Giridhar, Karthik V.

Abstract Assessment of patient out-of-pocket cost for palbociclib therapy in advanced breast cancerBackground:Palbociclib has demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with advanced hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer when used in combination with endocrine therapy 1,2. The current average wholesale price of therapy with this medication class exceeds $190,000 per year (at full dose). Financial toxicity is a major concern in the oncology population and can decrease patient quality of life and may result in non-adherence 3,4. Our objective was to describe the out-of-pocket cost burden for patients treated with palbociclib. Methods:A retrospective review of patients newly initiated on palbociclib therapy between May 5, 2018 and May 30, 2019 was completed at our institution. Patients were included if they were 18 years of age and older, newly starting palbociclib for advanced or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, had US-based insurance, and received palbociclib from our internal specialty pharmacy. Cost information was collected utilizing dispensing reports and additional patient-specific information was obtained from the EHR. Descriptive statistics were performed on the collected data. Results:A total of 44 patients were included in the cost analysis. Primary sources of coverage for these patients included commercial insurance (n=13), Medicare (n=25), and state/federal insurance (n=6). We first assessed costs with primary insurance coverage alone. The sum of all the initial cycle out-of-pocket copays after primary insurance totaled $49,108. The median individual copay was $291, the range was $0 to $2,943, and 9 of the 44 patients had no copay after the primary insurance was applied. The impact of assistance programs, which include independent grant funding, copay cards, vouchers, and secondary Medicaid plans, was significant. After applying primary insurance and aid from assistance programs, the sum of all initial cycle out-of-pocket copays reduced from $49,108 to $3,172. After assistance, 33 of the 44 patients had an initial copay cost of $0. Over 90% of the out-of-pocket total was from two patients (one each with a copay of $2,467 and $497). Ultimately, Mayo Clinic Specialty Pharmacy helped patients avoid $45,851 in first cycle out-of-pocket copays, of which $41,079 and $4,772 were for Medicare and commercially-insured patients, respectively. Copay cost by type of insurance was assessed. All patients with commercial insurance (n=13) had no actual copay for the first cycle. Medicare patients (n=25) are not eligible for copay cards and had larger pre-assistance copays compared to commercial patients (median $2,454 vs. $45). Vouchers or grants were utilized by 16 out of 25 Medicare covered patients. State/Federal insurance included 2 Tricare and 4 Medicaid patients. While ineligible for copay card assistance, the copays for these patients were low, ranging from $0-$28. Standard Medicare D plans do not have an out of pocket maximum for the year. The catastrophic phase requires an ongoing copay of 5% of the total claim cost, resulting in approximately a $600 per month copay for the remainder of the calendar year during the study period. When combined with the first cycle cost of approximately $2500, the yearly out-of-pocket cost for a patient with a standard Medicare D plan is roughly $10,000. Conclusion:Patients initiating therapy with palbociclib are commonly faced with high out-of-pocket costs. The availability, eligibility, and use of financial assistance programs are imperative in decreasing the financial toxicity. Specialty pharmacies play an important role in obtaining financial assistance which leads to decreased out-of-pocket expenses for patients. Citation Format: Allison P Golbach, Matthew D Smith, Jodi L Taraba, Karthik V Giridhar. Assessment of patient out-of-pocket cost for palbociclib therapy in advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-49.

