Graff‐Radford, Neill R.

AbstractBackgroundThe overarching goal of the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer Disease study (LEADS) is to optimally characterize early‐onset AD (EOAD) and establish an EOAD clinical trials network. Here we report the baseline demographic and imaging biomarker comparisons of the LEADS cohort to late‐onset AD (LOAD) subjects from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3).Method123 amyloid‐positive EOAD, 47 amyloid‐negative EOnonAD, 60 cognitively normal young controls were compared to 130 amyloid‐positive LOAD, 110 amyloid‐negative LOnonAD and 286 amyloid‐negative cognitively normal older controls. To account for the effect of cognitive aging between EO and LO populations, each cognitive measure was Z‐transformed. Cortical and hippocampal atrophy were quantified using W‐scores adjusted for age, sex and total intracranial volume. Z‐scores and W‐scores were compared using t‐test or Wilcoxson rank test as appropriate. All p‐values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate correction.ResultEOAD showed greater pathology burden and greater cortical atrophy (AD signature) relative to LOAD. EOAD also showed greater cognitive impairment across all cognitive tests. EOAD showed greater functional impairment, more depression but less neuropsychiatric behaviors overall compared to LOAD (Table 1 and Figure 1, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses stratified by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.EOnonAD differed from LOnonAD by also showing greater impairment on all cognitive and functional measures There were no significant differences in amyloid and tau burden, or atrophy W‐scores between these groups. EOnonAD were more depressed and showed more functional impairment compared to LOnonAD (Table 2 and Figure 2, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses split by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.ConclusionConsistent with our preexisting hypotheses, EOAD and EOnonAD perform much worse relative to their LO counterparts. EOAD also show greater pathological burden as expected. The reported analyses were done in chronological rather than disease time (time since disease onset). Benchmarking individuals along the disease spectrum might prove to be a better strategy especially when conducting analyses on rate of disease progression.

AbstractBackgroundAdvancing age is an important risk factor for dementia and cancer. An inverse association between these conditions has been described, yet caution from potential biases/confounders is warranted. Dementia and cancer may represent a spectrum of opposing dysregulated degenerative (apoptosis) and growth (proliferative) pathways respectively (Driver, 2014). Risk or resiliency factors affecting these pathways may influence cognitive outcomes in the oldest‐old. We sought to investigate demographics, clinical characteristics, and the impact of medical comorbidity on possible risk‐resiliency factors for neurodegeneration in nondemented and demented oldest‐old who died and underwent autopsy.MethodMedical records of 161 decedents (female n=134) from the Mayo Clinic 95+ year‐old cohort (age range 95‐106 years‐old) were reviewed. Groups consisting of nondemented (n=72) and demented (n=89) decedents were stratified and compared according to demographics and clinical variables, including history of cancer. Autopsy and neuropathologic evaluation was also conducted.ResultAge at death, sex, race, and education showed no differences between nondemented and demented decedents. History of cancer was higher in nondemented (57%) compared to demented decedents (30%) (p=0.002). APOE ε4 allele presence did not differ amongst groups, while APOE ε2 allele was more common in the nondemented group (p=0.026). History of coronary artery disease was higher in the nondemented (p=0.033). No differences were observed in other vascular risk factors, alcohol use, or depression. Smoking history approached significance and was higher in nondemented compared to demented (p=0.068). MMSE scores were higher in the nondemented group (p<0.001). Neuropathology findings included a lower Braak tangle staging in nondemented (median=III) compared to demented (median=V) groups (p<0.001) and less frequent diffuse plaques observed in the nondemented (67%) compared with those demented (93%) (p<0.001).ConclusionDementia is less frequent among cancer survivors in the 95+ oldest‐old. Disease‐related mechanisms associated with malignancy and surviving it may be protective against neurodegeneration in the oldest old.

