Wang, Yucai

Introduction Venetoclax + rituximab resulted in a 2-year progression-free survival estimate of 85% in the mostly 2nd-line, post-chemotherapy setting of the MURANO clinical trial (Seymour NEJM 2018). Short remissions with venetoclax in patients (pts) with prior cBTKi treatment (tx) for CLL are reported. However, these cohorts have included heavily pre-treated pts. Here, we report outcomes with venetoclax-based regimens in a contemporary cohort with cBTKi-exposed CLL and no prior chemotherapy. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of pts who received venetoclax for relapsed CLL after prior cBTKi tx at Mayo Clinic and across 8 centers in France. Pts with any prior chemotherapy tx were excluded. Pts were grouped as cBTKi-resistant (CLL disease progression on cBTKi) and cBTKi-exposed (any prior cBTKi tx but without disease progression). Overall survival (OS) was analyzed as the time from initiation of venetoclax until date of death or last known to be alive. Time to next therapy or death (TTNTD) after venetoclax was defined as the time from venetoclax initiation until the earliest date of next tx or death. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate associations of factors with OS and TTNTD. Results A total of 85 pts received venetoclax, including: venetoclax monotherapy (n=13, 15%), venetoclax + rituximab (n=45, 53%), and venetoclax + obinutuzumab (n=27, 32%). Patient characteristics at the time of venetoclax start were as follows: median age 69 years (interquartile range [IQR] 62-77), 59 (69%) male, 45% (33/73 evaluated) with TP53 disruption (del(17p) or TP53 mutation), 82% (46/56 evaluated) with unmutated IGHV, and 41% (15/37 evaluated) with complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 clonal structural or numerical abnormalities on karyotype). The median prior lines of therapy was 1 (IQR 1, 2); 32 (38%) pts had received prior anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and 8 (9%) pts had received 2 prior cBTKi. Prior cBTKi tx was stopped for a reason other than disease progression in 46 (54%) pts (cBTKi-exposed) and due to CLL progression in 39 (46%) pts (cBTKi-resistant). TP53 disruption, unmutated IGHV, and CK were more common in the cBTKi-resistant subgroup. Among pts with cBTKi-resistant CLL, 60% (12/20 evaluated) had a BTK and/or PLCG2 mutation. Median follow-up from start of venetoclax-based therapy was 20 months. The median TTNTD and OS for the entire cohort was 36 (95% CI 29-not evaluable [NE]) and 68 (95% CI 39-NE) months, respectively. Among the 46 pts with cBTKi-exposed CLL, the median duration of prior cBTKi tx was 6.7 months (IQR 1.8, 23.7). The median TTNTD and OS from venetoclax start were both 78 months in pts with cBTKi-exposed CLL. The 24-month TTNTD and OS estimates were 73% and 81%, respectively. Among the 39 pts with cBTKi-resistant CLL, the median duration of prior cBTKi tx was 42.3 months (IQR 23.4, 60.1). The median TTNTD from venetoclax start in pts with cBTKi-resistant CLL was 30 months. The 24-month TTNTD estimate was 65% in the cBTKi-resistant subgroup, 53% with venetoclax monotherapy (n=5), 62% with venetoclax + rituximab (n=30), and 100% venetoclax + obinutuzumab (n=4). The median OS from venetoclax initiation was 39 months overall in pts with cBTKi-resistant CLL. The 24-month OS estimate was 84% in the cBTKi-resistant subgroup overall, 53% with venetoclax monotherapy, 87% with venetoclax + rituximab, and 100% with venetoclax + obinutuzumab. On a univariate analysis in the whole cohort, only TP53 disruption was associated with shorter TTNTD (HR 2.23; 95% CI 1.02-4.87; P=0.04) and only older age was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.007-1.095, P=0.02). On a univariate analysis in the cBTKi-resistant subgroup, only TP53 disruption was associated with shorter TTNTD (HR 6.68; 95% CI 1.51-29.46; P=0.01) and OS (HR 7.95; 95% CI 1.02-61.97; P=0.04). Duration of prior cBTKi exposure (as a continuous variable) was not associated with survival outcomes in the cBTKi-resistant subgroup. Conclusions Pts with chemotherapy-naïve, cBTKi-treated CLL had worse than expected outcomes with venetoclax-based tx in a mostly 2nd-line tx cohort, particularly pts with cBTKi-resistant CLL. The frequency of high-risk disease features, shorter duration of disease control with their initial cBTKi tx, and small cohort size warrant caution in generalizing these results to all pts with cBTKi-resistant disease. Novel tx trial strategies in 1st- and 2nd-line settings remain a high priority for high-risk pts.

