Mangaonkar, Abhishek A.

Background Venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven-HMA) therapy has demonstrated improved outcomes in elderly/unfit patients with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) (N Engl J Med 2020;383). However, ~50% of patients who respond to Ven-HMA, eventually relapse (Am J Hematol 2024;99). In the current study we examined the prognostic contribution of gene mutations, karyotype, measurable residual disease (MRD) status and clinical risk factors for relapse in patients with ND-AML treated with Ven-HMA therapy. Methods Our study population of ND-AML was retrospectively recruited from Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL), after institutional review board approval and based on documentation of complete remission with/without count recovery (CR/CRi) following Ven-HMA therapy. Relapse-free survival was determined from the time of remission to relapse or last follow-up. Survival analysis was censored for transplant. The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria was used to assign cytogenetic risk and classify treatment response (Blood 2022;140). Standard statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro (Version 17.0.0). Results 247 ND-AML patients treated with Ven-HMA (median age 73 years, 62% male, 64% de novo) who achieved CR (n=153), or CRi (n=94) were included. MRD by multiparameter flow cytometry (sensitivity 0.01%) performed at the time of CR/CRi, was negative in 117 (70%) of 166 informative cases. ELN cytogenetic risk categories at diagnosis included favorable 2%, intermediate 69%, or adverse 29%. Mutations involved TET2 21%, SRSF2 21%, TP53 19%, ASXL1 18%, DNMT3A 18%, NPM1 17%, IDH2 15%, RUNX1 15%, K/NRAS 12%, IDH1 8%, FLT3-ITD 7%, and DDX41 in 6% of informative cases. Relapse was documented in a total of 99 (40%) patients who achieved CR (39%) or CRi (41%) after a median remission duration of 6 months (1-31). Patients that relapsed within the first-year vs those that did not, were more likely to be males (75% vs 55%), MRD positive (44% vs 24%), and harbor TP53 mutations (23% vs 16%). Univariate analysis for RFS identified male gender (12 vs 29 months; p=0.02), secondary AML (10 vs 21 months; p<0.01), adverse karyotype (9 vs 22 months; p<0.01), TP53 mutations (6 vs 18 months, p<0.01) and MRD positive remission (13 months vs not reached; p<0.01) as risk factors for relapse; on the other hand, IDH2 mutations (not reached vs 15 months; p<0.01) were associated with a lower risk of relapse. Multivariable analysis confirmed male gender (HR 2.2), TP53 mutations (HR 3.0) and MRD positive remission (HR 1.7) as unfavorable predictors of relapse. Subsequently, in a three-tiered relapse prediction model, RFS was significantly inferior in the presence of three risk factors (male gender, TP53 mutations, MRD positive remission) (n=10, median 4 months), vs two (n=34, median 10 months) vs ≤ 1 risk factor (n=122, median 31 months) (p<0.01); 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 100%, 56%, and 26% in the presence of three, two and ≤ 1 risk factors, respectively. 50 of 99 (65%) patients received salvage therapy which included cladribine-cytarabine-Ven (n=19), intensive induction chemotherapy (n=9), FLT3 inhibitors (n=5), Ven-HMA-FLT3 inhibitor (n=1), IDH1/2 inhibitors (n=5), glasdegib-cytarabine (n=4), gemtuzumab (n=3), lenalidomide (n=1), or investigational therapies (n=3); in addition, Ven-HMA was resumed in 14 patients in whom treatment had been discontinued for a median of 5 months (2-12). Overall, 20 (31%) of patients achieved second CR/CRi and response rates were similar with intensive vs less intensive therapy (CR/CRi; 44% vs 29%; p=0.37). Median follow up after relapse was 3.4 months (1-66), during which 73 (74%) deaths, and 4 (5%) ASCT were recorded. Median transplant-censored survival was 4.2 months (1-year; 22%), and inferior in patients with adverse karyotype (median 4.6 vs 3.4 months; p=0.02), and TP53 mutations (3.6 vs 4.4; p=0.11); on the other hand, male gender (3.5 vs 6.8 months; p=0.51), MRD positive remission (4.6 vs 4.2; p=0.56), and IDH2 mutations (6.7 vs 4.2; p=0.28), did not influence post-relapse survival. Conclusions The current study identifies male gender, TP53 mutations, and MRD status as powerful predictors of relapse and proposes a relapse prediction model for ND-AML patients receiving Ven-HMA therapy. Furthermore, relapse following Ven-HMA was associated with uniformly poor outcomes, regardless of salvage treatment strategy.

