Bennani, N. Nora

Background: Despite effective front-line therapies, DLBCL & MM have high relapse rates. Novel therapies like CAR-T & bispecific antibodies (BsAb) offer deep & durable remission compared to salvage therapies, but have a unique toxicity profile (TP) that requires monitoring. With no head-to-head trials, the rationale for therapy selection may vary. This study explores provider choices, sequencing preferences, & access barriers. Methods: Two anonymous surveys (MM and DLBCL) of US-based Hematologists were conducted from 2/2024 to 6/2024, on practice settings, CAR-T & BsAb availability, treatment preferences & barriers. Responses were analyzed to assess preferences across clinical scenarios. Results: Surveys were completed by 37 MM & 45 DLBCL providers. Most were at centers offering both CAR-T & BsAb. Most gave CAR-T inpatient, & BsAb outpatient. CAR-T was given by 73% MM providers & 66% DLBCL (92% used Cilta-cel, 96% used Ide-cel; 100% used Axi-cel, 90% used Liso-cel & 73% Tisa-cel). In MM, 78% used Teclistamab, 60% Talquetamab & 24% Elranatamab. In DLBCL, 62% used Epcoritamab & 40% Glofitamab. Providers preferred CAR-T over BsAb in MM after 4+ prior lines of therapy (LOT) (89%), & in DLBCL after 2+ prior LOT (93%). CAR-T was favored more among academic providers & those at CAR-T centers. Practice volume did not impact selection. Among providers at centers with BsAb-only, CAR-T was preferred by 60% (MM) and 50% (DLBCL). Providers at centers without both favored CAR-T (MM: 75%, DLBCL: 86%). CAR-T was chosen for better outcomes, short treatment, center choice, & prior experience. Other factors that influenced decisions were lower incidence of cytopenia/infection & “BsAb effective post-CAR-T, less so vice versa” (MM), & “curative potential of CAR-T” (DLBCL). Logistical barriers & institutional constraints influenced BsAb selection: CAR-T unavailability, access to specialized centers, referral complexity, insurance delay, manufacturing delay & hospitalization needs. In MM, 78% providers preferred Cilta-cel over Ide-cel, especially academic providers & those with CAR-T experience. CAR-T volume did not impact selection. Cilta-cel was preferred due to perceived better response rate (RR), more experience, “progression-free survival (PFS) benefit”, center choice, & logistical issues with Ide-cel. Ide-cel was selected due to center choice, favorable TP & insurance preference. Teclistamab was preferred by 78% due to more experience, better RR, TP & center choice, Elranatamab by 11% (better TP, RR, & “PFS”), & Talquetamab by 11% due to having a non-BCMA target. Academic providers preferred Teclistamab (89% vs 50%), & nonacademic providers preferred Talquetamab (38% vs 4%) and Elranatamab (13% vs 8%). In DLBCL after 2+ LOT, 69% favored Axi-cel due to prior experience, RR, center choice, & logistical issues with other products. Liso-cel & Tisa-cel were chosen by 27% & 2%, respectively, due to favorable TP. Axi-cel was also preferred 2nd line by 73% for similar reasons, while 24% favored Liso-cel for its favorable TP. Epcoritamab was preferred by 56% (subcutaneous injection, more experience & center choice) & Glofitamab by 42% (shorter treatment duration, easy administration, more experience, & center choice). Practice setting & volume did not impact selection between products in DLBCL. InBCMA-naïve MM pts, majority (97%) chose an anti-BCMA agent over GPRC5D due to better RR, TP, prior experience, & center choice. InBCMA-exposed pts, most (92%) favored an anti-GPRC5D agent. In contrast in DLBCL, 80% chose CD19 CAR-T after prior CD19-directed therapy, & 18% chose CD20 BsAb. Therefore, antigen escape was less of a concern in DLBCL vs MM. For relapse after 2nd line CAR-T in DLBCL, 78% preferred BsAb over other salvage options due to better RR, TP, & more experience. Providers prioritized RR, survival, & TP in decision making. Treatment logistics, duration, frequency, & cost were less crucial. MM providers also prioritized quality of life, which was less so in DLBCL. There were no differences in priority based on practice setting & experience with CAR-T. Conclusion: The study highlights factors influencing therapy choices in MM & DLBCL. Despite CAR-T's potential for better outcomes, significant access barriers exist. Efforts to streamline referral pathways, logistics, & expanding availability are crucial to improve outcomes. Understanding these preferences & barriers can guide future management strategies.

