5.3%) 83 (5.2%) 0.729 Yes 693 (35.4%) 136 (38.1%) 557 (34.8%) 0.241 Unable to pay bills 56 (2.9%) 10 (2.8%) 46 (2.9%) 0.911 Hormone/endocrine therapy Unknown 20 (1.0%) 4 (1.1%) 16 (1.0%) 0.750 No/Unknown 710 (36.3%) 141 (39.5%) 569 (35.6%) Employment status at time of diagnosis Yes 1247 (63.7%) 216 (60.5%) 1031 (64.4%) 0.163 Employed full-time 462 (23.6%) 83 (23.2%) 379 (23.7%) Surgery type Employed part-time/unemployed/retired 525 (26.8%) 92 (25.8%) 433 (27.1%) 0.856 Lumpectomy 846 (43.2%) 145 (40.6%) 701 (43.8%) Not available 970 (49.6%) 182 (51.0%) 788 (49.3%) 0.716 Mastectomy 903 (46.1%) 165 (46.2%) 738 (46.1%) 0.535 Stage at time of diagnosis None/Unknown 208 (10.6%) 47 (13.2%) 161 (10.1%) 0.069 0 or I 1037 (53.0%) 177 (49.6%) 860 (53.8%) Citation Format: Michael H. Storandt, Urshila Durani, Daniela Stan, Nicole Larson, Charles Loprinzi, Fergus Couch, Janet E. Olson, Nandita Khera, Kathryn J. Ruddy. Financial hardship in breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1012.

e17610 Background: Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) associated with sporadic ovarian cancer (OC) are detected in plasma from patients with treatment naïve tumors, but not cancer-free controls. To assess potential benefits to patients at risk for hereditary OC, the aim of this study was to measure the performance of validated sporadic OC MDMs in OC and benign ovarian tissue (BOT), surgically obtained from germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) mutation carriers. Methods: BRCA1/2 carriers with OC and BRCA1/2 carriers who had undergone risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (SO) were identified at a comprehensive cancer center. BRCA1/2 carriers in both OC and BOT groups were balanced on age and year of surgery with non- BRCA carriers with sporadic OC or benign indications for SO. OC and BOT formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues were macrodissected following pathologist selection of representative sites; DNA was extracted, and bisulfite converted. 15 OC MDMs ( GDF6, IFFO1, MAX.chr1.147790358, MAX.chr6.10382190, MAX.chr11.14926602, C2CD4D, PDRM14, NCOR2, SKI, DSCR6, SIM2, PALLD, CDO1, GPRIN1, BCAT1) previously identified in sporadic OC were assayed by quantitative methylation specific PCR, normalized by β-actin, by blinded personnel. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were generated for each MDM to assess discrimination of OC from benign tissue and compared between BRCA1/2 and sporadic (non- BRCA) patients, using a z-test. Results: Among BRCA1/2 carriers, there were 48 OC ( BRCA-OC) and 48 BOT ( BRCA-BOT); among non- BRCA, we matched 48 OC (Sporadic-OC) and 48 BOT (non- BRCA-BOT). The median AUC for OC MDM discriminated between OC and BOT with AUCs in BRCA1/2 carriers was 0.87, (IQR, 0.83-0.93). Sporadic-OC vs non- BRCA-BOT median AUC was 0.88 (IQR, 0.83-0.92). AUCs were not significantly different for each MDM when stratified by BRCA or sporadic status. MDMs with an AUC of ≥0.9 in either group are shown (Table). Conclusions: OC MDMs identified and validated in sporadic OC are highly discriminant for OC from BOT in DNA extracted from tissues of people who carry a BRCA1/2 mutation. Testing the performance of these OC MDMs in plasma from BRCA1/2 carriers with and without OC may be of clinical value for high-risk patients and inform multi-cancer early detection testing strategies.[Table: see text]

