Pittock, Sean J.

ABSTRACT Objective We sought to characterize the sixth most common finding in our neuroimmunological laboratory practice (tissue assay‐observed unclassified neural antibodies [UNAs]), combining protein microarray and phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP‐Seq). Methods Patient specimens (258; 133 serums; 125 CSF) meeting UNA criteria were profiled; October 2022–September 2023. Top‐ranking candidate antigens were validated in silico, by dual‐staining confocal microscopy, and ≥ 1 protein‐specific assay. Clinical data were reviewed. Results Among 21 patients, 11 autoantibodies were characterized (serum, 19; CSF, all 9 available). Autoantigens were CACNA1I, 1; CAMK2B, 2; CLIP2, 1; FMN2, 2; MAP1A, 2; MAP2, 5; NECAB1, 1; SNAP91, 3; SRCIN1, 1; SYNJ1, 1; SYT3, 2. Analytical validation was by confocal TIIFA (all), western blot (10/10 available), and cell‐based assay (5/5 performed). Clinical accompaniments were: encephalitis, 6; brainstem encephalitis, 2; encephalomyelitis, 2; cerebellar ataxia, 2; longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), 2; sensory neuronopathy, 1; peripheral neuropathy, 4, and movement disorders, 2. Inflammatory MRI abnormalities were identified in 5/16 patients (31%) with CNS disorders: T2 signal change (2), LETM (2), leptomeningeal enhancement (1). Seven of 8 (88%) had inflammatory CSF (pleocytosis, 5 [median 25.5 cells, range 7–294]; elevated IgG index/synthesis rate, 4; CSF‐exclusive oligoclonal bands, 4). Six had paraneoplastic causation (lung cancer, 2; other, 4); 3 were postinfectious (1 each of COVID‐19, HSV‐1, and post‐Group A streptococcal infection). Of 9 immunotherapy‐treated patients, 5 improved. Interpretation UNAs are partly accounted for by a repertoire of diverse mostly intracellular synaptic antigens. Their characterization is expedited by protein arrays and PhIPSeq. Further individual studies are needed to assess them as disease biomarkers.

This cohort study examines the oncological, neurological, and serological profiles of adult male patients with testicular germ cell tumors and paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

Abstract Objectives γ‐Aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABA B R)‐IgG (immunoglobulin G) is an intermediate‐risk paraneoplastic autoantibody often associated with seizures. We aimed to assess the clinical and oncological features of GABA B R‐IgG autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and evaluate the performance of antibody testing. Methods Patients testing positive for GABA B R‐IgG in serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory were identified. Archived sera were retested by cell‐based assay (CBA) at 1:100 and 1:200 dilutions. A live‐cell flow cytometry–based assay (LCFBA) was developed and validated using archived sera and CSF. True positivity included patients with classic presentations of GABA B R‐IgG AE or oncological explanations for antibody presence. Results Eighty‐six patients (median age 63 years; 43 female) presented with classic presentations of GABA B R‐IgG AE: encephalopathy with prominent seizures ( n = 55), status epilepticus ( n = 23), and rapidly progressive dementia ( n = 8). In addition, 44 patients (33%) had a false‐positive result for GABA B R‐IgG characterized by non‐specific symptoms/alternate diagnoses. Malignancy was identified in 78% of true‐positive patients, predominantly small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Testing serum at 1:100 dilution on CBA and using tissue immunofluorescence assay (IFA) in serum and CSF improved the identification of true‐positive patients ( p < 0.001). CBA at 1:100 dilution performed better than conventional CBA (at 1:10 dilution, p < 0.001) and tissue IFA ( p = 0.031). An in‐house LCFBA showed 100% sensitivity and specificity in CSF, performing similarly to conventional CBA ( p = 0.125) in CSF, but better than tissue IFA ( p = 0.031). Furthermore, serum LCFBA performed better than conventional CBA ( p = 0.022) and tissue IFA ( p = 0.006). LCFBA had the highest diagnostic accuracy and was closely followed by CBA at 1:100 dilution. Significance GABA B R‐IgG AE often presents as encephalopathy with seizures or status epilepticus in the context of an underlying SCLC. Multimodal evaluation using tissue IFA and fixed CBA at higher dilutions improves detection of true cases. LCFBA performs very well as a diagnostic test with very high sensitivity and specificity.