Introduction: DDX41, DEAD-box RNA helicase 41 gene located on chromosome 5q25.3, is one of the most mutated genes in patients with germline predisposition to myeloid neoplasms. Germline and somatic mutations often have different locations and patterns of mutation, with some hot-spots displaying diversity based on ethnicity. We aimed to explore clinical outcomes in patients with various DDX41 hot-spots. Methods: A retrospective study of patients at Mayo Clinic with DDX41 mutation identified through Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) between 2016 and 2024. Patients classified as germline DDX41 variants or somatic variants based on confirmed germline testing results. Data regarding mutations recorded at time of patients' first in-house NGS. We completed unadjusted comparisons using continuous or categorical variables, and survival rates assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression analysis. Median overall survival calculated from time of NGS to last follow-up or death using BlueSky Statistics V.10.3.4 Results: Clinical Characteristics: Eighty-two patients analyzed, predominantly male (69.5%), with median age of diagnosis of 68 years (IQR 62-75). Most common diagnosis was MDS (50%), followed by AML (22%) and myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) (7.3%). Fourteen percent were DDX41 mutation carriers, 4.9% clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS), and 1.2% chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL). MDS-IB2 was the prevalent MDS subtype (56.1%), and 83.3% of AML patients were intermediate risk. Cytogenetics normal in 73.8% of patients, with del20 being the most common abnormality (7.5%). Twenty-five (30.5%) of patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Forty-nine patients (59.8%) had pathogenic DDX41 mutation only, 15 (18.3%) had only VUS, and 18 (22.0%) had both. Molecular Characteristic s: Mutation hot-spots included 12.2% with p.Arg525His only, 28% p.M1I only, 9.8% p.Asp140GlyFs*2 only, 9.8% p.Arg525 with co-mutation other than p.M1I/p.Asp140. Two patients (2.4%) had p.M1I co-mutation with non-p.Arg525 and p.Asp140, while 1 patient (1.2%) had p.M1I and p.Arg525, and 1 patient (1.2%) had p.Asp140 and p.Arg525. Lastly, 33 patients (40.2%) had mutations in hot-spots other than specified in this study. Median hemoglobin (Hg) was lowest in patients with p.Arg525 hotspot mutation (9.9 g/dl), compared to median Hg of 11.2 g/dl in group with p.M1I and 10.4 g/dl in p.Asp140 only group (p=0.87). The most common cytogenetics in patients with only p.Arg525 and only p.M1I hot-spot mutation was normal cytogenetics (70% and 90.9%, p=0.5). In the 16 patients with proven germline DDX41 mutation, 7 (43.8%) had mutations in only p.M1I. Lastly, median (m) VAF was significantly lower in the group with only p.Arg525 hot-spot mutation (9.5%, IQR 5.5-13.8), compared to mVAF of 48% in patients with only p.M1I (IQR 48.0-49.5, p<0.001). Co-mutations: The most frequent co-mutation was DNMT3A (11.0%), followed by JAK2 (9.8%).Mean number of co-mutations in p.Arg525 only was 0.6, 0.3 in p.M1I only, and 0.5 in p.Asp140 only (p=0.8). Most common co-mutation in p.M1I was ASXL1, with 13.0% of patients with p.M1I only having ASXL1 co-mutation (p=0.062). The most common co-mutation in p.Asp140 was DNMT3A (p=0.7). Survival: Median overall survival (mOS) was 21.5 months (IQR 12.4-38.6). mOS for p.Arg525 only group was 31.3, compared to 41.2 months in p.M1I only (p=0.197). At 12- and 24-months, survival rate was 88.9% and 59.3% in the p.Arg525 only group, compared to p.M1I group with 100% survival rate at 12 months and 89.5% at 24 months. p.Asp140 had 87.5% survival rate at both 12 months and 24 months. Males in p.M1I group had lower survival rate at 24 months (81.8%), compared to 100% survival in females. p.M1I only group with alloHCT also had lower 24 month survival at 60% compared to 100% in group who did not undergo alloHCT. Conclusions: The p.M1I hot-spot was commonly seen in patients with germline DDX41 mutation, likely resulting in significantly higher VAF percentage. Co-mutations frequency differed by hot spot mutation while p.Arg525 as second mutation was seen mainly in cases other than p.M1I/pArg140Gly. Overall survival appears to be higher in p.M1I/pArg140Gly compared to p.Arg525His hot-spot mutation, though males with p.M1I and those who underwent alloHCT had lower survival. Findings suggest implications for clinical outcomes based on DDX41 mutation hot-spots.

DDX41 MT Germline Predisposition Syndrome (GPS) is the most common adult GPS for myeloid neoplasms (MN), including MDS and AML. Although there have been reports of non-myeloid neoplasms, particularly lymphoid malignancies, in DDX41MT-GPS, these occurrences are infrequent and poorly characterized. We carried out this study in a large cohort of DDX41MT-GPS patients to address this deficiency. Following IRB approval, we retrospectively analyzed our database of 174 patients with DDX41MT-GPS to determine the rates of non-myeloid malignancies. Our previous data revealed that certain DDX41MT genotypes classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) exhibit a similar phenotypic spectrum to those classified as pathogenic (Badar et al Hematologica). Consequently, we included all these variants in our analysis. The median age of the cohort was 68.6 yrs (range, 13-4-93.4); 66% (n=114) male, 93% (n=162) Caucasian, with a median follow-up of 1.4 yrs (range, 0.03-5.6) from DDX41MT-GPS detection. The cohort included 34 (19.5%) asymptomatic carriers, 17 (9.8%) with clonal hematopoiesis (CH) or clonal cytopenias (CCUS), and 123 (70.7%) with MN. Eighteen (10%) patients had a lymphoid neoplasm (78% male, 100% Caucasian), with a median age at lymphoid neoplasm diagnosis of 67.7 yrs (range, 12.2-85.9). The most common lymphoid neoplasm was chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) seen in 2.3% (n=), followed by follicular lymphoma (FL) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) present in 1.7% each (n=3; 