Giridhar, Karthik V.

Abstract Background: Treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer with selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) frequently results in the loss or reduction of ER expression. Whether these changes are due to on-target effects of SERDs degrading ER or arise as a mechanism of tumor resistance with associated changes in cellular phenotypes remains unknown. It is critical to distinguish between these possibilities to accurately assess treatment response and determine the most appropriate subsequent therapy. To this end, we created and conducted molecular analyses on patient-derived organoid cultures from post-treatment tissue in patients receiving neoadjuvant SERD therapy for early-stage ER+ breast cancer in the I-SPY2 Endocrine Optimization Protocol (EOP). Methods: The I-SPY2 EOP study is a prospective, randomized substudy within the I-SPY TRIAL testing the oral SERD amcenestrant alone or in combination with letrozole or abemaciclib in stage 2/3 ER+ Her2-negative breast cancer. Enrollment is ongoing, with patients receiving amcenestrant neoadjuvantly for 6 months until the day before surgery. Tumor tissue is collected at baseline, 3 weeks, and at surgery. Organoids were generated from post-treatment surgical samples. Organoid cultures were optimized based on established methods (Dekkers et al., Nature Protocols, 2021) to assess ER levels and activity. Pre- and post-treatment tissue samples were also assessed for ER, PR, Ki67, and GATA3, a luminal marker and transcription factor that is functionally linked with ER, via immunohistochemistry. Results: In 7 patients with both pre- and post-treatment tissue samples including fresh surgical samples for organoid generation, the ER in baseline tumor tissue was >=90% in all patients, PR ranged from 40-90%, and Ki67 ranged from 5-30%. In post-treatment surgical tissue from these cases, ER ranged from 0-30%, PR from 0-50%, Ki67 from < 1%-10%, and GATA3 was positive in 5 of 5 cases tested to-date. The creation of organoids from residual disease at surgery was attempted for these 7 patients, with organoids successfully propagated in 5 cases thus far. 3 of 5 organoid cultures were ready for analysis and in all cases strong ER and PR expression in organoids was observed after culture for > 1 month in the absence of amcenestrant. Detailed gene expression profiling (including Mammaprint/Blueprint) and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) to assess for intrinsic breast cancer subtype and ER activity in each sample and corresponding organoid culture are in progress and will be reported with the full dataset. Conclusion: Patient-derived organoid culturing of residual disease after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is feasible. Neoadjuvant treatment with a SERD can render ER and PR low or absent at the time of surgical resection, which does not necessarily imply the presence of endocrine therapy resistant disease. The use of organoids and additional IHC markers (GATA3) demonstrate that receptor negativity may be an indicator of the drug hitting its target, suggesting ER signaling is still intact. In general, patient-derived tumor organoid cultures modeling residual disease states can be a useful adjunct to existing methods used to monitor the effects of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and is being explored in the I-SPY EOP trial. Citation Format: Jennifer Rosenbluth, Christopher J. Schwartz, Tam Binh Bui, Shruti Warhadpande, Pravin Phadatare, Sigal Eini, Michael Bruck, Julissa Molina-Vega, Kami Pullakhandam, Nicole Schindler, Lamorna A. Brown Swigart, Christina Yau, Gillian Hirst, Rita Mukhtar, Karthik V. Giridhar, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Kevin Kalinsky, Cheryl A. Ewing, Jasmine M. Wong, Michael D. Alvarado, Laura Van’t Veer, Laura J. Esserman, Jo Chien. Characterization of residual disease after neoadjuvant selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) therapy using tumor organoids in the I-SPY Endocrine Optimization Protocol (EOP) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-01.

