Kallmes, David F.

Introduction Efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is still debatable. However, IVT's efficacy on stent retriever (SR) and aspiration thrombectomy (ASP) outcomes specifically remain unclear. In our meta‐analysis, we aimed to explore the effects of IVT on SR and ASP thrombectomy outcomes. Methods A systematic literature review was steered using Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Center of Clinical Trials databases, according to PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes of interest included successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2), modified first pass efficacy (mFPE), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and embolization to new territories (ENT). Results We included four randomized controlled trials with 1176 patients. SR and ASP had similar mTICI ≥2b, mFPE, and mRS 0‐2 rates whether they received IVT or not. SR without IVT was associated with a lower rate of mFPE compared with the SR+IVT (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97). Additionally, ASP without IVT resulted in a lower rate of mRS 0‐2 than the ASP+IVT (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.01). Finally, bridging therapy did not increase sICH and ENT rates after ASP or SR thrombectomy. Conclusion Our analysis suggests that SR and ASP thrombectomy have equivalent efficacy and safety outcomes regardless of prior IVT administration. Moreover, our results indicate that administration of IVT before MT may improve certain outcomes based on the used first‐line MT technique.

Introduction Background: The Woven Endo‐Bridge (WEB) device is an intrasaccular device being used to secure intracranial aneurysms through the endovascular approach. The WEB is commonly used for wide‐neck aneurysms. There are no comprehensive studies to assess the low‐profile device WEB 17 so far. Although, some single studies have reported their early experience using the device. We plan to provide a comprehensive assessment of the early center experience using the WEB 17 device to secure intracranial aneurysms. Objective: To provide an overview of the early‐center experience of the 0.017‐inch endovascular Woven EndoBridge device (WEB‐17) device. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted following the PRISMA recommendations. On April 15, 2023, we searched for eligible papers in Pubmed, Web of Science (ISI), Scopus, and Embase databases. The meta‐analysis was done using R software version 4.3.0. and the "meta" package. Pooled prevalence (%) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), random‐effects model based and the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) method. On the presence of multiple follow‐up points, we included the last available in the analysis. Complete occlusion was defined as Raymond–Roy occlusion classification (RROC) class I, and adequate occlusion was defined as RROC class I or II. Results Seven studies were finally included following the double‐reviewer screening of the retrieved literature. The patients' mean age ranged from 52.5±13.8 to 62.0±9.5 years, and 71.0% were females. The mean follow‐up duration ranged from 6±2.25 months to 11.6±4. Technical success was achieved in 98.34% (95% CI= 96.72‐99.17) of the cases, while adjunctive devices were used in 4.97% (95% CI= 1.60‐14.39) of them (Figure 1). The complete occlusion rate was 72.54% (95% CI= 63.44‐80.08) (Figure 2), while the adequate occlusion rate was 94.41 (95% CI= 88.17‐97.46) (Figure 3). There was no significant heterogeneity in all pooled outcomes. Conclusion The early experience of the device shows an efficacy profile comparable with the currently available devices in treating intracranial aneurysms.

Introduction Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT) has traditionally been treated medically with systemic anticoagulation. Recent advances in endovascular therapy (EVT) may represent an alternative treatment to medical therapy for CSVT. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the use of EVT for CSVT. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included studies that reported outcomes following EVT for CSVT. The primary outcome of interest was rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0‐2. Secondary outcomes of interest were rates of complete, partial, and failed recanalization, mortality, and new or expansion of hematoma. We calculated pooled rates (%) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Thirty‐eight studies with 682 patients were included. Rate of mRS 0‐2 was 82.6% (95% CI, 75.3%‐88.0%). Rate of complete recanalization was 60.9% (95% CI, 49.1%‐71.5%), rate of partial recanalization was 34.2% (95% CI, 24.1%‐45.9%), and rate of failed recanalization was 5.4% (95% CI, 3.1%‐9.2%). Rate of mortality was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.1%‐10.8%) and rate of new or expansion of hematoma was 5.1% (2.9%‐8.8%). Conclusion In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, EVT for CSVT was associated with favorable rates of mRS 0‐2 and recanalization. Furthermore, EVT was associated with a promising safety profile. Future prospective, comparative studies are warranted to assess EVT for CSVT.