Abstract Background: Cyclin dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) have improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in hormone-receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but progression of disease is inevitable. Serum thymidine kinase-1 (TK1) is a secreted marker of proliferation that is prognostic in patients (pts) with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC and may be predictive of ET and CDK 4/6i response. PROMISE (NCT0281902) is a prospective study enrolling women with HR-positive MBC starting palbociclib (Pb) + letrozole (L) (1st line) or Pb + fulvestrant (2nd line). We undertook a comprehensive “omic” assessment of blood, tumor, urine and the fecal microbiome in order to identify novel genomic variants and pathways associated with an early decline in TK1 (measured after 2 months) and PFS. Additionally, patient derived xenografts/organoids were generated at baseline and progression to test new therapeutic approaches to overcome resistance to CDK4/6i and ET. We report the initial association between the baseline genomic landscape and baseline TK1 levels. Methods: FFPE tumor biopsies were obtained for DNA/RNA sequencing (TempusTM) and blood samples for TK1 (Divitum® assay, Biovica) were collected pretreatment (pre-Pb) and after 2 cycles of Pb + ET (post-Pb2). Both whole-exome (exome capture) sequencing (WES) and RNA-Seq used the Integrated DNA Technologies xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0 capture kit. TK1+ disease was defined as > 200 Du/L and TK1- disease as below limit of detection up to 200 Du/L. We tested the association between genomic and transcriptomic characteristics with baseline TK1 data in pretreatment samples where both WES and RNA-seq and TK1 was available. The data were analyzed using bioinformatics pipelines for somatic and germline mutations and copy number alterations. The current analysis focuses on baseline 1st-line pre-Pb omics data in conjunction with baseline TK1 levels. The database was locked for analysis on 5/29/2020. Results: Thirty-three pts (median age: 59 yrs.) were evaluable, with paired samples for TK1 in 32. Six pts had TK1+ disease pre-Pb and post-Pb2. Twenty-two pts had TK1- disease pre-Pb and post-Pb2. Four pts had a decrease in TK1 after 2 cycles of treatment that altered the classification from TK1+ to TK1-. Both baseline RNA seq and serum TK1 (n=16) were available for 4 TK1+ and 12 TK1- pts. In this group, 476 genes were differentially regulated (398 upregulated; 78 downregulated). Pathway analysis demonstrated enrichment in complement and coagulation cascade pathway, PPAR signaling pathway, and metabolism-related pathways related to up-regulation of CYP and UGT gene families. Further testing for the association of WES data with baseline TK1+ (n=8) and TK1- (n=16) disease demonstrated somatic copy number variations on chromosomes 6, 11, 12 and 15. CDK4 copy number gains were observed in 3/8 TK1+ pts and 0/16 TK1- pts. We also observed that somatic mutations (LOH, copy number and/or SNV/INDELs) were more prevalent in the TK1+ compared to the TK1- pre-Pb group in several cancer-associated genes (FAS [p=0.06] PTEN, PIK3CB, NAB2, SOX9 and FAT1 [p=0.08], TP53, and MAP2K4 [p=0.22]). Conversely, we also noted that 6/7 pts with GATA3 mutations had TK1- disease (p=0.23). Conclusions: Using a comprehensive “omics” approach, our data suggest that a secreted biomarker of proliferation (TK1) obtained prior to initiating CDK4/6i and ET for the first line treatment of HR+ MBC is associated with established and novel genes and pathways associated with prognosis of pts receiving ET and CDK 4/6i. Analysis of on-treatment (after 2 cycles) tumor RNA seq and its association with change in TK1 as well as data from the 2nd-line cohort will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Ciara C O Sullivan, Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Peter T Vedell, Ann Moyer, Abraham D Eyman Casey, Jason Sinnwell, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin Thompson, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W Northfelt, Minetta C Liu, Tufia C Haddad, Saranya Chumsri, Prema Peethambaram, Kathryn J Ruddy, Karthik V Giridhar, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Adrian Nordmark, Mattias Bergqvist, Brendan P McMenomy, Richard M Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang, Matthew P Goetz. Novel genomic variants and pathways associated with baseline serum thymidine kinase 1 levels in HR-positive HER2-negative MBC patients commencing palbociclib and letrozole [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-24.

