Hebbring, Scott J.

The legacy of human-Neandertal interbreeding Non-African humans are estimated to have inherited on average 1.5 to 4% of their genomes from Neandertals. However, how this genetic legacy affects human traits is unknown. Simonti et al. combined genotyping data with electronic health records. Individual Neandertal alleles were correlated with clinically relevant phenotypes in individuals of European descent. These archaic genetic variants were associated with medical conditions affecting the skin, the blood, and the risk of depression. Science , this issue p. 737

Abstract The advancement in genotyping technology and large SNP arrays has led to an increase in the number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for various complex traits. These GWAS have resulted in the implication of over 1500 SNPs for association with disease traits. However, the SNPs identified from these GWAS are not necessarily the functional variants. Therefore, the next phase in GWAS will involve the validation, augmentation and refining of these putative regions or loci. One possible “next phase” approach would be to catalog all variants found in the study subjects within the loci of interest using sequencing technology, followed by the association analysis. However, sequencing a locus in a large number of subjects is still relatively expensive. By sequencing only a portion of the samples for the follow-up of signals from GWAS, followed by imputation in the remaining samples, one can significantly reduced the cost to localize the punitive variant involved in the etiology of complex phenotypes. A potentially attractive alternative option would be to impute based only on the 1000 Genomes Project; however, this has the drawbacks of using a reference population that does not necessarily match with disease status and LD pattern. Therefore, we conducted a study to investigate the ability to carry-out genotype imputation using a reference panel consisting of sequencing data for a fraction of the study participants. The various approaches were implemented using data from the candidate gene sequencing study conducted at the Mayo Clinic and the 1000 Genomes Project. Our results show that imputation of untyped markers based on sequencing a portion of the study participants is a reasonable, cost-saving, approach for disease mapping and the refinement of putative regions detected with GWAS. We recommend a few guidelines in designing sequencing studies to take advantage of the recent advances in genotype imputation: (1) Select the largest and most diverse reference panel for sequencing, with respect to both haplotypes and phenotypes. One can also use the 1000 Genomes Project in addition to the sequencing of a portion of the study participants; (2) Genotype as many “anchor” markers as possible, in that, the number of markers genotyped on all subjects impacts accuracy. Therefore, additional genotyping of a few common SNP markers not already genotyped on all subjects using a cost effective platform may be needed if the GWAS SNP array does not provide adequate coverage in the locus to be sequenced. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4738.

Abstract The mitochondrion, conventionally thought to be an organelle specific to energy metabolism, is in fact multifunctional and implicated in many diseases, including cancer. To evaluate whether mitochondria-related genes are associated with increased risk for prostate cancer, we genotyped 24 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) within the mitochondrial genome and 376 tagSNPs localized to 78 nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes. The tagSNPs were selected to achieve ≥80% coverage based on linkage disequilibrium. We compared allele and haplotype frequencies in ∼1,000 prostate cancer cases with ∼500 population controls. An association with prostate cancer was not detected for any of the SNPs within the mitochondrial genome individually or for 10 mitochondrial common haplotypes when evaluated using a global score statistic. For the nuclear-encoded genes, none of the tagSNPs were significantly associated with prostate cancer after adjusting for multiple testing. Nonetheless, we evaluated unadjusted P values by comparing our results with those from the Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) phase I data set. Seven tagSNPs had unadjusted P ≤ 0.05 in both our data and in CGEMS (two SNPs were identical and five were in strong linkage disequilibrium with CGEMS SNPs). These seven SNPs (rs17184211, rs4147684, rs4233367, rs2070902, rs3829037, rs7830235, and rs1203213) are located in genes MTRR, NDUFA9, NDUFS2, NDUFB9, and COX7A2, respectively. Five of the seven SNPs were further included in the CGEMS phase II study; however, none of the findings for these were replicated. Overall, these results suggest that polymorphisms in the mitochondrial genome and those in the nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes evaluated are not substantial risk factors for prostate cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(12):3558–66)

