Fruth, Kristin M.

Background: Contemporary rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasties (RH-TKAs) have shown reasonable short-term survivorship in smaller series, but concerns remain regarding risks of aseptic and septic failure. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of contemporary RH-TKAs in one of the largest series to date. Methods: We retrospectively identified 575 RH-TKAs (60% used for aseptic etiologies and 40% used during reimplantation in 2-stage treatment of periprosthetic joint infection [PJI]) from 2002 to 2021 at a single institution. The mean age was 67 years, 58% were female, and the mean body mass index was 33 kg/m 2 . Sixty-five percent had Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type-2B or 3 bone loss. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed. The mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 19 years). Results: Survivorship free from any revision was 76% at 5 years and 64% at 10 years. The most common revision indications were PJI (54%) and aseptic loosening (20%). RH-TKA used in the primary setting showed better survivorship compared with RH-TKA used during reimplantation after PJI (79% versus 60% at 10 years). Survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening was 96% at 5 years and 90% at 10 years. Survivorship free from revision for PJI was 84% at 5 years and 81% at 10 years. Survivorship free from revision for PJI was even lower for RH-TKAs used during reimplantation, 74% at 5 years and 73% at 10 years. RH-TKA used during reimplantation in the treatment of PJI was associated with an increased risk of any revision (HR = 2, p < 0.001). Radiographic analysis of 425 knees that were not revised and had radiographs available for review showed that 6% of femoral components and 8% of tibial components had evidence of loosening at the time of final follow-up. The mean Knee Society Score improved from 33 to 69 at 2 years (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The 10-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 90% in this large series of RH-TKAs. This represents one of the best survivorships free from aseptic loosening published to date. Knees with prior PJI had markedly poorer survivorship than knees treated for aseptic etiologies, with double the risk of revision. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Although patients often aim to lose weight after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA), long-term changes in body mass index (BMI) are unknown. We analyzed BMI at 2, 5, and 10 years after primary THA and TKA and determined predictors of BMI change. Methods: We identified patients who underwent primary THA or TKA for osteoarthritis between 2001 and 2011 and had a BMI at surgery and at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. This resulted in 763 patients (310 who underwent THA and 453 who underwent TKA). The mean patient age was 66 years, and 60% of patients were female. BMI changes were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Multinomial logistic regression determined predictors of BMI change. Results: Following THA, the mean BMI increased from 30.3 kg/m 2 at surgery to 30.9 kg/m 2 at both 2 years (p = 0.003) and 5 years (p = 0.002). Following TKA, the mean BMI increased from 32.7 kg/m 2 at surgery to 33.1 kg/m 2 at both 2 years (p = 0.053) and 5 years (p = 0.040). By 10 years, the mean BMI was 30.6 kg/m 2 (p = 0.453) for patients undergoing THA and 32.6 kg/m 2 (p = 0.947) for patients undergoing TKA, similar to the BMIs at surgery. At 10 years, 27% of patients who underwent THA and 30% of patients who underwent TKA had a BMI decrease of >5%, whereas 30% of patients who underwent THA and 32% of patients who underwent TKA had a BMI increase of >5%. Female sex among patients who underwent THA increased the odds of a >5% BMI increase at 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; p = 0.006). Older age among patients who underwent TKA decreased the odds of a >5% BMI increase at 10 years (OR per year, 0.95; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although most patients experienced a BMI change of >5% at 10 years, the mean BMI did not meaningfully change 2, 5, or 10 years after THA or TKA. Arthroplasty should not be viewed as a gateway to BMI improvement for patients overall, but female sex and older age may predict clinically important weight changes 10 years after arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: The relative advantages and disadvantages of 2-stage versus 1-stage management of infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are the current subject of intense debate. To understand the merits of each approach, detailed information on the short and, importantly, longer-term outcomes of each must be known. The purpose of the present study was to assess the long-term results of 2-stage exchange arthroplasty following THA in one of the largest series to date. Methods: We identified 331 periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) that had been treated with a 2-stage exchange arthroplasty between 1993 and 2021 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if they had had prior treatment for infection. The mean age at the time of reimplantation was 66 years, 38% of the patients were female, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 30 kg/m 2 . The diagnosis of PJI was based on the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. A competing-risk model accounting for death was utilized. The mean duration of follow-up was 8 years. Results: The cumulative incidence of reinfection was 7% at 1 year and 11% at 5 and 10 years. Factors predictive of reinfection included BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2; p = 0.049) and the need for a spacer exchange (HR = 3.2; p = 0.006). The cumulative incidence of any revision was 13% at 5 and 10 years. The cumulative incidence of aseptic revision was 3% at 1 year, 7% at 5 years, and 8% at 10 years. Dislocation occurred in 33 hips (11% at 10 years); 15 (45%) required revision. Factors predictive of dislocation were female sex (HR = 2; p = 0.047) and BMI <30 kg/m 2 (HR = 3; p = 0.02). The mean Harris hip score (HHS) improved from 54 to 75 at 10 years. Conclusions: In this series of 331 two-stage exchange arthroplasties that were performed for the treatment of infection, we found a low rate of aseptic revision (8%) and a low rate of reinfection (11%) at 10 years. These long-term mechanical and infection data must be kept in mind when considering a paradigm shift to 1-stage exchanges. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AimsThe purpose of this study was to directly compare the Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) Mobile Bearing Hip System (Stryker, USA) and large femoral heads (LFHs) in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) at mid-term follow-up, with specific emphasis on survival free of re-revision for dislocation, any re-revision, dislocation, and the risk of metal-related complications.MethodsWe identified 299 revision THAs performed at a single tertiary care academic institution from March 2011 to July 2014. Aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (n = 65), dislocation (n = 58), and reimplantation as part of a two-stage exchange protocol (n = 57) were the most common reasons for index revision. MDM constructs were used in 123 cases, and LFHs were used in 176 cases. Mean age was 66 years (28 to 93), mean BMI was 31 kg/m2 (18 to 55), and 45% (n = 136) were female. Mean follow-up was seven years (2 to 12).ResultsThe ten-year survival free of re-revision for dislocation was 99% (95% CI 95 to 100) in the MDM cohort and 91% (95% CI 84 to 96) in the LFH cohort, with a significantly increased risk of re-revision for dislocation in the LFH cohort (HR 7.1 (95% CI 1.3 to 40.8); p = 0.023). The ten-year survival free of any re-revision was 92% (95% CI 82 to 99%) in the MDM cohort and 84% (95% CI 74 to 90) in the LFH cohort with a significantly increased risk of any re-revision in the LFH cohort (HR 2.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.9); p = 0.024). The ten-year survival free of any dislocation was 95% (95% CI 85 to 99) in the MDM cohort and 87% (95% CI 78 to 92) in the LFH cohort with a significantly increased risk of any dislocation in the LFH cohort (HR 2.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 6.3); p = 0.028). There were no re-revisions or reoperations for metallosis or corrosion in the MDM cohort.ConclusionIn this head-to-head comparison, revision THAs with a MDM construct safely and effectively lowered the risk of re-revision for dislocation, any re-revision, and any dislocation compared to LFH at mid-term follow-up. There were no re-revisions or reoperations for metallosis or corrosion in the MDM cohort.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(1):58–64.

