Fervenza, Fernando C.

Background Little is known about the prognostic significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined and renal significance (MGUS and MGRS) in patients with CKD. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical and kidney outcomes of patients with CKD with either MGUS or MGRS compared with those with CKD without MGUS or MGRS. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2013 to 2018. Patients who had both CKD diagnosis and monoclonal testing were identified. Patients were divided into MGRS, MGUS, and no monoclonal gammopathy groups. Cumulative incidence functions and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to model time to event data and to evaluate the association between monoclonal gammopathy status and risk of kidney failure, with death treated as a competing risk. Results Among 1535 patients, 59 (4%) had MGRS, 648 (42%) had MGUS, and 828 (54%) had no monoclonal gammopathy. Unadjusted analysis showed that compared with no monoclonal gammopathy patients, patients with MGRS were at higher risk of kidney failure (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval]: 2.5 [1.5 to 4.2] but not patients with MGUS (HR [95% confidence interval]: 1.3 [0.97 to 1.6]), after taking death into account as a competing risk. However, in the multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, sex, eGFR, proteinuria, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, the risk of progression to kidney failure (with death as competing risk) in the MGRS group was no longer statistically significant (HR: 0.9 [0.5 to 1.8]). The same was also true for the MGUS group compared with the group with no monoclonal gammopathy (HR: 1.3 [0.95 to 1.6]). When evaluating the association between MGUS/MGRS status and overall survival, MGRS was significantly associated with mortality in fully adjusted models compared with the group with no monoclonal gammopathy, while MGUS was not. Conclusions After adjusting for traditional risk factors, MGUS/MGRS status was not associated with a greater risk of kidney failure, but MGRS was associated with a higher risk of mortality compared with patients with no monoclonal gammopathy.

ABSTRACT Membranous nephropathy (MN) is characterized by deposition of immune complexes leading to thickening of glomerular basement membranes. Over time, the understanding of MN has evolved, with the identification of specific autoantibodies against novel podocyte antigens and the unraveling of intricate pathogenic pathways. Although the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is favored as part of the initial therapy in MN, a subgroup of MN patients may be resistant to rituximab necessitating the use of alternative agents such as cytotoxic therapies. In addition, newer agents such as novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, therapies targeting the CD38-positive plasma cells and anti-complement therapy are being studied in patients who are resistant to traditional treatment strategies. This manuscript furnishes a review of the novel developments in the pathophysiology of MN including the identification of target antigens and current treatment standards for MN, concentrating on evidenced-based interventions designed to attain remission and to prevent disease progression.

ABSTRACT Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. MN is characterized by subepithelial accumulation of immune complexes along the glomerular basement membrane. The immune complexes are composed of immunoglobulin G and a target antigen. PLA2R is the target antigen in approximately 60% of MN cases, and MN is traditionally classified as PLA2R-positive or PLA2R-negative MN. Over the last 7 years, additional target antigens have been identified, which have specific disease associations, distinctive clinical and pathologic findings, and therapeutic implications. The newly discovered target antigens include NELL1, EXT1/EXT2, NCAM1, SEMA3B, PCDH7, FAT1, CNTN1, NTNG1, PCSK6 and NDNF. To group all these antigens into a generic ‘PLA2R-negative’ MN group is imprecise and un-informative. We propose a logical approach for detection of the target antigen which includes (i) currently available serology-based testing to detect anti-PLA2R and anti-THSD7A antibodies; and (ii) kidney biopsy testing to detect the target antigens. Determination of the antigen on kidney biopsy can be done by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence studies. Alternatively, laser capture microdissection (LCM) of glomeruli followed by mass spectrometry (MS) can be used to identify a target antigen. LCM/MS has the advantage of being a one-stop test and is particularly useful for detection of rare target antigens. At the current time, while it is possible to detect the newer antigens by immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence/LCM/MS, serology-based tests to detect serum antibodies to the new antigens are not yet available. It is critical that serology-based tests should be developed not just for accurate diagnosis, but as a guide for treatment. We review the current methodology and propose an algorithm for diagnosis and detection of target antigens in MN that may shape the current practice in the future. Membranous nephropathy (MN) results from accumulation of subepithelial immune complexes along the glomerular basement membrane.PLA2R is the most common target antigen, but newly discovered target antigens have filled the void of PLA2R-negative MN.MN associated with the newly discovered target antigens have distinctive clinical and pathologic findings, treatment and prognostic implications. These include NELL1, EXT1/EXT2, NCAM1, PCDH7, SEMA3B, CNTN1, FAT1, NDNF and PCSK6.Immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence methodology is currently in use for detecting target antigens in kidney biopsy tissue, although we anticipate laser capture microdissection of glomeruli followed by mass spectrometry will become available soon.Serologic testing is currently available for only detecting antibodies to PLA2R and THSD7A. It is critical that serologic tests become available for detecting antibodies to the newly discovered antigens.