Background and Methods: IEC-HS is a hyperinflammatory state with high morbidity and mortality. Effective interventions to reverse the process early in the clinical course may be critical to improve outcomes. We previously examined cytokine differences between IEC-HS and other secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and found significant differences in the patterns and outcomes.(1) This study examines cytokine profiles (CP) of patients treated with CAR-T from 9/2019 to 3/2024 who developed CRS, MAS-L and IEC-HS. Demographics and lab results were compared among the three groups and correlated with outcomes. Results: CP was tested in 113 of 366 CAR-T patients: 74 with CRS, 19 with MAS-L, and 20 with IEC-HS. The racial distribution was 93% White/Caucasian, 2% Black or African American, 1% Asian, 1% Native American and 3% other or unavailable. No differences were seen in demographics between groups except a higher percentage of patients with ECOG performance status ≥2 in IEC-HS (p=0.037). Incidence of IEC-HS by disease: 3.6% (7/193) in lymphoma, 5% (8/159) myeloma and 28.5% (4/14) B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (p=0.0002). Incidence of IEC-HS by CAR-T product: 3% (4/150) in Axi-cel, 23% (6/26) in Brexu-cel, 8% (1/13) in Tisa-cel, 5% each (3/60) in Cilta-cel and Ide-cel, and 0/17 in Liso-cel (p=0.001). Prior to lymphodepletion, labs were already different among the CRS, MAS-L, and IEC-HS groups: hemoglobin (g/dL: 11.1, 9.6, 8.45); platelets (x109/L: 168, 116, 52.5); ferritin (µg/L: 115, 946, 1944). CP was started when patients needed a second dose of tocilizumab or concern for developing MAS-L/IEC-HS, and continued daily until clinical improvement or resolution of inflammatory state. Tocilizumab and dexamethasone use were similar across groups. Other therapies used were vasopressors (3%, 10.5%, 45%; p<0.0001), Methylprednisolone (20%, 31.6%, 50%; p=0.027), Anakinra (12%, 63%, 85%; p<0.0001), Siltuximab (9.5%, 16%, 30%; p=0.06), Basiliximab (30% of IEC-HS), and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (30% of IEC-HS). Among the first CP, the CRS group had lower levels of cytokines (in pg/mL) compared to MAS-L and IEC-HS groups: TNF (31, 62.9, 47.7), IL-10 (29.3, 97.7, 169), IL-18 (794, 1353, 2011), IFN-gamma (74, 281, 250), MCP-1 (689, 2722, 2485.5), MIP-1 alpha (220, 234, 247.5), IL-6 (>315: 45%, 79%, 70%), soluble IL-2R alpha (>4000: 45%, 84%, 70%). The percentage of patients who received anakinra before CP1 were 4% (CRS), 21% (MAS-L) and 25% (IEC-HS) (p=0.007). IL-1 beta was below threshold among all patients who received anakinra in CRS and MAS-L and 75% in IEC-HS, suggesting rapid and effective IL-1 suppression by anakinra except in IEC-HS. Cytokines trends 24 hours and 48 hours after the first CP differed between MAS-L and IEC-HS. MAS-L had decreased TNF (62.9, 40.4, 18.5) and MCP-1 (2722, 355, 104) while these cytokines remained elevated or increased in IEC-HS (TNF: 47.7, 105.5, 62.6; MCP-1: 2486, 2276, 1585). IL-18 was minimally elevated in MAS-L (1353, 1955, 3068) and significantly increased in IEC-HS (2011, 2420, 4048). Notably, CP2 and CP3 levels of these cytokines in IEC-HS were statistically significantly higher than corresponding CPs among CRS and MAS-L. In addition, patients who died with persistent E. faecium bacteremia had higher IL-18 on CP3. Infections occurred in 43%, 58%, and 85% respectively (p=0.002), including E. faecium bacteremia (3%, 5%, 35%; p=0.0004), CMV viremia (30% of IEC-HS patients vs. 11% of non-IEC-HS; p=0.025), and invasive fungal infections (15% of IEC-HS patients; p=0.0001). Between the IEC-HS and non-IEC-HS groups, day 100 non-relapse mortality was 35% vs. 0 (p<0.0001), day 100 all-cause mortality was 45% vs. 3% (p<0.0001), and E. faecium bacteremia-related deaths were 50% vs. 1% (p<0.0001). Conclusions: CRS, MAS-L andIEC-HS are known complications of CAR-T. Cytokine-directed therapy can modify the cytokine milieu and control the inflammatory process. However, excess immunosuppression may result in life-threatening infections. Further studies are needed to identify optimal biomarker-guided immunosuppressive strategies to control the inflammatory cascade, while avoiding excess immunosuppression. References: 1. Leung, Nelson, et al. “Outcomes of patients who received CAR T cell therapy and developed IEC-HS treated with cytokine directed therapy.” (2024): 7516-7516.