Background: The specific advantages of spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the pain control, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes associated with spinal anesthesia compared with general anesthesia in a large cohort of primary THAs from a single, high-volume academic institution. Methods: We retrospectively identified 13,730 primary THAs (11,319 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our total joint registry. Of these cases, 58% had general anesthesia and 42% had spinal anesthesia. The demographic characteristics were similar between groups, with mean age of 64 years, 51% female, and mean body mass index (BMI) of 31 kg/m 2 . Data were analyzed using an inverse probability of treatment weighted model based on a propensity score that accounted for numerous patient and operative factors. The mean follow-up was 6 years. Results: Patients treated with spinal anesthesia had lower Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores (p < 0.001) and required fewer postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) at all time points evaluated (p < 0.001). Patients treated with spinal anesthesia also had shorter hospital length of stay (p = 0.02), fewer altered mental status events (odds ratio [OR], 0.7; p = 0.02), and fewer intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (OR, 0.7; p = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.8), pulmonary embolism (p = 0.4), 30-day readmissions (p = 0.17), 90-day readmissions (p = 0.18), all-cause revisions (p = 0.17), or all-cause reoperations (p = 0.14). Conclusions: In this large, single-institution study, we found that spinal anesthesia was associated with reduced pain scores and OME use postoperatively. Furthermore, spinal anesthesia resulted in fewer altered mental status events and ICU admissions. These data favor the use of spinal anesthesia in primary THAs. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Septic arthritis of the native knee often results in irreversible joint damage leading to the need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to examine the intermediate-term risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic revision, and reoperation following primary TKA in patients with a history of septic arthritis of the native knee as compared with primary TKA performed for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Methods: We retrospectively identified 215 primary TKAs performed from 1971 to 2016 at a single institution in patients with a history of septic arthritis of the native knee. Each case was matched 1:1 based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and surgical year to a TKA for osteoarthritis. The mean age and BMI were 63 years and 30 kg/m 2 , respectively. The mean duration of follow-up was 9 years. Results: Survivorships free of PJI at 10 years were 90% and 99% for the septic arthritis and osteoarthritis groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.1; p < 0.01). Ten-year survivorships free of any aseptic revisions were 83% and 93% (HR = 2.5; p < 0.01), and survivorships free of any reoperation were 61% and 84% (HR = 2.9; p < 0.01) for the septic arthritis and osteoarthritis groups, respectively. In addition, as time from the diagnosis of native knee septic arthritis to TKA increased, the relative risk of subsequent infection decreased. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative Knee Society scores were similar between the groups (p = 0.16 and p = 0.19, respectively). Conclusions: There was a 6.1-fold increased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA with a history of native knee septic arthritis when compared with controls undergoing TKA for the treatment of osteoarthritis, with a cumulative incidence of 9% at 10 years. Subgroup analysis of the septic arthritis cohort revealed a higher risk of any infection in patients who underwent TKA within the first 5 to 7 years after the diagnosis of septic arthritis as compared with those with a greater duration. Moreover, the 10-year rates of survival free of aseptic revision, any revision, and any reoperation were significantly worse in the native knee septic arthritis cohort. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Background We sought to compare the dysplasia detection rate of high-definition white light endoscopy (HDWLE) with that of chromoendoscopy in patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods This is a retrospective observational cohort of patients with IBD who underwent surveillance colonoscopy between October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017. We assessed the association between dysplasia detection and multiple variables. Results A total of 808 unique colonoscopies were performed, of which 150 (18.6%) included chromoendoscopy. Primary sclerosing cholangitis was a comorbid diagnosis in 24.5% of patients. The performing endoscopist was an IBD specialist with 37.1% of patients and had &gt;10 years’ experience with 64.9% of patients. Prior dysplasia had been seen in 245 (30.3%) patients: 102 (68.0%) and 143 (22.0%) among patients who had chromoendoscopy and HDWLE, respectively. Dysplasia in polyps was found in 129 procedures (15.1%). Among patients who had chromoendoscopy and HDWLE, polypoid dysplasia was identified in 50 (33.0%) and 79 (12.0%) patients, respectively, P &lt; 0.01. Dysplasia in random biopsies was found in 39 patients (4.8%): 15 (10%) who had chromoendoscopy and 24 (3.6%) who had HDWLE (P &lt; 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patient and disease characteristics significantly associated with an increased odds for polypoid dysplasia included older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3 per 10 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.60), having an IBD physician endoscopist (OR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67), having an endoscopist with less than 10 years’ experience (OR = 1.8; 95% CI (1.16-2.89), and prior random dysplasia (OR = 4.2; 95% CI (1.93-9.17). Concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis was significantly associated with random dysplasia (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.02-5.07). After multivariate analysis adjusting for these variables, chromoendoscopy was no more likely to identify dysplasia than was HDWLE. Conclusions Chromoendoscopy and HDWLE had a similar diagnostic yield for dysplasia detection in patients with chronic IBD-colitis after adjusting for multiple known risk factors.

