Thoendel, Matthew

Metagenomic shotgun sequencing for the identification of pathogens is being increasingly utilized as a diagnostic method. Interpretation of large and complicated data sets is a significant challenge, for which multiple commercial tools have been developed. Three commercial metagenomic shotgun sequencing tools, CosmosID, One Codex, and IDbyDNA, were compared to determine whether they result in similar interpretations of the same sequencing data.

We previously demonstrated that shotgun metagenomic sequencing can detect bacteria in sonicate fluid, providing a diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A limitation of the approach that we used is that data analysis was time-consuming and specialized bioinformatics expertise was required, both of which are barriers to routine clinical use.

Metagenomic shotgun sequencing has the potential to transform how serious infections are diagnosed by offering universal, culture-free pathogen detection. This may be especially advantageous for microbial diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) by synovial fluid analysis since synovial fluid cultures are not universally positive and since synovial fluid is easily obtained preoperatively.

Abstract Background Detection and identification of microorganism(s) involved in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can inform surgical management and directed antibiotic therapy. Metagenomic shotgun sequencing is a powerful tool with the potential to change how many PJIs are diagnosed as it allows direct detection and identification of pathogens in clinical specimens. In the largest series to date, we utilized a metagenomics-based approach applied to SF to define potential microbial etiologies of failed total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Methods Synovial fluid was collected from 112 failed TKAs [74 PJI and 38 aseptic implant failure (AF)] via preoperative arthrocentesis. Cell count and differential, standardized culture and DNA-based metagenomic shotgun sequencing were performed. Human DNA was depleted using the MolYsis basic kit prior to DNA extraction, whole genome amplification, and sequencing. Taxonomic assignment of reads and pathogen identification was achieved using a pipeline incorporating k-mer- and marker gene-based classification software. A scheme for analysis and filtration of false-positives was created and applied, incorporating cut-offs for the number of reads, quality scores, and coverage across a reference genome. Patients were classified as having PJI using the IDSA criteria and expert review. Analyses were recorded as percent agreement, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), of metagenomics to SF culture. Results Metagenomic analysis identified the known pathogen in 54 (90%) (CI, 79.5%–96.2%) of the 60 culture-positive PJIs analyzed and one (2%) (CI, 0.0%–8.9%) potential polymicrobial infection not detected by culture. For the 14 culture-negative PJIs tested, metagenomics showed 79% (CI, 49.2%–95.3%) agreement for negative findings; potential pathogens were identified in three (21%) (CI, 4.7%–50.8%) culture-negative PJI cases, with one being polymicrobial. Of the 37 culture-negative AF cases, metagenomics showed 97% (CI, 85.8%–99.9%) agreement with negative culture and identified one (3%) (CI, 0.0%–14.2%) potential pathogen. For the one culture-positive AF case, metagenomic results were negative, suggesting possible culture contamination. Conclusion Metagenomic shotgun sequencing performed on SF can be used to diagnose PJI and may be particularly useful for culture-negative PJI. Disclosures R. Patel, ASM: Board Member, None; CD Diagnostics, BioFire, Curetis, Merck, Hutchison Biofilm Medical Solutions, Accelerate Diagnostics, Allergan, and The Medicines Company: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; Curetis: Consultant, Monies paid to my employer; A patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued: Patents, Patents, any money is paid to my employer; Actelion: DSMB, Money paid to my employer; ASM and IDSA: Editor’s stipends, Editor’s stipends; NBME, Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course: NBME, Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course, Honoraria; Roche, ASM, and IDSA: Travel reimbursement, Travel reimbursement

ABSTRACT Whole-genome amplification (WGA) is a useful tool for amplification of very small quantities of DNA for many uses, including metagenomic shotgun sequencing for infection diagnosis. Depending on the application, background DNA from WGA kits can be problematic. Three WGA kits were tested for their utility in a metagenomics approach to identify the pathogens in sonicate fluid comprised of biofilms and other materials dislodged from the surfaces of explanted prosthetic joints using sonication. The Illustra V2 Genomiphi, Illustra single cell Genomiphi, and Qiagen REPLI-g single cell kits were used to test identical sonicate fluid samples. Variations in the number of background reads, the genera identified in the background, and the number of reads from known pathogens known to be present in the samples were observed between kits. These results were then compared to those obtained with a library preparation without prior WGA using an NEBNext Ultra II paired-end kit, which requires a very small amount of input DNA. This approach also resulted in the presence of contaminant bacterial DNA and yielded fewer reads from the known pathogens. These findings highlight the impact that WGA kit selection can have on metagenomic analysis of low-biomass samples and the importance of the careful selection and consideration of the implications of using these tools.