Marinelli, John P.

BACKGROUND: Given the increasing prevalence and shifting disease demographic of vestibular schwannoma toward smaller tumors in people with less advanced symptoms, increasing emphasis has been placed on functional hearing preservation. OBJECTIVE: To provide an update to the 2018 CNS Guideline on hearing preservation outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma. METHODS: Systematic review and clinical practice guideline summarizing data pertaining to hearing preservation outcomes within the first 10 years after contemporary stereotactic radiation, microsurgery, or observation with serial imaging. The analysis incorporates studies included in the 2018 guideline and additional literature published up to May 20, 2022, providing a comprehensive up-to-date review of published clinical outcome data over time. RESULTS: Pooled estimated rates of serviceable hearing preservation are presented for observation, radiosurgery, and microsurgery for adults with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who have documented serviceable hearing in the ipsilateral ear at the time of diagnosis. Overall estimated rates of maintaining serviceable hearing are 78% at 2 years, 59% at 5 years, and 47% at 10 years during observation; 71% at 2 years, 59% at 5 years, and 38% at 10 years after radiosurgery; and 48% at 2 years, 40% at 5 years, and 32% at 10 years after microsurgery. In addition, features portending hearing outcome among management modalities are reported to guide accurate patient counseling. CONCLUSION: Regardless of treatment modality, fewer than half of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who present with serviceable hearing will maintain useful hearing by 10 years. Across all studies, microsurgery and radiosurgery seem to accelerate this decline over the natural history, although further research is needed given limitations of available evidence. The full guideline can be seen online at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/treatment-adults-vestibular-schwannoma/4-hearing-preservation-outcomes-in-patients-with-s

Objective To describe the potential applications of awake cochlear implantation (CI). Patients Adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss who qualify for CI. Interventions CI under local anesthesia, without any form of systemic analgesia or anesthesia. Main Outcome Measures Acoustic hearing preservation, subjective patient report of cochlear implant pitch matching, and subjective patient report of cochlear implant sound quality. Results Four illustrative cases are presented, highlighting the potential uses of CI performed under local anesthesia for optimizing outcomes in hearing preservation, implant pitch matching, and implant sound quality. Conclusions CI under local anesthesia allows surgeons to use real-time patient feedback during electrode array insertion to minimize intracochlear trauma, particularly in cases where hearing preservation is a goal of CI, and to potentially improve implant performance by optimizing pitch matching and sound quality.

Objective Present the rationale for the development of a new, patient-facing vital sign for adult hearing. Study Design Structured A3 process. Setting Fourteen virtual meetings and two in-person meetings held between May 2021 and June 2022. Main Outcome Measure(s) Identification and refinement of a countermeasure to develop and imbed a hearing health vital sign for adult hearing. Results Through a rigorous, structured A3 process, the Hearing Health Collaborative identified and refined the rationale for and the qualities associated with a public-facing vital sign for adult hearing loss. Specifically, such a vital sign must embody five qualities: simple, accessible, stable, inclusive, and meaningful. These qualities together would ensure that a hearing health vital sign would be useful not only as a screening tool but also as an instrument to guide next steps in workup and potentially treatment. Conclusions Successful identification and implementation of a hearing metric or “vital sign” for the presence of adult hearing loss, using precedent convention of other medical diseases, may help reframe public perceptions surrounding hearing loss, improve awareness and literacy regarding the presence of the disease, and prompt action to seek diagnostic assessment.

AbstractObjectiveTo examine associations with changes in quality‐of‐life (QOL) outcomes following treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).Study DesignProspective longitudinal study.SettingTertiary academic center.MethodsPatients who were treated for sporadic VS using SRS from 2015 to 2022 were included. QOL outcomes were measured using the disease‐specific Penn Acoustic Neuroma QOL (PANQOL) scale.ResultsSeventy‐nine patients with pre‐SRS and at least one post‐SRS PANQOL assessments were available for analysis. The mean change in total PANQOL scores was −2 (SD 13) on a 100‐point scale. The mean duration between assessments was 4.6 years (SD 2.0). Age at SRS, sex, and SRS treatment doses were not significantly associated with changes in total PANQOL scores. Total PANQOL scores improved a mean of 4 points for patients with tumors confined to the internal auditory canal but declined a mean of 5 points for patients with tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle (P = .01); however, these changes did not exceed the minimum clinically significant threshold of 11 points. The correlation coefficient between treated tumor volume at SRS and change in total PANQOL scores was −0.30 (P = .007). Changes in PANQOL total (P = .5) and hearing domain (P = .3) scores for patients who maintained serviceable hearing or progressed to nonserviceable hearing did not significantly differ.ConclusionTumor extent and treated volume at SRS had a statistically significant but likely not clinically important impact on total PANQOL scores. Progression to nonserviceable hearing did not have a significant impact on PANQOL total or hearing domain scores.

