Leventakos, Konstantinos

e20639 Background: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a robust benefit of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We did a meta-analysis to examine the benefit of ICI in various subgroups. Methods: PubMed was searched up to Jan 15, 2019 for RCTs comparing overall survival (OS) between ICI and control (without ICI) arms. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each subgroup. Interaction tests were done to compare relative benefit between opposed subgroups of interest (eg. men vs women; reported as Pheterogeneity). All analyses were performed with a random effects model in Comprehensive Meta Analysis (v2). Results: Twelve phase 2/3 RCTs involving 7244 patients were included. A significant OS benefit of ICI was found in both squamous and non-squamous histology. Current/former smokers, EGFR wild-type, and KRAS mutant patients had a significant OS benefit from ICI, but never smokers, EGFR mutant, and KRAS wild-type patients did not. An OS benefit of ICI was found in patients with or without baseline brain metastasis, PD-L1 < 1% or ≥1%, men or women, age < 65 or ≥65, and ECOG PS 0 or ≥1. No significant difference of relative benefit from ICI over control was found in patients with different PD-L1 expression, sex, age, or ECOG PS (Table). Conclusions: OS benefit of ICI in NSCLC was associated with a smoking history, wild-type EGFR or KRAS mutation. However, the OS benefit of ICI was seen regardless of histology, PD-L1 expression, sex, age, and ECOG PS. [Table: see text]

6581 Background: While AC is recommended for all patients with stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA NSCLC, its use and benefit among the elderly population is unclear. Methods: We identified patients with stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA NSCLC using the National Cancer Database from 2006-2014. Patients were divided into age groups ≤65, 66-70, 71-75, 76-80, > 80 years. Trends in AC use, factors influencing AC administration, and outcomes associated with AC were studied. Results: Out of 27368 patients, 13464 received AC and 13904 did not. 11% had stage IIA disease, 50% had stage IIB disease and 39% had stage IIIA disease. AC use was lower with increasing age (49% age ≤65 vs. 3% age > 80 (P < 0.0001)). Temporal use of chemotherapy for each age group was unchanged from 2006-2014. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors predictive of lower AC use were older age, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, academic center, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Stage IIIA (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.6) and Stage IIB (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4) had a higher chance of receiving AC than stage IIA. In a Cox proportional hazard model, younger age, female sex, academic center, private insurance, higher income, lower CCI, West coast center and AC were associated with better outcomes. When stratified by age and stage, AC was still associated with better survival (Table). Conclusions: AC utilization in stages IIA, IIB and IIIA NSCLC remains low, despite its association with improved survival in the elderly. Future clinical trials may be needed focused on elderly patients to establish the best regimen to optimize outcomes. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have emerged as a serious clinical issue in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Risk factors for irAEs remain controversial. Therefore, we studied sex differences in irAEs in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy. Materials and Methods All patients with metastatic melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-PD-1 therapy at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Florida from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used for time-to-event analysis. Results In 245 patients with metastatic melanoma, premenopausal women were more likely to experience irAEs (all grades) compared with postmenopausal women and men (67% vs. 60% vs. 46%), primarily because of an increase in endocrinopathies (33% vs. 12% vs. 10%, respectively). In patients with NSCLC (231 patients), women (all ages) were also more likely to develop irAEs of all grades (48% vs. 31%). Women with NSCLC were more likely to develop pneumonitis (11% vs. 4%) and endocrinopathies (14% vs. 5%). No differences in grade ≥3 toxicities were seen across sexes in both cohorts, but women were more likely to receive systemic steroids for the treatment of irAEs compared with men. Better progression-free-survival was observed in women with NSCLC and irAEs (10 months vs. 3.3 months) compared with women without irAEs. Conclusion Women with metastatic melanoma and NSCLC are more likely to experience irAEs compared with men. We also observed differences between sexes in the frequency of certain irAEs. Larger studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying these associations. Implications for Practice The results of this study suggest that women may be at a higher risk for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) compared with men when treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy. In addition, women were more likely to develop certain irAEs, including endocrinopathies and pneumonitis. Close follow-up of women undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors will allow clinicians to diagnose these treatment-related complications early, potentially reducing their associated morbidity and mortality. In addition, a possible association between irAEs and response to therapy was observed.

