Danese, Silvio

Abstract Background and Aims Previously published long-term safety data reported a favourable ustekinumab safety profile for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. We present the final cumulative safety data from pooled ustekinumab IBD phase 2/3 clinical studies through 5 years in Crohn’s disease [CD] and 4 years in ulcerative colitis [UC]. Methods In phase 3 studies, patients received a single intravenous placebo or ustekinumab [130 mg or ~6 mg/kg] induction dose followed by subcutaneous maintenance doses of placebo or ustekinumab [90 mg q8w or q12w]. Analyses included all patients who received one dose of study treatment and included patients who were biologic-naïve and patients with a history of biologic failure. Safety outcomes are summarized and presented using number of events per 100 patient-years of follow-up and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results In this final pooled safety analysis, 2575 patients were treated with ustekinumab with 4826 patient-years of follow-up. Rates of key safety events, including major adverse cardiac events and malignancies, were similar between placebo and ustekinumab or not higher for ustekinumab. Opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis, and malignancies were reported infrequently. Rates of key safety events in the IBD group were no higher in the ustekinumab group than in the placebo group for both patients who were biologic-naïve or who had a history of biologic failure. No lymphomas or cases of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome [formerly known as reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome] were reported. Conclusion The final cumulative ustekinumab safety data through 5 years in CD and 4 years in UC demonstrated favourable safety compared to placebo and continue to support the well-established safety profile across all approved indications. Clinical trials.gov numbers NCT00265122, NCT00771667, NCT01369329, NCT01369342, NCT01369355, NCT02407236

Abstract Background The LIBERTY-CD study demonstrated a broad level of benefit for subcutaneous (SC) infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy compared with placebo in patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe active Crohn’s disease (CD) who responded to intravenous IFX induction. Characterising subgroups of pts with different levels of response could help to better position SC IFX therapy. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of 231 pts from the CT-P13 SC arm of the randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled LIBERTY-CD study (NCT03945019). Unsupervised group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM) was conducted to deconvolute cohort-level data into response trajectories. Longitudinal patient reported outcomes (PRO-2: abdominal pain and stool frequency) were used to investigate whether pts who received SC IFX maintenance therapy cluster into response trajectories. Efficacy endpoints (clinical remission, endoscopic response and remission, corticosteroid-free remission and comprehensive disease control [CDC] rate) were analysed and compared between different trajectories. Trough levels of IFX (TLI) were evaluated by trajectory throughout the treatment period. Baseline characteristics were analysed in a descriptive manner to explore predictors for super-response. Results Four distinct trajectories were clearly separated and stabilised around Week (W) 10–14 (Figure): rapid and sustained improvement (super-responders, n=61), rapid, but slightly less drastic than super-responders, then sustained improvement (fast responders, n=56), gradual then sustained improvement (slow responders, n=63) and partial improvement during the maintenance phase (limited responders, n=51). Super-responders had the highest rates of W54 clinical remission (73.8%; p=0.002), endoscopic response (63.9%; p=0.009), corticosteroid-free remission (63.6%; p=0.007), endoscopic remission (42.6%; p=0.094) and CDC (37.7%; p=0.013) among trajectories (Table). Super-responders also maintained the highest TLI from W10 throughout the maintenance period. Super-responders showed a trend towards lower baseline body weight, body mass index and oral corticosteroid use, but higher Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score and prior biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor use compared to other trajectories. Conclusion Distinct subpopulations with different levels of responses were detected by GBTM using data from a large group of pts with moderate-to-severe active CD who were treated with SC IFX for 1 year. Super-responders with rapid and sustained improvements during SC IFX therapy had a higher likelihood of achieving desirable long-term outcomes, with substantial individual benefit (CDC). Baseline characteristics and TLI were associated with super-response.