Abstract Background Hypomagnesemia has been correlated with inferior outcomes in patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) undergoing stem cell transplants. As T-cell and myeloid cell dysfunction have been associated with low magnesium conditions, we investigated whether serum magnesium (Mg) levels could predict clinical outcomes in LBCL patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Methods Patients with LBCL who received axi-cel under the ZUMA-1 trial or as FDA approved therapy at Mayo Clinic were examined. Serum samples were obtained at specified time points and cytokine analysis was performed. Single cell RNA sequencing was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The Student T-test, Kruskal Wallis, or Fisher's Exact Tests were used to compare differences in demographics across Mg levels. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared using the Wilcoxon test. Results We found that hypomagnesemia before lymphodepletion chemotherapy predicted for inferior progression-free and overall survival in the pivotal study ZUMA-1 (NCT02348216). These results were validated in an independent cohort of LBCL patients receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) at Mayo Clinic. Hypomagnesemia correlated with increased inflammatory serum markers and cytokine levels including ferritin, IL-6, IL1Ra, IL-8, and MIP1a. scRNAseq analysis unveiled altered immune interactions between monocytes and T cells with a concordant immune suppressive transcriptome. Conclusions Hypomagnesemia at the time of CAR-T infusion associates with an unfavorable inflammatory profile and decreased response and survival in LBCL patients receiving axi-cel. These findings suggest a potentially actionable prognostic factor for patients with large cell lymphoma undergoing CAR-T.

PURPOSE Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Little is known about the long-term survivorship after CAR T-cell therapy. METHODS We previously reported the results of 298 patients who were leukapheresed with the intent to receive standard-of-care axi-cel (n = 275 infused) after two or more previous lines of therapy at a median follow-up of 12.9 months. Here, we report extended follow-up of this cohort to a median of 58 months, with a focus on late survivorship events. RESULTS Among axi-cel–infused patients, progression-free survival at 5 years was 29% and overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 40%. The 5-year lymphoma-specific survival was 53% with infrequent late relapses. However, the 5-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 16.2%, with over half of NRM events occurring beyond 2 years. Patients who were 60 years and older had a lower risk of relapse ( P = .02), but a higher risk of NRM compared with patients younger than 60 years (NRM odds ratio, 4.5 [95% CI, 2.1 to 10.8]; P < .001). Late NRM was mainly due to infections and subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs). In total, SMNs occurred in 24 patients (9%), including therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (n = 15), solid tumors (n = 7), and unrelated lymphoid malignancies (n = 2). CONCLUSION In the standard-of-care setting, axi-cel exhibits outcomes consistent with those reported in clinical trials, with sustained, durable responses observed at the 5-year time point. However, late infections and the development of SMN are key survivorship issues that reduce long-term survival after CAR T-cell therapy, particularly in the elderly.

Abstract Little is known about risk factors for central nervous system (CNS) relapse in mature T-cell and natural killer cell neoplasms (MTNKNs). We aimed to describe the clinical epidemiology of CNS relapse in patients with MTNKN and developed the CNS relapse In T-cell lymphoma Index (CITI) to predict patients at the highest risk of CNS relapse. We reviewed data from 135 patients with MTNKN and CNS relapse from 19 North American institutions. After exclusion of leukemic and most cutaneous forms of MTNKNs, patients were pooled with non-CNS relapse control patients from a single institution to create a CNS relapse–enriched training set. Using a complete case analysis (n = 182), including 91 with CNS relapse, we applied a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model to select weighted clinicopathologic variables for the CITI score, which we validated in an external cohort from the Swedish Lymphoma Registry (n = 566). CNS relapse was most frequently observed in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (25%). Median time to CNS relapse and median overall survival after CNS relapse were 8.0 and 4.7 months, respectively. We calculated unique CITI risk scores for individual training set patients and stratified them into risk terciles. Validation set patients with low-risk (n = 158) and high-risk (n = 188) CITI scores had a 10-year cumulative risk of CNS relapse of 2.2% and 13.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 5.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-18.26; P = .018). We developed an open-access web-based CITI calculator (https://redcap.link/citicalc) to provide an easy tool for clinical practice. The CITI score is a validated model to predict patients with MTNKN at the highest risk of developing CNS relapse.

