Jevremović, Dragan

Abstract Background: The control of hemoglobin F (Hb F) expression has proven an elusive puzzle with several postulated but not mutually exclusive hypotheses. A silencing mechanism hypothesis, which predicts the existence of a regulatory element that suppresses HbF expression, has been supported by recent investigations into a 3.5 kb region upstream from the delta globin gene (HBD). To test this hypothesis, we have investigated our historical case files in a tertiary care high-throughput clinical laboratory and compared the patient phenotype (Hgb, MCV, MCH, RDW, Hb F %, and flow cytometry Hb F distribution) with the status of this 3.5 kb region. Methods: A query of clinical testing patient files from Mayo Clinic Metabolic Hematology Laboratory yielded 179 patients confirmed by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) to contain large deletions located within the epsilon through beta globin genes. Of these, 27 unrelated patients with breakpoints between the pseudobeta (HBBP1) and HBD genes were identified. Four additional MLPA probe pairs were placed in this region and the patient phenotypes were compared. Results: The interior two (of the four added) probes between HBBP1 and HBD stratified all 27 cases. The other two (flanking) probes were never discriminatory, thus refining the area of interest to 2.4 kb. Sixteen cases showed breakpoints within hg19 g.5260154-5259135 (5' region) and eleven cases showed breakpoints within hg19 g.5259136-5257692 (3' region) upstream of HBD. Patients who displayed a phenotype of HPFH (n = 9) contained breakpoints in the 5' region whereas those with a delta beta thalassemia (DBT) phenotype (n = 11) were associated with breakpoints in the 3' region. A subset (n = 7) with breakpoints in the 5' region had indefinite phenotypic features, but of these, all but one showed homocellular Hb F distribution. Conclusion: Our molecular and phenotypic correlation of 27 patients with large deletional breakpoints between HBBP1 and HBD supports the hypothesis of a silencing element located upstream of HBD and further narrows the area that segregates many HPFH and DBT patient phenotypes from 3.5 kb to 2.4 kb. Several potential silencing effectors with binding sites in this region include HDAC1, GATA1 and H3K27me3; interestingly, the BCL11A binding site may be outside of the regulatory area. Table 1. Phenotypic data of patients with deletions between HBBP1 and HBD. Case Age/Sex Hb F Hb A2 Hb X Hgb RBC MCV MCH MCHC RDW Hb F Flow (Y) (%) (%) (%) (g/dL) ( 10^12/L) (fL) (pg/cell) (hg/cell) (%) 3' Region 1 47 M 25.5 2.1 16.7 6.3 81.4 26.7 32.8 15.7 H 2 5 M 28.3 2.4 12.5 4.9 74.6 25.4 34 15.9 H 3 24 F 30.3 1.7 11.6 4.23 92.7 27.4 29.6 15.2 H 4 9 F 36.3 2.2 S = 62 13.1 5.2 69.9 NA NA 14.8 5 24 F 37.3 2.1 C = 61 12.9 5.1 72.9 25.5 35 14.3 6 3 M 39.7 2.1 12.4 4.4 88.7 28.1 31.7 16.3 7 27 F 40.2 3.4 S = 56 12.2 4.4 79.7 27.8 34.9 15 8 16 M 43.7 2.2 S = 54 15.9 6.8 71.5 23.5 32.9 14.1 9 7m M 100.0* 0.0 12.8 4.8 76 26.5 34.9 16.8 3' Region 10 28 F 20.9 2 10.11 4.4 70.9 22.7 32.1 19 H 11 64 M 21.4 2.3 10.51 4.1 81.1 25.8 31.8 18.1 12 2.5 M 24 2.1 10.21 5.3 59.4 19.3 32.5 20.9 H 13 58 F 24 2.1 9.51 4.4 72.2 21.5 29.8 17.7 H 14 14 F 25.4 1.5 10.81 4.9 69.4 22 31.8 17.6 H 15 52 F 26.9 1.8 8.42 3.6 72 23.5 32.7 19.4 T 16 34 M 38.7 1.7 S = 60 11.4 4.7 71.6 NA NA 21.6 5' Region 17 24 F 2.7 2.9 12.3 6.1 62.2 20 32.2 18.2 18 32 F 6.1 2.7 10.2 5.1 61.3 19.9 32.5 19.3 19 27 F 7.2 2.9 11 5.1 72.9 21.7 29.8 19.9 20 29 F 7.8 2.7 10.2 4.7 72.2 21.7 30 20.5 21 15 M 7.8 2.5 12.7 6.2 64.7 20.4 31.5 21.2 22 42 M 7.8 3.1 10.6 4.9 75.1 21.5 28.6 23.7 23 60 M 10.1 2.5 11 4.5 74.8 24.7 33 23.4 24 41 M 10.7 2.8 8.6 4.1 73.3 21.2 29 26.8 25 30 F 11.5 2.7 12.1 5.5 67.4 21.9 32.5 21.8 26 25 F 13.2 2.8 12.1 5.3 68.4 22.8 33.3 21.6 27 3 F 18.3 2.6 11.9 5.79 63.6 20.6 32.3 22.7 T Normal values <1 2-3.3 0 H = homocellular; T= heterocellular; I = indeterminate; *homozygous deletion -- = no deletion; + = deletion present (all alpha deletions were single -3.7 kb 'rightward' deletions) 1 = Suspected Fe deficiency; 2 = recent transfusion Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction. Voyager-V1 (VV1) is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express human interferon beta (IFNβ) to enhance cellular antitumor immune responses and tumor selectivity. VV1 also contains the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as an imaging gene. We report here the novel use of virus-encoded IFNβ as a PD marker using correlative data from three Phase I trials of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in patients with refractory cancers (n=46). Methods. 46 patients with solid tumors (n=34) and hematological malignancies (n=12) received 1 dose of VV1 either intratumorally (ITu) or intravenously (IV) at doses ranging from 3 x 106 to 5 x 1010 TCID50. Plasma IFNβ levels were collected pre-treatment, 4 hours post-infusion, Day 2 (24-hour), Day 3, 8, 15 and 29 (IT only). Samples were processed using a standard IFNβ specific ELISA kit. Results. ITu dose escalation is complete with 27 patients treated and no DLTs. IV escalation is ongoing at 5 x 1010 TCID50 with 19 patients treated to date. In the ITu study, plasma IFNβ levels at 24h were undetected at the lowest dose levels (up to 1 x 107 TCID50), and became detectable from 3 x 107 TCID50. In the IV patients, IFNβ was detectable at all dose levels (5 x 109 through 5 x 1010 TCID50) with the highest peak and longest duration in a patient with metastatic endometrial cancer coincident with shrinkage of multiple tumors. The IFNβ produced by virus-infected cells can be differentiated from the acute innate antiviral responses by magnitude of response and AUC as the majority of the inflammatory cytokines returned to baseline by 48h. Peak IFNβ levels were variable between patients, likely reflecting heterogeneity in tumor susceptibility to VV1, ranging from 1.4pg/mL to 656pg/mL across 6 patients (mean 153pg/ml) at the highest ITu dose. Plasma IFNβ 24 hours post-therapy of &gt;20pg/mL appears to predict for RECIST 1.1-evaluated SD vs PD, p=0.048 in the ITu patients. Peak IFNβ ranged from 18 to 1700 pg/mL across 9 patients (mean=442pg/ml) at 1.7 x 1010 in the IV study. Peak IFNβ was highest in two cases of endometrial cancer (1500 and 1700 pg/ml). The patient with the highest IFNβ levels on the IV trial showed 16.7% tumor shrinkage at the first tumor evaluation. SPECT imaging, which shows location of viral replication, was positive in 50% of ITu injected tumors, also validating of VV1 infection of target cells. To date, SPECT images were negative in the IV trial despite IFNβ positivity, reflecting IFNβ as a more sensitive PD marker of viral infection. IHC staining of tumor biopsies collected pre-treatment and 1 month after VSV showed increased numbers of CD3, CD8, CD68, PDL1 or PD1 in some injected or noninjected tumors. Other immune markers and tumor gene signatures are also being evaluated. Conclusions. Plasma IFNβ has emerged as a simple and convenient biomarker of viral replication in tumors. IFNβ will be used in future studies as a PD marker to assess the impact of immune-modulating combination drugs with VV1. Citation Format: Timothy P. Cripe, Jamie Bakkum-Gamez, Jaime R. Merchan, Martha Q. Lacy, Manish R. Patel, Steven Powell, James Strauss, Lianwen Zhang, Toshie Sakuma, Memy Diaz, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Deepak Upreti, Bethany Brunton, Dragan Jevremovic, Stephen J. Russell, Alice Bexon, Kah-Whye Peng. Rational design of an oncolytic virus permits use of interferon beta as a pharmacodynamic marker for clinical application [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT090.