AbstractBackgroundImpaired olfaction has been associated with neurodegenerative diseases and may be a useful tool to aid in diagnosis or track disease progression. We sought to compare olfaction in participants with the clinical diagnoses of idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), or Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD).MethodParticipants from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center database who had a diagnosis of RBD (n=27, 56% male), DLB (n=51, 84% male), or AD (n=83, 47% male), and were given the Brief Smell Identification Test (B‐SIT) were included in this analysis. The B‐SIT score was calculated as the sum of correct responses (12 possible). Scores were categorized as reflecting anosmia (<6), hyposmia (6‐10), and normal olfactory function (>10). All participants underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluations.ResultGlobal cognition was lower in AD and DLB than RBD (MMSE 21.5 ±4.9 in AD, 23.3 ±4.3 in DLB, 28.8 ± 1.2 in RBD; p <0.001). The mean B‐SIT total score was significantly lower for DLB (4.5 ± 3.1) compared to RBD (7.5 ± 3.0) or AD (7.0 ± 2.7) (p<0.001) using an ANOVA F‐test. Anosmia was present in 76% of DLB, which compared to 32% in RBD, and 32% in AD (p=0.9). Hyposmia was present in 18% of DLB, 47% of RBD, and 52% of AD (p=ns). Of 22 patients with normal olfaction, X% were DLB, X% RBD, and X% AD (p=X). An item analysis illustrated that participants with DLB were less likely to identify Menthol, Clove, Strawberry, Smoke, and Soap than those with RBD and AD. On serial examination, 12 RBD (60%) patients’ B‐SIT score decreased by at least one point at their most recent visit compared to their baseline visit.ConclusionThese findings suggest that impaired olfactory function is frequent in RBD, DLB and AD, with olfaction being worst in DLB in this cohort. Olfaction was declining in most of those with RBD who underwent serial evaluations. Further analyses are needed to determine if any scents are more sensitive to phenotype, progression, and degree of cognitive impairment. Supported by: NIH grants AG016574, NS100620, AG056639, AG015866

AbstractBackgroundNeocortical tau can be present in over half of patients with Lewy body disease at autopsy, and may influence the timing of when a diagnosis of Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) can be made. We examined whether the core features, onset age and latency of probable DLB diagnosis differ by pathological subgroups.MethodAll patients (n=176) met clinical criteria for probable DLB, underwent autopsy and were classified as transitional or diffuse Lewy body disease (TLBD, DLBD). The TLBD and DLBD groups were further subdivided based on the absence of neocortical tangles represented by a low (L) Braak NFT stage of 0‐III or by the presence of neocortical tangles represented by a high (H) Braak NFT stage of IV‐VI. Onset age and latency from cognitive symptom onset to probable DLB were compared for TLBD‐L (n=30), DLBD‐L (n=47), DLBD‐H (n=78) and TLBD‐H (n=21).ResultThe TLBD‐H group met criteria for DLB at an older age (median 76 years) compared to TLBD‐L, DLBD‐L or DLBD‐H groups (median age 70 years, p<0.001). The latency to probable DLB from cognitive onset was shortest for TLBD‐L and DLBD‐L (median < 1 year), which was shorter than DLBD‐H (median 2 years; p=0.016), each of which were shorter than TLBD‐H (median 7.3 years; p<0.001). RBD was more common in men (79% men vs. 40% women, p<0.001) and in patients without neocortical tangles (86% vs. 57%, p<0.001). Patients with RBD met criteria for probable DLB at a younger age than those without a history of RBD (median 69 years vs. 76 years, p<0.001). Men had a shorter latency to probable DLB than women (median 1.0 year vs. 2.8 years, p<0.01), but this was related to RBD status that was more common in men.ConclusionPresence of RBD in both sexes led to a younger onset age and shorter latency to diagnosis of probable DLB. Patients with more widespread tau relative to α‐synuclein pathology (TLBD‐H) were older when probable DLB was diagnosed compared to those with so‐called pure Lewy body disease (TLBD‐L, DLBD‐L) or those with diffuse α‐synuclein and tau pathology (DLBD‐H).

Abstract Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP) is a complex heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder for which mechanisms are poorly understood. To explore transcriptional changes underlying FTLD-TDP, we performed RNA-sequencing on 66 genetically unexplained FTLD-TDP patients, 24 FTLD-TDP patients with GRN mutations and 24 control participants. Using principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering, differential expression and coexpression network analyses, we showed that GRN mutation carriers and FTLD-TDP-A patients without a known mutation shared a common transcriptional signature that is independent of GRN loss-of-function. After combining both groups, differential expression as compared to the control group and coexpression analyses revealed alteration of processes related to immune response, synaptic transmission, RNA metabolism, angiogenesis and vesicle-mediated transport. Deconvolution of the data highlighted strong cellular alterations that were similar in FTLD-TDP-A and GRN mutation carriers with NSF as a potentially important player in both groups. We propose several potentially druggable pathways such as the GABAergic, GDNF and sphingolipid pathways. Our findings underline new disease mechanisms and strongly suggest that affected pathways in GRN mutation carriers extend beyond GRN and contribute to genetically unexplained forms of FTLD-TDP-A.

AbstractIntroductionCaregivers of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) spectrum disorders experience tremendous burden, which has been associated with the neuropsychiatric and behavioral features of the disorders.MethodsIn a sample of 558 participants with FTLD spectrum disorders, we performed multiple‐variable regressions to identify the behavioral features that were most strongly associated with caregiver burden, as measured by the Zarit Burden Interview, at each stage of disease.ResultsApathy and disinhibition, as rated by both clinicians and caregivers, as well as clinician‐rated psychosis, showed the strongest associations with caregiver burden, a pattern that was consistent when participants were separated cross‐sectionally by disease stage. In addition, behavioral features appeared to contribute most to caregiver burden in patients with early dementia.DiscussionCaregivers should be provided with early education on the management of the behavioral features of FTLD spectrum disorders. Interventions targeting apathy, disinhibition, and psychosis may be most useful to reduce caregiver burden.