Abstract Background: SG was approved in 2020 for the treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event in the ASCENT trial was neutropenia (51.2%) with a 6% incidence of febrile neutropenia. 1 Package insert recommendations do not endorse primary prophylactic growth factor support, rather only initiating if severe neutropenia occurs on treatment.2 Objective: This study retrospectively reviewed the utilization of growth factor support in patients (pts) with metastatic TNBC initiated on SG at each Mayo Clinic Enterprise site. Methods: We performed a multi-center, retrospective review of all pts with TNBC who received SG from January 2021 to December 2021 at Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Florida, Arizona, and its community-based health system network. Data collected included history of neutropenia with previous cycles of SG resulting in a treatment delay, number of cycles, grade of neutropenia and cycle/day of treatment plan when growth factor added. Pts who received only one dose of SG were excluded. The Fisher’s exact test was utilized to compare the difference in the use of primary prophylaxis between sites. Results: 67 pts received at least two doses of SG. Within this cohort, 42 pts (63%) received growth factor support during treatment with SG. Growth factor support was most often added during the first two cycles (59.5%). A total of 12 patients initiated growth factor with no history of delays related to neutropenia and without neutropenia at the time of administration. Eleven of these pts had growth factor support added on Cycle 1 as primary prophylaxis. Primary prophylaxis was most common at Mayo Clinic – Rochester compared to the other sites (Table 1), however there was not a statistically significant difference (p=0.27). There were 26 pts (39%) with a treatment delay due to neutropenia while receiving SG, of which 21 (81%) were managed with the addition of growth factor (13 pegfilgrastim, 8 filgrastim). The median number of cycles for all pts was 5 (range: 1-25). Pts who received growth factor were treated with a median of 5 cycles (range: 1-25) and pts who did not receive growth factor were treated with a median of 4 cycles (range: 1-19) (p=0.10). Conclusions: We observed wide variability in the use of prophylactic growth factor between Mayo Clinic sites with SG. The optimal practice of growth factor use with SG warrants further exploration. References: 1. Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(16):1529-1541 2. Immunomedics, Inc. Trodelvy (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy) [package insert]. Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences; 2020. Table 1: Grade of neutropenia for patients receiving SG when growth factor initiated Citation Format: Kaylee Clark, Jamie L. Carroll, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Brenda Ernst, Farah Raheem, Ashley Heil, Beth Boyer, Kristin Mara, Matthew P. Goetz, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Karthik V. Giridhar, Jodi Taraba. Mayo Clinic Enterprise patterns of growth-factor utilization for sacituzumab govitecan (SG)-induced neutropenia among patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-56.

Abstract Objective: Aberrantly methylated DNA may be used to detect minimal residual disease or early recurrence in breast cancer. As a 1st step, we aimed to develop an MDM panel to delineate between healthy women, stage I-III breast cancer in remission with no evidence of disease (NED), and metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients into 3 groups: healthy controls (adult females with a normal mammogram in past 12 months with no history of breast cancer), NED [stage I-III breast cancer with no clinical evidence of recurrence 6 months - 3 years post-treatment (adjuvant endocrine therapy allowed)], and MBC (collected either at initial diagnosis of untreated metastatic disease or radiographic progression). DNA was extracted from 6 mL of plasma derived from blood collected in LBgard tubes (Exact Sciences Corp., San Diego CA), and was bisulfite-treated and assayed by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQASTM) method for a panel of 15 previously identified MDMs [Table], normalized by the control gene, B3GALT6. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for each MDM to assess discrimination of MBC from other groups. With 60 patients per group, we had greater than 80% power to detect a difference of 0.20 from the null AUC of 0.7. Results: We tested samples from 60 MBC (10 untreated, 50 recurrent), 60 NED, and 60 healthy women. The median age was 63 (IQR, 55-72) and was not different between groups. The NED group was all hormone-receptor (HR) positive, with 47 (78%) being human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) and 13 (22%) HER2+; 48 (80%) were stage I and 9 (15%) were N+. The MBC group had 35 (58%) patients with HR+/HER2- tumors, 11 (18%) HR+/HER2+, and 6 (10%) HR-/HER2-, 4 (7%) HR-/HER2+, with 4 (7%) unknown. Of the 41 MBC whose original stage and nodal status were known 9 (22%) were stage I and 22 (54%) were N+. The markers were able to discriminate between MBC and NED patient samples with AUCs from 0.97 to 0.72. AUCs for 10/15 MDMs (ITPRIPL1, EMX1, C17orf64, OSR2, TRIM67, CHST2, IFFO1, TRH, FAM59B, and MPZ) were >0.90. No difference in MDMs was observed between the healthy and NED groups. Conclusions: MDMs, assayed from plasma, appear highly discriminant for metastatic breast cancer cases in comparison to control patients with NED or healthy controls. Further clinical validation of this MDM panel in a larger cohort is warranted. Table 1. Plasma MDM discrimination of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from healthy controls and previously treated breast cancer patients with no evidence of disease (NED) Citation Format: Karthik V. Giridhar, Fergus J. Couch, Jason P. Sinnwell, Seth W. Slettedahl, William R. Taylor, Douglas W. Mahoney, Patrick H. Foote, Maria C. O’Connell, Mariah J. Robran, Mary E. Devens, Anna M. Gonser, Nicole Larson, Karen A. Doering, Kelli N. Burger, Michael Kaiser, Hatim Allawi, Kathryn Ruddy, Janet Olson, John B. Kisiel. Plasma assay of methylated DNA markers (MDM) detects patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) compared to healthy controls and treated breast cancer patients with no evidence of disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-06.