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous work has shown age can impact treatment safety and efficacy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.1 This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of age on the safety and efficacy of etrasimod in patients with UC in the phase 3 ELEVATE UC clinical programme. Methods Data pooled from the ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) trials were analysed in patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg QD and placebo. ELEVATE UC 52 had a treat-through design comprising a 12-week induction period followed by a 40-week maintenance period. ELEVATE UC 12 was a 12-week induction trial. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years from pooled data of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and events of interest were stratified by age (<40 years, 40–59 years, ≥60 years) and analysed in patients who received ≥1 dose of etrasimod or placebo. Efficacy analyses were evaluated in patients with baseline Modified Mayo score (MMS) 5–9 for the primary efficacy endpoint (clinical remission) and select secondary endpoints at Week 12 (both trials) and Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52) stratified by age. Results There were 787 patients enrolled in the ELEVATE UC programme, of whom 420 (53.4%) were aged <40 years, 276 (35.1%) were aged 40–59 years and 91 (11.6%) were aged ≥60 years. The proportions and IRs of TEAEs and events of interest were mostly similar between age groups and treatment arms (Table). IRs of arthralgia, fatigue, hypertension and pyrexia were higher in older age groups, regardless of treatment arm. Serious AEs and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were low and consistent across all age subgroups. Serious infections and infection events of interest were balanced across age groups and treatment arms. Regardless of age subgroup, significantly more patients treated with etrasimod 2 mg QD vs placebo achieved the primary and select secondary efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and Week 52 (Figure). Conclusion The safety profile of etrasimod 2 mg QD in the UC population was consistent across age groups, and with no new risks other than the estimated risks associated with increasing age.2 Patients receiving etrasimod in the ELEVATE UC programme showed significant clinical benefit as assessed by clinical remission, symptomatic remission and endoscopic improvement compared with placebo, regardless of age. References 1. Lichtenstein GR et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 27–41. 2. Luo J et al. JMIR Med Inform 2016; 4: e30.

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL), an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, was approved for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) treatment after the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial (NCT02914522). In SELECTION, a greater proportion of FIL200 mg (FIL200)-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved comprehensive disease control (CDC), a stringent multi-component endpoint. We examined the long-term outcomes of achieving CDC in patients continuing on FIL200 in the ongoing long-term extension (LTE) study SELECTIONLTE (NCT02914535). Methods This interim analysis included adult patients with UC who completed SELECTION and received ≤144 weeks of FIL200 in the LTE (up to data cut-off 24/02/22). CDC (biomarker remission, endoscopic improvement, IBDQ remission and partial Mayo Clinic Score [pMCS] remission achieved concurrently) was assessed at SELECTION week 58 (LTE baseline [BL]). Mean pMCS and IBDQ score, use of corticosteroids (CS) and incidence of TEAEs and serious TEAEs in the LTE were compared between SELECTION CDC achievers and non-achievers. A mixed model for repeated measures was fitted on pMCS and IBDQ score, with CDC achiever status, study visit and the interaction between CDC achiever status and study visit as fixed effects; p values were nominal. Results We analysed 148 patients (CDC achievers, n=41; CDC non-achievers, n=107). Mean pMCS was stable in CDC achievers (0.44, LTE BL; 0.50, LTE week 144) and decreased in CDC non-achievers (1.49, LTE BL; 0.77, LTE week 144; Figure). Mean IBDQ score was stable in CDC achievers (204.05, LTE BL; 197.21, LTE week 144) and increased in CDC non-achievers (181.55, LTE BL; 196.37, LTE week 144; Figure). There was a significant beneficial effect of achieving CDC on pMCS and IBDQ score overall (pMCS: fixed effect estimate: −0.5542, p=0.0025; IBDQ score: fixed effect estimate: 13.1585, p=0.0042). There was a significant interaction between achieving CDC and study visit for IBDQ score (p=0.0183), with the benefit of achieving CDC lessening by week 144. Generally, a lower proportion of CDC achievers used CS than non-achievers; 2.4–7.3% of CDC achievers used CS vs 1.9–15.9% of CDC non-achievers. Incidence of TEAEs and serious TEAEs were stable over time and similar between CDC achievers and non-achievers. Conclusion Follow-up for ~3 years showed high levels of long-term benefit with continued FIL200 treatment. Achieving comprehensive disease control at the end of the randomized trial with FIL200 was associated with long-term efficacy, improved HRQoL and low overall use of CS. This may demonstrate the value of filgotinib-induced achievement of CDC in UC disease course. The safety profile of FIL200 was consistent between CDC achievers and non-achievers, suggesting an acceptable long-term benefit–risk profile.