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study is to determine if a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) degrades postoperative the audiological performance of patients with cochlear implantation (CI).Study DesignRetrospective review.SettingDepartment of Defense‐wide database.MethodsInternational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD‐9) and ICD‐10 codes were used to identify patients that were diagnosed with TBI prior to CI between 2005 and 2023. They were matched 2:1 with controls without TBI based on age and sex. Preoperative and postoperative pure tone average (PTA) thresholds and AzBio scores were compared.ResultsNineteen TBI patients representing 20 implanted ears were identified and matched with 39 patients without TBI representing 40 implanted ears. Thirteen ears carried a diagnosis of mild TBI, and seven were diagnosed with moderate to severe TBI. The average follow‐up period was 44 months. The TBI group attained mean postoperative PTA and AzBio scores of 37 dB (SD 24) and 67% (SD 28). The non‐TBI group attained scores of 31 dB (SD 12) and 69% (SD 26). P‐values for the PTA and AzBio intergroup comparisons were .93 and .88, respectively. All TBI ears attained at least sound awareness after implantation, with 79% achieving open‐set speech perception compared to 82% of non‐TBI ears.ConclusionCI after TBI of any severity provides hearing rehabilitation comparable to patients without a prior diagnosis of TBI.

Objective To examine the quality of information provided by artificial intelligence platforms ChatGPT-4 and Claude 2 surrounding the management of vestibular schwannomas. Study design Cross-sectional. Setting Skull base surgeons were involved from different centers and countries. Intervention Thirty-six questions regarding vestibular schwannoma management were tested. Artificial intelligence responses were subsequently evaluated by 19 lateral skull base surgeons using the Quality Assessment of Medical Artificial Intelligence (QAMAI) questionnaire, assessing “Accuracy,” “Clarity,” “Relevance,” “Completeness,” “Sources,” and “Usefulness.” Main Outcome Measure The scores of the answers from both chatbots were collected and analyzed using the Student t test. Analysis of responses grouped by stakeholders was performed with McNemar test. Stuart-Maxwell test was used to compare reading level among chatbots. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. Results ChatGPT-4 demonstrated significantly improved quality over Claude 2 in 14 of 36 (38.9%) questions, whereas higher-quality scores for Claude 2 were only observed in 2 (5.6%) answers. Chatbots exhibited variation across the dimensions of “Accuracy,” “Clarity,” “Completeness,” “Relevance,” and “Usefulness,” with ChatGPT-4 demonstrating a statistically significant superior performance. However, no statistically significant difference was found in the assessment of “Sources.” Additionally, ChatGPT-4 provided information at a significant lower reading grade level. Conclusions Artificial intelligence platforms failed to consistently provide accurate information surrounding the management of vestibular schwannoma, although ChatGPT-4 achieved significantly higher scores in most analyzed parameters. These findings demonstrate the potential for significant misinformation for patients seeking information through these platforms.

AbstractObjectiveLimited evidence guides the optimal timing of treatment after the detection of tumor growth during the observation of sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS). The current work aimed to inform the timing of radiosurgical intervention based on an analysis of patient outcomes among those who ultimately failed stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and underwent salvage microsurgery.Study DesignA historical cohort study.SettingSeven centers across the United States and Norway.MethodsAdults with sporadic VS who underwent salvage microsurgery following failed primary SRS were included. The primary outcome of interest was the association between tumor size at the time of primary SRS and the ability to achieve gross total resection (GTR) and maintain postoperative House–Brackmann (HB) facial nerve grade I at the last follow‐up after salvage microsurgery.ResultsAmong 96 patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor size at primary SRS was 14.5 mm (10.0‐19.0). Each 1‐mm increase in CPA tumor size at the time of primary SRS was associated with a 13% increased likelihood of near‐total/subtotal resection or most recent postoperative HB grade >I (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05‐1.21, P = .001), with an optimal tumor size threshold to distinguish this outcome of 12 mm of CPA extension (c‐index 0.73). Similarly, for each 1‐mm increase in CPA tumor size at the time of primary SRS, a 9% increase in any postoperative complication with salvage microsurgery was observed (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02‐1.15, P = .009).ConclusionCorroborated by size threshold surveillance data informing the timing of primary microsurgical resection, the current study suggests that VS outcomes are optimized when primary radiosurgical intervention is undertaken on growing tumors when they harbor 10–15 mm of cerebellopontine angle extension or less.