Abstract Background: In ER+ breast cancer (BC) models, Aurora A kinase (AURKA) activation is associated with expansion of CD44+/CD24low/- tumor initiating cells, down-regulation of ERα, and endocrine therapy resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, can restore ERα expression and endocrine sensitivity. Early phase studies evaluating alisertib alone or with fulvestrant for ER+ metastatic BC (MBC) demonstrated a favorable safety profile and promising antitumor activity [Haddad, Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018]. A phase II trial was conducted to determine if the addition of fulvestrant to alisertib improved objective response rate (ORR) and to assess clinical activity of alisertib alone or with fulvestrant in patients (pts) with prior fulvestrant and CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to Arm A, alisertib (50 mg PO BID Days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 q 28 days) or Arm B, alisertib with fulvestrant (500 mg IM Day 1, 15 for Cycle 1 and q 28 days thereafter). Eligibility included postmenopausal women, history of ER+ BC, prior fulvestrant, ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy lines, and measurable disease. Stratification factors included prior CDK4/6i, ER level (<10%, ≥10%), and primary/secondary endocrine resistance. Pts on Arm A could cross over to Arm B at progression. With 45 pts per arm, a one sided alpha=0.15 sequential binomial test would have an 85% chance of detecting an increase of ≥ 20% in the ORR of ArmB when the true ORR for Arm A is ≤ 20%. ORR was defined as a partial response (PR) + complete response (CR) by RECIST v.1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), 24-week clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR + PR + absence of progression for> 6 cycles), overall survival, duration of response (DoR), and safety. Blood and tumor specimens were collected at baseline, end of Cycle 1, and progression. Results: Pts enrolled July 2017 - November 2019 with 118 pre-registered, 96 registered, and 90 evaluable for the primary endpoint (Arm A: 45, Arm B: 45). Median age was 60 (range 33, 85). Nearly all received prior fulvestrant (n=89, 98.9%), aromatase inhibitor (n=83, 92.2%), and CDK4/6i (n=88, 97.8%). Most had secondary endocrine resistance (n=71, 78.9%). Pre-registration biopsy for ER was positive in 84 pts (86.7%) and negative in 6 pts (13.3%). More pts on Arm B had prior everolimus (A: 35.6%, B: 57.8%) and prior chemotherapy (A: 44.4%, B: 55.6%) for MBC. The ORR for alisertib and fulvestrant was 20.0% (90% CI: 10.9-32.3%), not significantly greater than alisertib alone 17.8% (90% CI: 9.2-29.8%). The 24-week CBR for Arm A was 42.2% (90% CI: 29.7-55.6%; n=19, including 7 PR) and Arm B was 31.1% (90% CI: 19.9-44.3%; n=14, including 8 PR). As of July 1, 2020, the median DoR was not reached in either arm. The median PFS time was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9 - 9.3) for Arm A and 5.1 months (95%CI: 3.8 - 7.6) for Arm B. Seventeen pts (18.9%) remain on treatment (A: 12, B: 5) having received at least 11 cycles (range up to 32+ cycles). At least one dose reduction was required for pts (A: 19, B: 18), most commonly due to neutropenia. The most common severe (grade ≥3) adverse events included neutropenia (n=19, 42.2% in each arm), anemia (A: 15.6%, B: 8.8%), and fatigue (n=5, 11.1% Arm B only). Pts discontinued therapy due to disease progression equally in each arm (n=28, 62.2%), however more pts on Arm B (n=12) than Arm A (n=5) discontinued therapy due to toxicity, refusal or other reasons. Conclusion: While the addition of fulvestrant to alisertib did not improve ORR, promising clinical activity with alisertib monotherapy was observed overall and notably for pts with endocrine and CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC. More severe toxicities and treatment discontinuation were observed in pts receiving combination therapy. Correlative blood (CTC/cfDNA) and tissue (AURKA, ERα, and stemness biomarkers) studies are underway. Citation Format: Tufia Haddad, Antonino D'Assoro, Vera Suman, Jodi Carter, Brendan McMenomy, Erica Mayer, Meghan Karuturi, Aki Morikawa, Paul Marcom, Claudine Isaacs, Sun Young Oh, Amy Clark, Ingrid Mayer, Khandan Keyomarsi, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Ciara O'Sullivan, Prema Peethambaram, Timothy Hobday, Minetta Liu, James Ingle, Matthew Goetz. Randomized phaseII trial to evaluate alisertib alone or combined with fulvestrant for advanced, endocrine-resistant breast cancer (TBCRC 041) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-05.

