Ters, Mireille El

Background. Experience with sequential hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and kidney transplant (KT) is limited. Methods. We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult patients who underwent both HSCT and KT at our center, with a median follow-up of 11 y. Results. In our 54 patients cohort (94% autologous HSCT), 36 (67%) patients received HSCT first followed by KT, while 18 (33%) received KT before HSCT. In both groups, AL amyloidosis represented 50% of hematologic diagnosis. Only 4 patients expired due to hematologic disease relapse (2 patients in each group) and only 3 allografts were lost due to hematologic disease recurrence (HSCT first n = 1 and KT first n = 2). Overall 1, 5, and 10 y death-censored graft survival rates were 94%, 94%, and 94%, respectively, for the HSCT first group and 89%, 89%, and 75%, respectively, for the KT first group. Overall 1, 5, and 10 y patients survival rates were 100%, 97% and 90%, respectively, for the HSCT first group and 100%, 76%, and 63%, respectively, for the KT first group. Conclusions. Our study supports safety of sequential KT and HSCT, with improved overall patient survival compared to recipients of HSCT remaining on dialysis and good long-term kidney allograft outcome.

Background. Graft survival after kidney transplant (KTX) is often estimated by the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method censoring for competing endpoints, primarily death. This method overestimates the incidence of graft loss. Methods. In 3157 adult KTX recipients followed for a mean of 79.2 months, we compared kidney and patient survival probabilities by KM versus competing risk analysis (CRA). These methods are extended to comparing different regression methods. Results. Compared with CRA, the probabilities of death and graft loss (censored for the other outcome) were substantially higher by KM. These differences increased with increasing follow-up time. Importantly, differences in graft losses were magnified in subgroups with greater probabilities of death. Among recipients with diabetes, the probabilities of graft loss at 20 years were 57% by KM and 32% by CRA, while for non-diabetes mellitus corresponding values were 44% and 35%. Similar results are noted when comparing older versus younger recipients. Finally, we find that the Fine-Gray method assumptions are violated when using age and gender as covariates and that the alternative method of Aalen-Johansen may be more appropriate. Conclusions. CRA provides more accurate estimates of long-term graft survival and death, particularly in subgroups of recipients with higher rates of the competing event. Overestimation of risk by KM leads to both quantitative and qualitative misinterpretations of long-term KTX outcomes. When using regression analyses, care should be taken to check assumptions to guide the choice of appropriate method.

Multiple myeloma is the most frequent malignant monoclonal gammopathy and the second most common hematological malignancy after non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There continues to be evolving therapies in the treatment which has significantly changed progression-free and overall survival of the patients. Increasingly, evidence shows that multiple myeloma no longer portends poor and lethal prognosis. With the advances in treatment of multiple myeloma and improved survival as seen in several studies, perhaps more attention should focus on kidney transplantation in these individuals given their suboptimal outcomes on dialysis. We would like to propose that a diagnosis of multiple myeloma not be considered as an absolute contraindication for kidney transplantation. Rather, a careful consideration of kidney transplantation is appropriate for a subset of patients with multiple myeloma and end-stage kidney disease. The candidacy of these patients should be reviewed by a multidisciplinary team comprising experts in hematology, kidney transplantation, and key stakeholders (including laboratory medicine, renal pathologists, and pharmacists) to allow appropriate risk stratification, prognostication for a successful and safe kidney transplantation.

Background. Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) is a distinct form of glomerulonephritis that often recurs after kidney transplantation causing severe graft injury and often failure. Methods. We describe post transplant outcomes and response to therapy in 20 recipients with PGNMID. Evidence of PGNMID recurrence or lack thereof was determined by protocol and clinical biopsies. Results. Histologic recurrence (deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin) occurred in 18 of 20 recipients (90%), a median of 7 (1 to 65) months post transplant. At diagnosis, recurrence was generally associated with mild or no clinical manifestations and often with mild glomerular morphologic changes by light microcopy. Four of the 18 patients with recurrence did not progress and were not treated. Another 4 patients with recurrences were treated with cyclophosphamide with or without plasmapheresis, and 2 of these grafts were lost from glomerulonephritis. Nine patients with recurrences were treated with anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab) alone, resulting in improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate (31.5 ± 16 versus 38.8 ± 13.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P = 0.011) and proteinuria (1280 [117 to 3752] versus 168 [83 to 1613] mg/24 h, P = 0.012) although complete clinical remission was rare. One graft in this later group was lost from recurrence 141 months post transplant. Posttreatment biopsies demonstrated stable or improved glomerular histology in most cases. However, PGNMID did not resolve in any case. Four patients received rituximab 4 months pretransplant to prevent recurrence. However, 3 had mild recurrences. Conclusions. Rituximab treatment of early PGNMID recurrence is effective, resulting in reasonable, long-term graft survival. Whether pretransplant rituximab modifies the course of recurrence requires additional studies.

AbstractIntroduction: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) may adversely impact future successful arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). As part of a quality improvement project, the performance of tunneled small bore tunneled central venous catheters (TSB‐CVCs), as alternatives to PICCs, was evaluated.Methods: A retrospective observational study, involving individuals ≥18 years of age who underwent TSB‐CVC placement by Interventional Radiology at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 1/1/2010 and 8/30/2013.Findings: The study cohort included 92 patients with a median age of 55 (46–67) years, who underwent 108 TSB‐CVC placements. Baseline renal disease was present in 71% (77/108). Most TSB‐CVCs were placed in hospitalized patients (94%; 102/108); five French in diameter (61%; 66/108) and located in an internal jugular vein (84%; 91/108). Median catheter indwelling time was 20 (11–43) days (n = 84). TSB‐CVC‐related bloodstream infection, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and superficial venous thrombosis (SpVT) rates per line were 0.009 (1/108), 0.018 (2/108), and 0.009 (1/108), respectively. Venous outcomes in a subgroup of 54 patients, who had documented PICC placements (n = 161) in addition to TSB‐CVC (n = 58) were compared. TSB‐CVC‐DVT rate was lower than the PICC‐DVT rate (0.017 [1/58] vs. 0.106 per line [17/161]; P = 0.04). The TSB‐CVC‐SpVT rate was not different from the PICC‐SpVT rate (0 [0/58] vs. 0.037 [6/161] per line; P = 0.14).Discussion: TSB‐CVCs demonstrated an excellent safety profile in our study. These catheters should be preferentially utilized for arm vein preservation in advanced kidney disease. Their impact on future AVF success needs further evaluation.