555 Background: Women with early-stage breast cancer (BCa) are living longer, and survivorship issues including second primary cancers (SPCs) are therefore increasingly important. This study seeks to determine the risk of SPCs, including contralateral breast cancer (CBCa), in women with early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Methods: The study population consisted of women with BCa diagnosis between 2000-2018 within the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER v 3.2.9) registry and between 2000-2021 in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry. In the SEER registry, the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for SPCs were estimated for adult women with histologically confirmed early stage (I-III) ILC compared to the development of any primary cancer in the general population. For reference, SIRs for SPCs for a similar patient population with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast were also estimated. For comparison of CBCa between ILC and IDC, follow up records from the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry were evaluated among adult women who underwent lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy for early stage ILC or IDC. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to compare the risk of CBCa between ILC and IDC while adjusting for the age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity and estrogen receptor status of the primary tumor. Results: An increased incidence (p<0.05) of any SPCs and second BCa was noted for both ILC and IDC compared to the expected rate of primary cancer in the general population (Table). Interestingly, women with ILC were observed to have a significantly increased incidence of subsequent gastric cancer which was not seen for women with IDC. An SIR >1.5 was noted for subsequent risk of sarcoma, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for both ILC and IDC (Table). In the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry of 2,218 women with ILC and 14,629 women with IDC meeting the inclusion criteria, the 5-year risk of CBCa was 2.6% and 1.5% (log rank statistic p-value =0.001) for ILC and IDC respectively. A significantly increased risk of CBCa was noted in women with ILC (Hazard Ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.34-2.47, p<0.001) compared to women with IDC in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Women with ILC may have an increased risk of SPC and second BCa compared to the risk of any primary cancer in the general population. The increased incidence of gastric cancer and the higher risk of CBCa in ILC survivors compared to women with IDC is intriguing and needs to be investigated further including evaluation of the role of germline genetic factors. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: The lack of consensus on whether bilateral oophorectomy impacts risk of developing breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers might be attributed to various biases, specifically, cancer-induced testing bias due to inclusion of prevalent cases. We conducted two complementary matched case–control analyses to evaluate the association of oophorectomy and BRCA1 breast cancer. Methods: A research questionnaire was administered every two years to collect information on exposures and disease. In the first analysis, we limited the study to prevalent breast cancer cases (diagnosed prior to study entry; n = 2,962) who were matched to controls on year of birth and country of residence (n = 4,358). In the second approach, we limited to 330 incident cases (diagnosed in the follow-up period) and 1,548 matched controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of invasive breast cancer. Results: In the first approach, there was a significant inverse association between oophorectomy and the risk of developing breast cancer [OR = 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34–0.55; P &lt; 00001]. In the second approach, there was no association between oophorectomy and risk (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.87–1.70; P = 0.26). Conclusions: The inclusion of women with a personal history of breast cancer prior to ascertainment likely impacts upon the association of oophorectomy and BRCA1 breast cancer risk. Impact: Oophorectomy is unlikely a determinant of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers but should be offered at age 35 to reduce the risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer.