Objectives The aim of this work was to determine the degree of symptom relief and survival free of retreatment after Mayo-McCall culdoplasty (MMC), open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC), and robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Methods We retrospectively studied patients who had undergone surgery for posthysterectomy apical vaginal prolapse from January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2012, at our institution. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records. Cross-sectional data for current pelvic floor symptoms were collected by using validated questionnaires. Survival free of retreatment was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. To account for selection bias, adjusted analyses using inverse probability weighting (IPW) were performed to compare outcomes for MMC versus ASC, MMC versus RSC, and ASC versus RSC. Results Of 512 patients, 337 completed at least a validated or abbreviated questionnaire. Among MMC, ASC, and RSC groups, overall Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire Short Form 7, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire 12 summary scores were not significantly different. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival free of retreatment for MMC (94.0%) versus RSC (95.5%) and ASC (94.8%) versus RSC (92.1%). However, patients who had MMC were more likely to have retreatment than patients who had ASC during the first 10 years (10-year survival free of retreatment: 81.1% vs 95.4%; hazard ratio, 3.68 [95% confidence interval, 1.51–8.98]); the 10-year data were not available for RSC comparisons, given the later initiation of RSC. Conclusions Symptom relief was comparable after MMC, ASC, and RSC. Among all groups, most patients were free of retreatment for prolapse at 5 years. Between the MMC and ASC groups, survival free of retreatment (%) within 10 years was still favorable, but ASC had greater durability, particularly after accounting for selection bias.

Background: High body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased rates of complications after total knee arthroplasty. To date, to our knowledge, studies have examined risk as a dichotomous variable using specific BMI thresholds. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify implant survival and the risk of common complications after total knee arthroplasty using BMI as a continuous variable. Methods: Using prospectively collected data from our institutional total joint registry, we analyzed 22,289 consecutive knees, in 16,136 patients, treated with primary total knee arthroplasty from 1985 to 2012. The mean BMI of these patients at the time of the surgical procedure was 31.3 kg/m 2 (range, 11 to 69 kg/m 2 ). The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used to estimate survivorship, reoperations, and common complications, with associations of outcomes assessed using a Cox regression model. Results: Utilizing smoothing spline parameterization, we found that reoperation (p < 0.001) and implant revision or removal rates (p < 0.001) increased with increasing BMI after total knee arthroplasty. Increasing BMI also was associated with increased rates of wound infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; p < 0.001) and deep infection (HR, 1.08; p < 0.001) per unit of BMI over 35 kg/m 2 . A BMI of 35 to 40 kg/m 2 was associated with a higher rate of implant revision for aseptic loosening (p < 0.001) and for polyethylene wear (p < 0.001) compared with a BMI of 18 to 24.99 kg/m 2 . There was no correlation between BMI and risk of venous thromboembolism, tibiofemoral instability, or need for knee manipulation. Conclusions: The rates of reoperation, implant revision or removal, and many common complications after total knee arthroplasty were strongly associated with BMI. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives To determine the rate of perioperative complications and cost associated with Mayo-McCall culdoplasty (MMC), open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC), and robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Methods We retrospectively searched for the records of patients undergoing posthysterectomy apical vaginal prolapse surgery (MMC, ASC, or RSC) between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2012, at our institution. For all patients identified, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, and inpatient costs to patients were abstracted from the medical records and compared by procedure. Inverse–probability-of-procedure weighting using propensity scores was used to obtain less-biased comparisons of outcomes between procedures. Results A total of 512 patients met the inclusion criteria (174 MMC, 237 ASC, and 101 RSC). Using inverse-probability weighting, the MMC group had a significantly lower intraoperative complication rate (3.3% vs 11.6% for ASC, 3.4% vs 24.1% for RSC), median operative time (94 vs 217 min for ASC, 100 vs 228 min for RSC), and median cost (US $8,776 vs $12,695 for ASC, US $8,773 vs $13,107 for RSC) than the ASC and RSC groups (all P < 0.01). In addition, the MMC group had significantly fewer postoperative grade 3+ complications than the RSC group (1.1% vs 9.4%, P < 0.01). Conclusions In the treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, MMC is associated with decreased non–urinary tract infection, less perioperative morbidity, and lower cost to patients compared with sacrocolpopexy.