BackgroundThe diagnosis of T‐cell neoplasms is often challenging, due to overlapping features with reactive T‐cells and limitations of currently available T‐cell clonality assays. The description of an antibody specific for one of two mutually exclusive T‐cell receptor (TCR) β‐chain constant regions (TRBC1) provide an opportunity to facilitate the detection of clonal TCRαβ T‐cells based on TRBC‐restriction.MethodsTwenty patients with mature T‐cell neoplasms and 44 patients without evidence of T‐cell neoplasia were studied. Peripheral blood (51), bone marrow (10), and lymph node (3) specimens were evaluated by 9‐color flow cytometry including TRBC1 (CD2/CD3/CD4/CD5/CD7/CD8/CD45/TCRγδ/TRBC1 and/or CD2/CD3/CD4/CD5/CD7/CD8/CD26/CD45/TRBC1). Monophasic TRBC1 expression on any immunophenotypically distinct CD4‐positive or CD8‐positive/TCRγδ‐negative T‐cell subset was considered indicative of clonality.ResultsMonophasic (clonal) TRBC1 expression was identified on immunophenotypically abnormal T‐cells from all 20 patients with T‐cell malignancies (100% sensitivity), including 17 cases with either >97% or <3% TRBC1‐positive events, and three cases with monophasic homogenous TRBC1‐dim expression. All immunophenotypically distinct CD4‐positive and CD8‐positive/TCRγδ‐negative T‐cell subsets from 44 patients without T‐cell malignancies showed the expected mixture of TRBC1‐positive and TRBC‐1‐negative subpopulations (non‐clonal), except for seven patients (16%) with very small CD8‐positive T‐cell subsets exhibiting a monophasic (clonal) pattern.ConclusionInclusion of a single anti‐TRBC1 antibody into a diagnostic T‐cell flow cytometry panel facilitates the rapid identification of T‐cell neoplasms, in addition to small monotypic CD8‐positive subsets of uncertain significance. © 2019 International Clinical Cytometry Society

