Morey, Allen F.

Abstract Background Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) fellowships offer variable experience in sexual health domains: erectile dysfunction, Peyronie’s disease, male infertility, male hypogonadism (low testosterone), reconstruction (including male incontinence), benign prostatic hyperplasia, gender affirmation surgery, sexual mental health, and female sexual dysfunction. Aim To evaluate baseline and postbootcamp understanding and trust in these domains. Methods In 2023, 28 of 31 urologists currently enrolled in SMSNA-endorsed fellowships participated in a 3.5-day training bootcamp in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Participants were asked to complete pre- and postbootcamp surveys. The bootcamp curriculum offered American Urological Association guidelines and case-based lectures, hands-on clinical training with cadavers (penile surgery) and models (collagenase training), and interaction with industry. Outcomes Changes in knowledge, independence, and trust in performing the procedures, as well as billing issues and feedback for future bootcamps. Results Prebootcamp surveys revealed vastly varied residency experience. Reported time with an expert faculty member was greatest for benign prostatic hyperplasia and least for female sexual dysfunction, gender affirmation surgery, and low testosterone. The lowest prebootcamp confidence in performing surgery independently was for penile grafting procedures and elevating the neurovascular bundle. Postbootcamp results revealed several areas of significant improvement in confidence (P ≤ .03): intralesional injections for Peyronie’s disease, manual modeling, penile plication, penile grafting procedures, and elevating the neurovascular bundle. There was a trend for improved confidence with the insertion of inflatable (P = .05) and semirigid (P = .08) penile prostheses. Nonsignificant improvement occurred in artificial urinary sphincter surgery (P = .12). Participants graded the bootcamp very highly and requested that next year’s bootcamp have more content on female sexual dysfunction, male incontinence, and low testosterone, as well as more hands-on skills sessions and case-based lecture formats. Clinical Implications Offering a bootcamp with hands-on instruction could significantly improve urologists’ knowledge and confidence. Strengths and Limitations As the main strength, this study was the first specialized bootcamp for urologists in the subject of men’s health, taking into account hands-on and cadaver laboratories, as well as highlighting industrial and pharmaceutical products. The small sample size was the major limitation. Conclusions Current SMSNA fellows present with varied levels of experience and confidence across sexual health domains. Notable confidence improvements were seen with topics that combined didactic lectures with hands-on trainings.

Abstract Introduction The Optilume Urethral Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) is a novel endoscopic treatment for recurrent male anterior urethral strictures. An important topic of discussion with patients during counseling on treatment options includes the potential affect of treatment on sexual function and fertility. The ROBUST III study was a prospective, randomized study comparing standard of care endoscopic therapy against treatment with the Optilume DCB. Assessments included evaluation of sexual function and andrology parameters. Objective The objective was to study the potential affect of treatment with the Optilume DCB on sexual function and, for younger patients, fertility. Methods A total of 79 men were randomized to receive treatment with the Optilume DCB. Sexual function was assessed via the 15 item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Erectile function, orgasmic function, and overall satisfaction sub-domains were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment in patients that were sexually active at baseline. Fifteen additional subjects were enrolled in a non-randomized pharmacokinetic sub-study that included assessments of paclitaxel concentration in semen and sperm quality parameters through 6 months post-treatment. Results Average erectile function and overall satisfaction scores improved from baseline to 12 months post-treatment, while orgasmic function was not changed (Figure). The improvement in satisfaction was statistically significant at 12 months (p=0.003). No adverse events of de novo erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction were reported. Average ejaculate sperm concentration did not change from baseline to 6 months (49 million/mL vs 46.6 million/mL, p=0.88), nor did total spermatozoa per ejaculate (107.2 million vs 104.0 million, p=0.94). Paclitaxel concentration in semen after treatment was maximal at 30 days (2.99 ng/mL) and was reduced near the limit of quantitation of the analytical method by 6 months (0.12 ng/mL). Conclusions Treatment of male anterior urethral strictures with the Optilume DCB did not appear to have an impact on sexual function as measured by the IIEF and adverse event assessments. Average sperm quality parameters did not differ from baseline to 6 months post-treatment. Low levels of paclitaxel were detected in semen after treatment but were nearly undetectable by 6 months. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Urotronic Inc. Clarification Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Boston Sci, Coloplast, Medtronic USA Inc., PROCEPT BioRobotic Corporation, NeoTract Inc., Janssen Biotech Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tolmar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 180 Medical Inc., AbbVie Inc., Pfizer Inc., Bluewind Medical, Astellas Pharma US Inc., Antares Pharma Inc., Axonic Modulation Technologies Inc., Allergan Inc., Terumo Medical Corporation, Dendreon Pharmaceuticals llc, Blue Earth Diagnostics Limited, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Olympus America Inc., Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Clovis Oncology Inc., Dornier MedTech America Inc., Travere Therapeutics Inc., Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe field of sexual medicine is continuously advancing, with novel outcomes reported on a regular basis. Given the rapid evolution, updated guidelines are essential to inform practicing clinicians on best practices.AimTo summarize the current literature and provide clinical guidelines on penile traction therapy, vacuum erection devices, and penile revascularization.MethodsA consensus panel was held with leading sexual medicine experts during the 2015 International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM). Relevant literature was reviewed and graded based on Oxford criteria to develop evidence-based guideline and consensus statements.Main Outcome MeasuresThe development of clinically relevant guidelines.ResultsPenile traction therapy is a viable therapy to modestly improve penile length as a primary therapy, before penile prosthesis placement in men with decreased penile length or after surgery for Peyronie's disease. It also might have a role in the acute phase of Peyronie's disease but has inconsistent outcomes in the long-term phase. Vacuum erection devices are effective in creating an erection satisfactory for intercourse, even in difficult-to-treat populations. They also might be used in the post-prostatectomy setting to maintain penile length but have insufficient evidence as a penile rehabilitation therapy. For vasculogenic erectile dysfunction, men with suspected arterial insufficiency can be evaluated with penile Duplex Doppler ultrasonography and confirmatory angiography. Penile revascularization procedures have consistently demonstrated benefits in very select patient populations; however, inadequate data exists to suggest the superiority of one technique. Men with vascular risk factors are likely poor candidates for penile revascularization, although veno-occlusive dysfunction and age are less significant. Therapies for treating primary veno-occlusive dysfunction are not recommended and should be reserved for clinical trials.ConclusionsSince the prior ICSM meeting, multiple developments have occurred in external mechanical devices and penile revascularization for the treatment of erectile and sexual dysfunction. Sexual medicine clinicians are encouraged to review and incorporate recommendations as applicable to their scope of practice.

