Petersen, Ronald

ABSTRACT Background Previous studies on the relationship between prediabetes, HbA1c and cognitive trajectories show mixed results. Therefore, we investigated the association of prediabetes, diabetes and HbA1c with change in global and domain‐specific cognitive scores in cognitively unimpaired (CU) adults, as well as the potential effect modification by sex or age. Methods This longitudinal study included 4236 CU persons aged ≥ 50 years from the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. We ran linear mixed‐effect models with baseline prediabetes, diabetes and HbA1c predicting longitudinal global and domain‐specific (i.e., memory, language, attention/executive function, and visuospatial skills) cognitive z‐scores and raw scores. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education, medical comorbidity, repeated cognitive testing, and ApoEɛ4. We additionally ran models with sex and age interactions. Results Compared to normoglycemic individuals, individuals with prediabetes and diabetes showed poorer performance on cognitive tests, i.e., TMT‐B, category fluency, and block design subtest over time. Additionally, the presence of prediabetes, diabetes, longer diabetes duration and higher HbA1c were associated with faster global and domain‐specific cognitive decline over a median follow‐up of 6.4 years (range 1–19). Three‐way interactions showed that the effect of diabetes on decline in global cognition, attention and visuospatial domains was more pronounced in women than in men. Age did not modify the effect of diabetes or higher HbA1c on cognition. Conclusions The results suggest that prediabetes and diabetes significantly shorten the timeframe before a potentially clinically noticeable change in global and domain‐specific cognition is reached. Thus, lifestyle modification to reverse prediabetes and prevent diabetes could potentially reduce the rate of cognitive decline in aging populations. The findings differed by sex (i.e., the effect of diabetes on decline in global cognition, attention and visuospatial domains was more pronounced in women than men).

Abstract BACKGROUND Understanding long-term sequelae of cancer care is critical. Cognitive impairment is a common and disabling survivorship issue. Because sex influences tumor biology, therapy exposure, and dementia risk, we examined whether cancer care for a prior malignancy alters late-life cognitive outcomes differently in males and females. METHODS We assessed adults ≥50 years, cognitively normal at study entry, from a longitudinal, population-based cohort (Mayo Clinic Study of Aging). Participants were linked to our institutional cancer registry (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia were adjudicated by consensus. We fitted multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to estimate how prevalent cancer diagnosis influenced the risk of developing MCI/dementia. Sex-specific effects were determined by incorporating a cancer×sex interaction term and by generating separate hazard ratios. Analyses were controlled for age, APOE4 status, education, and presence of vascular/metabolic conditions. RESULTS 5793 MCSA participants (female: 49.4%, APOE4 positive: 27.5%) were included in the study, with a mean age of 73 years at study entry. Incident MCI was recorded in 866 participants, and 737 were diagnosed with incident dementia. About 20% (n=1176) of the cohort had a cancer diagnosis, most commonly prostate (n=423) and breast (n=277). There was no independent relationship between history of cancer and risk for MCI or dementia. We found that males with cancer had an increased risk for MCI (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.57, p=0.003) and dementia (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.6, p=0.053). Conversely, females with cancer had a lower risk for MCI (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.01, p=0.063), although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggests male cancer survivors may be more susceptible to cognitive impairment, independent of age, APOE4 status, education, and vascular/metabolic burden. Elucidating the hormonal, treatment-related, and systemic pathways driving this should be a priority for future mechanistic studies.