AbstractAchievement of a complete response has been associated with improved outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Recently, increasing application of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment has shown that MRD negativity is a powerful prognostic factor for survival outcomes. We wanted to examine the impact of the polyclonal plasma cell (pPC) compartment among patients in complete response (CR) but are MRD positive. This is a retrospective cohort study where 460 myeloma patients were identified who met criteria for CR and had multicolor flow cytometry performed on the bone marrow (BM). Monoclonal and pPCs were estimated during MRD testing. Final outcomes including overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were compared among the groups. The median OS for the entire cohort was not reached (95% CI; 63 mos, NR) and the median TTNT was 31 months (95% CI; 27,36). Among the MRDneg group, median TTNT was 37.6 months vs 23 months for MRDpos patients (P < .001); the median OS was not reached for either group, but there was a trend toward better survival for MRDneg patients. Among the MRDpos group, median percentage of pPCs was 65% (2.5–98.5), and those with >95% pPCs had a significantly better TTNT (NR vs 23 months; P = .02) and a trend toward better OS. We conclude that achievement of MRD negativity predicts for better response durability and trend toward improved OS and an increased proportion of pPC predicts for better outcomes within those who have residual tumor cells highlighting the importance of marrow normalization.

This article provides an overview of the role of flow cytometry in the diagnosis, prognosis, and follow‐up of T and NK‐cell lymphoproliferative disorders. For each category, we will briefly discuss the immunophenotypic features of normal T and NK cells, and address technical issues in flow cytometry, the approach to diagnosis in various contexts, pitfalls in interpretation, and its use in follow‐up and post‐therapy management. In addition to reviewing the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utility of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in several of specific T and NK cell entities, we will also cover some of the new immunophenotypic markers. Furthermore, we will touch upon incorporation of flow cytometry in the final diagnosis, including correlation with other ancillary tests. © 2019 International Clinical Cytometry Society

AbstractTrisomies of odd numbered chromosomes are seen in nearly half of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and typically correlate with a hyperdiploid state and better overall survival (OS). We compared DNA ploidy of monoclonal plasma cells (as a surrogate for the presence of trisomies) assessed simultaneously by PCPRO (plasma cell proliferative index), a novel method that estimates DNA index by multi‐parametric flow cytometry to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 1703 patients with plasma cell disorders. The distribution of ploidy was hyperdiploid: 759 (45%), diploid 765 (45%), hypodiploid: 71 (4%), tetraploid/near‐tetraploid: 108 (6%). FISH identified trisomies in 82% (621/756) of patients with hyperdiploidy by PCPRO and no trisomy by FISH was observed in 88% (730/834) of patients without hyperdiploidy. 95% (795/834) of patients without hyperdiploidy on PCPRO had one or less trisomy by FISH. Sensitivity and specificity of PCPRO for detecting hyperdiploidy was 86% (621/725) and 84% (730/865), respectively. Sensitivity increased to 94% (579/618) for patients with more than one trisomy. Newly diagnosed MM patients with hyperdiploidy on PCPRO (147/275) had better OS compared to nonhyperdiploid patients (median not reached vs 59 months, P = 0.008) and better progression free survival (median: 33 vs 23 months, P = 0.03). Within the hyperdiploidy group, patients with high‐hyperdiploidy (DNA index: 1.19‐1.50) versus those with low‐hyperdiploidy (DNA index: 1.05‐1.18) had superior OS (3 year OS of 88% vs 68% P = 0.03). Ploidy assessment by flow cytometry can provide rapid, valuable prognostic information and also reduces the number of copy number FISH probes required and hence the cost of FISH.

Abstract The plasma cell proliferative index (PCPI), determined by a slide technique or by flow cytometry, detects cells in the S phase of the cell cycle and is a useful prognostic tool in patients with plasma cell disorders such as multiple myeloma and amyloidosis. We conducted a retrospective review analyzing the prognostic effect of PCPI in 306 patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Seventy-nine (26%) patients had an elevated PCPI (&gt;0.5). An elevated PCPI predicted an inferior time to progression (median, 3.0 vs 7.1 years for those with a low PCPI; P = .0004). Within 24 months, the progression rate was significantly higher for patients with an elevated PCPI (49% vs. 20%; P &lt; .0001). PCPI is a valuable tool in risk stratifying patients with SMM and identifies patients with earlier progression who may benefit from closer follow-up and consideration of early intervention trials.