ABSTRACT Introduction Penile prosthesis implantation has emerged as a definitive treatment to restore sexual function to the motivated man with erectile dysfunction. Substantial improvements in the design of inflatable devices have been made since they first became available more than four decades ago. Aim To review the history of the penile prosthesis, the indications, preoperative evaluation, and patient and partner satisfaction. The current approaches to addressing intra- and postoperative complications, provide an understanding of prosthesis infection, and placement of these devices will be reviewed. Methods A committee of worldwide experts in this field was assembled during the 2015 International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM) and performed a systematic review of the peer-reviewed published medical literature pertaining to penile prosthesis. Particular attention was given to higher level trials when available. Recommendations are based upon the Oxford Criteria. Main Outcome Measures Unfortunately there is limited level 1 and 2 evidence, and where expert opinion was utilized, the decision was unanimous within the committee with a goal of presenting a clinically relevant guideline pertaining to penile prostheses. Results Penile prosthesis has undergone an evolution over the past 40 years resulting in a more effective and reliable treatment for advanced erectile dysfunction not responding to less invasive methods including oral treatment with PDE5 inhibitors, vacuum erection device, and intracorporal injection therapy. It should be considered an appropriate treatment option for the man who wishes to restore erectile function and who understands the potential risk of mechanical failure and infection, both of which are less common now as a result of improvements made in device design as well as surgical protocols adhered to in the operating room. Patients must be clearly informed of the risks associated with penile prosthesis including mechanical failure, infection, shortening of the penis, change in sensation and configuration of the penis, as well as injury to local structures. Intraoperative complications are unusual but do occur and can usually be addressed intraoperatively to allow placement of the device at the time of initial surgery. Postoperative complications may also be addressed when they occur but may require more advanced reconstructive surgical techniques. Men with Peyronie's disease, corporal fibrosis due to infection, trauma, prior prosthesis explantation, priapism, and men who have undergone construction of a neophallus may require additional advanced maneuvers to obtain optimum results with a penile prosthesis. Conclusion Penile prosthesis remains as an important, viable, and effective treatment for male erectile dysfunction that does not respond to other less invasive approaches or when these approaches are contraindicated or not acceptable to the patient. These devices provide the patient with the ability to engage in penetrative sexual activity without interfering with urination, ejaculation, sensation, or orgasm. Although mechanical failure can occur, the current devices are more reliable as a result of design modifications. Infection remains the most dreaded complication but since the introduction of antibiotic and hydrophilic coatings, infection is less common. Overall, patient and partner satisfaction appear to be reasonably high when a penile prosthesis is used to restore erectile function.