Sinicrope, Frank A.

603 Background: Oncogenic BRAFV600E mutations activate MAP kinase signaling and are associated with treatment resistance and poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In BRAFV600E mutant CRCs, treatment failure may be related to BRAFV600E-mediated apoptosis resistance that occurs by an as yet undefined mechanism. Methods: BRAF isogenic RKO CRC cells and RKO, HT29, WiDr cell lines were treated with cobimetinib ± the small molecule MCL-1 inhibitor, A-1210477. Apoptosis was measured by Annexin V staining and caspase cleavage. Gene knockdown or overexpression was achieved by lentivirus; ERK siRNA was utilized. Competitive RT-PCR was performed for MCL-1 mRNA expression. HT-29 cells with control or MCL-1 shRNA were xenografted into SCID mice, treated with cobimetinib or vehicle, and tumor volume was measured. Results: We found that BRAFV600E can upregulate anti-apoptotic MCL-1 in a gene dose-dependent manner using CRC cell lines isogenic for BRAF. BRAFV600E-induced MCL-1 upregulation was confirmed by ectopic BRAFV600E expression that activated MEK/ERK signaling to phosphorylate (MCL-1Thr163) and stabilize MCL-1. Upregulation of MCL-1 was mediated by MEK/ERK shown by ERK siRNA that suppressed MCL-1. Stabilization of MCL-1 by phosphorylation was shown by a phosphorylation-mimicking mutant and an unphosphorylated MCL-1 mutant that decreased or increased MCL-1 protein turnover, respectively.MEK /ERK inhibition by cobimetinib suppressed MCL-1 expression/phosphorylation and induced pro-apoptotic BIM to a greater extent than did vemurafenib in BRAFV600E cell lines. MCL-1 knockdown vs control shRNA significantly enhanced cobimetinib-induced apoptosis in vitro and in HT29 colon cancer xenografts. A-1210477 also enhanced cobimetinib-induced apoptosis in vitrothat was due to disruption of the interaction of MCL-1 with pro-apoptotic BAK and BIM. Knockdown of BIM attenuated BAX, but not BAK, activation by cobimetinib plus A-1210477. Conclusions: BRAFV600E-mediated MEK/ERK activation can upregulate MCL-1 by phosphorylation/stabilization to confer apoptosis resistance that can be reversed by MCL-1 antagonism.

492 Background: Beclin 1 interacts with its cofactor UVRAG to promote autophagy, a cellular degradation process induced by cellular stress. While cells with defective autophagy are prone to genomic instability, it is unknown whether Beclin 1 and/or UVRAG can regulate DNA damage/repair. Methods: Colorectal cancer cell lines (HT-29, DLD1) with Beclin 1 or UVRAG siRNA were irradiated ± 5-FU. DNA damage (pATM, pH2Ax, 53BP1, RAD51), cell death (annexin V, caspase-3, clonogenic survival), and centrosome number (γ-tubulin staining), were determined. Beclin 1 protein expression was analyzed in pretreatment endoscopic biopsies from 96 rectal carcinoma patients who received radiation + 5-FU followed by surgery. Results: Beclin 1 or UVRAG knockdown was shown to enhance DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and cell death induced by radiation ± 5-FU. Suppression of either gene increased the percentage of irradiated cells with nuclear foci expressing 53BP1 (nonhomologous end joining), but not RAD51 (homologous recombination). Beclin 1 was shown to regulate UVRAG, and a UVRAG deletion mutant defective in Beclin 1 binding decreased protection against radiation-induced DSBs. Knockdown of Beclin 1 or UVRAG increased centrosome number in irradiated cells. While autophagy inhibition by ATG5 or LC3 siRNA enhanced radiation-induced DSBs, they did not alter centrosome number suggesting independence from autophagy. In rectal carcinomas, high vs low level Beclin 1 expression was detected in 56 (58.3%) and 40 (41.7%) tumors, respectively. Pre-treatment Beclin 1 was not associated with clinicopathological variables. However, high vs low Beclin 1 predicted a significantly reduced pathological response (macroscopic vs. microscopic or no residual tumor) to chemoradiation (high: 14.2% vs. low: 40%; p = 0.017). High vs low Beclin 1 was independently associated with poorer overall survival (HR, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.42-16.47; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Beclin 1 and UVRAG confer protection against radiation-induced DNA damage and maintain centrosome stability. The ability of Beclin 1 overexpression to confer resistance to chemoradiation, suggests its potential utility as a predictive biomarker in rectal cancer.