Background: Despite effective front-line therapies, DLBCL & MM have high relapse rates. Novel therapies like CAR-T & bispecific antibodies (BsAb) offer deep & durable remission compared to salvage therapies, but have a unique toxicity profile (TP) that requires monitoring. With no head-to-head trials, the rationale for therapy selection may vary. This study explores provider choices, sequencing preferences, & access barriers. Methods: Two anonymous surveys (MM and DLBCL) of US-based Hematologists were conducted from 2/2024 to 6/2024, on practice settings, CAR-T & BsAb availability, treatment preferences & barriers. Responses were analyzed to assess preferences across clinical scenarios. Results: Surveys were completed by 37 MM & 45 DLBCL providers. Most were at centers offering both CAR-T & BsAb. Most gave CAR-T inpatient, & BsAb outpatient. CAR-T was given by 73% MM providers & 66% DLBCL (92% used Cilta-cel, 96% used Ide-cel; 100% used Axi-cel, 90% used Liso-cel & 73% Tisa-cel). In MM, 78% used Teclistamab, 60% Talquetamab & 24% Elranatamab. In DLBCL, 62% used Epcoritamab & 40% Glofitamab. Providers preferred CAR-T over BsAb in MM after 4+ prior lines of therapy (LOT) (89%), & in DLBCL after 2+ prior LOT (93%). CAR-T was favored more among academic providers & those at CAR-T centers. Practice volume did not impact selection. Among providers at centers with BsAb-only, CAR-T was preferred by 60% (MM) and 50% (DLBCL). Providers at centers without both favored CAR-T (MM: 75%, DLBCL: 86%). CAR-T was chosen for better outcomes, short treatment, center choice, & prior experience. Other factors that influenced decisions were lower incidence of cytopenia/infection & “BsAb effective post-CAR-T, less so vice versa” (MM), & “curative potential of CAR-T” (DLBCL). Logistical barriers & institutional constraints influenced BsAb selection: CAR-T unavailability, access to specialized centers, referral complexity, insurance delay, manufacturing delay & hospitalization needs. In MM, 78% providers preferred Cilta-cel over Ide-cel, especially academic providers & those with CAR-T experience. CAR-T volume did not impact selection. Cilta-cel was preferred due to perceived better response rate (RR), more experience, “progression-free survival (PFS) benefit”, center choice, & logistical issues with Ide-cel. Ide-cel was selected due to center choice, favorable TP & insurance preference. Teclistamab was preferred by 78% due to more experience, better RR, TP & center choice, Elranatamab by 11% (better TP, RR, & “PFS”), & Talquetamab by 11% due to having a non-BCMA target. Academic providers preferred Teclistamab (89% vs 50%), & nonacademic providers preferred Talquetamab (38% vs 4%) and Elranatamab (13% vs 8%). In DLBCL after 2+ LOT, 69% favored Axi-cel due to prior experience, RR, center choice, & logistical issues with other products. Liso-cel & Tisa-cel were chosen by 27% & 2%, respectively, due to favorable TP. Axi-cel was also preferred 2nd line by 73% for similar reasons, while 24% favored Liso-cel for its favorable TP. Epcoritamab was preferred by 56% (subcutaneous injection, more experience & center choice) & Glofitamab by 42% (shorter treatment duration, easy administration, more experience, & center choice). Practice setting & volume did not impact selection between products in DLBCL. InBCMA-naïve MM pts, majority (97%) chose an anti-BCMA agent over GPRC5D due to better RR, TP, prior experience, & center choice. InBCMA-exposed pts, most (92%) favored an anti-GPRC5D agent. In contrast in DLBCL, 80% chose CD19 CAR-T after prior CD19-directed therapy, & 18% chose CD20 BsAb. Therefore, antigen escape was less of a concern in DLBCL vs MM. For relapse after 2nd line CAR-T in DLBCL, 78% preferred BsAb over other salvage options due to better RR, TP, & more experience. Providers prioritized RR, survival, & TP in decision making. Treatment logistics, duration, frequency, & cost were less crucial. MM providers also prioritized quality of life, which was less so in DLBCL. There were no differences in priority based on practice setting & experience with CAR-T. Conclusion: The study highlights factors influencing therapy choices in MM & DLBCL. Despite CAR-T's potential for better outcomes, significant access barriers exist. Efforts to streamline referral pathways, logistics, & expanding availability are crucial to improve outcomes. Understanding these preferences & barriers can guide future management strategies.