1 T-ALL and 2 B-ALL: 1 Ph+ and1 Ph-like). Additionally, there was 1 patient each with monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL), Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia , peripheral T cell lymphoma , large granular lymphocytic leukemia, and marginal zone lymphoma. Germline genotypes were classified as pathogenic in 50% (n=9, D140Gfs*2 x2, K331del, M1I x3, M316Dfs*31, P258L, Y340N) and VUS in 50% (n=9, E426K, E69D, G313D, K184R, P206A, P70S, Q246E, R164W, c.572-3T>C. Among these 18, 9 (50%) patients had co-existing myeloid disorders (CCUS x3, MDS x5, AML x1), and 5 (27.8%) patients were later diagnosed with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (TMN) at a median of 5.9 yrs (range,1.6-38.7) after lymphoid neoplasm diagnosis and treatment. Seven (4%) patients had plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD; 3 with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance(MGUS) and 4 with multiple myeloma (MM)); 57% (n=4) were male, with a median age of 61.3 yrs (range, 41.4-83.8) at PCD diagnosis. Subtypes of MGUS included IgG Kappa (n=2) and IgG Lambda (n=1), subtypes of MM included IgG Kappa (n=2), IgA Kappa (n=1), and Kappa light chain only (n=1). DDX41MT-GPS genotypes were pathogenic in 28.6% (n=2, G67Vfs*13, G313S) and VUS in 71.4% (n=5, A555T, R164W, Q246E x2, M307T). All patients with MM (n=4) received an autologous stem cell transplant, with 3 (75%) being subsequently diagnosed with a t-MN; median 3.6yrs after PCD diagnosis (range, 3.2-12.3). Seventeen percent (n=31) had visceral malignancies; 2.8% (n=5) having >1malignancy, 61% (n=19) male, 93.5% (n=29) Caucasian and 6.5% (n=2) Hispanic. Prostate cancer was most common (n=8, 4.6%), followed by breast (n=7, 4.0%), colon (n=5, 2.9%), squamous cell carcinoma (n=4, 2.3%, 3 of the head/neck and 1 of the leg), bladder (n=4, 2.3%), testicular (n=3, 1.7%), gynecologic (n=3, 1.7%), lung (n=2, 1.2%), thyroid (n=1, 0.6%) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET, n=1, 0.6%), respectively. The median age at first solid tumor diagnosis was 62.4 yrs (range, 10.9-81.9). DDX41MT-GPS was pathogenic in 64.5% (n=20, D140Gfs*2 x3, E113Kfs*14, G67Vfs*13, I396T, L283Cfs*21, M1I x4, M316Dfs*31 x2, p.M1?, P258L, Q368*, Q41* x2, R159*, R311*) and VUS in 35.5% (n=11, D30Y, H203Y, I215L, I337V, M155I, p.?, S289L, T13I, V318G, A555T). Of the 31 patients with visceral malignancies , 51.6% (n=16) were diagnosed with t-MN at a median of 4.9 yrs (range, 1.1-34.3) after malignancy diagnosis. While DDX41MT-GPS are clearly associated with an increased risk of myeloid neoplasms, we demonstrate potential associations with other neoplasms, especially lymphoproliferative disorders (10%). We for the first-time report associations with PCD (4%) and visceral malignancies (17%) and also highlight a worrisome trend for t-MN in DDX41MT-GPS treated with genotoxic agents. Given limitations of a retrospective analysis, this study underscores the need for a comprehensive natural history study in patients with DDX41MT-GPS .

Background: Previously published risk variables for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) included age, gender, CMML subtype, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion status, hemoglobin, leukocyte, monocyte, lymphocyte and platelet counts, immature myeloid cells, peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow blast percentage, and mutations including ASXL1, RUNX1, NRAS, and SETBP1. Recent studies have reported on additional prognostically favorable (TET2) or unfavorable (DNMT3A, ASXL1, NRAS, SETBP1) mutations. In the current study, we took advantage of a clinically well-characterized and molecularly annotated cohort of CMML patients, in order to revisit the prognostic interaction between the aforementioned risk factors, with emphasis on mutations. Methods: The current study was conducted under an institutional review board approved protocol that allowed retrospective collection and analysis of data from Mayo Clinic patient records. Mutations were screened by multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS). Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022; 140:1200). Conventional statistical methods were employed (JMP Pro 17.0.0 software SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Survival analysis was censored for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) plots and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to compare predictive performance of the new model (MMMv2) vs. the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM) vs. the CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS). Results: The study cohort included 416 patients with CMML that were fully annotated for mutations. Cytogenetic information was available in 404 patients. At a median follow-up of 18 months, 302 (72%) deaths, 72 (18%) leukemic transformations, and 44 (11%) ASCTs were documented. Age-adjusted multivariable analysis (MVA) of mutations identified the following as risk factors: DNMT3A (HR 5.5; p<0.01), PHF6 (HR 0.3; p<0.01), TET2 (HR 0.6; p<0.01), PTPN11 (HR 2.5; p=0.01), NRAS (HR 1.6; p<0.01), ASXL1 (HR 1.3; p=0.02), and SETBP1 (HR 1.8; p=0.01). A separate MVA of clinical and cytogenetic variables identified RBC transfusion need, leukocyte count ≥13 x 109/L, peripheral blood blast ≥1%, abnormal karyotype, older age, and male sex to be independently associated with inferior survival (p<0.04 in all instances). All-inclusive MVA identified the following as independent risk factors for survival (p <0.01): DNMT3A mutation (HR 3.7; 95% CI 2.0-6.7), absence of PHF6 mutation (HR 2.8; 1.3-5.8), RBC transfusion need (HR 2.3; 1.7-3.1), leukocyte count ≥13 x 109/L (HR 2.0; 1.5-2.6), abnormal karyotype (HR 1.6; 1.2-2.2), and absence of TET2 mutation (HR 1.4,1.1-1.8). An HR based prognostic model was subsequently constructed by assigning 3 points to DNMT3A mutation, 2 points each for RBC transfusion need, leukocyte count ≥13 x 109/L, and absence of PHF6 mutation and one point each for abnormal