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a safe and effective treatment option for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. To investigate differences in outcomes between patients receiving left-sided and right-sided MT, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic literature review was performed using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Additional literature was searched for manually. Studies reporting safety and efficacy metrics for MT were included. Data regarding the modified Rankin scale (mRS), thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The literature search yielded 13 reports consisting of 19 studies ranging from 98 to 5590 patients. Patients presenting with left-sided stroke had a National Institutes of health stroke scale score 2.89 greater than patients presenting with right-sided stroke (MD = 2.89; 95% CI = 2.09–3.68; P -value < 0.001). There were no differences between left-sided and right-sided MT patients for mRS 0–2 (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.85–1.04; P -value = 0.224), TICI 2b–3 (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.88–1.25; P -value = 0.598), sICH (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.61–1.14; P -value = 0.255), or 90-day mortality (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.84–1.33; P -value = 0.610). Conclusions There does not appear to be a difference in outcomes for patients undergoing left-sided or right-sided thrombectomy.

ImportanceEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO), but optimal post-EVT blood pressure (BP) control remains debated.ObjectiveTo assess the association of different systolic BP targets following EVT with functional outcomes, mortality, and complications in patients with AIS due to LVO.Data SourcesSystematic review and meta-analysis of databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) to September 8, 2023.Study SelectionInclusion criteria consisted of randomized clinical trials examining post-EVT management of systolic BP in patients with AIS and LVO comparing intensive vs conventional targets. Nonrandomized studies, observational studies, noninterventional trials, meeting abstracts, duplicate studies, studies with overlapping data, and non–English language studies were excluded. Two authors independently applied these criteria through a blinded review, with discrepancies resolved through consensus. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.Data Extraction and SynthesisThis study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Three authors extracted data regarding study characteristics, baseline patient data, and outcomes of interest. The pooled data were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis.Main Outcomes and MeasuresRates of functional independence, 90-day mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and hypotensive events.ResultsA total of 4 randomized clinical trials with 1571 initially enrolled patients were included in the analysis. Lower functional independence rates were observed in the intensive control group (relative risk [RR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.98]). No significant differences were found in 90-day mortality (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92-1.52]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.75-1.67]), or hypotensive events (RR, 1.80 [95% CI, 0.37-8.76]). There was minimal heterogeneity among the studies included in the functional independence outcome (I2 = 13% and τ2 = 0.003), which was absent among other outcomes (I2 = 0 and τ2 = 0).Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that intensive post-EVT BP reduction does not yield benefits and may carry risks. While awaiting the results of additional ongoing trials, a conservative BP management strategy after endovascular recanalization is favored in daily practice.

Background Cancer-related cerebral embolism due to direct tumor embolization results in a rare acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Despite the established status of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in LVO management, its effectiveness and safety remains inadequately explored in this specific patient group. Methods We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using the Nested Knowledge AutoLit software, encompassing databases like Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, from their inception up to 9 May 2023. Results In the review of 35 studies encompassing 37 cases, mean patient age was 52 years, and 30% were female. Cardiac myxoma (29.7%), cardiac papillary fibroelastoma (16.2%), and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (8.1%) were the most frequent underlying cancers. The left middle cerebral artery was the most commonly affected occlusion site (24.3%). Of the patients, 67.5% underwent MT alone, while 32.5% received MT combined with intravenous thrombolysis. Successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b–3) was achieved in 89.1% of cases, with 59.4% reaching TICI 3. Functional independence was observed in 29.7% of patients. Conclusion While limitations exist, this comprehensive study highlights the potential benefits of MT in a patient group historically excluded from major trials, warranting further investigation.