Abstract Introduction: We performed matched case-control studies utilizing cohorts of postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AI) on MA.27 [anastrozole, exemestane] or PreFace [letrozole] to assess the association between estrogen suppression after 6 months of treatment and an early breast cancer (EBC) event within 5 years of AI initiation (Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:2986-98). We found a significant 3.0-fold increase in risk of an EBC event for those taking anastrozole with levels of estrone (E1) ≥1.3 pg/mL and estradiol (E2) ≥0.5 pg/mL, but not for exemestane or letrozole. Given these findings we designed a prospective pharmacodynamic (PD) study to evaluate the impact of anastrozole (1 mg/day: ANA1) on E1 and E2 levels, and among those with inadequate estrogen suppression (IES: E1 ≥1.3 pg/mL and E2 ≥0.5 pg/mL), to evaluate the safety and PD efficacy of high-dose anastrozole (10 mg/day: ANA10), which has been found to be safe in prior clinical trials (Cancer 1998;83:1142-52). Methods: Post-menopausal women with stage I-III, ER ≥1% positive/HER2-negative breast cancer who were candidates for anastrozole were eligible after completion of locoregional therapy and chemotherapy, as clinically indicated. Women who were pre-menopausal at diagnosis were not eligible. All patients received 8-10 weeks of ANA1, after which those with adequate estrogen suppression (AES: E1< 1.3 pg/mL or E2< 0.5 pg/mL) came off study. Those with IES went on to receive ANA10 for 8-10 weeks, followed by letrozole (2.5 mg/day: LET) for 8-10 weeks. All patients were managed at their treating oncologist’s discretion following study discontinuation. E1 and E2 blood levels were measured pre-treatment and after completion of each treatment cycle by a CLIA-approved liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in the Immunochemical Core Laboratory at Mayo Clinic. With a sample size of 29 patients with IES after ANA1, a one-sided binomial test of proportions with a significance level of 0.05 will have an 87% chance of rejecting the proportion with AES after ANA10 is at most 25% (Ho) when the true proportion is at least 50%. Specifically, the null hypothesis is rejected if the number of women with AES after ANA10 is 12 or more. Data lock was July 6, 2022. Results: Of the 161 women enrolled from April 2020 through May 2022, 3 withdrew consent prior to start of ANA1 and 2 were ineligible; thus, 156 women comprised the study cohort. Median patient age was 64 years (range 44-86), 10% of patients were of Hispanic ethnicity and/or non-white race, and 15% received chemotherapy. Six patients remain on ANA1, and 10 discontinued ANA1 due to refusal (7), adverse event (AE) (2), or COVID-19 (1). Forty-one of the remaining 140 patients (29.3%; 95%CI: 21.9-37.6%) had IES with ANA1. Nine of these 41 patients did not go on to ANA10 due to refusal (6) or AE (3). Of the 32 patients who started ANA10, 8 remain on treatment, 5 discontinued due to refusal (3) or AE (1-grade 2 urinary tract infection; 1-grade 1 palpitations), and 19 had a blood draw 45 days or more after starting ANA10. No grade 3-5 AEs or grade 2 hot flashes or arthralgias were reported. Of these 19 patients, 14 achieved AES with ANA10 (73.7%; 95%CI: 48.8-90.9%). All 19 patients switched to LET of which 3 remain on treatment, 1 is missing E1/E2 data, and 15 had a blood draw 45 days or more after starting LET. Of these 15 patients, 10 maintained AES, 2 acquired AES with LET, and 3 no longer had AES. Anastrozole and letrozole drug levels will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Approximately 29% of postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- BC receiving adjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/daily had IES. A majority of these patients achieved AES with dose escalation to ANA10 without tolerability issues. E1 and E2 levels are logical biomarkers given the mechanism of action of anastrozole, and further study utilizing them to determine the optimal dose of anastrozole for a given patient should be performed. Citation Format: Tufia C. Haddad, Vera Suman, Karthik V. Giridhar, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald Northfelt, Brenda Ernst, Kostandinos Sideras, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Ravinder Singh, Zeruesenay Desta, Jodi Taraba, Barbara Goodnature, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang, James N. Ingle. Anastrozole dose escalation for optimal estrogen suppression in postmenopausal early stage breast cancer: A prospective trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-02.