karyotype and absence of TET2 mutation, resulting in a 4-tiered survival risk model (MMMv2): low risk (0-2 points; N=103) with median survival of 74 months; intermediate-1 (3 points; N=65) with median 37 months; intermediate-2 (4-5 points; N=126) with median 19 months; and high (6 points; N=88) with median 12 months (p<0.01). Independent genetic risk factors associated with inferior leukemia-free survival included DNMT3A (HR 5.5), PHF6 (HR 0.2), abnormal karyotype (HR 2.0), PTPN11 (HR 5.2), ASXL1 (HR 2.0), and BCOR (HR 8.7). Leukocyte count ≥13 x 109/L (p=0.01) but not RBC transfusion need (p=0.2) was additionally significant. However, presence of immature myeloid cells (p<0.01) and circulating blasts ≥1% (p<0.01) were prognostically more relevant than leukocyte count ≥13 x 109/L and independently predicted leukemic transformation, along with DNMT3A, PTPN11 and ASXL1 mutations. Predictive performance was superior for MMMv2 (AUC 87, AIC 137) vs. MMM (AUC 74, AIC 194) vs. CPSS (AUC 76, AIC 177). Conclusion: The revised Mayo Molecular Model (MMMv2) provides a contemporary risk model for CMML that recognizes DNMT3A as the most unfavorable and PHF6 as the most favorable mutation and confirms the mutation-independent prognostic contribution from red cell transfusion need and sustained leukocytosis (≥13 x 109/L). Mutations were also important in predicting leukemic transformation, notably DNMT3A, PTPN11 and ASXL1.

Introduction Somatic mutations in TET2 are present in ~60% of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) patients and are associated with improved median overall (mOS) and acute leukemia free survival (mLFS). Multiple TET2 mutations are detected in ~50% of such cases and are thought to confer additional benefit. Whether these benefits apply to the molecularly distinct myelodysplastic (MD) and myeloproliferative (MP) CMML subtypes is unknown. This study assesses the impact of the number and type of TET2 mutations across the MD and MP-CMML subtypes. Methods CMML patients seen at Mayo Clinic (n = 400, 47%) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (n = 449, 53%) were included with IRB approval. Analyses considered the clinical and molecular data at diagnosis or first referral. Truncating (frameshift or nonsense) mutations in TET2 were further annotated by location in either the proximal genome targeting domain (aa 1 - 1128) or distal catalytic domain (aa 1129 - 1936) as described (Coltro, 2020). Categorical variables were compared by Pearson Chi squared and continuous by Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses utilized Cox proportional hazards models with continuous variables binarized by receiver operator curves. Kaplan-Meier analyses were censored at hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Calculations used BlueSky (v10.3.1) or Prism (v10.2.3). Results In a cohort of 849 CMML patients (median age 71 years, 32% female, 90% white), 454 (54%) were classified as MD-CMML and 394 (46%) as MP-CMML. Cumulatively, 664 somatic TET2 mutations were identified across the MD (n = 415, 63%) and MP-CMML (n = 249, 38%) subgroups, with ≥1 TET2 mutation in 57% vs 44% (p < 0.001) and ≥2 TET2mutations in 33% vs 20% (p = 0.001) , respectively. The median (range) number of TET2 mutations in MD vs MP-CMML was 1 (0 - 4) vs 0 (0 - 3; p < 0.001). Truncating frameshift or nonsense mutations comprised 86% vs 78% of mutations in each group with hypomorphic missense mutations comprising 13% vs 20% (p = 0.03). Proximal (48% vs 43%) and distal (38% vs 35%) truncations were evenly distributed between MD and MP-CMML (p = 0.91). In both the MD and MP subgroups as well as the overall cohort (p < 0.01 each), increasing number of TET2 mutations (0 vs 1 vs ≥2) was associated with higher median hemoglobin (10.3 vs 11.4 vs 12.0 g/dL), fewer mean peripheral blasts (1.3% vs 0.5% vs 0.3%), and a higher proportion of normal karyotypes (60% vs 76% vs 79%). Likewise, co-mutations were increasingly frequent in SRSF2 (36% vs 45% vs 53%) and less frequent in IDH2 (9% vs 1% vs 1%) and SETBP1 (14% vs 4% vs 0%) throughout the cohort. TET2 mutations were mutually exclusive with ETV6, GATA2, IDH1, and WT1 mutations. Uniquely, MD-CMML cases with TET2 mutations (0 vs 1 vs ≥2) were enriched for co-mutations in ZRSR2 (5% vs 13% vs 9%) and had fewer co-mutations in both ASXL1 (47% vs 34% vs 28%) and U2AF1 (11% vs 6% vs 3%). In MP-CMML, co-mutations in CBL (11% vs 20% vs 27%) were increased while co-mutations in BCOR (6% vs 1% vs 0%) were decreased. Accordingly, the favorable ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype was more common in MD (39% vs 22%), while the adverse ASXL1MT/TET2WT genotype was more common in MP-CMML (20% vs 33%; p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, the presence of ≥2 TET2 mutations was favorably associated with OS and LFS in both MD and MP-CMML (hazard ratios 0.53 - 0.67, p < 0.04) independent of several clinical and genetic features including ASXL1 mutations and abnormal karyotype. Beyond the number of TET2 mutations, however, neither the mutation class (truncating vs hypomorphic) nor location (proximal vs distal) further affected OS or LFS. Likewise, although the median variant allele fraction (VAF) was lower in MD vs MP-CMML (42% vs 46%, p < 0.001), VAF did not impact survival. Accordingly, the mOS for patients with 0, 1, or ≥2 TET2 mutations was 29, 58, and 75 months in MD-CMML and 19, 26, and 39 months in MP-CMML, respectively (p < 0.001 each). The mLFS was similarly improved to 26, 52, and 67 months in MD-CMML (p < 0.001) and 16, 22, and 31 months in MP-CMML (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS This multicenter study demonstrates that the favorable impact of multiple TET2 mutations in CMML extends to both the MD and MP subtypes. In MD-CMML, multiple TET2 mutations segregate against adverse ASXL1 mutations while, in MP-CMML, they appear to offset the impact of adverse RAS pathway mutations. Thus, multiple TET2 mutations may identify a lower-risk subgroup of MP-CMML patients.

