Citations 302

Treatment and outcomes of progression of disease post–CAR T-cell therapy in mantle cell lymphoma: a multicenter analysis

Blood Advances | August 5, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 5654-5662

10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016315 | PMID 40763269

Abstract The treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients experiencing progression of disease (POD) following CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are undefined. We identified all patients who received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy for R/R MCL therapy across 15 international centers, and studied those experiencing POD post–CAR T-cell therapy in detail. We extracted clinical/treatment/pathologic variables, and associated these features with survival outcomes. In total, 384 patients received CAR T-cell therapy, and 135 (35%) experienced POD. POD occurred at a median of 6 months following CAR T-cell therapy infusion, and most (64%) patients with POD had complete response as best response to CAR T-cell therapy. Tumor features at POD included blastoid/pleomorphic morphology in 29 of 78 (37%) patients, and TP53 mutation in 21 of 41 (51%) patients. Following POD, 17 patients received no further therapy, 13 underwent local therapy, and 105 received systemic therapy. The most common first-line systemic therapies were chemo(immuno)therapy (22 patients; overall response rate [ORR], 40%), pirtobrutinib (17 patients; ORR, 36%), and bispecific antibodies (13 patients; ORR, 67%). Among patients experiencing POD, the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 2.5 months and 5.4 months, respectively, from POD. Lack of response to CAR T-cell therapy and short time from CAR T-cell therapy infusion to POD (<3 vs 3-6 vs >6 months), among other factors, were associated with inferior OS after POD. In conclusion, we confirm the challenging prognosis for patients experiencing POD following CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for R/R MCL, and establish a benchmark for future investigations in this patient population.
The role of imaging studies in predicting time to first treatment and overall survival in high‐count monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis

British Journal of Haematology | July 16, 2025 | Volume: 207 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 860-868

10.1111/bjh.70009 | PMID 40664436

SummaryIn individuals with high‐count monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis (MBL), we investigated if lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly found by imaging was associated with shorter time to first chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) therapy (TTFT) and overall survival (OS). Individuals with MBL seen at Mayo Clinic (2002–2019) were retrospectively divided into three cohorts based on imaging studies within 1 year of diagnosis: no imaging studies (Cohort A); imaging with no evidence of lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly (Cohort B); imaging with evidence of lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly (Cohort C). We compared baseline characteristics, TTFT and OS across the MBL cohorts to a cohort of individuals with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). A total of 1078 patients were included: 640 with MBL and 438 with SLL. Compared to Cohort B, individuals in Cohort C were more likely to have unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV) (43% vs. 25% p = 0.016), high‐risk fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (del17p and del11q in 15% vs. 4%, p = 0.038) and higher expression of CD38 (31% vs. 16%; p = 0.011). After adjusting for sex and CLL‐International Prognostic Index (IPI), lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly was associated with a shorter TTFT (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–4.04, p = 0.042) but not OS (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.62–1.92, p = 0.775). Lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly on imaging in individuals with high‐count MBL is associated with a more unfavourable risk profile and shorter time to first CLL‐directed therapy.
Real-world outcomes of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma treated with epcoritamab or glofitamab

Blood | July 15, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 2177-2188

10.1182/blood.2025029117 | PMID 40663785

Abstract Epcoritamab and glofitamab are CD20-directed bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved in the United States for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Limited data exist for patients treated outside of trials. Patients with R/R DLBCL receiving commercial epcoritamab or glofitamab between 1 January 2023 and 15 October 2024 were collected from 21 United States institutions. Among 245 patients, 156 received epcoritamab and 89 received glofitamab, 113 were refractory to front-line therapy, 40 had MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, 147 received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and 174 patients would have been ineligible for registrational trials. The overall response rate (ORR) for epcoritamab and glofitamab was 51% (23% complete response, [CR]) and 53% (30% CR), respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.8 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-11.0 months). The 6-month PFS was 36% (95% CI, 30-44) and the 6-month OS was 60% (95% CI, 54-67). Both trial ineligibility and undetectable CD20 pre-BsAbs portended shorter PFS and OS. Of 17 individuals with paired biopsies, 15 (88.2%) lost CD20 expression after BsAbs with a median time to progression of 3.7 months. This analysis including patients with R/R DLBCL shows the ORR to CD3/CD20 BsAbs was comparable to pivotal trials, although PFS and OS were lower. Baseline undetectable levels of CD20 were associated with poor outcomes. These results demonstrate the activity of BsAbs in R/R DLBCL, and underscore the importance of target antigen expression.
Prognostic Implication of Karyotypic Evaluation in Patients With Richter Transformation in the Modern Era

American Journal of Hematology | July 2, 2025 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1709-1713

10.1002/ajh.27760 | PMID 40600589

Comparison of Frontline Therapies in Older Adults Age ≥ 80 Years With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Mayo Clinic and Danish Nation‐Wide Study

American Journal of Hematology | June 29, 2025 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1678-1681

10.1002/ajh.27747 | PMID 40530575

Impact of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor on safety of chimeric antigen receptor‐T‐cell therapy in non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

British Journal of Haematology | June 17, 2025 | Volume: 207 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 606-611

10.1111/bjh.20207 | PMID 40524548

199 | PEMBROLIZUMAB THERAPY INDUCES AN INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE IN LYMPHOMA PATIENTS BY RESHAPING MONOCYTES RESULTING IN HYPERPROGRESSIVE DISEASE

Hematological Oncology | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hon.70094_199

339 | OUTCOMES IN AN INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTRE STUDY OF 600 PATIENTS WITH CNS RELAPSE OF LARGE B CELL LYMPHOMA: COMPARTMENT OF RELAPSE IS PROGNOSTIC

Hematological Oncology | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hon.70094_339

224 | REGULAR ASPIRIN USE PRIOR TO DIAGNOSIS AND FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA PROGNOSIS: NOVEL ASSOCIATION WITH SUPERIOR EVENT‐FREE SURVIVAL

Hematological Oncology | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hon.70094_224

438 | ORELABRUTINIB FOR THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA: EFFICACY AND SAFETY RESULTS FROM A GLOBAL PHASE 1/2 STUDY

Hematological Oncology | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hon.70094_438