Abstract Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Despite extensive data supporting its use, outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity groups are limited. Here, we report clinical outcomes with axi-cel in patients with R/R LBCL by race and ethnicity in both real-world and clinical trial settings. In the real-world setting, 1290 patients who received axi-cel between 2017 and 2020 were identified from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database; 106 and 169 patients were included from the ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 trials, respectively. Overall survival was consistent across race/ethnicity groups. However, non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients had lower overall response rate (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.63) and lower complete response rate (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97) than NH White patients. NH Black patients also had a shorter progression-free survival vs NH White (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.90) and NH Asian patients (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-2.59). NH Asian patients had a longer duration of response than NH White (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.94) and Hispanic patients (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97). There was no difference in cytokine release syndrome by race/ethnicity; however, higher rates of any-grade immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome were observed in NH White patients than in other patients. These results provide important context when treating patients with R/R LBCL with CAR T-cell therapy across different racial and ethnic groups. ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: #NCT02348216 and #NCT03391466, respectively) are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Abstract Background Although CAR T-cell therapy has achieved remarkable response in patients (pts) with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), 20-30% of pts still have primary refractory disease (PD1), and another 30-40% relapse (PD2). We and others have shown that monocytes can modulate T-cell functions and impact clinical response to chemoimmunotherapy in NHL. Given that monocytes nadir and recovery kinetics differ from lymphocytes post lymphodepletion chemotherapy, we hypothesize that monocyte phenotype at peak CAR-T expansion and in the early month post CAR-T can modulate immune responses. Methods scRNAseq were performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells of NHL pts prior to lymphodepletion chemotherapy (pre), at peak CAR-T expansion (peak), and one month following CAR-T (M1). Seurat v4.3.0 was used for unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. Lugano criteria was used to determine clinical responses which were categorized as CR (complete remission), PD1, or PD2. Results We analyzed 129,981 monocytes from 77 samples of 32 pts (16 CR, 4 PD1, 12 PD2) and 5 healthy controls. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis identified 13 monocyte clusters: 4 classical monocyte (CM) clusters with transcriptome profiles for enriched signaling in IL-6, TGFβ, EMT, and p53; 2 intermediate monocyte (IM) clusters enriched for IL-1 or CD38 signaling; 2 non-classical monocytes (NM), one with increased CD36 expression; 3 monocytic MDSC clusters with enrichment of TGFβ, SIRPα, and HIF1α signaling; and 2 lymphoma-associated monocytes, expressing CD163 or CD169. At Pre and Peak, the distribution of the monocyte clusters was similar in pts with CR, PD2, or PD1, with only a slight decrease in the percent of NM in the PD2 group at Pre and slight increase of CD36 NM in PD1 at Peak. Compared to Pre, all pts had increased percent of CD36 NM and IL-1 IM at Peak. Interestingly, while the distribution of monocyte clusters was similar at Pre and Peak across clinical responses, GSEA showed that monocytes in CR pts, compared to PD1 and PD2, had gene expression enrichment of MYC target V2 pathway at Pre and TGFβ pathway at Peak. At M1, pts in PD1 had increased percent of p53 and TGFβ CM and decreased percent of NM. In contrast, pts with CR had decreased percent of IL-6 CM, p53 CM, TGFβ CM, IL-1 IM and increased percent of NM. Notably, as pts with CR and PD2 may appear similar clinically at M1, pts with PD2, compared to CR, have increased IL-6 CM, IL-1 IM, and decreased NM. In addition, GSEA showed that PD2 pts had increased IFNα response. Our results demonstrate that monocyte phenotype differences at Pre and Peak could be associated with CAR-T clinical response, and that persistent inflammatory monocyte signaling at M1 in pts with clinical response is associated with relapse. These data suggest a role for development of monocyte biomarkers to predict response and therapeutic targeting. Citation Format: Andre de Menezes Silva Corraes, Panwen Wang, Radhika Bansal, Henan Zhang, Zuoyi Shao, Kevin Regan, Eider Moreno Cortes, Arushi Khurana, Nora Bennani, Yucai Wang, Paul Hampel, Jonas Paludo, Patrick Johnston, Hemant Murthy, Madiha Iqbal, Stephen Ansell, Javier Munoz, Allison Rosenthal, Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja, Januario Castro, Saad Kenderian, Haidong Dong, Ying Li, Yi Lin. Monocyte transcriptome profiles associated with clinical response in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving CD19-directed CAR-T therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4001.