Introduction: ASXL1-mutant Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) is a high-risk myeloid neoplasm characterized by epigenetic remodeling and overexpression of leukemogenic driver genes. DLK1 (delta-like homolog 1) is a non-canonical Notch ligand, crucial for the proliferation of early hematopoietic progenitor cells and its expression is controlled by maternal imprinting. DLK1 expression is restricted to select progenitor populations, but was found to be overexpressed in several malignancies including ASXL1-mutant CMML. Here we investigate the molecular mechanisms that drive the aberrant re-expression of DLK1 and postulate potential targeted therapeutic interventions. Methods: We performed bulk RNA- and ChIP-seq (H3K4me1/3, H3K27ac/me3, H2AK119ub, H2BK20ac) on bone marrow mononuclear cells from 20 patients with CMML (11 ASXL1-mutant, 9 -wildtype). All libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq instrument. Differential gene expression and histone modification occupancy between ASXL1-mutant and -wildtype patients were assessed. Single-cell RNA-seq was performed for a subset of patients to investigate the cell populations of interest for DLK1 expression. To assess DLK1 allelic expression, we identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the coding region of DLK1 (rs1802710) and used cases which were confirmed heterozygous by Sanger sequencing. DLK1 transcript levels were quantified by RT-PCR, and the relative abundance of alleles was measured using digital droplet PCR. We designed primers to amplify the region around our SNP of interest and utilized high mismatch discrimination locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes labeled with FAM (reference SNP allele) and HEX (alternate SNP allele) to quantify specific alleles. The number of RNA molecules originating from each allele was quantified by counting the number of droplets that fluoresced with the corresponding probe colors. Illumina 850K EPIC microarrays were used to evaluate DNA methylation. Drug studies were carried out in progenitor colony forming assays derived from ASXL1-mutant patients (bone marrow mononuclear cells) with the dual BRD4 and p300 / CBP inhibitor EP31670 (62 nM, 24-hour exposure), quantifying DLK1 expression by real-time RT-PCR. Results: This study included 20 patients with CMML (median age at diagnosis 74 years). All ASXL1 mutations were typical hotspot mutations (most commonly Gly646Trpfs*12) and the variant allele frequencies were compatible with heterozygosity (median 0.41). The spectrum of co-mutations was typical and included TET2 (23%), SRSF2 (16%), CBL (7%), among others. DLK1 was strongly overexpressed in ASXL1-mutant patients (log2 fold-change +4.0, FDR < 0.001). Allele-specific gene expression studies (n = 3) revealed the re-expression of the imprinted maternal DLK1 allele in ASXL1-mutant patients. Single-cell gene expression studies (n = 5) demonstrated that the DLK1 overexpression is restricted to the hematopoietic progenitor cell population. Differential methylation analysis between patients with ASXL1-mutant clonal hematopoiesis (n = 4) and matched controls (n = 8) identified two hypermethylated CpG islands in the DLK1 promoter region (cg18122767, Δß = +8.6%, p = 0.021 and cg15831296, Δß = +5.8%, p = 0.008). Histone modification analysis identified DLK1 as a p300 target gene by mapping H2BK20ac onto established ASXL1-mutant-specific enhancer regions (H3K4me1 + H3K27ac co-occupancy). The distal enhancer EH38D2760182 was predicted to bind p300 and to govern the expression of DLK1. ChIP-seq experiment in K-562 and Kasumi-1 cells showed the binding of BRD4 and p300 to EH38D2760182, respectively. Targeting BRD4 and p300 using EP31670 led to the downregulation of DLK1 expression (mean fold-change = 0.569, p < 0.001, n = 3) in progenitor colony forming assays. Conclusions: We observed the aberrant re-expression of the maternally imprinted DLK1 allele in patients with ASXL1-mutant CMML. Both DLK1 promoter hypermethylation and the genotype-specific activation of enhancers by p300 were identified as putative regulatory mechanisms. The distal enhancer EH38D2760182 was found to bind BRD4 and p300 and the pharmacologic disruption of BRD4 / p300 activity in model systems led to the downregulation of DLK1. The clinical-grade dual inhibitor of BRD and CBP / p300 EP31670 is currently being investigated in patients with ASXL1-mutant chronic myeloid neoplasms (NCT05488548).