451 Background: Classifications for molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability (MSI), the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and somatic mutations in BRAFV600E and KRAS have been proposed to reflect distinct pathways of colorectal tumorigenesis. We assessed the relationship between these subtype classifications and colorectal cancer survival in a population-based study. Methods: Tumor-markers were evaluated in incident colorectal cancer cases diagnosed between 1997-2007 in western Washington State. Cases were classified into pathway-based subtypes according to the following tumor-marker combinations: (1) traditional pathway [microsatellite stable / low MSI (MSS/MSI-L), non-CIMP, BRAF-wildtype, KRAS-wildtype, n = 631]; (2) MSI-high serrated (MSI-high, CIMP-positive, BRAF-mutated, KRAS-wildtype, N=100); (3) MSS/MSI-L serrated (MSS/MSI-L, CIMP-positive, BRAF-mutated, KRAS-wildtype, n = 55); (4) alternate pathway (MSS/MSI-L, non-CIMP, BRAF-wildtype, KRAS-mutated, n = 353); and (5) MSI-high familial (MSI-high, non-CIMP, BRAF-wildtype, KRAS-wildtype, n = 50). Multiple-imputation was used to classify tumor-marker status for cases with missing data on one to three markers. Differences in survival across subtypes were assessed through multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. Results: Relative to cases of the predominant traditional pathway subtype, cases with MSS/MSI-L serrated and alternate pathway tumor subtypes experienced statistically significantly worse disease-specific survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50-3.36 and HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.12-1.71, respectively]; cases with MSI-high familial tumors had the most favorable disease-specific prognosis (HR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12-0.64). With respect to overall survival, associations were similar but slightly attenuated. Conclusions: In this large, population-based study, colorectal cancer subtype classifications based on integrated pathways were associated with marked differences in survival, highlighting the significance of molecular heterogeneity in colorectal cancer.

2 Background: Testing for HER2 in EAC has become routine given its ability to predict benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. HER2 protein analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is more rapid and generally less expensive than assessment of gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, the accuracy of IHC for predicting HER2 amplification has not been examined in a large EAC cohort. Methods: Surgical EAC specimens were examined from 675 patients who underwent curative resection at a single institution without preoperative therapy. Tumors were located in the esophagus (47%) or gastroesophageal junction (53%); most were node-positive (73%). Every tumor was evaluated by IHC in parallel with FISH in a blinded manner using FDA-approved assays. A consensus IHC score was determined by 2 pathologists using tumor-specific criteria (negative, 0 or 1+; equivocal, 2+; positive, 3+). Gene amplification by FISH was defined as a HER2/CEP17ratio ≥ 2. Results: HER2 amplification was detected in 89% of IHC 3+ cases, 13% of IHC 2+ cases, and 4% of IHC 0-1+ cases (Table). Accordingly, using FISH as the reference standard, the positive predictive value (PPV) of a positive IHC test (3+) was 89% (79/89 [95% CI 82%-95%]), and the negative predictive value of a negative IHC test (0-1+) was 96% (401/417 [94%-98%]). Importantly, the PPV of an equivocal IHC score (2+) for detecting HER2 amplification was 13% (22/169 [8%-18%]). Conclusions: In the largest study to date comparing HER2 testing methods in EAC, a negative IHC result (0 or 1+) nearly excludes the presence of gene amplification by FISH. Whereas a positive IHC result (3+) strongly predicts for the presence of amplification, an equivocal IHC result (2+) is a weak predictor. These findings in EAC support a HER2 testing algorithm where IHC is used for initial screening and FISH testing is restricted to cases with equivocal IHC results. [Table: see text]