Abstract Background: Despite the importance of diversity while studying new drugs, many cancer clinical trials (CT) lack appropriate representation of specific patient populations, limiting the generalizability of the evidence obtained. Therefore, we determined the representation of ethnic minorities, the elderly, and women in cancer CT. Methods: Enrollment data from all therapeutic trials reported as completed in clinicaltrial.gov from 2003 to 2016 were analyzed. CT in rare cancers (&lt; 1% incidence) or with recruitment outside of the United States were excluded. Enrollment fraction (EF) was defined as the number of enrollees divided by the 2013 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database cancer prevalence. Results: Out of 1,012 CT, 310 (31%) reported ethnicity with a total of 55,689 enrollees. 46,431 (83%) enrollees were non-Hispanic white, 3,270 (6%) African American, 2,982 (5.3%) Asian, 1,484 (2.6%) Hispanic, and 1,332 (2.4%) were classified as other. Participation in CT varied significantly across ethnic groups; non-Hispanic whites were more likely to be enrolled in CT (EF of 1.2%) than African Americans (EF of 0.7%, p &lt;0.001) and Hispanics (EF of 0.4%, p &lt;0.001). A decrease in African American (6% vs. 9.2%) and Hispanic (2.6% vs. 3.1%) enrollment was observed when compared with historical data from 1996 to 2002. Asians were well represented and their recruitment doubled over the past 14 years (2% vs. 5.3%). Hispanics were less represented in breast and prostate cancer CT, only contributing to 3% and 1.5% of the study population. African Americans were less represented in lung (5.4%) and renal cell carcinoma (3%) trials. Enrollees' median age was 60 years with 64% of patients &lt;65 years of age. Younger patients (&lt;65 years) were more likely to be enrolled in CT than the elderly (64% vs. 36%, p &lt; 0.001). Lower recruitment of female patients was observed in CT for melanoma (35%), lung (39%), and pancreatic cancer (40%). Conclusions: African Americans, Hispanics, and the elderly were less likely to be enrolled in CT. Comparing with historical data, we observed a decrease in minorities' recruitment over the past 14 years. This change could be attributed to the increased complexity of CT and mandatory molecular testing as many minorities lack access to institutions with genetic-testing capacity. Future trials should take extra measures to recruit participants who adequately represent the U.S. cancer population. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Jesus Vera-Aguilera, Yucai Wang, Jonas Paludo, Konstantinos Leventakos, Aaron Mansfield, Alex Adjei. Representation of minorities, the elderly, and women in over 1000 clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr A26.

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. About 75% of ovarian cancer patients relapse and/or develop chemo‐resistant disease after initial response to standard‐of‐care treatment with platinum‐based therapies. HER2 amplifications and overexpression in ovarian cancer are reported to vary, and responses to HER2 inhibitors have been poor. Next generation sequencing technologies in conjunction with testing using patient‐derived xenografts (PDX) allow validation of personalized treatments. Using a whole‐genome mate‐pair next generation sequencing (MPseq) protocol, we identified several high grade serous ovarian cancers (HGS‐OC) with DNA alterations in genes encoding members of the ERBB2 pathway. The efficiency of anti‐HER2 therapy was tested in three different PDX lines with the identified alterations and high levels of HER2 protein expression. Treatment responses to pertuzumab or pertuzumab/trastuzumab were compared in each PDX line WITH standard carboplatin and paclitaxel combination treatment. In all three PDX models, HER2‐targeted therapy resulted in significant inhibition of tumor growth compared with untreated controls. However, the responses in each case were inferior to those to chemotherapy, even for chemo‐resistant lines. When chemotherapy and HER2‐targeted therapy were administered together, a significant regression of tumor was observed after 6 weeks of treatment compared with chemotherapy alone. Post‐treatment analysis of these tissues revealed that inhibition of the ERBB2 pathway occurred at the level of phosphorylation and expression of downstream targets. In conclusion, while targeting of presumably activated ERBB2 pathway alone in HGS‐OC results in a modest treatment benefit, a combination therapy including both chemotherapy drugs and HER2 inhibitors provides a far better response. Further studies are needed to address development of recurrence and sensitivity of recurrent disease to HER2‐targeted therapy.