Background A gap remains in the role of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with ILC. Method Single-institution retrospective review of patients with ILC who received neoadjuvant therapy between 2008 and 2019. Results 141 patients met inclusion criteria: 71 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and 70 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). 7/71 (9.9%) patients had a pCR following NACT compared to 1/70 (1.4%) with NET ( P = .063). pCR was observed in 5/18 (27.8%) patients with Her2Neu-positive disease following NACT, compared to 2/53 (3.8%) with Her2Neu-negative disease ( P = .01). For luminal B tumors, median Ki-67 decrease was similar following NACT and NET (18.3 vs 16.3, P = .26). T category decreased in 59 (42.1%) patients following neoadjuvant therapy, increased in 9 (6.4%), and was unchanged in 72 (51.4%). More patients had an increase (28.6%) than decrease (12.1%) in their N category, including 13/60 (21.7%) who were clinically node-negative at diagnosis and identified to have node-positive disease following neoadjuvant therapy, at definitive surgery. Conclusion In Her2Neu-negative ILC, the potential of a pCR with NACT or NET is low. Most patients’ nodal status and tumor size remain unchanged. There is a potential for pathologic stage to be higher at surgery compared to the clinical stage prior to neoadjuvant therapy.

12107 Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), a major adverse effect of cancer treatment, can attenuate life quality. Multiple international antiemetic guidelines have recommended a 4-drug regimen (corticosteroid, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, NK-1 receptor antagonist, and the antipsychotic medication olanzapine) for decreasing highly emetogenic CINV. This raised a question regarding whether antiemetic therapy regimens for highly emetogenic chemotherapy could be de-intensified, decreasing cost and side effects from anti-emetogenic agents. Methods: Study A221602 was developed to compare two olanzapine-containing antiemetic regimens, one with the use of an NK-1 receptor antagonist (aprepitant or fosaprepitant) and one without. Patients (pts) received intravenous highly emetogenic chemotherapy as either 1) cisplatin, given on one day, at a dose of ≥ 70 mg/m2, with or without other chemotherapy agent(s) or 2) doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) on one day. Pts in both arms received 1) a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (palonosetron 0.25 mg IV or ondansetron 8-16 mg IV or 16-24 mg PO,) on day one, 2) dexamethasone (12 mg PO, day one followed by 8 mg PO, days 2-4), and 3) olanzapine (10 mg/day PO, days 1 to 4). On Day 1, all agents were given prior to chemotherapy, with the exception that olanzapine could be taken prior to chemotherapy or at bedtime. Additionally, pts were randomized to receive an NK-1 receptor antagonist (fosaprepitant 150 mg IV or aprepitant 130 mg IV; 346 pts) or a matching placebo (344 pts). The primary objective was to compare the proportion of patients with no nausea for 5 days following receipt of their chemotherapy between the two study arms. Results: While there was no suggestion of outcome differences on day 1 between the two study arms, fewer pts (7.4%; upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was 13.5%) without NK-1 receptor antagonists were without nausea for the complete 5-day study period. Conclusions: Per the study design, created to exclude a 10% benefit for NK-1 receptor antagonists, the results did not provide sufficient evidence to reject the hypothesis that the 4-drug regimen was superior to the protocol 3-drug regimen (p=0.24). Support: UG1CA189823; Clinical trial information: NCT03578081.