ABSTRACT Hematuria—either macroscopic hematuria or asymptomatic microscopic hematuria—is a clinical feature typical but not specific for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). The only biomarker supported by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes group as a predictor of progression, identifying patients needing treatment, is proteinuria >1 g/day persistent despite maximized supportive care. However, proteinuria can occur in the setting of active glomerulonephritis or secondary to sclerotic renal lesions. Microscopic hematuria is observed in experimental models of IgAN after IgA–IgG immunocomplex deposition, activation of inflammation and complement pathways. Oxidative damage, triggered by hemoglobin release, is thought to contribute to the development of proteinuria and progression. Despite being a clinical hallmark of IgAN and having a rational relationship with its pathophysiology, the value of microscopic hematuria in assessing activity and predicting outcomes in patients with IgAN is still debated. This was partly due to a lack of standardization and day-to-day variability of microhematuria, which discouraged the inclusion of microhematuria in large multicenter studies. More recently, several studies from Asia, Europe and the USA have highlighted the importance of microhematuria assessment over longitudinal follow-up, using a systematic approach with either experienced personnel or automated techniques. We report lights and shadows of microhematuria evaluation in IgAN, looking for evidence for a more consistent consensus on its value as a marker of clinical and histological activity, risk assessment and prediction of treatment response. We propose that hematuria should be included as part of the clinical decision-making process when considering when to use immunosuppressive therapy and as part of criteria for enrollment into clinical trials to test drugs targeting the inflammatory reaction elicited by immune pathway activation in IgAN.

The pivotal event in the pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy is the binding of circulating IgA-containing immune complexes to mesangial cells, with secondary glomerular and tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis. The paramount difficulty in the management of IgA nephropathy is the heterogeneity in its clinical presentation and prognosis, requiring an individualized treatment approach. Goal-directed supportive care remains the bedrock of therapy for all patients, regardless of risk of progression. Sodium–glucose transporter 2 inhibitors and sparsentan should be integral to contemporary supportive care, particularly in patients with chronic kidney damage. Pending the development of reliable biomarkers, it remains a challenge to identify patients prone to progression due to active disease and most likely to derive a net benefit from immunosuppression. The use of clinical parameters, including the degree of proteinuria, the presence of persistent microscopic hematuria, and the rate of eGFR loss, combined with the mesangial hypercellularity, endocapillary hypercellularity, segmental glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, crescents score, is currently the best approach. Systemic glucocorticoids are indicated in high-risk patients, but the beneficial effects wane after withdrawal and come at the price of substantial treatment-associated toxicity. Therapies with direct effect on disease pathogenesis are increasingly becoming available. While targeted-release budesonide has garnered the most attention, anti–B-cell strategies and selective complement inhibition will most likely prove their added value. We propose a comprehensive approach that tackles the different targets in the pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy according to their relevance in the individual patient.