Abstract Purpose: The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) catalyze the glutathione conjugation of reactive electrophiles, including carcinogens and many antineoplastic drugs. GSTT1 and GSTM1 are polymorphically deleted, but the full range of genetic variation in these two genes has not yet been explored. We set out to systematically identify common polymorphisms in GSTT1 and GSTM1, followed by functional genomic studies. Experimental Design: First, multiplex PCR was used to determine GSTT1 and GSTM1 copy number in 400 DNA samples (100 each from 4 ethnic groups). Exons, splice junctions, and 5′-flanking regions (5′-FR) were then resequenced using DNA samples that contained at least one copy of GSTT1 or GSTM1. Results: Gene deletion frequencies among ethnic groups were from 33.5% to 73.5% for GSTT1 and from 50.5% to 78.0% for GSTM1. GSTT1 deletion data correlated with the results of mRNA microarray expression studies. The 18 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) observed in GSTT1 included three nonsynonymous coding SNPs (cSNPs) and one single-nucleotide deletion, whereas the 51 GSTM1 SNPs included two nonsynonymous cSNPs. Two of the GSTT1 nonsynonymous cSNPs resulted in decreases in levels of immunoreactive protein to 56% and 12% of wild type (WT), whereas those in GSTM1 resulted in modest increases in protein levels. Reporter gene assays showed that one GSTT1 5′-FR haplotype, with a frequency of 32% in African-American subjects, resulted in an increase in transcription in JEG-3 cells to 351% of that for the WT sequence, and one GSTM1 5′-FR haplotype resulted in an increase in transcription in JEG-3 cells to 129% of WT. Conclusions: These observations suggest that functionally significant pharmacogenomic variation beyond GSTT1 and GSTM1 gene deletion may contribute to carcinogenesis or individual variation in antineoplastic drug therapy response.

AbstractPrevious studies suggest that enzymes involved in the androgen metabolic pathway are susceptibility factors for prostate cancer. Estrogen metabolites functioning as genotoxins have also been proposed as risk factors. In this study, we systematically tested the hypothesis that common genetic variations for those enzymes involved in the androgen and estrogen metabolic pathways increase risk for sporadic and familial prostate cancer. From these two pathways, 46 polymorphisms (34 single nucleotide polymorphisms, 10 short tandem repeat polymorphisms, and 2 null alleles) in 25 genes were tested for possible associations. Those genes tested included PRL, LHB, CYP11A1, HSD3B1, HSD3B2, HSD17B2, CYP17, SRD5A2, AKR1C3, UGT2B15, AR, SHBG, and KLK3 from the androgen pathway and CYP19, HSD17B1, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, COMT, GSTP1, GSTT1, GSTM1, NQO1, ESR1, and ESR2 from the estrogen pathway. A case-control study design was used with two sets of cases: familial cases with a strong prostate cancer family history (n = 438 from 178 families) and sporadic cases with a negative prostate cancer family history (n = 499). The controls (n = 493) were derived from a population-based collection. Our results provide suggestive findings for an association with either familial or sporadic prostate cancer with polymorphisms in four genes: AKR1C3, HSD17B1, NQO1, and GSTT1. Additional suggestive findings for an association with clinical variables (disease stage, grade, and/or node status) were observed for single nucleotide polymorphisms in eight genes: HSD3B2, SRD5A2, SHBG, ESR1, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, GSTT1, and NQO1. However, none of the findings were statistically significant after appropriate corrections for multiple comparisons. Given that the point estimates for the odds ratio for each of these polymorphisms are <2.0, much larger sample sizes will be required for confirmation. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(5):969–78)