e17036 Background: Elevated serum CGA is associated with an intrinsic or treatment-related neuroendocrine differentiation in men with mCRPC. We previously demonstrated that elevated serum CGA was negatively associated with OS in men with mCRPC. Fluctuations in serum CGA during mCRPC therapy is not well known. We analyzed the impact of (i) rising serum CGA and (ii) baseline CGA/PSA ratio during treatment to identify associations with AA therapy. Methods: Between June 2013 and August 2015, 92 men with mCRPC were enrolled in a prospective trial (“PROMOTE”; NCT#01953640) with uniform serum processing performed prior to initiating abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) and serially after 12 weeks of AA/P treatments. Serum CGA was measured using a homogenous automated immunofluorescent assay. Patients (pts) receiving proton pump inhibitors or with abnormal renal function were excluded due to possible false elevations of serum CGA (n = 21 excluded). All patients underwent a composite response assessment at 12-weeks with imaging/PSA/QOL questionnaires. Kaplan Meier estimates, and Cox Regression models were used to calculate association with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) analyses, defined as time from treatment initiation to AA/P discontinuation based on disease progression (BlueSky Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Of the 71 eligible pts, 67/71 had paired baseline and 12-week CGA and 70/71 pts had a baseline and a 12-week PSA available. The median baseline CGA was 83.0ng/ml (range: 53.0 - 127.0 ng/ml), median baseline PSA was 14.4 ng/ml (range: 6.4-40.2 ng/ml), and the median TTF was 10 months (range: 6-25 months). The median CGA after 12 weeks of AA/P was 98.0 ng/ml (58.0 -148.0 ng/ml) and we observed a CGA rise in 41/67 (61.2%) pts. An increase in chromogranin was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure (HR: 0.52, p = 0.0181). The median CGA/PSA ratio was 7.8 (2.6 -16.0). An elevated pretreatment CGA/PSA ratio above the median was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure (HR: 0.54 p value = 0.0185). Conclusions: We show that an increasing chromogranin on AA/P and an elevated baseline CGA/PSA in pts with mCRPC were associated with a favorable response to AA/P. Further studies are needed to assess if rising CGA during therapy reflects neuroendocrine differentiation and may indicate a sign of treatment effect targeting the androgen susceptible cells. Clinical trial information: NCT#01953640.

TPS1107 Background: ALP (α-selective PI3K inhibitor and degrader) is approved with FUL for pts with PIK3CA-mut HR+, HER2− ABC. HG is a known on-target effect of PI3K inhibition, manageable with oral anti-HG agents such as MET and dose interruptions/modifications of ALP and reversible upon discontinuation of ALP. Although HG management guidelines were refined throughout the SOLAR-1 and BYLieve studies evaluating ALP + FUL/letrozole, there remains a need for optimized strategies beyond initial MET therapy that offers earlier and more sustained improvement of HG, particularly for pts at an increased risk for severe HG. In preclinical models, the addition of a SGLT2 inhibitor to ALP (+/− MET) reduced HG while maintaining ALP efficacy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic MET XR +/− the SGLT2 inhibitor DAPA in reducing severe HG in pts with PIK3CA-mut HR+, HER2− ABC on ALP + FUL with an increased risk for severe HG (grade ≥ 3) on ALP. Methods: EPIK-B4 is a Phase II, randomized (1:1), open-label, active-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of MET XR +/− DAPA (starting at Cycle 1 Day 1 [C1D1]) with ALP (300 mg orally [PO], once daily [QD], starting at C1D8) + FUL (500 mg intramuscularly on C1D1, C1D15, and D1 of subsequent cycles) in pts (N ≈ 132) with HR+, HER2–, PIK3CA-mut ABC after progression on/after endocrine-based treatment (Tx). MET XR is administered PO starting at 500 mg QD (titrated up to 2 g QD) and MET XR + DAPA starting at 500 mg and 5 mg QD (titrated up to 2 g and 10 mg QD), respectively. Eligible pts include adult men or postmenopausal women with confirmed HR+, HER2–, PIK3CA-mut ABC and ≥ 1 risk factor for severe HG (diabetes [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%], prediabetes [FPG ≥ 100 to < 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c 5.7% to < 6.5%], obesity [BMI ≥ 30], age ≥ 75 years); prior endocrine-based Tx (eg, FUL or oral SERD) was permitted. Randomization is stratified by baseline diabetes status. Key exclusion criteria include > 1 line of Tx in the metastatic setting; prior chemotherapy (metastatic setting) or PI3K, mTOR, or AKT inhibitor; type I or II diabetes requiring Tx; or antecedent of pancreatitis or severe cutaneous reaction. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of severe HG (grade ≥ 3 [glucose > 250 mg/dL] based on laboratory assessments) over the first 8 weeks of ALP + FUL. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall response and clinical benefit rates with confirmed response, safety, and tolerability. A biomarker analysis is planned as an exploratory objective. Recruitment is ongoing with enrollment planned in 56 sites across 8 countries; completion of primary data collection is anticipated in 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT04899349; EUDRACT#2021-001908-15.

