Back to Authors

Kharfan‐Dabaja, Mohamed A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-5185

A5017327825 | I4210146710

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Citations 180

A simple prognostic system in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a CIBMTR/EBMT analysis

Blood Advances | May 3, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 3993-4002

10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009886 | PMID 37134306

AbstractTo develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), we examined the data of 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in the United States (the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients who received transplantation in Europe (the European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] cohort; n = 623). Patient age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.96), and HLA-matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with an increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin levels <100 g/L at time of transplantation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2-2.19) and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.52) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points), and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61-76), 51% (95% CI, 46-56.4), and 34% (95% CI, 21-49), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; P = .0017) but not of relapse (P = .12). The derived score was predictive of OS (P < .001) and TRM (P = .002) but not of relapse (P = .17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in 2 large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF about the transplantation outcomes.
Impact of second primary malignancy post–autologous transplantation on outcomes of multiple myeloma: a CIBMTR analysis

Blood Advances | February 24, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2746-2757

10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009138 | PMID 36827681

Abstract The overall survival (OS) has improved significantly in multiple myeloma (MM) over the last decade with the use of proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug-based combinations, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and subsequent maintenance therapies in eligible newly diagnosed patients. However, clinical trials using auto-HSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance have shown an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), including second hematological malignancies (SHM). We evaluated the impact of SPM and SHM on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients with MM after auto-HSCT using CIBMTR registry data. Adult patients with MM who underwent first auto-HSCT in the United States with melphalan conditioning regimen from 2011 to 2018 and received maintenance therapy were included (n = 3948). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 175 (4%) patients developed SPM, including 112 (64%) solid, 36 (20%) myeloid, 24 (14%) SHM, not otherwise specified, and 3 (2%) lymphoid malignancies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SPM and SHM were associated with an inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.62, P < .001 and HR 5.01, P < .001, respectively) and OS (HR 3.85, P < .001 and HR 8.13, P < .001, respectively). In patients who developed SPM and SHM, MM remained the most frequent primary cause of death (42% vs 30% and 53% vs 18%, respectively). We conclude the development of SPM and SHM leads to a poor survival in patients with MM and is an important survivorship challenge. Given the median survival for MM continues to improve, continued vigilance is needed to assess the risks of SPM and SHM with maintenance therapy post–auto-HSCT.
Lisocabtagene maraleucel for relapsed or refractory large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy | January 20, 2023 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 121-126

10.1080/14737140.2023.2171397 | PMID 36662602

CAR T-cell therapy for follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma

Therapeutic Advances in Hematology | December 16, 2022 | Volume: 13 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/20406207221142133 | PMID 36544864

Patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have a poor prognosis with anticipated short progression-free and overall survivals. Two CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies are approved in the United States for R/R FL, namely, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel. The results of ZUMA-5 and ELARA studies led to the approval of axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel, respectively, after demonstrating high overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates in this high-risk population of FL patients who had received a median of 3 (range = 2–4) and 4 (range = 2–13) prior lines of therapies, respectively. For instance, the ORR for ZUMA-5 was 94% (CR = 79%), and for ELARA, it was 86% (CR = 69.1%). Pertaining to MCL, brexucabtagene autoleucel is approved for R/R MCL based on results of the ZUMA-2 study. In the latter study, despite the fact that all R/R MCL patients had been exposed to prior Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the reported ORR was 91%, with 68% achieving a CR. These results undoubtedly demonstrate a strong efficacy of CAR T therapy in both R/R FL and MCL; yet, one must acknowledge the relatively short follow-up time of all aforementioned studies. Thus, longer follow-up showing durability of responses and long-term safety is definitely needed.
IPSS-Molecular but Not Individual Mutations Predicts Outcomes of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (Allo-HCT): A Mayo Clinic Cohort

Blood | November 29, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 4863-4864

10.1182/blood-2022-168053

Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Consolidation for First Response Is Associated with Longer Survival in Patients with Nodal Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood | November 28, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 6569-6570

10.1182/blood-2022-168347

Peri-Transplant and Maintenance Daratumumab for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Eradication in Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients

Blood | November 28, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 10165-10166

10.1182/blood-2022-165209

Efficacy of CD19 Directed Therapies in Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Relapsing after Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy

Blood | November 28, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 10396-10398

10.1182/blood-2022-169689

Low Incidence of Fungal Infections after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in an Endemic Region for Coccidioidomycosis

Blood | November 28, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 12111-12113

10.1182/blood-2022-159744

Comparing Survival Outcomes of Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Nodal Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood | November 28, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 10634-10636

10.1182/blood-2022-169200