Abstract Background The primary objective of the VIVID-1 trial (NCT03926130) was to demonstrate efficacy and safety of mirikizumab (miri), a p19-directed anti-IL-23 antibody, compared to placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. Miri demonstrated statistically significant improvements in co-primary and all key secondary endpoints versus (vs) PBO1. Here we present the results of secondary endpoints on the comparisons of miri to ustekinumab (uste), a p40 directed anti-IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor from the Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active- and PBO-controlled, treat-through (TT) study, VIVID-1 (NCT03926130). Methods Adult pts (N=1065) were randomised 6:3:2 to miri (N=579) 900mg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) to W12, then 300mg subcutaneously (SC) Q4W to W52, uste (N=287) one ~6 mg/kg IV dose, then 90mg SC Q8W to W52 or PBO (N=199). At W12 PBO responders continued PBO to W52; PBO non-responders received the same blinded miri regimen as described above (IV then SC). Efficacy of miri vs uste was assessed by the proportion of pts achieving endoscopic response and by the proportion of pts achieving clinical remission by Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at W52 (both gated). Additional non-multiplicity-adjusted endpoints included endoscopic remission, corticosteroid-free clinical remission by CDAI, and the composite of CDAI clinical remission and endoscopic response at W52. (Figure 1 for definitions). Results Baseline characteristics were overall balanced across the three treatment groups (table 1). Pts treated with miri achieved all key major secondary endpoints (p<.000001) compared to PBO (Figure 1). Miri achieved non-inferiority to uste for clinical remission by CDAI (p=0.113117) (Figure 1C). Although superiority to uste in endoscopic response was not achieved (p=0.51) (Figure 1A), in biologic failed pts miri demonstrated a numerical trend towards greater response rates compared to uste for endoscopic response and clinical remission by CDAI (Figure 1 B & D). The overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of miri. The proportion of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were similar for miri (78.6%) and uste (77.3%); most common TEAEs were COVID-19, anaemia, arthralgia, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis and injection site reaction. Instances of serious adverse events were comparable for miri (10.3%) and uste (10.7%). Conclusion In this phase 3 TT design study, miri achieved non-inferiority to uste for clinical remission by CDAI. In biologic failed pts miri had a numerical trend towards greater response compared to uste in clinical and endoscopic endpoints, with an acceptable safety profile. 1Ferrante et al., submitted to ECCO 2024

SummaryBackgroundUpadacitinib is an oral, selective Janus kinase inhibitor.AimTo assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate‐to‐severe ulcerative colitis following 16‐week extended induction therapy, and 52‐week maintenance therapy in patients achieving clinical response after 16‐week extended induction therapyMethodsPatients without clinical response to 8 weeks' upadacitinib 45 mg once daily induction therapy in two induction trials were eligible for an additional 8 weeks of therapy. Patients achieving clinical response at Week 16 were subsequently re‐randomised (1:1) to upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily for 52‐week maintenance therapy. Efficacy was assessed at induction Week 16 (integrated) and maintenance Week 52; safety was assessed throughout.ResultsOverall, 127/663 (19.2%) patients did not achieve clinical response to upadacitinib 45 mg at Week 8 and received an additional 8 weeks of therapy; 75/127 (59.1%) subsequently achieved clinical response at Week 16 and entered the maintenance trial. At Week 52, 26.5% of patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, and 43.6% receiving 30 mg, achieved clinical remission; efficacy was observed across all other endpoints with both doses. Herpes zoster rates increased with longer duration (16 weeks) of exposure to upadacitinib 45 mg during induction compared with the same population during the first 8 weeks. No other new safety signals were observed, and results are otherwise consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib.ConclusionsPatients without clinical response after 8 weeks' upadacitinib 45 mg induction therapy, may benefit from an additional 8 weeks of therapy.Clinical trial registration: NCT02819635; NCT03653026