Abstract Background: Although CAR T-cell therapy has achieved remarkable response rates in adult patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), 20-30% of pts still have primary refractory disease, and 30-40% of pts relapse, often within 6 months of therapy. Given that durable clinical response can be achieved without CAR T cell persistence, we hypothesized that durable remission is correlated with the expansion of tumor-reactive T-cell receptor (TCR) clones following CAR T-cell infusion. To assess this, we examined the TCR repertoire of adult pts with B-NHL who received CD19 CAR T-cell (axi-cel) therapy to identify correlates of clinical response. Methods: Single-cell (sc) RNA sequencing (seq) and scTCR-seq were performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells from B-NHL pts before lymphodepletion chemotherapy (pre), at peak CAR-T expansion (peak), and one month following CAR-T (M1). scRNAseq and scTCR-seq data were processed using CellRanger v7.0.1, which were then analyzed using Immunarch (v0.9.0) for TCR clonality and sample diversity. Diversity was assessed using the Gini coefficient to indicate clone size inequality (0 = maximum diversity). TCR diversity and phenotype of expanded and emerged TCR clones post CAR-T were compared across clinical response categories: CR (complete remission for at least 6 months), PD1 (primary refractory), and PD2 (relapsed after partial or complete response). Results: We analyzed 107,035 T cells from 77 serial samples of 32 pts (16 CR, 4 PD1, 12 PD2) and 5 healthy controls. Compared to pts with PD1 and PD2, pts with CR had a larger Gini coefficient for TCR clones at M1 relative to Pre and Peak. The Gini coefficient was the largest for tumor recirculating CD8 T effector memory (Tem) and activated CD8 peripheral memory (Tpm) cells at M1 for pts with CR. Examining the repertoire of emerged and expanded TCR clones at Peak and M1 from Pre, pts with PD2, compared to pts with CR, had a higher percentage of activated CD8 T peripheral memory (Tpm) and T regulatory cells (Treg) among the emerged clones and activated CD8 Tpm among the expanded clones. Patients with PD1, relative to patients with CR, had more proliferating and non-activated CD8 Tpm among the expanded and emerged clones. Conclusion: NHL pts with CR after CAR-T had more robust clonal expansion of T cells, particularly tumor recirculating CD8 Tem and activated CD8 Tpm, compared to pts with relapsed or refractory disease. In contrast, pts with relapsed or refractory disease had an expansion of TCR clones with a larger proportion of CD8 Tpm and Tregs. Endogenous tumor-reactive TCR expansion may help predict favorable clinical response following CAR T-cell therapy. Citation Format: Aiman J. Faruqi, Panwen Wang, Radhika Bansal, Andre De Menezes Silva Corraes, Henan Zhang, Zuoyi Shao, Kevin Regan, Eider Moreno Cortes, Arushi Khurana, Nora Bennani, Yucai Wang, Paul Hampel, Jonas Paludo, Patrick Johnston, Hemant Murthy, Madiha Iqbal, Stephen Ansell, Javier Munoz, Allison Rosenthal, Mohamed Kharfan Dabaja, Januario E. Castro, Saad Kenderian, Haidong Dong, Ying Li, Yi Lin. T-cell receptor repertoire changes associated with clinical response in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving CD19 CAR-T therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 53.