Leung, Nelson

Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare and understudied plasma cell disorder. It is caused by abnormal misfolding of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains, leading to extracellular deposition of amyloid, ultimately resulting in organ dysfunction and death. Since AL amyloidosis is uncommon, therapies are adapted from the more common plasma cell disorders like multiple myeloma. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, was first tested in several prospective and retrospective studies in AL patients with relapsed refractory disease. The ANDROMEDA study (Kastritis E et al, NEJM 2021) established daratumumab in combination with CyBorD (Cyclophosphamide-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone) followed by daratumumab maintenance as the new standard of care compared to CyBorD alone for newly diagnosed patients. Consequently, daratumumab maintenance has become universally offered to all newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients. Notably, there was no second randomization before the initiation of maintenance therapy in ANDROMEDA. Hence, a critical question that remains is whether the superior efficacy observed in the investigational arm of the ANDROMEDA trial is solely a result of the addition of daratumumab during the induction phase or if the maintenance phase contributed to the favorable outcomes in the investigational arm. We hypothesize that a shorter duration of maintenance would prove non-inferior to the standard duration of daratumumab maintenance in patients with AL amyloidosis that have responded to Daratumumab-CyBorD induction. To answer this question we are conducting a pragmatic phase 2 randomized trial assessing the optimal duration of daratumumab maintenance in patients with AL amyloidosis who have responded to Daratumumab-CyBorD induction. Study Design, Patients and Methods: We use broadened eligibility criteria consistent with pragmatic trial design. The estimated total enrollment is up to 96 patients. The main eligibility criteria are patients with biopsy-proven AL Amyloidosis who have completed 6 cycles of Dara-CyBorD-based induction treatment and achieved an adequate response to induction (defined as hematological complete response (CR), hematological very good partial response (VGPR), or hematological partial response (PR) with at least one organ response). Patients in whom bortezomib and/or cyclophosphamide were omitted from induction due to toxicity concerns or adverse effects are allowed. The major exclusion criteria are patients who were concomitantly diagnosed with multiple myeloma based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. This phase II, open-label, multicenter trial (NCT05898646) randomizes patients who have attained an adequate response to 6 cycles of Dara-CyBorD-based induction in a 1:1 ratio, using a dynamic allocation procedure that balances the marginal distributions of the stratification factors (age, cardiac stage, and t(11;14) status). Randomization is to either single-agent daratumumab maintenance of 6 cycles duration (experimental arm) or 18 cycles of daratumumab maintenance (control arm) (cycle = 28 days). Treatment is allowed to be given at a local facility After completing maintenance treatment, patients will follow up every 3 months for up to 36 months from registration. The primary endpoint of the trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of a shorter (6 cycles) daratumumab maintenance measured by event-free survival (EFS) compared to the standard maintenance of 18 cycles in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis who receive 6 cycles of daratumumab-CyBorD based induction. EFS in this study is defined as time from registration to any of the following events: hematological progression, organ progression, subsequent anti-plasma cell therapy in the absence of hematological progression but with persistent organ dysfunction or death, whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints are depth of hematological and organ response, bone marrow measurable residual disease negativity rate, duration of response, quality of life, and survival. By investigating whether a shorter duration of maintenance is non-inferior to the standard duration, we aim to inform clinical practice and potentially reduce the toxicities associated with prolonged maintenance therapy, including hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent infections, the need for intravenous gammaglobulin replacement, and financial toxicity.

Introduction: Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a well-validated prognostic marker and interim outcomes measure in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Despite its broad acceptance as a robust prognostic marker, the MRD status is only available down the treatment line, and there is limited information on the markers at diagnosis that can predict achievement of MRD negativity post-transplant. This study explored the relationship between baseline risk factors and post-autologous stem cell transplantation (post-ASCT) MRD status, as well as the combined impact of these baseline factors and post-ASCT MRD status on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of patients achieving at least VGPR after ASCT between 01/01/2016 and 12/30/2023, majority (n=814, 98%) received ASCT in the frontline setting. MRD testing was performed between days 60-100 post-transplant using next-generation flow cytometry with a sensitivity of at least 1x10^5 nucleated cells (minimum 2x10^6 cells assessed). Treatment response and disease progression were determined by IMWG criteria. High-risk disease (HRD) was defined as presence of International Staging System ISS stage 3, high lactate dehydrogenase, 1q gain, 17p deletion, or t(4;14) chromosomal abnormalities. We calculated PFS/OS from transplant day 0 to first documented event (progression or death). Categorical variables were compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Non-parametric tests compared continuous variables, and logistic regression analyses tested associations between clinical/lab variables and MRD status post-ASCT. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and compared using log-rank test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using the Cox regression model. Result: The study cohort included 831 newly diagnosed MM patients. The median follow-up for the cohort was 50 months (95% CI: 48-51). 48% (n=402) achieved MRD negativity (MRD-neg) post-ASCT. Univariate analysis demonstrated that R2-ISS stage, depth of response pre-ASCT, and presence of t(11;14) to be associated with worse MRD-negativity rates. Multivariate analysis revealed that t(11;14) significantly decreased the odds of MRD-negativity (p<0.0001, OR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.6) and a deeper pre-ASCT response was associated with increase odd of MRD-negativity OR-4.7 (95%CI 3.2-7.4) p<0.0001. Patients with MRD-positive disease post-transplant had an inferior estimated median PFS of 57.6 months (95% CI: 49-69) with a 5-year PFS of 49% (95% CI: 43-56), compared to an estimated median PFS of 83.3 months (95% CI: NA) and a 5-year PFS of 66% in MRD-negative patients (p<0.0001, HR=1.9, 95% CI: 1.5-2.5). Similarly, MRD positivity was associated with an inferior OS [estimated median of 92.6 months (95% CI NA) ,5-year OS 76% (95%CI 72-82) for MRD-pos vs. Median OS NR, 5-year OS 85%(95%CI NA) in MRD-neg; p=0.003, HR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.2-2.38)]. In MRD-neg patients, a baseline bone marrow plasma cells BMPC% >60% was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR=1.9, 95% CI: 1.26-2.99; p<0.01). High-risk disease was not associated with an inferior PFS or OS in patients with MRD-negativity. For MRD-neg patients, estimated median PFS was not reached for those without HRD, 5-year PFS was 66% (95%CI 51-85), compared to 83 months(95%CI 65-NA) for those with HRD, 5-year PFS was 65%(95%CI57-74), p=0.6441. The median OS was not reached in either group (p=0.07). Five-year OS was 94% (95%CI 86-100) in MRD-neg without HRD vs. 81%(95%CI 75-87) with HRD (p=0.07). In MRD-pos patients, median PFS was 81 months (95%CI 58-NA) for those without HRD, 5-year PFS of 59% (95%CI 46-77), compared to PFS of 41 months(95%CI 36-52) for those with HRD ,5-year PFS of 39% (95%CI 31.3-47) , p=0.003. Median OS was not reached in MRD-pos patients without HRD, but it was 59.8 months ( for those with HRD (p=0.0012). Five-year OS was 94% (95%CI 89-99) in MRD-pos without HRD vs. 67%(95%CI 60-74) with HRD (p<0.0001). For every 1 log increase in the residual cell % on MRD testing in MRD-pos patients, the hazard ratio for PFS increased by 42% (p=0.0002, HR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.2-1.7). Conclusion: Patients with t(11;14) have a reduced likelihood of achieving MRD negativity post-ASCT, whereas high-risk cytogenetics did not impact MRD-negativity rates. Achievement of MRD negativity post-ASCT mitigates the impact of high-risk characteristics.

Background and Methods: IEC-HS is a hyperinflammatory state with high morbidity and mortality. Effective interventions to reverse the process early in the clinical course may be critical to improve outcomes. We previously examined cytokine differences between IEC-HS and other secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and found significant differences in the patterns and outcomes.(1) This study examines cytokine profiles (CP) of patients treated with CAR-T from 9/2019 to 3/2024 who developed CRS, MAS-L and IEC-HS. Demographics and lab results were compared among the three groups and correlated with outcomes. Results: CP was tested in 113 of 366 CAR-T patients: 74 with CRS, 19 with MAS-L, and 20 with IEC-HS. The racial distribution was 93% White/Caucasian, 2% Black or African American, 1% Asian, 1% Native American and 3% other or unavailable. No differences were seen in demographics between groups except a higher percentage of patients with ECOG performance status ≥2 in IEC-HS (p=0.037). Incidence of IEC-HS by disease: 3.6% (7/193) in lymphoma, 5% (8/159) myeloma and 28.5% (4/14) B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (p=0.0002). Incidence of IEC-HS by CAR-T product: 3% (4/150) in Axi-cel, 23% (6/26) in Brexu-cel, 8% (1/13) in Tisa-cel, 5% each (3/60) in Cilta-cel and Ide-cel, and 0/17 in Liso-cel (p=0.001). Prior to lymphodepletion, labs were already different among the CRS, MAS-L, and IEC-HS groups: hemoglobin (g/dL: 11.1, 9.6, 8.45); platelets (x109/L: 168, 116, 52.5); ferritin (µg/L: 115, 946, 1944). CP was started when patients needed a second dose of tocilizumab or concern for developing MAS-L/IEC-HS, and continued daily until clinical improvement or resolution of inflammatory state. Tocilizumab and dexamethasone use were similar across groups. Other therapies used were vasopressors (3%, 10.5%, 45%; p<0.0001), Methylprednisolone (20%, 31.6%, 50%; p=0.027), Anakinra (12%, 63%, 85%; p<0.0001), Siltuximab (9.5%, 16%, 30%; p=0.06), Basiliximab (30% of IEC-HS), and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (30% of IEC-HS). Among the first CP, the CRS group had lower levels of cytokines (in pg/mL) compared to MAS-L and IEC-HS groups: TNF (31, 62.9, 47.7), IL-10 (29.3, 97.7, 169), IL-18 (794, 1353, 2011), IFN-gamma (74, 281, 250), MCP-1 (689, 2722, 2485.5), MIP-1 alpha (220, 234, 247.5), IL-6 (>315: 45%, 79%, 70%), soluble IL-2R alpha (>4000: 45%, 84%, 70%). The percentage of patients who received anakinra before CP1 were 4% (CRS), 21% (MAS-L) and 25% (IEC-HS) (p=0.007). IL-1 beta was below threshold among all patients who received anakinra in CRS and MAS-L and 75% in IEC-HS, suggesting rapid and effective IL-1 suppression by anakinra except in IEC-HS. Cytokines trends 24 hours and 48 hours after the first CP differed between MAS-L and IEC-HS. MAS-L had decreased TNF (62.9, 40.4, 18.5) and MCP-1 (2722, 355, 104) while these cytokines remained elevated or increased in IEC-HS (TNF: 47.7, 105.5, 62.6; MCP-1: 2486, 2276, 1585). IL-18 was minimally elevated in MAS-L (1353, 1955, 3068) and significantly increased in IEC-HS (2011, 2420, 4048). Notably, CP2 and CP3 levels of these cytokines in IEC-HS were statistically significantly higher than corresponding CPs among CRS and MAS-L. In addition, patients who died with persistent E. faecium bacteremia had higher IL-18 on CP3. Infections occurred in 43%, 58%, and 85% respectively (p=0.002), including E. faecium bacteremia (3%, 5%, 35%; p=0.0004), CMV viremia (30% of IEC-HS patients vs. 11% of non-IEC-HS; p=0.025), and invasive fungal infections (15% of IEC-HS patients; p=0.0001). Between the IEC-HS and non-IEC-HS groups, day 100 non-relapse mortality was 35% vs. 0 (p<0.0001), day 100 all-cause mortality was 45% vs. 3% (p<0.0001), and E. faecium bacteremia-related deaths were 50% vs. 1% (p<0.0001). Conclusions: CRS, MAS-L andIEC-HS are known complications of CAR-T. Cytokine-directed therapy can modify the cytokine milieu and control the inflammatory process. However, excess immunosuppression may result in life-threatening infections. Further studies are needed to identify optimal biomarker-guided immunosuppressive strategies to control the inflammatory cascade, while avoiding excess immunosuppression. References: 1. Leung, Nelson, et al. “Outcomes of patients who received CAR T cell therapy and developed IEC-HS treated with cytokine directed therapy.” (2024): 7516-7516.

Background In 2014, the IMWG updated the criteria for diagnosing multiple myeloma (MM) and added three additional criteria to the traditional CRAB criteria. The new criteria called the SLiM criteria, include clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥60%, involved to uninvolved free light chain ratio (rFLC) ≥100 (involved FLC must be ≥ 100 mg/L), and > one focal lesion on MRI studies (each lesion ≥ 5 mm). These criteria were deemed myeloma-defining events (MDE) in the absence of CRAB criteria. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been used for treating MM for over three decades and is safe and efficacious. We report on outcomes of outpatient ASCT in a cohort of patients with MM where therapy was initiated solely based on SLiM criteria. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of all patients diagnosed with MM based on SLiM criteria at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. We compared this cohort to a matched cohort of newly diagnosed MM patients whose MDE was CRAB and who underwent an ASCT. For every patient whose MDE was SLiM, we matched two patients whose MDE was CRAB. The matching was done by age, gender, and melphalan dose. Results Between 2013 and 2022, 30 patients received an ASCT due to SLiM criteria at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Durie Salmon Stage IA). The median age of our cohort was 63 (range 46-75) years, and 60% had an ISS of 1. Seventeen percent of the cohort was treated with DVRd induction. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 6.5 months (IQR 6-7), and all but one received full intensity conditioning with melphalan 200 mg/m2. 53% of patients completed the ASCT without requiring hospitalization, and 47% (n=14) of patients required hospitalization with a median duration of hospital admission of 6 days (IQR 5-14). Bacteremia was confirmed in 7 patients (23%). The matched cohort included 60 patients. Baseline characteristics were similar, with the exception of lower hemoglobin levels in the control group, as expected (13.1 vs 12, P=0.0017). No differences were seen in the number of cells collected (3.4 vs 3.67 X106 cells/kg, P=0.19) or the use of Plerixafor (80% vs 78%, P=0.8). The SLiM cohort had a shorter median time to neutrophil (15 vs 16 days, P=0.049) and platelet (15 vs 17 days, P=0.0004) engraftment. Similar hospitalization and bacteremia rates were seen. The overall response rate was 100%, with a complete response or better (sCR/CR) seen in 30% of patients. The matched cohort had an ORR of 98%, with sCR/CR of 37%. The MRD- rate was the same in both groups. More patients in the SLiM cohort achieved VGPR (50%) than in the CRAB cohort (27%). None of the patients died within 100 days of transplant. The 36-month OS was 100% in the SLiM group and 93.3% in the control group (95% CI 83.1%-97.4%), with a trend towards higher OS in the SLiM cohort (P=0.065). The 36-month PFS was 91.61% in the SLiM cohort (95% CI 69.93-97.87%) and 65.95% in the control group (95% CI 52.31%-76.53%). There was no difference in the PFS between the cohorts (P=0.414). Conclusion ASCT is efficacious and safe in MM patients transplanted only due to SLIM criteria. Improved MRD- and longer PFS were not seen despite lower ISS stage disease in the SLiM group.

Monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS) is a recently recognized thrombophilia characterized by the production of a monoclonal antibody that binds to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and stimulates platelet activation (Blood. 2022 Jul 7;140(1):73-77). Typical signs of MGTS include a history of recurrent thrombosis, persistent thrombocytopenia, and positive laboratory results in PF4/polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) testing, as in the related thrombotic disorder heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Here, we present a case of MGTS, presenting with transient thrombocytopenia coincident with thrombotic episodes and negative test results in SRA and PF4/polyanion-based testing platforms (ELISAs and automated assays). A 56-year-old male patient initially presented with acute left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and a pulmonary embolism. Following the administration of warfarin, the patient experienced a second DVT four months later and was transitioned to a factor Xa inhibitor. Fifty-two months later, the patient developed occlusion of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins despite additional anticoagulation therapy. Further testing led to a diagnosis of an IgG2 kappa monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Eleven months later, the patient again suffered breakthrough thrombosis, specifically radial artery thrombosis, and a thrombotic cerebrovascular accident, leading to the addition of aspirin to the patient's treatment regimen. Notably, where detailed blood counts were available in the patient's clinical history, the patient experienced only transient thrombocytopenia coinciding with his two most recent thrombotic episodes and has had platelet counts in the normal range in the four-year period since his last thrombotic event. After initiating dual anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy, the patient has not developed recurrent thrombocytopenia or new thrombotic events. Antigen-based and functional testing for HIT antibodies (ELISA, SRA, and automated immunoassays) were negative in this patient, unlike in the previously described index case of MGTS, where serological testing mimicked classical HIT serology (i.e., HIT ELISA and SRA positivity). The sample was also non-reactive in a vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)-specific ELISA employing uncomplexed PF4 targets, as previously described (Am J Hematol. 2022 May;97(5):519-526). Conversely, the patient's antibody consistently stimulated platelet activation in a PF4- and IgG-dependent manner in functional testing using PF4-treated platelets. This included PF4-treated platelets that were freshly isolated and used in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) and cryopreserved platelets used in the thrombospondin-1 release assay. Interestingly, consistently positive PEA results have been documented from four samples over the last four years, during which the patient had normal platelet counts. To further characterize the patient's IgG2 MGUS antibody, the patient's monoclonal was immuno-enriched. Patient sera and the immuno-enriched MGUS were then compared by mass spectrometry, which generated identical mass profiles. After confirming the effective enrichment of the patient's MGUS by mass spectrometry, the antibody was de novo sequenced or “reverse-engineered” to obtain the antibody's amino acid sequence. The antibody was then expressed and tested in ELISA-based and functional platelet assays. Importantly, the recombinant antibody replicated the PF4-dependent platelet activation observed with patient serum and did not bind PF4/polyanion targets in ELISA testing. Together, these data strongly support the identification of a new class of ELISA- and SRA-negative anti-PF4 monoclonal antibodies that cause MGTS. This case illustrates the diagnostic challenges in MGTS. MGTS patients may not exhibit persistent thrombocytopenia, and diagnostic tests for detecting HIT antibodies may be ineffective in accurately diagnosing this new thrombophilia. This case emphasizes the importance of reviewing platelet counts in the peri-thrombotic period to recognize transient thrombocytopenia and establishes the utility of PF4-enhanced functional assays to detect pathogenic anti-PF4 antibodies, even in settings where classical HIT testing (i.e., ELISA/SRA) is negative.

Introduction: Light chain multiple myeloma (LCMM) is a distinct subtype of multiple myeloma (MM) characterized by the exclusive production of immunoglobulin light chains, unlike the common form of MM that produces the complete immunoglobulin. There is a paucity of literature on the specific tumor cell alterations leading to light chain-only disease as opposed to the typical presentation in MM. Additionally, data on treatment response and outcomes in this subgroup of patients is sparse. This study explores the differences in baseline characteristics, including cytogenetic abnormalities and treatment response between LCMM and multiple myeloma with heavy chain involvement. Materials and Methods: We reviewed patient charts to obtain clinical and laboratory information for individuals diagnosed with LCMM and those with heavy chain MM (comparison cohort) from 2004 to 2022. Patients were matched for age, sex, and year of diagnosis. Data collected included treatment