Abstract Background: Several studies suggest clinical utility of serial circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration as a means of assessing response status in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The aim of this study is to conduct a comprehensive pooled analysis comprising globally available data to further define and explore the role of CTC enumeration as a tool for early treatment monitoring in patients with MBC with a focus on the predictive power in different breast cancer subtypes and clinical settings. Methods: In a global effort, peer-reviewed published studies with data on repeated CTC assessments (CellSearch® technology; Menarini Silicon Biosystems; Bologna, Italy) in MBC patients were screened and investigators were asked to provide individual patient data for this pooled analysis. 2761 cases from 32 data sets with data on both baseline and one follow up CTC assessments were included in the analysis (median time interval between the two CTC assessments 35 days). Data were analyzed using log rank tests and Cox regressions to evaluate the association between serial CTC enumeration results and overall survival (OS) in the full patient cohort and defined subgroups. Results: 588 (21.3%) patients had no CTCs at both time points (neg/neg), 236 (8.5%) patients were CTC negative at baseline and CTC positive at follow up (neg/pos), 712 (25.8%) patients converted from CTC positive at baseline to CTC negative (pos/neg), and 1225 (44.4%) patients had at least one CTC at both time points (pos/pos). Log rank tests showed significant differences in OS between these four CTC change groups (p < 0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons except for the comparison between neg/pos and pos/neg, p = 0.015). Median OS for the neg/neg, neg/pos, pos/neg and pos/pos group was 45.6, 26.1, 34.6, and 17.6 months, respectively. Hazard ratios (HR) (reference group neg/neg) were 1.38 (95% CI 1.16 - 1.64) for the pos/neg group, 1.78 (95% CI 1.43 - 2.22) for the neg/pos group, and 3.06 (95% CI 2.63 - 3.56) for the pos/pos group. Results were similar if a cutoff of 5 CTCs was used for CTC positivity (pos/neg group: HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.25 - 1.63; neg/pos group: HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.91 - 2.99; pos/pos group: HR 3.54, 95% CI 3.12 - 4.02). In total, 2586 patients could be assigned to different tumor subtypes based on known hormone receptor (ER) and HER2 status of the primary tumor: 1513 (58.5%) patients had a luminal-like tumor (ER positive, HER2 negative), 682 (26.4%) patients had a HER2-positive tumor, and 391 (15.1%) patients had a triple-negative tumor. In patients with luminal-like tumors, the hazard ratios were 1.67 (95% CI 1.29 - 2.17), 2.01 (95% CI 1.45 - 2.77), and 3.87 (95% CI 3.09 - 4.83) for the pos/neg, neg/pos, and pos/pos group, respectively. In patients with HER2-positive tumors, the neg/pos group (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.12 - 2.53) and the pos/pos group (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.58 - 2.83) showed significantly worse OS compared to the neg/neg group, while in triple-negative patients, the pos/pos group had a significantly shorter OS compared to the neg/neg group (HR 2.99, 95% CI 2.11 - 4.24). The results will be up-dated by inclusion of additional large data sets (CALGB 40502, CALGB 40503, COMET, SWOG S0500, TBCRC 001) for the analysis to be presented at SABCS 2020. Conclusion: This large pooled analysis confirms that at a median of 35 days after treatment initiation, follow-up CTC assessments strongly predict overall survival. These results suggest potential clinical utility of CTC monitoring as early response marker in MBC, especially in luminal-like tumors. Citation Format: Wolfgang J Janni, Tracy C. Yab, Daniel F. Hayes, Massimo Cristofanilli, Francois-Clement Bidard, Michail Ignatiadis, Meredith M. Regan, Catherine Alix-Panabières, William E. Barlow, Carlos Caldas, Lisa A. Carey, Luc Dirix, Tanja Fehm, Jose A. Garcia-Saenz, Paola Gazzaniga, Daniele Generali, Lorenzo Gerratana, Rafael Gisbert-Criado, William Jacot, Zefei Jiang, Evi Lianidou, Mark J.M. Magbanua, Luis Manso, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Volkmar Müller, Elisabetta Munzone, Klaus Pantel, Jean-Yves Pierga, Brigitte Rack, Sabine Riethdorf, Hope S. Rugo, Kostandinos Sideras, Stefan Sleijfer, Jeffrey Smerage, Justin Stebbing, Leon W.M.M. Terstappen, José Vidal-Martínez, Rita Zamarchi, Karthik Giridhar, Thomas W.P. Friedl, Minetta C. Liu. Clinical utility of repeated circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration as early treatment monitoring tool in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) - a global pooled analysis with individual patient data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-08.