Background The 2021 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend following anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody levels as a marker of treatment response in membranous nephropathy; however, the optimal timing to evaluate antibody levels and how to combine them with other clinical variables are currently unknown. Methods We used a cohort of 85 patients from the Membranous Nephropathy Trial Of Rituximab (MENTOR) with anti-PLA2R antibodies ≥14 RU/ml to identify risk factors for not experiencing proteinuria remission after 12 months of treatment with cyclosporine or rituximab. Three landmark times were considered: at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Logistic regression model performance was evaluated using C-statistics and model fit (Akaike information criterion [AIC], R 2 ). Results The model at baseline that best predicted no remission included anti-PLA2R antibodies >323 RU/ml and creatinine clearance; the best model after 3 months included the change from baseline in both antibody and albumin levels; and the best model after 6 months included antibody levels >14 RU/ml, creatinine clearance, and the change from baseline in albumin. Compared with the model at baseline, the model at 3 months had better model fit (AIC 70.9 versus 96.4, R 2 51.8% versus 30.1%) and higher C-statistic (0.93 versus 0.83, P = 0.008). The model at 6 months had no difference in performance compared with the model at 3 months (AIC 68.6, R 2 53.0%, C-statistic 0.94, P = 0.67). Conclusions In patients with membranous nephropathy treated with cyclosporine or rituximab in the MENTOR trial, we found that the optimal method to evaluate risk factors for the probability of treatment response was to use anti-PLA2R antibody levels combined with albumin levels after 3 months of treatment, which was significantly better than using antibody levels alone or risk factor evaluation at baseline, with no added benefit of waiting until 6 months of treatment. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2023_10_09_CJN0000000000000237.mp3

Abstract Background and Aims A significant number of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) with glomerulonephritis (AAV-GN) still progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD, eGFR<15mL/min/1.73m2) despite advances in remission-induction treatment. Method A retrospective cohort study on MPO- or PR3-ANCA positive patients with AAV (MPA or GPA) and ESKD at presentation. Renal recovery, dialysis discontinuation and maintenance in ESKD after standard remission-induction, with or without the use of PLEX were compared. Results We analyzed 166 patients with biopsy proven active kidney involvement and eGFR <15mL/min/1.73m2 at the time of AAV-GN diagnosis. Patients received glucocorticoids with CYC (n = 84) or with RTX (n = 72) for remission-induction, and 49 also received PLEX. The predictors for renal recovery were erythrocyte sedimentation rate, SCr at diagnosis and minimal or mild chronicity changes. We analyzed 71 patients who started dialysis with or without PLEX within 4 weeks from AAV-GN diagnosis. The predictors for dialysis discontinuation were minimal chronicity changes in kidney biopsy at the time of diagnosis (OR 6.138, [95%CI 1.389-27.118],p = 0.017) and focal glomerular involvement (OR 5.017,[95%CI 1.287-19.567],p = 0.020). Predictors for maintenance in ESKD at 12 months included higher serum creatinine (SCr) at the time of diagnosis (IRR 1.086, [95%CI 1.005-1.173],p = 0.037), moderate (IRR 3.797,[95%CI 1.090-13.225],p = 0.036), or severe chronicity changes in kidney biopsy (IRR 5.883,[95%CI 1.542–22.439],p = 0.009). Conclusion In our cohort, kidney recovery, dialysis discontinuation, and maintenance of ESKD in patients with AAV-GN and eGFR<15mL/min/1.73m2 depended on SCr and histologic findings on kidney biopsies at the time of diagnosis and was not affected by the addition of PLEX.