Background: While myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (MF), are usually sporadic, adult-onset neoplasms, an increasing number of germline risk alleles have been described (e.g. EGLN1, ETV6, SH2B3, and ATM) in these disorders. DDX41MT Germline Predisposition Syndrome (GPS) is the most common myeloid GPS in adults and while there is extensive data on MDS/AML, little is known regarding MPN occurring in this context. We carried out this study to define the prevalence and characteristics of DDX41MT-GPS associated MPN. Methods: After IRB approval, we retrospectively assessed the Mayo Clinic cohort of 174 patients with DDX41MT-GPS, which included both pathogenic and clinically relevant germline variants of undetermined significance (VUS), based on our previous analysis (Badar et al Haematologica 2023). Standard statistical measures were applied. Results: We identified 12 (6.9%) patients with MPN (ET-5, PV-2, PMF-4, MPN-NOS-1). The median age at MPN diagnosis was 61.2 years (range, 8.-70.4); 58.3% (n=7) were male, and 83.3% (n=10) were Caucasian. A family history of hematologic malignancy was present in 16.7% (n=2, AML and T-LGL), while 50% (n=6) had a family history of visceral malignancies and 41.7% (n=5) had no family history of malignancies. Among ET patients (n=5) with DDX41MT-GPS, JAK2V617F was the MPN driver in 4 (80%) while type 1-CALR (L367fs*46) was a driver in 1 (20%). This included a 9-year-old child diagnosed with JAK2V617FMT ET. The DDX41 variant was classified as pathogenic in 40% (n=2; E113Kfs*14, D140Gfs*2) and VUS in 60% (n=3; V544L, V591I, P38L). Bone marrow (BM) aspirates in the ET patients were hypercellular in 40% (n=2), normocellular in 40% (n=2) and hypocellular in 20% (n=1), and none had increased blasts, or reticulin fibrosis (RF). In addition to JAK2V617F, somatic mutations seen included SF3B1 (K666T, VAF 16%) in 1 patient and IDH2 (R140Q, VAF 6%) and DNMT3A (R882H, VAF 7%) in 1 patient, respectively. With a median follow-up from diagnosis of 3.9yrs (range 2.9-8.9), there were no thrombotic events and no disease progressions was documented. There were 2 patients with JAK2V167FMT PV in whom the DDX41MT were clinically significant VUS (c.138+5G>T and M155I). Both patients had hypercellular BM, with no increase in blasts, no RF, normal karyotypes and no additional somatic mutations. With a median follow up of 7.5yrs (range, 2.1-12.9), 1 patient developed a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and there were no fibrotic or leukemic transformations. There were 4 patients with PMF; 3 (75%) with JAK2V617F and 1(25%) with a type 1-CALR driver mutation (L367fs*46). DIPPS-plus scores ranged from 1 to 4 (median 2.5). The DDX41 variants were pathogenic in 50% (n=2, E256K and P78Qfs*3) and VUS in 50% (n=2, P510S and M155I). The median grade of RF at PMF diagnosis was grade 2 (range, 2-3). BM were hypercellular in 75% (n=3) and hypocellular in 25% (n=1), and 1 patient had 3% peripheral blasts (and no BM blasts). Somatic co-mutations included TET2 in 1 patient with a JAK2V617F, and CBL, EZH2 and SRSF2 in 1 patient with a CALR driver-mutation, respectively. PMF patients were treated with ruxolitinib (n=3), stem cell transplant (n=1), and pIFNα (n=1). With a median follow up of 3.9yrs (range,1.1-21.9), all patients were alive, and none had leukemia transformation. There was 1 patient with a JAK2V617F MPN-NOS with trisomy 9, where the DDX41MT-GPS was a VUS (I215L). There were no somatic co-mutations and at last follow up (3.1 years), there was no evidence for progression. Conclusions: While associations between late onset MDS/AML and DDX41MT-GPS has been well established, we systematically describe the MPN landscape seen in this context. MPN was diagnosed in 7% of our cohort, with JAK2V617F being the most common driver mutation. Most importantly, unlike in AML/MDS, where somatic DDX41 mutations are frequently associated with neoplastic transformation (30-50%; R525H being most common), none of our MPN patients had a somatic DDX41 mutation. Our work underscores the importance of germline mutation testing in patients with MPN.