48 Background: Improving new patient access to medical oncology clinics is a priority. Unlike external referrals which undergo a review process, internal referrals (from any Mayo department or community-based, affiliated health system) are scheduled directly. At times, these internal referrals lack necessary clinical information, or may be more appropriate for electronic consultation (e-consult). This impacts the patient experience, provider satisfaction, and access to new patient visits. A pilot program was implemented in the Medical Oncology breast clinic to review new internal referrals prior to scheduling. Methods: In 2018, all internally referred patients to Medical Oncology breast clinic were reviewed by an advanced practice provider in breast oncology. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect diagnosis, pathology, radiology information and treatment to date. Internal referrals were either accepted directly to medical oncology breast clinic, triaged to an internal medicine clinic for workup of a new breast mass, converted to an e-consult, or declined as no medical oncology need was identified. Results: 52 patients were referred internally to Medical Oncology breast clinic. Of these, 29 (55.8%) were accepted directly as new consultations, 8 (15.4%) were triaged to the Internal Medicine clinic, 6 (11.5%) were converted to e-consults, and 6 (11.5%) were declined as not requiring breast medical oncology input. Of the 8 patients that started in the IM clinic, 6 eventually required Medical Oncology breast clinic consults for invasive breast cancers. The most common e-consult was for extending adjuvant endocrine therapy (3/6). 1/6 e-consults required a follow up consultation. The most common reason for declining a consult was no diagnosis of an invasive breast cancer (4/6). A total of 16/52 referrals (30.2%) did not require a breast oncology new consultation. Conclusions: Review of internal referrals improved the efficiency of new breast cancer medical oncology consultations. This review process has been implemented across the entire Medical Oncology practice.

Abstract Purpose: Blood-based candidate biomarkers of disease can be monitored by analyzing CTCs and/or circulating cfDNA isolated from the peripheral blood. Our primary objective is to understand the relative contributions of these circulating factors (i.e., CTCs and cfDNA) to the overall disease profile in MBC. Methods: Clinically archived FFPE tumor tissue and prospective blood samples are collected through a minimal risk protocol approved by the Mayo Clinic IRB (#16-001540) from patients with MBC and objective evidence of disease progression. Blood samples include 20 mL whole blood in Streck blood collection tubes (BCTs) for platelet poor plasma (PPP); 20 mL whole blood in AccuCyte BCTs for CTCs, WBCs, and PPP; and 10 mL whole blood in EDTA BCTs for PPP. Nucleated, EpCAM+/cytokeratin+/CD45- CTCs are identified, assessed for ER/HER2 status, and isolated using a centrifugation and direct imaging platform that allows for single cell retrieval (RareCyte). DNA is extracted from PPP, CTCs, WBCs, and FFPE tumor tissue using established methods. Targeted sequencing for SNVs/indels is performed on paired WBCs and CTC-DNA, AccuCyte-cfDNA, Streck-cfDNA, EDTA-cfDNA, and tumor tissue derived DNA using the same NGS panel and informatics pipeline (65 genes; CleanPlex OncoZoom; Paragon Genomics). Results: Tissue and blood samples were collected from 40 patients with metastatic breast cancer. 10 cases were selected for initial analyses on the basis of CTC yield (range 3-113 per 3.75 mL blood); up to 5 CTCs per subject were isolated and pooled for DNA extraction. Plasma cfDNA yields and variant allele frequencies were highly comparable between AccuCyte and Streck collected blood samples. Mutations (range 1-3) were identified in CTC-DNA and/or cfDNA in 9 of 10 cases for a total of 18 detected mutations: 10 in CTC-DNA and cfDNA (BRCA2 N372H, PIK3CA E542K, PIK3CA E545K (x3), PIK3CA H1047R, PTEN R130P, RET G691S, TP53 C135W, TP53 Q192*); 5 in CTC-DNA only (EGFR R521K, EGFR T790M, PIK3CA H1047R, SMAD4 C363Y, TP53 N263D); and 3 in cfDNA only (DNMT3A W893S, DNMT3A S714C, TP53 Q136E). Parallel analyses of samples from 10 more subjects are in progress. Analysis of tumor tissue for all 20 subjects and of EDTA-cfDNA and single CTCs for a subset of cases is ongoing. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: It is feasible to isolate high quality CTCs and cfDNA from the same blood collection tube to perform targeted sequencing; this streamlines specimen processing, decreases overall costs, and minimizes required blood volumes. Importantly, there is overlap in the majority of mutations identified in CTC-DNA and cfDNA, but actionable mutations (e.g., PIK3CA, EGFR) were detected in CTC-DNA only. The clinical and theranostic relevance of these findings is unclear and warrants further investigation. Citation Format: Minetta C. Liu, Karthik V. Giridhar, Roberto A. Leon Ferre, Jamie L. Carroll, Matthew P. Goetz, Tufia C. Haddad, Deanne R. Smith, Siddhartha Yadav, Vidushi Kapoor, Guoying Liu, Tad George, Nolan Ericson, Arturo B. Ramirez, Eric Kaldjian, Keegan E. Haselkorn. Comparison of circulating tumor cell (CTC) derived DNA and circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from simultaneous blood sampling of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3119.

