Borlaug, Barry A.

Background— Exercise intolerance is a hallmark of heart failure, but factors associated with impaired exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are unclear. We hypothesized that in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the severity of resting ventricular and vascular dysfunction are associated with impairment in exercise tolerance as assessed by peak oxygen consumption. Methods and Results— Subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction enrolled in the PhosphodiesteRasE-5 Inhibition to Improve CLinical Status And EXercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure (RELAX) clinical trial (n=216) underwent baseline Doppler echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and cardiac MRI. RELAX participants were elderly (median age 69 years) and 48% were women. Ejection fraction (60%) and stroke volume (77 mL) were normal, while diastolic dysfunction (medial E / e ′, 16; deceleration time, 185 ms; left atrial volume, 44 mL/m 2 ) and increased arterial load (arterial elastance, 1.51 mm Hg/mL) were evident. Peak oxygen consumption was reduced (11.7 mLkg −1 min −1 , 1141 mL/min) and age, sex, body mass index, hemoglobin, and chronotropic response collectively explained 64% of the variance in raw peak oxygen consumption (mL/min). After adjustment for these variables, left ventricular structure (diastolic dimension [1.5%, P =0.008] and left ventricular mass [1.6%, P =0.008]), resting stroke volume (2.0%, P =0.002), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (deceleration time [0.9%, P =0.03] and E / e ′ [1.4%, P =0.009]), and arterial function (arterial elastance [2.1%, P =0.002] and systemic arterial compliance [1.5%, P =0.007]), each explained only a small additional portion of the variance in peak oxygen consumption. Conclusions— In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, potentially modifiable factors (obesity, anemia, and chronotropic incompetence) are strongly associated with exercise capacity, whereas resting measures of ventricular and vascular structure and function are not. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00763867

Background Medication treatment decisions in heart failure ( HF ) are currently informed by measurements of brachial artery pressure, but ventricular afterload is more accurately represented by central aortic pressure, which differs from brachial pressure. We sought to determine whether aggressive titration of vasoactive medicines beyond goal‐directed heart failure medical therapy ( GDMT ) based upon aortic pressure improves exercise capacity and cardiovascular structure‐function. Methods and Results Subjects with chronic HF (n=50) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing, echocardiography, and arterial tonometry to measure aortic pressure and augmentation index, and were then randomized to aortic pressure‐guided treatment (active, n=23) or conventional therapy (control, n=27). Subjects returned for 6 monthly visits wherein GDMT was first optimized. Additional vasoactive therapies were then sequentially added with the goal to reduce aortic augmentation index to 0% (active) or if brachial pressure remained elevated (control). Subjects randomized to active treatment experienced greater improvement in peak oxygen consumption compared with controls (1.37±3.76 versus −0.65±2.21 mL min −1 kg −1 , P =0.025) though reductions in aortic augmentation index were similar (−7±9% versus −5±6%, P =0.46). Forward stroke volume increased while arterial elastance and left ventricular volumes decreased in all participants, with no between‐group difference. Subjects randomized to active treatment were more likely to receive additional vasoactive therapies including nitrates, aldosterone antagonists and hydralazine, with no increased risk of hypotension or worsening renal function. Conclusions Maximization of goal‐directed medical therapy in heart failure patients may enhance afterload reduction and lead to reverse remodeling, while additional medicine titration based upon aortic pressure data improves exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.

ObjectivesWe set to measure the interatrial pressure gradient during simulated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).BackgroundOSA occurs when a sleeping patient attempts to inhale against an obstructed airway. How this event affects the interatrial pressure gradient has not been defined. We hypothesized that simulated OSA in a conscious subject (Mueller maneuver [MM], inspiration against obstruction) would promote increased right‐to‐left pressure gradient, and then the substrate for right‐to‐left atrial shunting.MethodsSelected patients underwent simultaneous measurement of airway and atrial pressures (both left and right atrium [LA, RA]) using high‐fidelity micromanometry at rest, during MM, and during VM, during right heart catheterization.ResultsTen patients (age 55 ± 11 years, two women) were successfully studied. During the onset of MM, RA pressure transiently but consistently exceeded LA pressure in response to the steep decline in intrathoracic pressure (maximum RA‐LA pressure gradient increased from 0.1 ± 1.4 mm Hg at baseline to 7.0 ± 4.3 mm Hg during MM, P < 0.001). The maximum right‐to‐left atrial pressure gradient during Mueller maneuver was higher than that achieved during the Valsalva maneuver release (P < 0.007).ConclusionsThe onset of MM increased right‐to‐left pressure gradient across the atrial septum, likely as a result of greater blood return to the RA from extrathoracic veins. The RA‐LA pressure gradient achieved during MM was greater than that observed during VM. These findings delineate the hemodynamic substrate for right to left shunting during OSA. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background The utility of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain and strain rate in determining prognosis in chronic heart failure is not well established. Methods and Results In 416 patients with chronic systolic heart failure, we performed speckle‐tracking analyses of left ventricular longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain and strain rate on archived echocardiography images (30 frames per second). Cox regression models were used to determine the associations between strain and strain rate and risk of all‐cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, and ventricular‐assist device placement. The area under the time‐dependent ROC curve ( AUC ) was also calculated at 1 year and 5 years. Over a maximum follow‐up of 8.9 years, there were 138 events (33.2%). In unadjusted models, all strain and strain rate parameters were associated with adverse outcomes ( P <0.001). In multivariable models, all parameters with the exception of radial strain rate ( P =0.11) remained independently associated, with patients in the lowest tertile of strain or strain rate parameter having a ≈2‐fold increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with the reference group ( P <0.05). Addition of strain to ejection fraction ( EF ) led to a significantly improved AUC at 1 year (0.697 versus 0.633, P =0.032) and 5 years (0.700 versus 0.638, P =0.001). In contrast, strain rate did not provide incremental prognostic value to EF alone. Conclusions Longitudinal and circumferential strain and strain rate, and radial strain are associated with chronic heart failure prognosis. Strain provides incremental value to EF in the prediction of adverse outcomes, and with additional study may be a clinically relevant prognostic tool.

Background— Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its clinical profile and impact on exercise capacity remain unclear. RELAX (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in HFpEF) was a multicenter randomized trial testing the impact of sildenafil on peak V O 2 in stable outpatients with chronic HFpEF. We sought to compare clinical features and exercise capacity among patients with HFpEF who were in sinus rhythm (SR) or AF. Methods and Results— RELAX enrolled 216 patients with HFpEF, of whom 79 (37%) were in AF, 124 (57%) in SR, and 13 in other rhythms. Participants underwent baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing, echocardiogram, biomarker assessment, and rhythm status assessment before randomization. Patients with AF were older than those in SR but had similar symptom severity, comorbidities, and renal function. β-blocker use and chronotropic indices were also similar. Despite comparable left ventricular size and mass, AF was associated with worse systolic (lower EF, stroke volume, and cardiac index) and diastolic (shorter deceleration time and larger left atria) function compared with SR. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure was higher in AF. Patients with AF had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, aldosterone, endothelin-1, troponin I, and C-telopeptide for type I collagen levels, suggesting more severe neurohumoral activation, myocyte necrosis, and fibrosis. Peak V O 2 was lower in AF, even after adjustment for age, sex, and chronotropic response, and V E /V CO 2 was higher. Conclusions— AF identifies an HFpEF cohort with more advanced disease and significantly reduced exercise capacity. These data suggest that evaluation of the impact of different rate or rhythm control strategies on exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF and AF is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00763867.