Abstract Background: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) accounts for ~60-70% of all BC cases. CDK4/6i combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care for first- and second-line therapy of patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on substantial improvements in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to ET alone. Unfortunately, most patients (pts) develop resistance to CDK4/6i. The mechanisms underlying CDK4/6i resistance have not been fully elucidated. Robust in vivo CDK4/6i resistant animal models from pts with de novo and acquired CDK 4/6i resistance are lacking. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are important preclinical tools in oncology to advance our understanding of cancer biology and to evaluate drug response phenotypes. Unfortunately, the establishment of sustainable PDXs from pts with HR+ BC is much more difficult than from HR-negative BC. In order to obtain clinically relevant models that can be utilized to better understand mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to ET and CDK4/6i, we report the development of PDXs from a prospective study in which percutaneous biopsies were obtained from women receiving palbociclib for the treatment of HR+ advanced or MBC (PROMISE; NCT03281902). Methods: PROMISE (Prospective Study to Evaluate the Role of Tumor Sequencing in Women Receiving Palbociclib for Advanced Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive Breast Cancer) is a prospective trial which enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC who planned to start treatment with palbociclib and letrozole (1st line [FL]) or palbociclib and fulvestrant (2nd line [SL]). For pts enrolled at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), serial tumor biopsies were obtained prior to the start of treatment and at disease progression to establish PDXs. Because baseline take rate was low, we amended the protocol to attempt PDX generation after the 2nd cycle (C2) of therapy. Tissues were received within an hour of excision and were orthotopically implanted in the mammary fat pad of 6~8-week-old nonobese diabetic (NOD)/SCID/IL-2g-receptor null (NSG) mice. Tumor growth was defined as tumor volume ≥ 50 mm3. Tumor take rate was defined as percent of patients with development of at least one stably transplantable (passed at least for two generations) xenograft that was pathologically confirmed as BC. Results: Of the 50 pts enrolled at MCR, 37 were FL pts (2 ineligible) and 13 were SL pts (1 ineligible). Fresh tumor samples obtained pre-treatment from 43 eligible pts (32 FL), after C2 from 17 eligible pts (13 FL), and at disease progression from 10 eligible pts (5 FL) were implanted. Tumor growth was seen in at least one mouse from a pre-treatment specimen in 1 (3.1%) FL pt (confirmed BC) and 4 (36.4%) SL pts (2 confirmed BC); from end of C2 specimens in 2 (15.4%) FL pts and 2 (50%) SL pts (1 confirmed BC); and at progression in 1 (20%) FL pt and 2 (40%) SL pts (1 confirmed BC). The take rate from pre-treatment samples among FL pts was 1/32 (3.1%; 95% CI: 0.08-16.2%). Take rates in other groups are pending histological review. Discussion: In pts receiving palbociclib for HR+ MBC, the take rate using a pre-treatment percutaneous biopsy was low (3.1%) in the FL setting. However, higher growth rates were seen in the SL setting. The observation of higher growth rates at the end of C2 and at progression may relate to the activation of G1/S that occurs with withdrawal of palbociclib, and should be further studied. PDX remains a valuable tool for the evaluation of tumor biology and the development of new therapeutics, especially for those models established from pts with palbociclib and ET resistance. Proteogenomic and sequencing studies are ongoing to fully characterize these PDXs. Citation Format: Jia Yu, Vera J. Suman, Jun He, Jason P. Sinnwell, Ann M. Moyer, Bo Qin, Yayun Gu, Huan Zhang, Jodi M. Carter, Krishna R. Kalari, Brendan P. McMenomy, Minetta C. Liu, Tufia C. Haddad, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Fergus J. Couch, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W. Northfelt, Richard Weinshilboum, Ciara O'Sullivan, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) generated from hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) before and after cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) treatment: Initial findings from the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-07.