Abstract Background: BRCA1/2 carriers have higher scores in the 21-gene RS assay compared to non-carriers. Little is known about the 21-gene RS patterns in women harboring germline mutations in genes outside BRCA1/2. Methods: We utilized the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Study Registry to identify individuals with non-metastatic estrogen receptor positive breast cancer and clinical 21-gene RS results available. We cross-referenced this with an institutional registry of patients tested for hereditary cancer genes, either from the electronic health record or from a research study conducted using a custom QIAseq multiplex amplicon-based panel (Qiagen). The latter assay covered target regions of all coding regions for the following predisposition genes: ATM, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CDKN2A, CHEK2, ERCC2, FANCC, FANCM, MLH1, MRE11A, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, NF1, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, RECQL, PRSS1, STK11, TP53, and XRCC2. Student’s t-test was used to compare 21-gene RS between carriers, non-carriers, and specific carrier genes (JMP v 14.0). Results: 282 patients were identified with early stage breast cancer and 21-gene RS available, including 85 known mutation carriers and 197 non-carriers (or unknown carrier status). Germline mutations were identified in CHEK2 (n=25), BRCA2 (n=18), ATM (n=10), BRCA1 (n=5), PALB2 (n=5), TP53 (n=3), FANCM (n=2), MUTYH (n=2), PMS2 (n=2), PPM1D (n=2), RECQL (n=2), BARD1 (n=1), BLM (n=1), CDH1 (n=1), ERCC2 (n=1), FANCC (n=1), MSH6 (n=1), NBN (n=1), PRSS1 (n=1), and PTEN (n=1). In the entire cohort, the mean 21-gene RS was 20.4 in carriers and 18.0 in non-carriers (p=0.11). We performed individual analyses on specific genes identified in ≥ 5 patients (table 1). Compared to the mean RS in non-carriers (18.0), higher mean RS were observed in patients harboring BRCA1 (38.8, p=0.002), PALB2 (26.6, p=0.0724), and BRCA2 (23.2, p=0.0453). The RS in CHEK2 and ATM carriers were comparable to those of non-carriers. Conclusions: We observed differences in RS score distribution based on specific mutated breast cancer predisposition genes. Further validation of the distribution and performance of the 21-gene RS in germline carriers is needed. 21-gene RS scorenMedian RSMean≤1516-25≥26n%n%n%CHEK2251616.61248728624BRCA2182123.2211.11161.1527.8ATM101716.9330550220BRCA153635.8120120360PALB253326.6120120360None1971518.09950.367343115.7 Citation Format: Karthik V Giridhar, Grace M Choong, Siddartha Yadav, Eric C Polley, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Minetta C Liu, Matthew P Goetz, Fergus J Couch. Distribution of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay (Oncotype DX) in carriers of germline mutations associated with breast cancer predisposition syndromes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-03-07.