Introduction: Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) epcoritamab (Epco) and glofitamab (Glofit) are approved in the US for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) based upon high response rates and manageable toxicity profiles reported in pivotal trials. However, data on outcomes for pts treated with BsAbs outside of clinical trials are limited. As such, we sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of Epco and Glofit for the treatment of pts with r/r LBCLs in real-world settings. Methods: We performed a retrospective study including 19 US centers evaluating pts with r/r LBCLs receiving commercially available Epco or Glofit between 2023 and 2024. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Efficacy outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), complete and partial response (CR, PR) rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method. Key safety outcomes included cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Results: As of May 31, 2024, a total of 209 pts with r/r LBCLs were treated with Epco (n=139) or Glofit (n=70). Median age at BsAb start was 67 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-76). Most were male (62.2%), and the most common histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=155 [74.2%]). Of pts with molecular testing (n=168), 34 (20.2%) had double/triple hit lymphoma. Most (78.9%) had Ann Arbor stage III-IV disease and 91% had an ECOG performance status of ≤1. Median number of lines of treatment before BsAb was 3 (range 1-12). Of pts with known response assessment following front-line therapy, 54 (32.1%) had primary refractory disease, defined as failure to achieve PR or CR to front-line therapy. Most pts (n=126 [60.3%]) received prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and 21 (10.0%) received prior autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant. CD20 expression was assessed in 106 biopsies (50.7%) prior to BsAb and was positive in 90 (84.9%). A total of 172 pts were response-evaluable. The best ORR was 50.6%, with CR in 41 (23.8%), PR in 46 (26.7%), stable disease in 10 (5.8%), and progressive disease in 75 (43.6%). The ORR and CR rates were 49% and 23% for Epco, and 53% and 25% for Glofit, respectively. With a median follow-up of 5 months, the median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 2.0, 3.9) and median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.1, not reached [NR]). The estimated PFS and OS at six months were 35% (95% CI 29%-43%) and 59% (95% CI 52%-67%), respectively. For pts who relapsed after CAR T-cell therapy, the median PFS and OS were 2.5 (95% CI 1.8, 4.7) and 7.8 (95% CI 6.2, NR) months, respectively. Pts without detectable CD20 expression via immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry prior to BsAb therapy had significantly inferior outcomes (PFS 1.1 vs 3.4 months, P < 0.001 and OS 1.3 vs 13 months, P < 0.001) compared to pts with detectable CD20. CRS of any grade occurred in 82 pts (39.2%), corresponding to 51.1% and 28.6% of pts treated with Epco and Glofit, respectively. Grade ≥3 CRS occurred in 9 (4.3%), all of whom received Epco. CRS was treated with tocilizumab in 43 pts (53.1%). ICANS occurred in 24 (11.5%) pts; any grade ICANS occurred in 13.7% and 7.1% of pts treated with Epco and Glofit, respectively. Grade ≥3 ICANS occurred in 6 pts (2.9%), 5 of which received Epco (3.6%). Of those experiencing ICANS, 66.0% were treated with corticosteroids. Two pts had deaths attributed to ICANS and one to CRS. A total of 122 (58.4%) pts discontinued therapy after a median of 3 cycles (range 0-48), 91 (74.6%) due to disease progression and 31 (25.4%) due to adverse events (15 due to infection, 3 due to ICANS, 2 due to CRS, and 11 for other reasons). Conclusions: In this heavily pretreated group with adverse disease features and high rate of CAR T exposure, the response rates, PFS, and OS following BsAb therapy were lower compared to pivotal trials. Poor outcomes were observed for those without detectable CD20. Rates of ICANS and grade ≥3 CRS were higher than reported in pivotal trials, as was the rate of discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Future efforts to improve outcomes may include intensified dose escalation protocols to more rapidly achieve disease control, combination therapies, and characterization of clinicopathologic factors that predict response to BsAb to identify subgroups of pts who can derive maximal benefit from these agents.

ABSTRACTDiffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients that fail to achieve a complete metabolic response with frontline immunochemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Genomic profiling has led to a broader understanding of the molecular drivers in DLBCL, but it is unknown how well current classifiers identify patients that will experience primary treatment resistance (PTR). Using whole exome and RNA sequencing data from newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, we evaluated the genomic landscape of PTR and compared it to that of non‐PTR DLBCL. We found a significant increase in the frequency of TP53 (34% vs. 15%, p = 0.005) and ARID1A mutations (21% vs. 7%, p = 0.007) in PTR cases, with pathway analysis further demonstrating a downregulation of TP53 and an increase in chromatin modifying pathways. These results suggest that TP53 and ARID1A may be key mediators of PTR and important pathways contributing to the poor outcomes. We found that the current molecular classifiers were unable to identify PTR cases at diagnosis. However, our newly identified high‐risk signature identified 46% of PTR cases at diagnosis. Overall, these results contribute to our understanding of the genomic landscape of patients with primary treatment resistance.