Background: Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS), a precursor of myeloid neoplasms (MN), is characterized by one or more persistent cytopenias, and acquired mutations in myeloid malignancy-associated genes. ZRSR2, located at Xp22.2, is one of the MN-associated genes and a member of the spliceosome family of genes. Aim: Describe the clinical characteristics, pattern of progression, and genetics of ZRSR2 mutation (ZRSR2m)-harboring CCUS patients. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for 9320 patients between 2016-2023 at Mayo Clinic. After obtaining IRB approval, clinical characteristics and results of bone marrow morphology, cytogenetics, and molecular studies were abstracted. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier, from the date of NGS until death or last follow-up. The ZRSR2m MN control cohort included 125 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), and MDS/MPN overlap. BlueSky Statistics V10.3.1 was used for statistical analysis. Results: ZRSR2m was detected in 39 CCUS patients, all of whom were males. Concurrent hematological neoplasms were identified in 8 patients (21%). Five (13%) had plasma cell proliferative disorders including 3 multiple myeloma, 1 MGUS, and 1 AL amyloidosis. There were also 2 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 1 with VEXAS syndrome. Prior chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, was given to 4 patients (10.3%), whereas 13 patients (33%) had received previous immunotherapy. Abnormal cytogenetics were detected in 11 patients (29%), with the most common abnormality being +8 (n=5, 13%). In 23 patients (59%), an absolute monocyte count of ≥0.5 x 10^9/L was documented which could be classified as clonal cytopenia with monocytosis of unknown significance (CCMUS). ZRSR2 median gender-corrected VAF among CCUS patients was 32% (range, 1-45). Isolated ZRSR2m was found in 6 patients (15%), and 1 (3%) had multiple ZRSR2m. The median number of co-mutations was 1 (range, 0-3). Sequential NGS, available in 13 patients, showed that 1 patient developed 3 ZRSR2 mutations and 2 ZRSR2 VUS. TET2 was the most common co-mutation (n=25, 64%). Additionally, TET2 was an isolated co-mutation in 18 patients (46%). ASXL1 co-mutation was the second most common (n=8, 20.5%), while other less common co-mutations were IDH1, IDH2, SRSF2, SF3B1, TP53, GATA2, and KDM6A. Pre-ZF1 was the most commonly mutated region in ZRSR2 mutations (n=23, 59%). With a median follow-up of 32 months, 9 (23%) of the ZRSR2m CCUS patients progressed to MNs, none progressed to AML. Five (55.6%) progressed to MDS, 4 were subclassified as low blast (LB) and 1 as increased blast-1 (IB1). Four (44.4%) progressed to MDS/MPN overlap syndrome, with 3 subclassified as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). None of the patients with isolated ZRSR2m progressed to MDS or CMML. None of the patients who received prior immunotherapy progressed to MDS. Thirty-six (92.3%) patients had high-risk CCUS (Malcovati et al, Blood 2017) while 3 had intermediate risk with no low-risk patients. None of the intermediate-risk patients progressed to MDS, while 5 patients of the high-risk (13.9%) progressed to MDS (p=1). Twelve (31%) patients died, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 56 months. Higher hemoglobin levels improved OS (HR=0.59, p=0.02), while higher adjusted ZRSR2 VAF worsened OS (HR=1.05, p=0.017). Patients with TET2 as isolated co-mutations showed better mOS than the rest of the cohort (not reached vs 41 months, p= 0.03). ZRSR2m CCUS patients showed a trend suggestive of better mOS than ZRSR2m with MNs including AML (56 vs 30 months, p=0.14), and with excluding AML (56 vs 39 months, p=0.24). On multivariate analysis, both Hgb (HR=0.61, p=0.03) and isolated TET2 co-mutation (HR=0.19, p=0.04) retained statistical significance. mOS was not affected by prior history of treatment, number of co-mutations, isolated ZRSR2, ASXL1 co-mutation, or MDS progression. Conclusion: ZRSR2m CCUS cohort was exclusively males. There was a significant number of patients with concurrent hematological malignancy or a history of prior chemo- and/or immuno-therapy (36%). Most patients had high-risk CCUS but showed a low rate of progression to MNs, especially in those with isolated ZRSR2. Additionally, patients with isolated TET2 co-mutation had better survival, indicating that TET2 confers a favorable prognosis among ZRSR2m CCUS patients.

Background: Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is considered the standard front-line treatment for acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) for pts >40 years. For pts aged <40 years who have a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended. This recommendation is based on the toxicity associated with alternative donors; haploidentical (HAPLO) and unrelated donor (URD) HSCT for patients who lack a MSD. However, the hematopoietic response after IST is ~ 70-80%, even after augmentation with eltrombopag in the front-line setting, and failure-free survival (FFS, defined as patients alive and in remission without clonal disease more than 10 years after IST) remains < 40%. HSCT is often employed as a second line salvage therapy for those who do not respond to IST or have disease recurrence. However, outcomes after HSCT are often compromised because of IST-related complications such as clonal evolution, development of donor specific antibodies, infectious adverse events and organ dysfunction. In contrast, a successful allogeneic HSCT leads to relatively prompt hematopoietic and immune reconstitution and mitigates the risk of secondary clonal disease. Innovations in recent decades, such as improved graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and supportive care, have steadily reduced the morbidity and mortality of adults undergoing HSCT from unrelated or mismatched donors and expanded the donor pool such that almost all pts with SAA have a potential donor available. The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is now a well-established approach to facilitate engraftment and mitigate the risk of GVHD. It was successfully used in relapsed/refractory SAA pts using HAPLO donors in the multi-center BMT CTN #1502 trial (NCT02918292). Similar PTCy based approaches have been effective in the upfront setting with HAPLO and URD in small single center studies. Opened in July 2024, the CureAA trial (NCT06517641), seeks to increase donor options for SAA pts who have not yet received IST