Summary Background Filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) is an approved treatment for adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Aim To report integrated safety data from the phase 2b/3 SELECTION study (NCT02914522) and its ongoing long‐term extension study SELECTIONLTE (NCT02914535). Methods Safety outcomes were analysed in adults with moderately to severely active UC who received FIL200, filgotinib 100 mg (FIL100) or placebo once daily throughout the 11‐week SELECTION induction study, the 47‐week SELECTION maintenance study (if applicable) and SELECTIONLTE (if applicable). Exposure‐adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 censored patient‐years of exposure with 95% confidence intervals were reported for treatment‐emergent adverse events (AEs). Certain AE data were presented in subgroups, including age and prior biologic exposure status. Results This interim analysis included 1348 patients representing 3326.2 patient‐years of exposure. Baseline characteristics of patients entering SELECTION were similar across treatment groups. EAIRs for serious infection, thromboembolic events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were consistently low across treatment groups. Most patients with MACE had cardiovascular risk factors. The EAIR for herpes zoster was numerically higher for FIL200 than for placebo. Infection incidences were numerically higher in biologic‐experienced than biologic‐naive patients. Higher incidences of certain AEs in patients 65 years of age or older were as expected. Four deaths occurred, including three cardiovascular deaths, none of which was considered related to filgotinib. Conclusion FIL200 and FIL100 were well tolerated with no unexpected safety signals in patients with moderately to severely active UC, regardless of previous biologic exposure or age. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers (NCT numbers) NCT02914522, NCT02914535.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab, an anti-α4β7 integrin approved for intravenous (IV) treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), was evaluated as a subcutaneous (SC) formulation in maintenance therapy for UC and CD in phase 3 VISIBLE 1, 2, and open-label extension studies, and recently approved in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy and safety of IV and SC vedolizumab in clinically relevant UC and CD scenarios. Methods Post hoc data analyses from VISIBLE trials examined: (1) whether baseline characteristics predict clinical response to 2 vs 3 IV vedolizumab induction doses; (2) efficacy and safety of switching during maintenance vedolizumab IV to SC in patients with UC; (3) vedolizumab SC after treatment interruption of 1–46 weeks; (4) increasing dose frequency of vedolizumab SC from every 2 weeks (Q2W) to every week (QW) after disease worsening. Results No baseline characteristics were identified as strong predictors of response to 2 vs 3 vedolizumab infusions. Most patients achieved clinical response after 2 or 3 doses of IV vedolizumab maintained with SC treatment. Clinical remission and response rates were maintained in patients transitioned from maintenance vedolizumab IV to SC treatment. Of patients with UC, ≥75% achieved response following resumption after dose interruption. Escalation to QW dosing resulted in ≥45% of patients regaining response after loss while receiving vedolizumab Q2W. Conclusions Clinical real-world scenarios with vedolizumab SC were reviewed using VISIBLE studies data. Vedolizumab SC provides an additional dosing option for patients with UC and CD.