Abstract Progression of disease within 24 months of initial immunochemotherapy (POD24) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). There is no standard treatment after POD24. Assembling an academic-based cohort from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes Consortium for Real World Evidence, we evaluated patterns of care and outcomes for 220 patients with FL with POD24 and retained FL histology. Therapy after POD24 was heterogeneous, with no treatment category accounting for >25% of the total. Among patients initially treated with bendamustine-rituximab, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) was the predominant second-line choice (48%). Among patients initially treated with R-CHOP, aggressive salvage therapy was the predominant second-line choice (38%). Overall response rate to therapy after POD24 was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56-70); complete response rate was 39% (95% CI, 32-46). The median event-free survival for therapy after POD24 was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.3-12.1); 5-year overall survival (OS) was 71% (95% CI, 65-78). OS was inferior for patients aged >70 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.27-4.20) and those with high-risk FL International Prognostic Index scores at diagnosis (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.23-3.60). No treatment category stood out with more favorable results. Cause of death was predominantly lymphoma related. Patients with follicular histology at their POD24 event had a low cumulative incidence of transformation (1.1% at 5 years). Our study is among the largest cohorts describing contemporary patterns of care for patients with POD24, providing a focused data set useful for interpreting and designing prospective clinical trials in this population.

Abstract Background Hypomagnesemia has been correlated with inferior outcomes in patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) undergoing stem cell transplants. As T-cell and myeloid cell dysfunction have been associated with low magnesium conditions, we investigated whether serum magnesium (Mg) levels could predict clinical outcomes in LBCL patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Methods Patients with LBCL who received axi-cel under the ZUMA-1 trial or as FDA approved therapy at Mayo Clinic were examined. Serum samples were obtained at specified time points and cytokine analysis was performed. Single cell RNA sequencing was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The Student T-test, Kruskal Wallis, or Fisher's Exact Tests were used to compare differences in demographics across Mg levels. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared using the Wilcoxon test. Results We found that hypomagnesemia before lymphodepletion chemotherapy predicted for inferior progression-free and overall survival in the pivotal study ZUMA-1 (NCT02348216). These results were validated in an independent cohort of LBCL patients receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) at Mayo Clinic. Hypomagnesemia correlated with increased inflammatory serum markers and cytokine levels including ferritin, IL-6, IL1Ra, IL-8, and MIP1a. scRNAseq analysis unveiled altered immune interactions between monocytes and T cells with a concordant immune suppressive transcriptome. Conclusions Hypomagnesemia at the time of CAR-T infusion associates with an unfavorable inflammatory profile and decreased response and survival in LBCL patients receiving axi-cel. These findings suggest a potentially actionable prognostic factor for patients with large cell lymphoma undergoing CAR-T.

Abstract Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) includes extranodal MZL (EMZL), splenic MZL (SMZL), and nodal MZL (NMZL) subtypes. Histologic transformation (HT) to large B-cell lymphomas is well documented but with a large variability in published cumulative incidence rates. We report results from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort on the cumulative incidence of HT (with death as competing risk) and the associated risk factors and outcomes. We also conducted a meta-analysis of available studies on the cumulative incidence of HT. From 2002 to 2015, 529 patients with MZL were enrolled in the MER study (69% EMZL, 16% SMZL, and 15% NMZL). The 10-year overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 66%. HT occurred in 21 patients with a 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.05) and 3.6% (95% CI, 0.02-0.06), respectively. HT was associated with an increased risk for death (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 3.95; 95% CI, 2.06-7.55). Predictors of HT were ≥2 extranodal sites and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue International Prognostic Index score ≥2. The OS was 79% at 5 years and 55% at 10 years after HT. In the meta-analysis of 12 studies (6161 patients), the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of HT across all subtypes were 5% (95% CI, 0.05-0.06) and 8% (95% CI, 0.07-0.09), respectively. These rates were lower in EMZL (3% and 5%) than in SMZL (7% and 13%) and NMZL (9% and 13%). Although HT is relatively uncommon in the first decade after MZL diagnosis, it is associated with an inferior outcome and needs new approaches for prevention and management.