508 Background: Severe adverse events (AEs) to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) constitute a major dilemma in CC treatment. We recently demonstrated that specific deleterious DPYD variants in the coding region were highly predictive of grade >3 (G3+) AEs in stage III CC pts receiving adjuvant 5-FU based combination chemotherapy [Lee et al. JNCI. In press]. Other studies have suggested potential associations between AEs and non-coding DPYD variants: a novel haplotype (HapB3) containing three intronic variants (c.483+18 G>A, c.680+139 G>A, and c.959-51 T>C), one synonymous variant (c.1236 G>A, E412E), and a deep intronic variant (c.1129-5923 C>G) that affects pre-mRNA splicing. However, these studies included a diversity of cancer types, stages and treatments. The findings require further evaluation in a refined population. Methods: A total of 2,134 Caucasian stage III CC pts without DPYD*2A, D949V, and I560S variants from NCCTG N0147 trial who received adjuvant FOLFOX or FOLFIRI +/- cetuximab were genotyped by multiplexed single-base extension assays on the Sequenom MassARRAY. G3+ AEs were recorded (CTCAE v3) and classified as common to 5-FU treatment (5FU-AEs). Logistic regressions were used to assess the univariate and multivariate associations. Results: Analyzed pts displayed the following characteristics: 54.3% male, median age 59 [19-85], proficient MMR 87.5%, PS-0 76.5%, + irinotecan 8.5%, and + cetuximab 46.5%. Pts carrying c.1129-5923 C>G were significantly associated with higher risk of G3+ 5FU-AEs (Odds Ratio [OR]=1.539, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.001 – 2.367, p=0.049). Only marginal association was observed for one of the HapB3 variants, c.1236 G>A (p=0.058). A linearly increasing risk of G3+ 5FU-AEs was identified for HapB3, comparing pts with no, one or >1 variant present (unadjusted OR=1.539, 95% CI=1.001 – 2.367, p=0.041; adjusted OR=1.198, 95% CI=0.998-1.437, p=0.052). Conclusions: In the largest study to date, c.1129-5923 C>G and HapB3 were predictive of 5FU-AE risk in stage III CC patients without DPYD*2A, D949V, and I560S variants receiving 5-FU-based combination chemotherapy.

460 Background: The immune response has emerged as a strong prognostic factor in colon cancer. Whereas CD8+ T cells mediate antitumor response, regulatory T cells expressing FoxP3+ can antagonize this effect, though prognostic data conflict. These markers have yet to be analyzed with MMR status, which is important since dMMR tumors show enhanced immune response. Methods: CD8+ and FoxP3+ density were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in resected stage II and III colon carcinomas (N = 216) from participants in phase III adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based trials. High vs low immune density was dichotomized at the median. MMR status, determined by IHC or analysis of microsatellite instability, was categorized as dMMR (12%) or proficient MMR (pMMR). Cox models, stratified by study, were adjusted for age, stage, grade and, where noted, MMR. Results: The association of FoxP3+ density with overall survival (OS) differed by CD8+ density (P for interaction = .040). By multivariable analysis, FoxP3+high was significantly associated with improved OS in CD8+low tumors (hazard ratio 0.43 [95% confidence interval 0.19 – 0.95]; P = .030], but not in CD8+high tumors (P = .91). Results were consistent after MMR adjustment. We then determined their prognostic impact in the larger pMMR subset (N = 119). Tumors with high FoxP3+ were associated with improved OS in cases with low, but not high, CD8+ density ( Table ). These patients (FoxP3+high, CD8+low) had similar 5-year OS rates as 107 dMMR cases from parent studies (89% vs 80%; P = .74), despite having distinct clinicopathologic features. Conclusions: The prognostic impact of FoxP3+ T cells depends on CD8+, indicating the importance of analyzing both in combination. High FoxP3+ exerts a paradoxically favorable survival impact, but only when CD8+ is low. Survival in pMMR tumors with high FoxP3+ and low CD8+ was similar to that of dMMR tumors, indicating that a favorable pMMR subset can be identified. [Table: see text]