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the risk factors for acute ischemic stroke, usually leading to poor prognosis. While DM can reduce the effect of intravenous thrombolysis, metformin can have a positive outcome on AIS patients. The outcomes of stroke in diabetic patients receiving metformin is largely unexplored. In the present study we performed a systematic review to assess the effect of metformin on AIS outcomes in diabetic patients. Methods: A systematic review of literature was performed following PRISMA guideline. PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of science were used for the literature search. Study outcomes such as modified Rankin Scale (mRS 0-2) at discharge, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day mortality were extracted from the full text and analysis were performed to calculate 95% confidence intervals with pooled odds ratio for all the outcomes. Results: Total of six studies were included in the analysis with a total of 5390 patients taking metformin and 6039 patients without metformin. Favorable mRS of 0-2 was significantly higher among patients taking metformin (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.21:1.93). The mortality rate was significantly lower in metformin group (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42:0.61). These results favor the beneficial effect of taking metformin among DM patients with AIS. Conclusion: Overall, chronic use of metformin seems to be beneficial in AIS patients with DM. There is a trend of favorable outcomes of mRS and Mortality, with a non-statistical significance increase of sICH.

Background: The current evidence supports the benefits of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials expanded the EVT window up to 24 hours. A few real-world studies explored EVT outcomes in DAWN/DEFUSE-3 ineligible (NDND) patients. Methods: This meta-analysis investigated EVT outcomes in patients with late-window anterior circulation LVO, including both DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and NDND patients. Nine studies were included, focusing on study characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes. Results: Baseline characteristics showed comparable age, gender, comorbidities, NIHSS score, and ASPECTS between DD and NDND patients. NDND patients exhibited larger infarct volumes and higher atrial fibrillation rate. Successful reperfusion rates (TICI 2b-3) were comparable between the two groups (OR= 0.86; 95% CI= 0.40, 1.84; p = 0.689), with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 73%; P = 0.002). Functional independence (90-day mRS score 0-2) was not significantly different between the two groups (OR= 1.12; 95% CI= 0.77, 1.63; p = 0.552) with notable heterogeneity (I 2 = 46%, p = 0.063). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rate was lower in the DD group as compared to NDND patients (OR= 0.49; 95% CI= 0.25, 0.93; p = 0.029) with no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.552). 90-day mortality was lower in the DD group than in the NDND group (OR= 0.55; 95%-CI= 0.37, 0.82; p = 0.004) with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, p = 0.536). Conclusion: While this meta-analysis showed comparable rates of functional independence between DD and NDND patients, the potential bias introduced by the higher rates of sICH and mortality in the latter group should prompt great care when offering EVT to NDND patients. Less restricted EVT eligibility criteria might yield positive outcomes in real-world practice in specific patients. However, increased risks of sICH and mortality in NDND patients warrant further investigation to optimize the risk-benefit balance in expanding EVT eligibility criteria.

Introduction: While balloon guide catheters (BGCs) enhance safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions, their impact on distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of BGC vs non-BGC in DMVO thrombectomy. Methods: This retrospective study focused on DMVO cases defined as occlusions in M2-M4 middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery. Baseline characteristics and technical and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups, with subgroup analysis in first-line thrombectomy techniques, including ADAPT, stent retriever, and Solumbra. First pass effect (FPE) was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥ 2C after the first pass. Results: A total of 1,508 patients were included, of whom 231 (15.3%) were in the BGC group and 1,277 (84.7%) were in the Non-BGC group. The BGC group was associated with a lower mTICI score ≥ 2C (overall: 43.2% vs. 52.7%, p = 0.01; ADAPT: 42.2% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.01; Solumbra: 32.4% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.005), longer puncture to intracranial access time (overall: 15 vs. 8 min, p < 0.001; ADAPT: 17 vs. 8 min, p < 0.001; Solumbra: 12 vs. 8 min, p = 0.02), and longer puncture to recanalization time (overall: 97 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001; ADAPT: 100 vs. 28 min, p < 0.001; Solumbra: 78 vs. 46 min, p < 0.001; Stent retriever: 95 vs. 45 min, p < 0.001 ). The BGC group also had a lower FPE rate (17.4% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.03) in the Solumbra subgroup. In terms of clinical outcomes, the BGC group had a lower rate of distal embolization (overall: 8.8% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.02), but there were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes between the two groups in first-line thrombectomy techniques. Conclusions: Our findings showed that the use of BGC in DMVO had a lower mTICI score, reduced FPE rates, decreased distal embolization, and longer procedure times. Figure 1: Figure 2: