Goyal, Gaurav

Introduction The treatment of Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) has been revolutionized by the discovery of MAPK/ERK pathway mutations, most common being BRAF-V600E (50%). The US-FDA approved single-agent vemurafenib for BRAF-V600-mutated ECD in 2017 based on a phase II trial that included 22 patients with ECD and 4 with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), resulting in 100% overall response rate (ORR) by FDG-PET criteria (Diamond et al. JAMA Onc 2018). However, adverse events (AEs) to vemurafenib led to treatment interruption and/or dose modification in all patients, and drug discontinuation in 8 (31%) patients. Long-term outcomes and tolerability of BRAF-inhibitor (BRAFi) monotherapy in real world setting are unknown. In this study, we aimed to address these questions utilizing a large cohort of patients with ECD. Methods Registry-based ( NCT03329274) study of patients with ECD who received BRAFi (vemurafenib or dabrafenib) as any line of treatment. The registry captures detailed longitudinal clinical, treatment, and outcomes data through medical record abstraction. For this study, we focused on the events of discontinuation, dose reductions, and AEs to BRAFi therapy. Time-to-event analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier method from the date of initiation of BRAFi. Primary endpoint of the study was event-free survival (EFS), defined as time to progression of disease, discontinuation or alteration of therapy due to any cause (including addition of a MEK inhibitor), or death. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time to progression of disease or death, and overall survival (OS). Results We included 64 patients with ECD (including 7 with mixed ECD/LCH) in this study. Median age at diagnosis was 56y (range, 26-77) and at initiation of BRAFi was 57y (range, 26-77). Of these, 59 (92%) were BRAF-V600E, 2 (3.1%) were BRAF-wildtype, 1 had BRAF-V471F, 1 had BRAF-PICALM fusion, and 1 had unknown BRAF status. The distribution of organ involvement was bone (91%), neurologic (78%), brain parenchyma (62%), cardiovascular (58%), retroperitoneum (58%), skin (25%), and pulmonary (19%). BRAFi therapy was used as first-line in 38 (59.3%) and as subsequent line in the rest (median 1, range 1-7). The most common initial BRAFi used was vemurafenib (80%) followed by dabrafenib (20%). The median starting dose of vemurafenib was 720 mg bid (range 480-960) and end dose was 480mg bid (range, 240-480). The median start dose of dabrafenib was 100mg bid (range 50-150) and end dose was 50mg bid (range 50-100). Initial dose reduction of BRAFi was required due to AEs in 28 of 52 cases (54%) with final dose data available, encompassing cutaneous (43%), generalized symptoms or fatigue (18%), >1 system affected (14%), lab abnormalities (11%), musculoskeletal (7%), and other (7%) toxicities. Of 60 patients with response data, a response was seen in 51 patients or 85% (42 partial response, 9 complete response, 8 stable disease, and 1 progressive disease). The median follow-up duration was 3.9 years (range 0.2-8.8). Single-agent BRAFi therapy was discontinued in 38 (59%) patients who received it initially (vemurafenib 63% vs. dabrafenib 46%, p=0.28). Reasons for discontinuation included AEs (n=20, 53%), addition of MEK-inhibitor (18%) for reducing cutaneous toxicities (n=5) or augment CNS response (n=2), disease progression (n=4, 11%), death (n=3, 8%), or others (n=4, 11%). 17 patients were rechallenged with a BRAFi after initial discontinuation, and 6 (35%) discontinued it again. The median EFS for the entire cohort from first BRAFi treatment was 2.99y (95% CI 1.6-4.8) and from second BRAFi was 2.82y (95% CI 1.19- not reached). The median PFS and OS were not reached, and 4 patients died at last follow-up (3 from ECD). Conclusions Almost 5 years after the FDA approval of vemurafenib for ECD, our real-world study from long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients highlights high response rates, but at the cost of adverse events leading to dose reductions and treatment discontinuation in a large subset. Our results also highlight the entity of disease progression on BRAFi therapy. Our results underscore the importance of developing therapies that are efficacious and well-tolerated in this incurable disease.

Abstract In the pre–novel agent era, the median postprogression overall survival (PPS) of patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who progress after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was 2 to 3 years. Recently, checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and brentuximab vedotin (BV) have improved the depth and durability of response in this population. Here, we report the estimate of PPS in patients with relapsed cHL after ASCT in the era of CPI and BV. In this multicenter retrospective study of 15 participating institutions, adult patients with relapsed cHL after ASCT were included. Study objective was postprogression overall survival (PPS), defined as the time from posttransplant progression to death or last follow-up. Of 1158 patients who underwent ASCT, 367 had progressive disease. Median age was 34 years (range, 27-46) and 192 were male. Median PPS was 114.57 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 91-not achieved) or 9.5 years. In multivariate analysis, increasing age, progression within 6 months, and pre-ASCT positive positron emission tomography scan were associated with inferior PPS. When adjusted for these features, patients who received CPI, but not BV, as first treatment for post-ASCT progression had significantly higher PPS than the no CPI/no BV group (hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.8; P = .001). Receipt of allogeneic SCT (Allo-SCT) did not improve PPS. In the era of novel agents, progressive cHL after ASCT had long survival that compares favorably with previous reports. Patients who receive CPI as first treatment for progression had higher PPS. Receipt to Allo-SCT was not associated with PPS in this population.

Abstract Advances in the treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) have resulted in a growing survivor population. There is a lack of data on long-term outcomes among adults with LCH. We conducted a retrospective record review of 219 adults (aged ≥18 years) with LCH. Most common presentation was multisystem (34.2%), followed by single-system pulmonary (32%), unifocal (28.3%), and single-system multifocal (5.5%) LCH. Risk organ involvement (the liver, spleen, or bone marrow) was seen in 8.7% of cases, and 40 of 88 (45.5%) tested cases were BRAFV600E. At a median follow-up of 74 months, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 58.3% and estimated median PFS was 83 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 5- and 10-year OS rates were 88.7% and 74.5%, respectively. Risk organ involvement was associated with worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 4.5) and OS (HR, 10.8). BRAFV600E was not associated with risk organ involvement or survival. When compared with matched unaffected US population, individuals with LCH had a significantly higher risk of overall mortality (standardized mortality ratio [SMR], 2.66), specifically among those aged <55 years at diagnosis (SMR, 5.94) and those with multisystem disease (SMR, 4.12). Second cancers occurred in 16.4% cases, including diverse hematologic and solid organ malignancies. LCH-associated deaths constituted 36.1% of deaths and occurred within 5 years of diagnosis. After 5 years, non-LCH causes of death, including second cancers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cardiovascular diseases, predominated. Our study highlights, to our knowledge, for the first time, that adults with LCH experience early and late mortality from non-LCH causes and the need for development of targeted survivorship programs to improve outcomes.

Abstract In this retrospective study, BRAF mutation status did not correlate with disease extent or (event-free) survival in 156 adults with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. BRAFV600E was associated with an increased incidence of second malignancies, often comprising hematological cancers, which may be clonally related.

Abstract Objectives Understanding of histiocytic disorders has been revolutionized by demonstration of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway mutations, most commonly BRAFV600E. The optimal testing strategy to assess BRAFV600E is unknown. We aimed to compare performance of testing modalities, to propose a framework for evaluation of BRAFV600E mutation status in histiocytic disorders. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with histiocytic disorders and BRAF mutation testing on a lesional tissue specimen. Results In 120 patients, BRAF assessment included immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 97 (80.2%), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 35 (28.9%), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 62 (51.2%). Forty-five underwent both NGS and IHC. With NGS as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of IHC were 82.4% and 96.4%. Three false negatives were observed in biopsy specimens with low BRAFV600E variant allele frequency or decalcified tissue. One false-positive IHC was observed in a lung biopsy specimen, likely due to antibody cross-reactivity with respiratory cilia. Among 14 with successful NGS and PCR, a single discordance was observed. Two PCR-to-IHC discrepancies were observed, including one other false-positive IHC. Conclusions Immunohistochemistry was highly specific for detection of BRAFV600E. Main caveats were false negatives and lack of detection of non-BRAFV600E mutations. We propose the use of IHC as initial screening in general practice with reflex molecular testing if negative.