AbstractAs prevention trials advance with autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) participants, understanding the similarities and differences between ADAD and “sporadic” late‐onset AD (LOAD) is critical to determine generalizability of findings between these cohorts. Cognitive trajectories of ADAD mutation carriers (MCs) and autopsy‐confirmed LOAD individuals were compared to address this question. Longitudinal rates of change on cognitive measures were compared in ADAD MCs (n = 310) and autopsy‐confirmed LOAD participants (n = 163) before and after symptom onset (estimated/observed). LOAD participants declined more rapidly in the presymptomatic (preclinical) period and performed more poorly at symptom onset than ADAD participants on a cognitive composite. After symptom onset, however, the younger ADAD MCs declined more rapidly. The similar but not identical cognitive trajectories (declining but at different rates) for ADAD and LOAD suggest common AD pathologies but with some differences.

AbstractThe global prevalence of dementia is expected to triple by the year 2050. This impending health care crisis has led to new heights of public awareness and general concern regarding cognitive impairment. Subsequently, clinicians are seeing more and more people presenting with cognitive concerns. It is important that clinicians meet these concerns with a strategy promoting accurate diagnoses. We have diagramed and described a practical approach to cognitive impairment. Through an algorithmic approach, we determine the presence and severity of cognitive impairment, systematically evaluate domains of function, and use this information to determine the next steps in evaluation. We also discuss how to proceed when cognitive impairment is associated with motor abnormalities or rapid progression.

AbstractIntroductionWe examined the temporal sequence of the core features in probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).MethodsIn 488 patients with probable DLB, the onset of each core feature and time to diagnosis was determined for men and women, and a pathologic subgroup (n = 209).ResultsREM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) developed before the other core features in men and women. Men were more likely to have RBD and were diagnosed with probable DLB earlier than women. Visual hallucinations developed after the other core features in men, but in women, they appeared earlier and concurrently with fluctuations and parkinsonism. Women were older and more cognitively impaired at first visit, were less likely to have RBD, more likely to be diagnosed with probable DLB later than men, and more likely to have neocortical tangles.DiscussionAn earlier latency to probable DLB was associated with men, RBD, and Lewy body disease without neocortical tangles.

Abstract At present, no research criteria exist for the diagnosis of prodromal behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), though early detection is of high research importance. Thus, we sought to develop and validate a proposed set of research criteria for prodromal bvFTD, termed ‘mild behavioural and/or cognitive impairment in bvFTD’ (MBCI-FTD). Participants included 72 participants deemed to have prodromal bvFTD; this comprised 55 carriers of a pathogenic mutation known to cause frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and 17 individuals with autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration. All had mild behavioural and/or cognitive changes, as judged by an evaluating clinician. Based on extensive clinical workup, the prodromal bvFTD group was divided into a Development Group (n = 22) and a Validation Group (n = 50). The Development Group was selected to be the subset of the prodromal bvFTD group for whom we had the strongest longitudinal evidence of conversion to bvFTD, and was used to develop the MBCI-FTD criteria. The Validation Group was the remainder of the prodromal bvFTD group and was used as a separate sample on which to validate the criteria. Familial non-carriers were included as healthy controls (n = 165). The frequencies of behavioural and neuropsychiatric features, neuropsychological deficits, and social cognitive dysfunction in the prodromal bvFTD Development Group and healthy controls were assessed. Based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, seven core features were identified: apathy without moderate-severe dysphoria, behavioural disinhibition, irritability/agitation, reduced empathy/sympathy, repetitive behaviours (simple and/or complex), joviality/gregariousness, and appetite changes/hyperorality. Supportive features include a neuropsychological profile of impaired executive function or naming with intact orientation and visuospatial skills, reduced insight for cognitive or behavioural changes, and poor social cognition. Three core features or two core features plus one supportive feature are required for the diagnosis of possible MBCI-FTD; probable MBCI-FTD requires imaging or biomarker evidence, or a pathogenic genetic mutation. The proposed MBCI-FTD criteria correctly classified 95% of the prodromal bvFTD Development Group, and 74% of the prodromal bvFTD Validation Group, with a false positive rate of &lt;10% in healthy controls. Finally, the MBCI-FTD criteria were tested on a cohort of individuals with prodromal Alzheimer’s disease, and the false positive rate of diagnosis was 11–16%. Future research will need to refine the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria, and incorporate emerging biomarker evidence.