assessment, overall survival, and progression-free survival (PFS). Associations between outcomes and categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, while the Mann-Whitney U test was employed to compare medians. Progression-free survival following initiation of initial therapy and overall survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study. Results: We identified 848 patients, representing 17.1% of newly diagnosed MM cases. The median age of the LCMM cohort was 63 years (range 16-92), with a female-to-male ratio of 1:5. The LCMM cohort had higher levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), beta-2 microglobulin (p<0.0001), higher baseline creatinine (p<0.0001) and calcium (p<0.0001). The two cohorts had no significant difference in the International Staging System (ISS) or revised ISS (R2-ISS). Additionally, hemoglobin (Hb) and white blood cell count at presentation were higher in the LCMM cohort. Chromosome 1 abnormalities were lower in the LCMM cohort: 1q gain (OR-0.7; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9) and 1p deletion (OR-0.7; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9, p=0.02). Likewise, the frequencies of trisomies and hyperdiploidy were lower in the LCMM cohort, with odds ratios of 0.32 (p=0.012) and 0.37 (p<0.001), respectively. The frequencies of translocations t(4;14) (OR-0.35, p<0.001) and t(14;16) (OR-0.6, p=0.03) were lower in LCMM compared to heavy chain MM. In contrast, the frequencies of t(11;14) (OR-3.4) and t(6;14) (OR-4.9) and deletion of 13q(OR-1.3) was higher in the LCMM cohort. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of del(17p)/TP53 abnormalities. The median PFS after the first regimen was shorter in the LCMM cohort (23 months vs. 27 months, p=0.03), and this difference remained significant after adjusting for baseline adverse prognostic indices and treatment regimen. Median PFS in LCMM patients with monoclonal antibody (Mab) as part of their treatment was 37 months vs. 23 months (Proteasome Inhibitor or immunomodulator-based regimen without Mab), though this difference is not statistically significant p=0.87. No significant difference was found in overall survival between the two groups. Conclusion: This study highlights unique features of light chain multiple myeloma, including increased frequencies of specific cytogenetic abnormalities. Further evaluation of observed differences in cytogenetic abnormalities may enhance our understanding of LCMM and potentially guide baseline treatment choices to improve outcome.

Summary In 2014, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updated the criteria for diagnosing myeloma and added three additional criteria to the traditional Calcium elevation, Renal impairment, Anemia, Bone disease (CRAB) criteria, called the Sixty % marrow plama cells, Light chain ratio >60, Mri demonstates lytic lesions (SLiM) criteria (clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥60%, involved to uninvolved free light chain ratio (FLCr) ≥100 and >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)). We report on the outcomes of 30 patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) where therapy was initiated solely based on SLiM criteria and compared them to a matched cohort of 60 patients whose myeloma‐defining event was CRAB. The SLiM cohort had a shorter median time to neutrophil (15 vs. 16 days, p = 0.049) and platelet (15 vs. 17 days, p = 0.0004) engraftment. The 36‐month overall survival (OS) was 100% in the SLiM group and 93.27% in the control group (95% CI 83.06%–97.42%), with a trend towards longer OS in the SLiM cohort ( p = 0.065). The 36‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) was 91.61% in the SLiM (95% CI 69.93%–97.87%) and 65.95% in the control group (95% CI 52.31%–76.53%). There was no difference in the PFS between the cohorts ( p = 0.414). ASCT is efficacious and safe in MM patients transplanted only due to SLIM criteria. Early intervention in this asymptomatic cohort did not appear to result in deeper responses or better PFS compared to outcomes in symptomatic patients.

Abstract As patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) continue to live longer, they might get exposed to most available drugs and drug classes during the disease course. For such late line RRMM or among patients without access to novel therapies, retreatment with a drug that the disease had previously been refractory to might be one option. In this retrospective study, we describe 315 patients with RRMM at our institution who were retreated with a drug that the disease had been previously refractory to. We found an overall response rate of 56.2% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 11 months with retreatment. Patients with a longer time on initial therapy with the index drug (>28.4 months) had a superior PFS with retreatment (median PFS, 16.9 vs 8.1 months; P < .001). Similarly, patients with a longer time gap between the initial line of therapy with index drug and retreatment with index drug (>46.1 months) had better PFS with retreatment (28.2 vs 8.9 months; P = .016). In conclusion, retreatment with a previously refractory drug is a viable therapeutic option for RRMM, with the most significant benefit derived in disease demonstrating sensitivity to initial drug exposure and among those with a longer gap between initial drug exposure and retreatment.