by using PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis for HSCT using HAPLO or URD. Study Design and Methods: This BMT CTN study (#2207) is a prospective multi-center phase II trial to assess efficacy of HSCT using HAPLO or URD bone marrow with a reduced intensity, thymoglobulin (ATG)-containing preparative regimen and PTCy GVHD prophylaxis in previously untreated SAA pts. This trial has two parallel cohorts for each donor type, HAPLO and URD, with an accrual goal of 30 participants in each cohort. All will receive ATG (0.5mg/kg on day -9 and 2mg/kg on days -8 and -7), cyclophosphamide (14.5mg/kg on days -6 and -5), fludarabine (30mg/m2 on days -6 to -2), 400 cGy total body irradiation (day -1 in a single fraction), a marrow graft (goal >2.5 x 108 nucleated cells per kg of recipient) on day 0 and PTCy (50mg/kg on days +3 and +4). Additionally, participants receive tacrolimus (until day +180) and mycophenolate mofetil days +5-35. The primary objective of the trial is to estimate the GVHD-free failure-free survival (GFFS) rate at 1 year after initiation of conditioning. GFFS is a composite endpoint of survival without grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppression, or primary or secondary graft failure requiring second definitive therapy within 1 year after initiation of conditioning. Secondary objectives will evaluate patient survival, engraftment, transfusion dependence, cumulative incidence of GVHD and hematologic response. Health related quality of life, healthcare utilization and financial toxicity data will also be collected. These endpoints will allow clinical comparison with current results achieved with upfront IST in other studies. We hypothesize that this HSCT approach will improve survival without significant transplant-associated morbidity by using a low toxicity regimen that reduces rates of GVHD and provides rapid hematologic recovery without graft failure, thereby making HAPLO and URD HSCT a viable option for initial upfront treatment of SAA. The ability to use mismatched donors will also ensure that a HSCT option is more widely available to all racial/ethnic groups. This collaborative study was funded by grants U10HL069294, U24HL138660 to the BMT CTN from the NHLBI/ NCI, along with funding from Sanofi. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Background: SETBP1 gene, located on 18q12.3, is a major oncogene in myeloid neoplasms. GATA2 gene, located on 3q21, is one of the six GATA transcription factors regulating gene expression via two conserved zinc finger domains (ZF). Previous data suggested that in patients with germline GATA2 mutation (m), acquisition of a somatic SETBP1 mutation (m) was associated with leukemic transformation among patients with excess blast MDS and CMML. Aim: To study the characteristics of patients with somatic SETBP1-GATA2 mutated myeloid neoplasms. Methods: This study is a retrospective study at Mayo Clinic. After obtaining IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had myeloid NGS panel results between 2016-2023. All data were recorded at time of first NGS. Cohort 1 was defined as patients with SETBP1m and GATA2m, cohort 2; patients with SETBP1m and GATA2wt, and cohort 3; patients with SETBP1wt and GATA2m. Germline work-up was not performed in the majority of GATA2 cases. We stratified risk based on the European LeukemiaNet 2022 guidelines for AML, IPSS-M for MDS and MDS/MPN, and CPSS-M for CMML. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of NGS to date of last follow-up based on Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression analysis. For statistical analysis, we used BlueSky Statistics V10.3.1. Results: General characteristics: 114 patients had SETBP1m (median VAF= 39%), and 63 patients had GATA2m (median VAF= 35%). Nine patients had co-occurring SETBP1m/GATA2m mutations (cohort 1). 4/9 patients in cohort 1 had MDS/MPN (44.4%), while only 13/105 in cohort 2 (12.4%) had MDS/MPN (P=0.02). AML was seen in 2 patients in cohort 1 (22.2%) compared to18 in cohort 2 (17.1%) (p=0.6). The median WBC count was 22.9 x 109 cells/L among cohort 1 compared to 9 x 109 cells/L among cohort 2 cases (p=0.09). BM blasts were higher in cohort 3 (7%) compared to cohort 1 (5%) and cohort 2 (3%) (p=0.09), while peripheral blasts tended to be lower in cohort 2 (1%) in comparison to cohort 1 (6%) and cohort 3 (4%) (p=0.48). Genetic characteristics: In cohort 1,7 GATA2m clustered in zinc finger 2 (ZF2) (77.8%), while the other two mutations were outside the ZF domains (22.2%). This was higher than the ZF2 mutated cases in cohort 3 (46.3%, p=0.1). Abnormal cytogenetics were seen in 66.7% of cohort 1 patients and 45% of cohort 2 (p= 0.3). Two cases with trisomy 8 were seen among patients in cohort 1 (22.2%), compared to only 4.9% in cohort 2 (p=0.09). Two incidences of isochromosome 17q [i(17q)] were seen in cohort 1 (22.2%), versus 5 cases in cohort 2 (4.8%) and 1 case in cohort 3 (1.9%) (p= 0.068). Co-mutations: The median number of co-mutationswas 3 in both cohort 1 and cohort 2 (p= 0.6). In cohort 1, ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutations were the most common (7/9, 77.8%) followed by NRAS (22.2%) and TET2 (22.2%). 77.8% of cohort 1 patients had SRSF2 co-mutation, compared to 44.8% in cohort 2 (p=0.08), and 27.8% in cohort 3 (p= 0.006). No isolated SETBP1m/GATA2m cases were found. Survival: Patients in cohort 1 had a numerically higher median OS compared to those in cohort 2 (19.4 vs 15.4 months, p= 0.3). When comparing with the cohort 3, patients in cohort 1 tended to have better outcomes (median OS= 19.4 vs 13.8 months, p=0.8). Among cohort 1, SRSF2 co-mutation was associated with worse survival outcomes compared to patients with SRSF2wt (median OS= 5.3 vs 19.4 months, p= 0.02); this association was not found in cohort 2 (12.5 vs 18.4 months, p= 0.3) and cohort 3 (13.2 vs 17.1 months, p= 0.4). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation was associated with favorable survival outcomes in all cohorts (cohort 1: 22.6 vs 7.8 months, p= 0.1; cohort 2: 20.9 vs 12.5 months, p= 0.04; cohort 3: 25.6 vs 13.1 months, p= 0.03). Conclusion: SETBP1m/GATA2m myeloid neoplasms included a significantly higher proportion of MDS/MPN overlap cases in comparison with the SETBP1m/GATA2wt group. The SETBP1m/GATA2m group had a higher proportion of ZF2 GATA2m and SRSF2 co-mutation compared to patients with SETBP1wt/GATA2m. Survival of SETBP1m/GATA2m patients was not worse compared to SETBP1wt/GATA2m or SETBP1m/GATA2wt.