Abstract Background Improvement in clinical outcomes and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP), are considered treatment targets per STRIDE-II guidelines.1 We evaluated the effect of the oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) on changes in hs-CRP, FCP, and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods In 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction studies (U-EXCEL, NCT03345849; U-EXCEED, NCT03345836), patients with moderate-to-severe CD received 12-week treatment with UPA 45 mg (UPA45) once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO). Patients with clinical response to UPA45 were rerandomised in U-ENDURE (NCT03345823) to receive 52-week maintenance treatment with UPA 30 mg QD (UPA30), UPA 15 mg QD (UPA15), or PBO. Endpoints included marker normalisation (hs-CRP ≤ 5 mg/L, FCP ≤ 250 µg/g) in patients with elevated baseline marker levels, normal marker and clinical remission by Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI < 150) or very soft/liquid stool frequency (SF)/abdominal pain score (APS) (average daily SF ≤ 2.8 and average daily APS ≤ 1, neither greater than baseline), and ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in marker values with a decrease of at least 100 points in CDAI from baseline. Median changes from baseline in marker levels were also evaluated. Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 was used. Results Of 1021 enrolled patients, 645 (63.2%) had elevated hs-CRP (> 5 mg/L) and 750 (73.5%) had elevated FCP (> 250 µg/g) levels at baseline. Significantly greater proportions of patients with elevated baseline marker levels achieved normalisation with UPA compared with PBO at week 12 (Fig 1A/B) and week 52 (Fig 2A/B; nominal P < .001 for all). Decreases in marker levels from baseline with UPA were observed as early as week 2 and were significantly greater than with PBO through week 12 (Fig 1C) and week 52 (Fig 2C; nominal P < .001 for all). Patients achieved clinical endpoints and improvements in markers at significantly higher rates with UPA45 vs PBO at week 12 (Fig 1D–F) and with UPA15 and UPA30 vs PBO at week 52 (Fig 2D–F; P < .001 for all). The safety profile of UPA in CD was previously reported and no new safety concerns were identified. Conclusion Improvements in clinical endpoints and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation were achieved as early as week 2 with UPA45 induction and sustained with UPA15 and UPA30 maintenance therapy in patients with CD. Median changes in hs-CRP and FCP with UPA support continued improvement of inflammation up to week 52. 1. Turner D., et al. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(5):1570–1583.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective humanised monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody for treatment of UC and CD. This post-authorization safety study (PASS) compared long-term safety in patients (pts) treated with VDZ or other biologics for UC or CD. Methods This was a prospective, observational, multicentre, cohort study in pts with UC or CD starting treatment with VDZ or other biologics (NCT02674308, EUPAS6469). Pts were biologic naïve (VDZ=35%, Other biologic=65%) or had prior exposure to biologics other than VDZ and were followed for up to 7 yrs. Pts were treated under usual standard of care as directed by their physician with no discontinuation from the study due to physician-directed treatment changes. The primary safety outcome was serious infections and was compared between cohorts using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted by propensity score (with other biologics as reference). Secondary safety outcomes were adverse events (AE) of special interest (AESI) as listed in Tables 2 and 3. Results In total, 5208 patients were enrolled across 21 countries between Mar 2015 and Jul 2019. The full analysis set comprised 5008 pts (VDZ=2502; other biologic=2506) and mean (SD) study duration was 37.4 (14.1) months. Consistent with the observational nature of the study and the current standard of care, the baseline characteristics in the two cohorts were imbalanced (Table 1). The overall treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) rate was 61.3% (VDZ) and 59.5% (other biologic), with serious AEs in 27.5% (VDZ) and 25.7% (other biologic), respectively. In UC pts, the incidence rate (IR) of serious infections were: 0.014 (95% CI: 0.010, 0.019) [VDZ] and 0.015 (0.010, 0.023) [other biologic], with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.018 (0.931, 1.114), p=0.70 (Table 2). In CD pts, corresponding findings were 0.012 (95% CI: 0.008, 0.017) [VDZ] and 0.006 (95% CI: 0.004, 0.009) [other biologic] with HR of 1.035 (0.959, 1.117), p=0.38 (Table 3). The incidence of primary and secondary safety outcomes is reported in Table 2 for UC and Table 3 for CD. There were no safety issues relating to pregnancy and no cases of PML observed. There were 19 deaths in the VDZ cohort (1 case of pneumonia deemed as treatment-related); and 13 deaths in the other biologic cohort, 2 cases deemed treatment-related (one case septic shock and pneumonia; one case non-small cell lung cancer). Clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) measures were comparable between cohorts. Conclusion In this long-term, prospective, real-world observational study of a large multinational population under routine standard of care there was no new safety signal identified in relation to VDZ. Results are consistent with the known safety profile of VDZ.