Abstract Introduction: Breast cancer treatments can impair fertility via direct gonadotoxicity (chemotherapy) as well as by introducing delays in childbearing that allow natural ovarian aging. Guidelines strongly recommend fertility counseling and consideration of fertility preservation techniques for premenopausal women who have not completed their desired childbearing at the time of cancer diagnosis. Prior studies have identified high rates of fertility concern but relatively low rates of fertility counseling and use of fertility preservation techniques. We sought to investigate rates of fertility counseling, use of fertility preservation techniques, and how fertility concerns impact cancer treatment decisions in a modern cohort of patients with breast cancer at a large academic medical center in the United States. Methods: All patients seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester with a new diagnosis (within the year prior) of stage 0-4 breast cancer were invited (by mail or in person) to participate in the Mayo Clinic Breast Registry. After informed consent, participants were asked to complete a baseline survey and annual follow-up surveys. On baseline and one-year surveys, patients were queried about desire for future children and fertility concerns. Nurse chart abstraction was used to collect information about tumor subtype, stage, and treatments received. We examined survey data from women diagnosed under the age of 50 who expressed an interest in having future biological children on either the baseline or year 1 survey between February 2015 and October 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the degree of fertility concern in this population, the impact of that concern on cancer treatment decisions, and steps taken to preserve fertility. Results: Between February 2015 and October 2020, 865 women under age 50 at diagnosis consented to the registry. Of these women, 627 completed a baseline and/or 1-year survey and 100 answered either “yes” or “unsure” to the question: “At the present time, do you wish to have any more biological children in the future?” on one or both surveys. Among the 100 women expressing interest in future child-bearing, 92% were white, 27% had node-positive and one had distant metastatic disease at diagnosis. The age at diagnosis ranged from 19 to 49 years, with a mean age of 33.8 years. Of the 75 who reported a desire for future children at baseline, 28% felt “somewhat concerned” about their future fertility and 40% felt “very concerned.” Of the 70 who reported a desire for future children on the year 1 survey, 17% felt “somewhat concerned” and 59% felt “very concerned.” For those “very concerned” about future fertility at year 1, 65% reported that this concern had a major impact on their treatment decisions. Often, that treatment modification entailed using endocrine therapy for less than 5 years; 52% of those who specified the type of treatment modification they had made indicated this option. Of note, six women who reported no desire for future biological children at baseline were “unsure” at year 1. At year 1, 93% of women recalled a discussion about fertility with their doctor prior to starting treatment, and 49% had taken steps to preserve fertility (32.5% with embryo cryopreservation, 20% with oocyte cryopreservation and 65% with a GnRH agonist; some selected multiple options). Conclusion: We found a reassuringly high rate of patient-reported fertility counseling and use of reproductive endocrinology technologies to preserve fertility in women who reported a desire for additional children at or soon after diagnosis with breast cancer. Consistent with prior studies, fertility concerns frequently impacted breast cancer treatment decisions. It is important to err on the side of inclusivity when providing fertility counseling because desire for fertility can change over time. Citation Format: Samantha Mannion, Alexandra Higgins, Elizabeth A Stewart, Zaraq Khan, Chandra Shenoy, Nicole Larson, Hazel B Nichols, H Irene Su, Ann H Partridge, Fergus J Couch, Janet E Olson, Kathryn Ruddy. Prevalence and impact of fertility concerns in young women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-02.

Abstract Funding Source: Institutional funds at Mayo Clinic. Background: While alopecia is a common and distressing acute side effect of chemotherapy, chronic hair thinning is also reported by some survivors during endocrine therapy. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate real world experiences of late/long-term alopecia among breast cancer survivors. Methods: Breast cancer survivors participating in the ongoing prospective Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry (MCBDR) were mailed a survey six years after diagnosis, between June and November 2020. Respondents were asked to report how bothered they are by hair thinning and hair loss over the last year on a scale from 0 “not at all” to 4 “extremely”. They were also asked whether they used any hair thickening or regrowth products. Results: 552/899 survivors responded (response rate 61%); 403 survivors’ responses were available for analysis. Respondents’ median age was 66 years, and median time since diagnosis was 78 months. Seventy patients (17%) were diagnosed with stage 0 breast cancer, 195 (48%) were diagnosed with stage 1 cancer, 104 (26%) with stage 2, 25 (6%) with stage 3; 6 (1%) had been diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent disease at the time of this survey. 