446 Background: MutKRAS and mutBRAF are important predictive and prognostic markers, respectively, in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, little is known about why some tumors harbor these mutations. N0147 is a phase III adjuvant trial for stage III CRC patients (N=3397) in which patients completed questionnaires and tumor variables and KRAS/BRAF mutation status was assessed. Methods: 2,323/3,397 patients who were enrolled prior to a 2008 amendment requiring KRAS testing completed a Patient Questionnaire. Primary tumors were assessed for mutKRAS and mutBRAF using standard methods; MMR status was determined using IHC. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of mutation status. Results: 60% and 86% of mutKRAS and mutBRAF tumors were right-sided, respectively. MutKRAS was less likely if there was a family history of CRC and in ever-smokers, and was nearly mutually exclusive with mutBRAF. MutBRAF was associated with deficient MMR (dMMR), high grade histology, and 4+ positive lymph nodes at surgery. MutBRAF was more likely in patients age > 70, retired persons, ever-smokers, but was less likely in non-whites and men. Conclusions: Smoking, family history of CRC, and dMMR status are associated with lower frequency of mutKRAS , but higher mutBRAF. Both mutations tend to be right sided, and mutBRAF is more common in the elderly, females, and non-Hispanic whites. [Table: see text]

419 Background: Deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) results in microsatellite instability (MSI) that is detected in ∼15% of sporadic colon cancers. MMR status has been shown to provide prognostic and predictive information. We developed a model to predict MMR deficiency using clinically available data, and thereby facilitate the selection of patient tumors for MMR testing. Methods: Data were utilized from stage II and III colon carcinoma patients (n = 2016) who participated in 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant studies (NCCTG, FFCD, NCIC, GIVIO, NSABP) and an Italian cohort. MMR status in tumors had been determined by MSI testing or by immunohistochemistry for hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins. Logistic regression and a recursive partitioning and amalgamation analysis was used to identify factors (histologic grade, gender, tumor site, stage, age, lymph node status, T-stage) predictive of MMR status. Results: Of the cancers, 357 (17.7%) showed deficient MMR. Tumor site was the most important predictor of MMR status followed by histologic grade, then stage (II vs. III) and then gender. Distal tumors had a low likelihood of deficient MMR (5% rate overall), whereas proximal tumors had a greater likelihood of deficient MMR (30%). For patients with proximal tumors, the addition of histologic grade and stage increased the prediction of deficient MMR (Table). Using tumor site, histologic grade, and stage, the logistic regression model showed excellent discrimination (c-statistic = 0.80). Conclusions: Routine clinicopathological data can facilitate the identification of MMR deficient cases. Tumor site and histologic grade were the strongest predictors of MMR deficiency. Within proximal, poorly differentiated tumors, stage was highly predictive. These findings suggest that our model can assist in selecting sporadic colon cancers for MMR testing for use in clinical decision-making, especially for stage II patients. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

363 Background: Irinotecan (CPT-11) has demonstrated antitumor activity against metastatic colorectal cancer used alone or with 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV). Two arms with CPT-11, 5FU, and LV (FOLFIRI) +/- cetuximab (Cmab) were originally included in N0147. However, after CALGB 89803 (J Clin Oncol. 25:3456, 2007), PETACC-3 (J Clin Oncol. 27:3117, 2009), and Accord02 (Ann Oncol. 20:674, 2009) showed no benefit to the three-drug combination in adjuvant therapy, the CPT-11 arms of N0147 were discontinued. We report the outcomes for patients given FOLFIRI +/- Cmab. Methods: Following a signed informed consent patients with resected stage III colon cancer were randomized to one of 6 arms including 12 biweekly cycles of CPT-11 180 mg/m2 d1 with LV 400 mg/m2, 5FU 400 mg/m2 bolus IV, then 46-hr IV 5FU 2,400 mg/m2 on d1-2 without (Arm B, FOLFIRI) or with Cmab (Arm E) 400 mg/m2 d1 cycle 1 then Cmab at 250 mg/m2 d1 and 8. Primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: 156 patients (Arm B-111, Arm E-45) were enrolled; median follow-up on 81 patients in Arm B was 60.3 months and 58.2 months in Arm E for 41 patients. wtKRAS (vs mt) status was associated with improved DFS (HR=0.6 [95% CI 0.4-1.1], p = 0.09) and OS (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.4-1.5], p = 0.38). The addition of Cmab improved DFS and OS in the overall group and within wtKRAS pts. Grade greater than III non-hematologic adverse effects were significantly increased in the Cmab arm (46% vs. 64%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: In this randomized phase III trial adjuvant FOLFIRI resulted in a 3-year DFS lower than that expected for FOLFOX. Trends for improved DFS and OS with the addition of Cmab were observed in patients with resected stage III colon cancer patients, regardless of KRAS status. Supported by NIH Grant CA25224, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImClone, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]