Abstract Background: The clinical utility of routine annual mammogram after curative-intent treatment for male breast cancer is uncertain. There is potentially greater value after lumpectomy (as surveillance for ipsilateral recurrence) than mastectomy (as screening for a new contralateral cancer). The goal of this study was to assess real world use of mammography in men during the first year after lumpectomy or mastectomy to treat breast cancer. Methods: Administrative claims data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse (a large US database that includes privately insured patients and Medicare Advantage-insured enrollees from all 50 states and of all ages and ethnic and racial groups) were used to identify men treated with breast surgery for a new diagnosis of breast cancer between 2007 and 2017. We required continuous coverage starting at least 6 months prior to the non-metastatic breast cancer diagnosis and continuing until at least 13 months after the breast surgery. Our primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had at least one mammogram during the year (13-month period, to allow for scheduling and other logistical delays) after lumpectomy or mastectomy. Univariate and multivariate testing were performed to identify predictors of mammography (with p<0.05 used as the threshold for statistical significance for both). Our secondary endpoint was the proportion with at least one mammogram within 24 months of surgery, performed in a subset who maintained their insurance coverage for at least that duration. Results: The 13-month analysis included 730 men with a median age at diagnosis of 62 years (Range: 25 to 87 years) and a median follow-up duration of 35 months (Range: 13 to 134 months). 209 (29%) of these men underwent mammography within 13 months after surgery. The characteristics of patients who underwent mammography and those who did not are shown in Table 1. Mammography was more likely after lumpectomy than mastectomy (41% vs. 27%) and after radiation therapy (41% vs. 32% in those who did not receive radiation). In a multivariate logistic regression model, more recent diagnosis (2015+) was associated with lower odds of undergoing mammography, while receipt of radiation was associated with higher odds of undergoing mammography. In the subset of patients with two or more years of post-surgery coverage (n=527), the proportion who had at least one mammogram during that 24-month period was 49% after lumpectomy and 40% after mastectomy. Conclusions: In this insured cohort, 73% of men did not undergo mammography within a year after mastectomy, and 59% did not within a year after lumpectomy. Mammography was less likely in patients diagnosed more recently (perhaps due to acknowledgment of the unique aspects of male breast cancer including a relatively low risk of contralateral second primary tumors), and more likely in those who received radiation. These variations in practice likely result from the paucity of evidence-based guidelines for male breast cancer survivorship care. More research is needed pertaining to whether or not mammograms improve clinical outcomes after curative intent treatment for male breast cancer. Table 1: Patient characteristics associated with receipt of mammogram within first 13 months after male breast cancer surgeryUnivariate AnalysisMultivariate AnalysisNo Mammogram (N=521)Mammogram (N=209)P-value, chi-square testOdds Ratio (OR) and 95% CIP-value for ORAge Group:0.1225-4966 (12.7%)32 (15.3%)Reference50-64216 (41.5%)98 (46.9%)0.99 (0.60, 1.63)0.9665-74112 (21.5%)44 (21.1%)0.87 (0.48, 1.57)0.6575+127 (24.4%)35 (16.7%)0.57 (0.30, 1.07)0.08Census Region:0.52Midwest138 (26.5%)59 (28.2%)ReferenceNortheast97 (18.6%)47 (22.5%)1.10 (0.68, 1.78)0.69South223 (42.8%)79 (37.8%)0.74 (0.49, 1.11)0.15West63 (12.1%)24 (11.5%)0.83 (0.47, 1.47)0.51Year of diagnosis:0.072007-2010126 (24.2%)65 (31.1%)Reference2011-2014199 (38.2%)82 (39.2%)0.80 (0.54, 1.20)0.292015+196 (37.6%)62 (29.7%)0.63 (0.41, 0.96)0.03Elixhauser Category:0.250148 (28.4%)69 (33.0%)Reference1-2218 (41.8%)74 (35.4%)0.85 (0.56, 1.28)0.433+155 (29.8%)66 (31.6%)1.18 (0.75, 1.87)0.47Surgery Type:0.005Lumpectomy55 (10.6%)38 (18.2%)ReferenceMastectomy466 (89.4%)171 (81.8%)1.57 (0.97, 2.55)0.07Chemotherapy:0.79No301 (57.8%)123 (58.9%)ReferenceYes220 (42.2%)86 (41.1%)0.79 (0.54, 1.16)0.23Radiation:0.02No355 (68.1%)124 (59.3%)ReferenceYes166 (31.9%)85 (40.7%)1.51 (1.03, 2.20)0.03 Citation Format: Siddhartha Yadav, Lindsey Sangaralingham, Stephanie R. Payne, Karthik V. Giridhar, Tina J. Hieken, Judy C. Boughey, Robert W. Mutter, John R. Hawse, Rafael E. Jimenez, Rachel A. Freedman, Sadia Choudhery, Fergus J. Couch, Celine M. Vachon, Nilay Shah, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Kathryn J. Ruddy. Surveillance mammography after treatment for male breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-17-08.