555 Background: Women with early-stage breast cancer (BCa) are living longer, and survivorship issues including second primary cancers (SPCs) are therefore increasingly important. This study seeks to determine the risk of SPCs, including contralateral breast cancer (CBCa), in women with early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Methods: The study population consisted of women with BCa diagnosis between 2000-2018 within the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER v 3.2.9) registry and between 2000-2021 in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry. In the SEER registry, the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for SPCs were estimated for adult women with histologically confirmed early stage (I-III) ILC compared to the development of any primary cancer in the general population. For reference, SIRs for SPCs for a similar patient population with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast were also estimated. For comparison of CBCa between ILC and IDC, follow up records from the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry were evaluated among adult women who underwent lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy for early stage ILC or IDC. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to compare the risk of CBCa between ILC and IDC while adjusting for the age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity and estrogen receptor status of the primary tumor. Results: An increased incidence (p<0.05) of any SPCs and second BCa was noted for both ILC and IDC compared to the expected rate of primary cancer in the general population (Table). Interestingly, women with ILC were observed to have a significantly increased incidence of subsequent gastric cancer which was not seen for women with IDC. An SIR >1.5 was noted for subsequent risk of sarcoma, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for both ILC and IDC (Table). In the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry of 2,218 women with ILC and 14,629 women with IDC meeting the inclusion criteria, the 5-year risk of CBCa was 2.6% and 1.5% (log rank statistic p-value =0.001) for ILC and IDC respectively. A significantly increased risk of CBCa was noted in women with ILC (Hazard Ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.34-2.47, p<0.001) compared to women with IDC in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Women with ILC may have an increased risk of SPC and second BCa compared to the risk of any primary cancer in the general population. The increased incidence of gastric cancer and the higher risk of CBCa in ILC survivors compared to women with IDC is intriguing and needs to be investigated further including evaluation of the role of germline genetic factors. [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose Cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), are standard either in the first (1L) or second line (2L) setting for the treatment of hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the optimal sequencing of treatments after progression on CDK4/6i remains unknown. We performed a single institution analysis to identify treatments and outcomes after progression on a CDK4/6i. Methods We identified patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC prescribed a CDK4/6i in the 1L or 2L settings from December 2014-February 2018 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Outcomes were collected through September 30, 2020. Results Palbociclib, in combination with letrozole or fulvestrant, was the most prescribed CDK4/6i. The 1L and 2L CDK4/6i cohorts exhibited comparable overall survival (OS), but progression free survival (PFS) was longer in the 1L than the 2L cohort [28.2 months (95% CI 19.6–34.9) vs 19.8 months (95% CI 15.7–29.6)]. The most common post-CDK4/6i treatments were PI3K/mTOR inhibitors (PI3K/mTORi), single agent ET, or chemotherapy. PFS in the 1L CDK4/6i cohort following PI3K/mTORi was 8.5 months (95% CI 5.5 months – NE), single-agent ET was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.3–14.0 months), and chemotherapy PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI 3.3 months- NE). Conclusions Following progression on a CDK 4/6i, mPFS was short, with similar PFS times comparing chemotherapy and ET, with slightly longer PFS for targeted strategies (PI3K/mTOR). These results highlight a major need to better understand the mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance and identify new therapeutic strategies for these patients.