Background The literature on dyslipidemia and cognitive trajectories among cognitively unimpaired (CU) persons remains inconclusive. Objective To investigate the association between baseline dyslipidemia and change in global and domain specific (i.e., memory, language, attention/executive function, and visuospatial skills) cognition in a population-based setting and whether the association differs by sex, age, or APOE ɛ4 carrier status. Methods We conducted a longitudinal study derived from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, involving 4236 CU persons aged ≥ 50 years. We ran linear mixed-effect models to examine baseline dyslipidemia in predicting longitudinal cognitive global and domain-specific z-scores adjusted for age, sex, education, medical comorbidity, repeated cognitive testing, and APOE ɛ4. We examined interactions among dyslipidemia, years since baseline, and separately by sex, age, and APOE ɛ4 carrier status. Results Over a median follow-up period of 6.4 years, CU individuals with dyslipidemia showed faster decline in z-scores of all domains, i.e., memory, language, attention/executive function, visuospatial and global cognition relative to CU individuals without dyslipidemia. Three-way interactions showed that dyslipidemia's effect on decline in z-scores of global cognition, attention and visuospatial skills was less pronounced in males than females. Higher age increased dyslipidemia's effect on decline in z-scores of attention but not global cognition or any other domain. APOE ɛ4 carrier status did not modify the effect of dyslipidemia on cognitive z-scores. Conclusions Dyslipidemia was associated with faster global and domain-specific cognitive decline over time in older community-dwelling individuals who were cognitively unimpaired at baseline. The effect of dyslipidemia on cognitive trajectories may be sex-influenced.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Research is limited regarding meaningful change thresholds for individual patients on clinical outcome assessments (COAs) frequently used in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), particularly in population‐based studies early in the disease course. METHODS There were 646 study participants in the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA), 54–99 years old (47% females), who developed the clinical syndromes of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with complete data to establish clinically meaningful within‐patient change thresholds in cognitive and functional COAs. RESULTS Using the diagnosis of incident MCI as the anchor, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) annualized estimates of change were: Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale Sum of Boxes (SB) 0.49 (0.43, 0.55), Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) −1.01 (−1.12, −0.91), and Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) score 1.04 (0.82, 1.26). DISCUSSION This study provides within‐patient estimates of clinically meaningful change early in disease progression in a community‐based sample. Highlights We studied incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) participants from a population‐based study. Within‐patient change thresholds were estimated for clinical outcome assessments (COAs) used in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD). These estimates may be used to plan and evaluate clinical trials involving disease‐modifying therapies (DMTs).

Abstract A workgroup assembled by the Alzheimer’s Association recently described a conceptual framework for Alzheimer’s disease biological staging based on amyloid and tau PET imaging. However, specific tau PET cut points were left to be determined, a step necessary prior to clinical application. We sought to operationalize and evaluate Alzheimer’s disease biological staging by identifying meaningful tau PET cut points to define the four biological stages in a well-characterized participant cohort and describe the features of individuals placed into the different biological stages. The primary analysis included 896 participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging or the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center longitudinal cohorts. A validation cohort consisted of 328 participants in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Both cognitively normal and impaired individuals with positive amyloid PET and evaluable tau PET imaging were included. Tau PET cut points were identified with Gaussian mixture models to characterize Alzheimer’s disease biological stage in study participants with different clinical diagnoses and objective degrees of cognitive impairment as measured by Mini-Mental State Examination. A tau PET cut point in the medial temporal region and two cut points in the temporoparietal region were identified to produce, collectively, the four Alzheimer’s disease biological stages described in the revised criteria. Increasing stage was associated with greater likelihood of mild cognitive impairment and dementia diagnosis and worsening cognitive performance on Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes, a result that was reproduced in the independent Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. This study provided empirical validation for the concept of using amyloid PET and tau PET to separate subjects with biomarker-proven Alzheimer’s disease into four biological stages with distinct characteristics.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONWe investigated the usefulness of plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for capturing vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) in the context of amyloidosis.METHODSUsing two independent cohorts (n = 1810), we assessed the relationship of plasma NfL and GFAP with (1) vascular brain indices; (2) diagnostic states using the following definitions: vascular versus not (white matter hyperintensity/total intracranial volume ≥ 1.3%), and cognitively impaired (CI) versus cognitively unimpaired (CU) using Clinical Dementia Rating ([CDR] scale ≥ 0.5); and (3) their upstream predictors using structural equation models (SEMs).RESULTSPlasma NfL and GFAP were associated with vascular brain damage and differed across states (VCI > vascular CU > non‐vascular CI > non‐vascular CU). In a population‐based sample, these biomarkers distinguished vascular CU and VCI from non‐vascular CU groups with greater separation in amyloid negative participants. Pathway analyses showed NfL was primarily influenced by systemic/brain vascular health, whereas amyloid contributed to GFAP variability.DISCUSSIONPlasma biomarkers, particularly NfL, capture vascular brain changes and show promise for VCI identification.Highlights Plasma NfL and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were associated with vascular brain indices. Plasma biomarkers differed across diagnostic states (VCI > vascular CU > non‐vascular CI > non‐vascular CU). Plasma markers discriminated vascular from non‐vascular states with greater separation in Aβ− participants. NfL was linked to vascular health, while amyloid influenced GFAP variability in the population‐based sample. Future longitudinal frameworks should consider systemic inflammation markers along with these plasma markers to better understand VCID‐related brain changes and cognitive decline.