Abstract Background: The combination of cyclin dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) has resulted in clinically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in hormone-receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, most patients’ disease ultimately progresses on CDK4/6i and ET. Therefore, further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms driving primary and secondary resistance. PROMISE is a multicenter prospective cohort study enrolling women with HR-positive MBC commencing treatment with palbociclib + letrozole (1st line) or palbociclib + fulvestrant (2nd Line). The study provides a comprehensive “omic” assessment of blood, tumor, urine and the fecal microbiome to identify molecular or cellular features associated with primary endocrine resistance (e.g. disease progression ≤ 12 months on treatment) and acquired resistance to CDK 4/6i. Additionally, patient derived xenografts and organoids are created to test new drug strategies designed to overcome resistance to CDK 4/6i and ET. Here, we present initial sequencing results from pretreatment biospecimens collected from PROMISE study participants. Methods: On-study tumor biopsies and blood samples were collected for DNA/RNA sequencing (TempusTM). The analyzed biospecimens were all obtained prior to initiation of palbociclib and ET. We correlated patient clinical characteristics (phenotypes) with molecular data and responses to protocol treatment. The data were analyzed using a series of cutting-edge bioinformatics pipelines for somatic and germline mutations in addition to copy number alterations (CNAs). The study database was locked for analysis on 06/20/2019. Results: We analyzed the somatic single nucleotide variants/INDELs (sSNV/INDEL) profiles across the tumor samples to determine the genes that were least likely to occur as a result of background mutation processes. Twenty-six patients had somatic copy number alterations (sCNA) and/or sSNV/INDEL in at least one of 18 genes with the most significant sSNV/INDEL profiles (p < 0.03) which included clinically and biologically relevant genes. The genes with the most statistically significant sSNV/INDEL mutation profiles were GATA3, PIK3CA, CDH1, and ESR1 (p < 0.0009). We observed a high percentage of tumors with somatic alterations in GATA3 (23% sSNV/INDEL, 15% sCNA), PIK3CA (38%, 12%), CDH1 (19%, 50%) and ESR1 (19%, 58%). ESR1 mutations were more frequent in patients receiving 2nd line treatment. Other frequently altered genes included TP53 (15%, 46%), MAP2K4 (8%, 50%), DNAAF1 (8%, 50%), and CDKN1B (8%, 35%). Further, ZNF317 and F3 were altered in 9 and 7 patients, respectively. Twenty-four samples had alterations in at least one of the CDK4/6 pathway genes (RB1, CCNE2, CCND1, CDK6, ESR1, CDKN2A, CCND3, CDK4, CDK2 and CCNE1). Four patients progressed on therapy; three of the four patients had mutations in PIK3CA, and one had a mutation in ESR1. Results of the RNA sequencing data (N=26) will be presented at the SABCS meeting. Conclusions: This is the first report of a prospective study designed to characterize the genomic landscape of ER+/HER2- MBC prior to palbociclib treatment. We observed high frequencies of known targetable alterations in PIK3CA and ESR1, including in patients that progress, which is consistent with previous reports. RNA sequencing data will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Ciara C O Sullivan, Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Peter T Vedell, Ann Moyer, Erin Carlson, Jason Sinnwell, Tejaswi Alaparthi, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin Thompson, Jaeyun Sung, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald Northfelt, Minetta C Liu, Tufia C Haddad, Prema Peethambaram, Saranya Chumsri, Kathryn J Ruddy, Karthik V Giridhar, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Paula Gill, Mohammad Ranginwala, Asad Javed, Sameer Batoo, Brendan P. McMenomy, Richard Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang, Matthew P Goetz. Comprehensive tumor sequencing to identify biomarkers of palbociclib response: First report of the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-07.