Abstract Purpose: Germ cell tumors (GCTs) pose significant diagnostic challenges due to the limited sensitivity and specificity of current tumor markers. Hereby we utilize phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-Seq) technique to develop a unique immunosignature panel (iSIGN) with high sensitivity and specificity to improve the diagnosis and differentiation of GCTs. Patients and Methods: Serum samples from patients with confirmed gonadal or extragonadal GCTs and controls were collected from Mayo Clinic repositories. Controls included benign testicular lesions, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and other cancers. Samples were randomized into development and validation cohorts. PhIP-Seq identified antigen-autoantibody interactions, and enrichment scores were calculated to develop a biomarker panel distinguishing GCT from non-GCT cases. A second biomarker panel was developed to predict seminoma from nonseminoma cases. Results: A total of 427 serum samples were analyzed, including 150 from GCT patients and 277 controls. For our primary model to distinguish GCT cases (GCT-iSIGN), 24 peptides from 16 antigens were identified based on significant differential autoantibody binding enrichment in GCT patients (p &lt; 0.05), ≥2 peptides per antigen, and enrichment scores ≥ 2.5-fold. GCT-iSIGN was highly sensitive (93%) and specific (99%) for identifying GCT cases from controls with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.93 and 9% Unknown Case Rate (UCR). The secondary panel (Sem-iSIGN) included 17 peptides corresponding to 5 unique proteins with high specificity (93%), moderate sensitivity (65%) and AUC of 0.77 to distinguish seminoma from nonseminoma GCT cases. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential use of PhIP-Seq to identify unique immunosignature panels that can serve as reliable biomarkers for GCT. These panels address the limitations of traditional markers and other proteomic techniques. This immunosignature model represents a cost-effective, stable, and scalable approach to enhancing GCT diagnosis and management. Citation Format: M Bakri Hammami, Andrew Knight, Haidara Kherbek, Brian Costello, Silvana De Lorenzo, Bradley C. Leibovich, John C. Cheville, Yong Guo, Jessica Sagen, Janet E. Olson, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Sean J. Pittock, John R. Mills, Surendra Dasari, Divyanshu Dubey. iSIGN panel identifies germ cell tumors via whole-proteome phage immunoprecipitation sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Mechanisms of Cancer Immunity and Cancer-related Autoimmunity; 2025 Sep 24-27; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B027.

ABSTRACTClinicians often repeat aquaporin‐4‐immunoglobulin G (AQP4‐IgG) testing in case of possible seroconversion. Compared with older, less sensitive immunofluorescence assays (IFA), cell‐based assays (CBA) offer higher sensitivity. This study assessed the frequency of seroconversion in a retrospective Cleveland Clinic cohort (2006–2024) of 451 patients with an initial negative AQP4‐IgG result who underwent serial testing. Seroconversion occurred in 4.3% (7/170) of patients initially tested by tissue IFA, but in none (0/263) of those tested by CBA. The lack of AQP4‐IgG seroconversion after a negative CBA, with only rare cases after a negative IFA, suggests that repeat AQP4‐IgG testing is low yield unless prior testing used older methods such as IFA.

Background: Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is a demyelinating syndrome observed in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) but there are limited data on application of this definition to its cerebral attacks or in adults with this disease. Methods: We analyzed patients from the Mayo Clinic MOGAD cohort ( n = 263) with cerebral attacks. We assessed whether children (<18 years-old) and adults (⩾18 years-old) fulfilled the 2013 ADEM definition. Results: We identified 89 patients (children, 34; adults, 55) and 55/89 (62%) were of female sex. Acute magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities included: poorly demarcated T2 lesions (white matter, 85 (96%); deep gray matter, 41 (46%); T1-hypointense lesions (42 (47%)). Forty-two patients did not fulfill the ADEM definition due to: monofocal syndrome, 9; or no encephalopathy, 33. The remaining 47 patients (53%: children, 27/34 (79%); adults, 20/55 (36%)) fulfilled the ADEM definition, and 14 had preceding attacks, and 34 had subsequent attacks relative to ADEM episode. The features in children and adults with ADEM were broadly comparable. Conclusion: Applying the ADEM definition to MOGAD cerebral attacks highlighted that an update of the 2013 ADEM definition would be beneficial and could explicitly state its application to both adults and children and allow it to be applied to attacks at any time during the disease course.