139 (34%) patients had received chemotherapy. Of the patients who received chemotherapy, 82 (59%) had received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, 41 (29%) received docetaxel and cyclophosphamide, 77 (55%) received paclitaxel, and 27 (19%) received carboplatin. 258 (64%) received endocrine therapy. Of these patients who received endocrine therapy, 131 (51%) received Tamoxifen and 186 (72%) received aromatase inhibitors. 309 survivors (77%) were 55 years or older. 189 (47%) of all patients reported that they were bothered by chronic hair loss, and 225 (56%) reported that they were bothered by hair thinning; 71 (18%) reported use of thickening/regrowth products. There did not appear to be differences in chronic hair loss or thinning by receipt of chemotherapy: 64 patients (46%) who received chemotherapy reported hair loss and 79 (56%) reported hair thinning, compared with 123 patients (46%) who did not receive chemotherapy and reported hair loss and 142 (54%) who reported hair thinning. Hair thinning or loss did not appear to differ based upon age (Table 1). Symptoms did not appear to be more common amongst current or previous endocrine therapy recipients, with 113 (44%) of that subset bothered by hair loss and 128 (50%) by hair thinning. Conclusion: Hair loss and thinning are frequently reported as bothersome symptoms by long-term breast cancer survivors. Future investigations into treatments for chronic hair thinning during and after cancer therapy are needed. Table 1.&lt; 5555+Bothered by hair loss (n)%Bothered by hair thinning (n)%Bothered by hair loss (n)%Bothered by hair thinning (n)%Not at all5761%4649%15751%13142%Slightly1920%2426%8728%9731%Moderately77%910%3110%4113%BOTHERED BY HAIR LOSS (N)%BOTHERED BY HAIR THINNING (N)%BOTHERED BY HAIR LOSS (N)%BOTHERED BY HAIR THINNING (N)%Quite a bit77%1112%227%268%Extremely44%33%93%103%Missing00%11%31%41% Citation Format: Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Charles L Loprinzi, Janet E Olson, Fergus Couch, Brittany Dulmage, Maryam Lustberg, Nicole Larson, Kathryn J Ruddy. Alopecia among breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-17.

Abstract Background: Eyebrow and eyelash loss are widely recognized as consequences of some chemotherapies, but prevalence and predictors are understudied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate real world experiences of eyebrow and eyelash loss during treatment for breast cancer. Methods: Breast cancer survivors participating in the ongoing prospective Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry (MCBDR) were mailed a survey one year after diagnosis. Respondents were asked to recall their severity of eyebrow and eyelash loss since diagnosis, measured from “no loss” to “a little loss” to “a lot of loss” to “complete loss”. Results: 524 participants were mailed a survey including these questions between May 2020 and November 2020; the median time from diagnosis to survey completion was 12 months (range 6 months). Of the 265 participants whose responses were available for analysis (median age 60.8 years), 88 (33%) had received chemotherapy, including 39 (44%) who received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, 16 (18%) who received docetaxel and cyclophosphamide, 56 (64%) who received paclitaxel, and 11 (13%) who received carboplatin. 173 (65%) had received endocrine therapy: 56 (32%) of patients who received endocrine therapy received tamoxifen, and 115 (66%) received aromatase inhibitors. 124 (47%) reported at least a little eyebrow loss, and 22 (8%) reported complete loss. Forty-seven percent reported at least a little eyelash loss, and 27 (10%) reported complete loss (Table 1). In the subgroup of 88 patients who received chemotherapy, the rates of at least a little eyebrow and eyelash loss were 50% and 55%, respectively, and rates of complete loss were 8% and 9%. Rates of eyebrow and eyelash loss did not appear to differ significantly by age. Conclusion: Eyebrow and eyelash loss are frequently reported during breast cancer-directed therapy. Future investigations into the incidence and treatment of this side effect are needed. Table 1.&lt;55 years old55+ years oldEyebrow Loss (N)%Eyelash Loss (N)%Eyebrow Loss (N)%Eyelash Loss (N)%No Loss4551%4753%9655%9353%A Little Loss2629%2225%3922%3922%A lot of loss1011%1112%2715%2514%Complete Loss89%910%148%1810%Funding Source: Breast Cancer Research Foundation (CLL) Clinic Citation Format: Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Charles L Loprinzi, Fergus Couch, Janet Olson, Brittany Dulmage, Maryam Lustberg, Nicole Larson, Kathryn J Ruddy. Eyebrow/eyelash loss among survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-11.