Objective To evaluate cochlear implant speech perception among patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who underwent ipsilateral implantation. Study Design Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study. Setting Eleven tertiary academic medical centers across Germany, Denmark, and the United States. Patients One hundred six patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who received an ipsilateral cochlear implant from 2011 to 2022. Interventions Ipsilateral cochlear implantation with observation, stereotactic radiosurgery, or microsurgery for tumor management. Main Outcome Measures Monosyllabic speech perception testing scores and rates of open-set speech perception. Results Among 106 patients studied, 101 (95%) achieved open-set speech perception with a median of 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12–42 mo) of audiometric follow-up. Median ipsilateral monosyllabic speech perception testing achieved was 72% (IQR 54–85%), and median ipsilateral AzBio in quiet was 75% (IQR 46–90%). Most (91 of 106 [86%]) underwent microsurgery for tumor control, with cochlear implantation performed simultaneously in 98% (89 of 91) of these patients. The ability to achieve gross total resection significantly differed by tumor complexity, with 97% of low-complexity tumors, 100% of intermediate complexity, and 0% of high-complexity tumors undergoing gross total resection (p < 0.001). However, among patients managed with microsurgery, there was not a statistically significant difference in post-cochlear implantation monosyllabic speech perception scores across complexity groupings, with median scores of 75 and 70% for patients with tumors of low or intermediate complexity and those with tumors of high complexity, respectively (p = 0.5). Eight of 102 patients (8%) assessed experienced deterioration in cochlear implant performance over time. Among the subset of 39 patients with available MRI to review, the region of surveillance interest could be visualized postoperatively on MRI in all cases. Conclusions Open-set speech perception is achieved in most patients with inner ear schwannoma undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Although cochlear implantation in high-complexity inner ear schwannomas is only possible with incomplete tumor resection, long-term open-set speech perception outcomes are similar to lower-complexity tumors.

OBJECTIVE It is uncertain which cochlear dose parameters significantly impact hearing after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of cochlear dose parameters on hearing outcomes for patients with serviceable hearing (SH). METHODS This was a historical cohort study performed at a single tertiary center that included patients with sporadic VS and SH who underwent single-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery treatment from 2007 to 2022. Associations of cochlear dose parameters with time to non-SH and rates of change in pure-tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS) following SRS were assessed. RESULTS A total of 205 patients with SH underwent SRS for a sporadic VS. At SRS, 54 (26%) tumors were confined to the internal auditory canal and 151 (74%) extended into the cerebellopontine angle. At 2, 5, and 10 years following SRS, 62%, 37%, and 15% of patients maintained SH, respectively. The median time to non-SH was 1.8 years. The median rates of change in PTA and WRS were 6.0 dB of hearing loss per year and −6.5% per year, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, each 1-Gy increase in minimum cochlear dose was significantly associated with time to non-SH (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.9), rate of change in PTA decibel hearing loss per year (parameter estimate [PE] 3.4, 95% CI 0.6–6.2), and rate of change in WRS percentage per year (PE −6.4, 95% CI −11.2 to −1.5). The associations of each 1-Gy increase in mean cochlear dose with hearing outcomes were only significant among patients with class B hearing (time to non-SH HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6; rate of change in PTA PE 3.6, 95% CI 1.2–5.9; and rate of change in WRS PE −5.7, 95% CI −9.7 to −1.7). CONCLUSIONS The minimum cochlear dose impacts hearing outcomes after SRS for VS and should be considered in radiosurgical treatment planning. In this cohort, the mean cochlear dose was only associated with hearing outcomes in the subgroup of patients with class B hearing at SRS.

Objective To compare cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed with observation, radiosurgery, or microsurgery. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Eleven tertiary academic medical centers. Patients One hundred patients with sporadic VS who received an ipsilateral CI. Interventions Ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures Pure-tone thresholds, monosyllabic speech perception testing scores, and rates of open-set speech acquisition. Results Of the 100 patients studied, 54 underwent microsurgery, 26 underwent radiosurgery, 19 continued observation, and 1 underwent multimodal therapy. Among all patients, the median post-implantation pure-tone average was 31 dB (interquartile range [IQR] 25–39 dB) and the median monosyllabic speech perception score was 30% (IQR 0–60%) at a median of 12 months (IQR 5–25 months) post-implantation. Patients who were managed with microsurgery (median speech perception score 11%, IQR 0–52%) exhibited poorer implant outcomes overall compared with those managed with observation (median speech perception score 52%, IQR 40–72%) or radiosurgery (median speech perception score 30%, IQR 16–60%). Open-set speech perception was achieved in 61% of patients managed with microsurgery, 100% with observation, and 80% with radiosurgery. In a multivariable setting, those managed with observation (p = 0.02) or who underwent radiosurgery (p = 0.04) were significantly more likely to achieve open-set speech perception compared with patients who underwent microsurgery. Conclusions Cochlear implants offer benefit in selected patients with sporadic VS. Although achieved in over half of people after microsurgery, open-set speech perception is more reliably attained in patients who are treated with observation or radiosurgery compared with microsurgical resection. These data may inform patient counseling and VS tumor management in people who may benefit from implantation.