Abstract Two variants (rs1447295/DG8S737) of chromosome 8q24 were recently reported to be associated with increased risk of prostate cancer (PC). To confirm this finding, we genotyped and compared the frequencies of these polymorphisms among 1,121 Caucasian men with PC (435 men with familial PC, 491 men with sporadic PC, and 195 men with aggressive PC) to 545 population-based controls. For the single nucleotide polymorphism marker rs1447295, frequencies of the minor allele (A) were 10.3% in controls, 11.9% in sporadic cases, 16.7% in familial cases, and 17.2% in aggressive cases. Compared with controls, the A allele was significantly more common in both familial PC [odds ratios (OR), 1.93; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 1.37–2.72; P = 0.0004] and aggressive PC (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.28–2.74; P = 0.0005) but not for sporadic PC (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.85–1.58; P = 0.25). Although the A allele was more frequent in aggressive PC cases when compared with controls, the allele frequencies were similar among cases with high- and low-grade PC (Gleason grades <7 and ≥7, respectively). For the microsatellite marker DG8S737, the −8 allele was significantly more frequent in familial PC (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09–2.60; P = 0.031), whereas the −10 allele was more frequent in aggressive PC (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.52–5.36; P = 0.0004). Haplotype analysis showed significant differences in haplotype frequencies between the familial PC (P = 0.006) and aggressive PC (P = 0.005) cases versus controls. The −8/A haplotype showed the strongest association with familial PC (P = 0.008), whereas the −10/A haplotype was most strongly associated with aggressive PC (P = 0.00005). These results further confirm the importance of these two polymorphic variants (rs1447295 and DG8S737) as risk factors for PC. However, the mechanism explaining this increased risk has not yet been established. [Cancer Res 2007;67(7):2944–50]

Abstract The Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 (NBS1) gene, which participates in DNA double strand break repair, has been postulated to be a susceptibility factor for a number of cancers, including prostate cancer. Numerous mutations have been identified in NBS1, including the founder mutation 657del5. In this study, a number of analyses were done to determine whether mutations in NBS1 are associated with an increased risk for prostate cancer. The frequency of the 657del5 mutation in both familial prostate cancer cases (1,819 affected men among 909 families) and sporadic prostate cancer cases (1,218 affected men) collected from five centers participating in the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics were compared with that found in 697 normal controls. Seven individuals were identified to carry the mutation among the 3,037 cases screened: four in the familial group (three from one family and one from another) and three in the sporadic cases. The carrier frequency was 0.22% (2 of 909) for the probands and 0.25% (3 of 1,218) for the sporadic cases of prostate cancer. The 657del5 mutation was not detected in either the 293 unaffected members of the prostate cancer families or in the 697 control samples tested. The entire NBS1 gene was also sequenced in 20 of the youngest affected individuals from the Finnish group of familial cases to identify the presence of possible mutations in this high-risk group. One rare (D95N) and one common (E185Q) missense alteration was identified. More detailed analyses of the E185Q polymorphism, along with a third rare variant (R215W), failed to show an association with prostate cancer. Because the 657del5 mutation was absent from the control population, we are unable to determine if this alteration predisposes to prostate cancer. However, our data does suggest that mutations within NBS1, and in particular, 657del5, do not significantly contribute to the overall prostate cancer burden within our patient samples. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(5):935–8)

Abstract Prostate cancer is a leading and increasingly prevalent cause of cancer death in men. Whereas family history of disease is one of the strongest prostate cancer risk factors and suggests a hereditary component, the predisposing genetic factors remain unknown. We first showed that KLF6 is a tumor suppressor somatically inactivated in prostate cancer and since then, its functional loss has been further established in prostate cancer cell lines and other human cancers. Wild-type KLF6, but not patient-derived mutants, suppresses cell growth through p53-independent transactivation of p21. Here we show that a germline KLF6 single nucleotide polymorphism, confirmed in a tri-institutional study of 3,411 men, is significantly associated with an increased relative risk of prostate cancer in men, regardless of family history of disease. This prostate cancer–associated allele generates a novel functional SRp40 DNA binding site and increases transcription of three alternatively spliced KLF6 isoforms. The KLF6 variant proteins KLF6-SV1 and KLF6-SV2 are mislocalized to the cytoplasm, antagonize wtKLF6 function, leading to decreased p21 expression and increased cell growth, and are up-regulated in tumor versus normal prostatic tissue. Thus, these results are the first to identify a novel mechanism of self-encoded tumor suppressor gene inactivation and link a relatively common single nucleotide polymorphism to both regulation of alternative splicing and an increased risk in a major human cancer.