8549 Background: Bronchial carcinoid tumors are a rare group of neoplasms that usually have an indolent clinical behavior. Surgical resection is the main treatment modality for patients with early stage disease, however it is unclear if lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection (L) is superior compared to partial lobectomy (PL). Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2004-2012, 1551 patients diagnosed with T1N0 or T2N0 typical carcinoid tumors (CT), and 167 atypical carcinoid tumors (ACT), who underwent L or PL (segmental or wedge resection) as initial treatment strategy, and did not receive chemotherapy or radiation were identified. All patients had pathologically confirmed diagnosis, negative surgical margins, and complete follow up data. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests were used for statistical comparisons. Cox proportional hazards were performed to control for age, sex, race, grade, year of diagnosis, Charlson/Deyo Score, insurance, income, and facility type. T-test was used to compare post-surgical hospital stay. Results: The entire cohort median age was 61 years (range 18-90), and male to female ratio was 0.43. 75% of patients with CT and 78% of ATC underwent L. The 90 day mortality following surgery was < 1 % in both surgical groups. Patients who underwent L had longer post-operative hospitalization stay (mean 5.3 vs. 4.3 days; p < 0.001). The 5 year survival for patients with CT was 95% in the L versus 93% in the PL group (p = 0.62), and for ACT 89% in the L versus 81% PL group (p = 0.28). In a multivariate analysis increasing age was the only prognostic factor, and was associated with inferior survival. The HR for death comparing PL to L was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.65-1.78; p = 0.71) for CT and 1.25 (95% CI: 0.45-3.23; p = 0.65) for ACT. Conclusions: Patients with localized node-negative CT and ACT have excellent 5 year survival. Performing a lobectomy with mediastinal node dissection may not provide additional benefit compared to partial lobectomy, but this may increase the length of hospital stay.

2533 Background: Many cancer clinical trials (CT) lack appropriate representation of specific patients populations, limiting the generalizability of the evidence obtained. Therefore, we determined the representation of ethnic minorities in oncology CT. Methods: Enrollment data from all therapeutic trials reported as completed in clinicaltrial.gov from 2003 to 2016 were analyzed. CT in rare cancers (< 1% incidence) or with recruitment outside of the US were excluded. Enrollment fraction (EF) was defined as the number of enrollees divided by the 2013 SEER database cancer prevalence. Chi-square test was used to estimate differences in categorical data. Results: Out of 1,012 CT, 310 (31%) reported ethnicity with a total of 55689 enrollees. Distribution by race and comparison with data from 1996-2002, US cancer prevalence and US census are described in the Table. Participation in CT varied significantly across ethnic groups, non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) were more likely to be enrolled in CT (EF of 1.2%) than African Americans (EF of 0.7%, p < 0.001) and Hispanics (EF of 0.4%, p<0.001). A decrease in African Americans (AA) and Hispanics (H) enrollment was observed when compared with historical data from 1996 to 2002. Hispanics were less represented in breast and prostate cancer CT contributing only to 3% and 1.5% of the study population; African Americans were less represented in lung (5.4%) and renal cell carcinoma (3%) trials. Asians were well represented and their recruitment doubled over the past 14 years (2% vs 5.3%). Conclusions: African Americans and Hispanics were less likely to be enrolled in CT. Comparing with historical data; we observed a decrease in minorities’ recruitment in the past 14 years. This change could be attributed to the increased complexity of CT and mandatory molecular testing as many minorities lack access to institutions with genetic testing capacity. Future trials should take extra measures to recruit participants that adequately represent the U.S. cancer population. [Table: see text]

8533 Background: BNET are a rare and frequently indolent group of neoplasms. Lobectomy is frequently done for patients with non-metastatic disease, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with node positive disease (N+) is debated. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2004-2012 we identified 1682 patients with N+ non-metastatic BNET. All patients underwent primary resection, had pathologically confirmed diagnosis, complete follow up data, and were alive > 30 days following surgery. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests were used to compare 2 groups of patients that differed based on receiving or not adjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed based on histologic subtypes. Cox proportional hazards was performed to control for age, sex, race, grade, surgical margins, type of surgery, year of diagnosis, Charlson/Deyo Score, insurance, facility type, and location. Results: 651 patients with typical carcinoid (CT), 239 atypical carcinoid (ACT), 426 large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), and 366 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) were analyzed. The cohort median age was 61, and the female:male ratio was 1.8 for CT, ACT and NEC, and 1 for LCNEC 90% of patients were White and there were no significant differences amongst histologic subtypes. 6% of patients with CT received ADJ-CT, compared to 40% ACT, 42% NEC, and 70% LCNEC. In a multivariate analysis, only increasing age was associated with worse prognosis across all histologic subtypes, and non-academic facility for CT, and male sex for NEC. ADJ-CT was not associated with OS benefit for patients with ACT (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.68-1.78; p:0.6), was associated with inferior OS in CT (HR: 3.8 (95% CI 1.9-7.0; p = 0.004) and NEC (HR: 2.15; 95% CI 1.5-3.0; p < 0.001), and may provide benefit for LCNEC (HR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.5-0.9; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with survival benefit for patients with node positive and non-metastatic BNET except for LCNEC, and may be harmful for patients with CT and NEC.