Abstract Background and Aims Previous studies have shown that chronic changes on kidney biopsy are useful for stratifying the risk of kidney failure in patients with AAV-GN. We aimed to evaluate the impact of inflammatory activity for the prediction of renal outcomes. Method A retrospective cohort study of MPO- or PR3-ANCA positive patients with AAV and active renal disease. Inflammatory activity was assessed by the Activity Index (AI): a ratio between the number of crescents and/or necrosis and the total number of glomeruli (in percent). We calculated the AI score: 0-5 = 0; 6-10 = 1; 11-15 = 2; 16-20 = 3; 21-25 = 4; 26-37.5 = 5; 37.6-50 = 6; 51-65 = 7; 66-80 = 8; 80-90 = 9; 90-100 = 10. Chronicity was evaluated with the Mayo Clinic Chronicity Score (MCCS). For the combined score, we summed the MCCS and the AI. Results Results. We analyzed 326 patients with kidney biopsies available to score. The biopsies had in median (IQR), 13 glomeruli (9-20), 4 crescents (2-6) and an AI of 28.6% (15.3-47.6). The population was classified according with the risk of progression to kidney failure (KF) in 3 classes as (i) low (0-6) – 114 (35.0%), (ii) intermediate (7-11) – 152 (46.6%), and (iii) high (≥12) – 60 (18.4%). Median eGFR at baseline correlated with the overall risk categories: 42.2 vs. 22.1 vs. 13.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, p<0.0001. The proportion of patients with eGFR< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 was increased in patients classified as high: 88.3% vs. 66.4% vs. 36.0%, p<0.0001. Renal recovery was more frequent in patients at low risk of progression: 87.7% vs. 64.6% vs. 36.6%, p<0.0001, whereas kidney failure at 12 months and dialysis were more frequent in patients at higher risk (36.7% vs. 12.4% vs. 3.8%, p<0.0001; 35.6% vs. 13.0% vs. 2.9%, p<0.0001, respectively). The combination of AI with MCCS independently predicted the risk of KF at 12 months (HR 1.916, 95%CI 1.210 - 3.033, p = 0.006), particularly increased in patients classified as high risk (HR 3.124, 95%CI 1.224 – 7.970, p = 0.017) and in patients with PR3-ANCA (HR 1.896, 95%CI 1.012 - 3.551, p = 0.046) independently of eGFR at AAV-GN diagnosis and adjusted for severity of renal involvement and age. Conclusion The combined assessment of acute inflammatory activity and chronic changes on kidney histology independently predicted renal outcomes in patients with AAV-GN. The impact of the inflammatory activity is cumulative to the chronic changes.

ABSTRACT Updated guidelines on the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) were released in 2021 by the American College of Rheumatology jointly with the Vasculitis Foundation and, subsequently, in 2022 by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. In addition, in 2021, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes had released updated recommendations on the treatment of AAV with glomerulonephritis (AAV-GN). Kidney involvement is particularly relevant in microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis, but is less frequent in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. The management of AAV-GN has been a focus for drug development and change over the past 10 years. Avoidance of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or kidney failure is one of the main unmet needs in the management of AAV, with ESKD having a major impact on morbidity, health costs and mortality risk. Relevant changes in AAV-GN management are related to remission-induction treatment of patients with severe kidney disease, the use of glucocorticoids and avacopan, and remission-maintenance treatment. All the documents provide guidance in accordance with the evidence-based standard of care available at the time of their release. With our work we aim to (i) show the progress made and identify the differences between guidelines and recommendations, (ii) discuss the supporting rationale for those, and (iii) identify gaps in knowledge that could benefit from additional research and should be revised in subsequent updates.

ABSTRACT Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults and if untreated can progress to endstage kidney disease. Factors considered to place a patient at high or very high risk for progression include elevated serum creatinine at baseline, declining kidney function, persistent heavy proteinuria (>8 g/24 h), or persistent NS, presence of life-threatening complications related to NS (such as venous thromboembolic events), or very high anti-PLA2R antibody titers (>150 RU/ml). Patients who are at high or very high risk of progression should be treated with immunosuppression therapy to induce remission of proteinuria and to avoid progressive loss of kidney function. Traditional forms of immunosuppression for patients with MN have included the use of cyclic courses of corticosteroids with cyclophosphamide or calcineurin inhibitors. These forms of therapy are associated with significant toxicity, e.g. corticosteroids (infections, diabetes, weight gain), cyclophosphamide (infertility, severe leukopenia, malignancy), and calcineurin inhibitors (hypertension, nephrotoxicity). The introduction of anti-CD20+ B-cell therapies in the late 1990s has changed the landscape. In this article we will argue that anti-CD20+ B therapy should be the treatment of choice for patients at high/very high risk of progression when considering its efficacy and side-effect profile.